Recently, I’ve had two conversations about natural gas that have worried me greatly.
The first was with a friend who spent upwards of $15,000 to connect natural gas to his home. The gas is cheap, he said, and so cheap that it should pay for itself in savings within a few years. The second conversation was with my father, who is also strongly considering the switch.
Natural gas provides an appealing energy alternative in these tough financial times. The current price is about one-seventh of its high several years ago. This is the result of long- and short-term factors.
In the short term, the recession pushed down energy prices, yet the commodities markets and global political unrest kept crude oil prices around where they have been. The longer-term factor is that natural gas companies are now using a new method of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” to get to a supply of natural gas previously deemed untouchable.
Yet the price won’t stay this low. Eventually the markets will correct, the increased demand for gas will raise prices, we will probably find substantially less gas than we are led to believe exists and environmental hazards will seriously harm production.
Fracking is still very questionable and in the past couple of years it has driven prices down dramatically by supplying almost a third of natural gas used in this country. According to a recent study by Duke University scientists, this method of extraction is almost certainly poisoning groundwater. The group tested drinking water wells in Pennsylvania and New York and found 17 times as much methane in wells closer to fracking sites. In some cases homes blew up after this gas seeped into basements and in several drinking water wells scientists were actually able to light the well water on fire.
As part of shale natural gas extraction companies pump a crude sludge into their drill sites. Though drilling companies reassure the public, environmentalists fear the chemicals may leach through the rock. Additionally, some seismologists are concerned that drilling wells so deep through the shale may activate long-dormant fault lines and tectonic plates, increasing the number of and severity of earthquakes.
It’s common for gas and drilling companies to say that we have 100 years of shale gas in the U.S. This figure was first given in early 2011 by the Potential Gas Committee, a pro-gas group. The group estimates a future gas supply of about 2,170 trillion cubic feet, which at 2010 usage would last about 95 years. Only about 12 percent of that is absolutely proven reserves.
What that means is that we only have about 10 years of proven gas reserves in this country, a number that will drop dramatically as more people switch to gas. Yet even if we have 50 years worth, once the environmental hazards become better known there will almost certainly be a lengthy review of the process that will lead to much higher prices.
Even with all of these concerns, wells are being dug all over a good part of our country. This kind of gas extraction has become big business all over New York, Pennsylvania, Colorado, Wyoming and parts of Texas, just to name a few. Many large coal power plants are being refitted to handle natural gas.
Here in Maine, Gov. Paul LePage has met with gas companies about building a gas pipeline from Richmond to Skowhegan and a new gas-fired power plant.
Before switching over or deciding that natural gas offers a magically cheap energy source that will stay that way, we all need to take into account the larger perspective. The price will surely go up and the environmental risk is too great. The only answers are renewable energy sources that are stable — sources such as solar, wind and hydro power.
Fortunately Maine is perfectly positioned to be a leader in all three areas. Let’s not blow our advantage by focusing on an energy that may not exist in two decades.
Timothy Rich is a candidate for the Maine House of Representatives in District 35 and the owner of The Independent Cafe in Bar Harbor. He has been a certified energy auditor and has studied energy issues extensively. He lives on Mount Desert Island.



Fool. Frack away.
What a frackin’ mess…
Timothy, a really thoughtful article..well researched and accurate. At the moment there is a glut on natural gas due to shale gas and they have cut back on production because prices are so low. But I agree with you , unwise to leap to an expensive conversion to natural gas. It is a transitional energy..greener and cheaper than fuel oil, a lower carbon foot print but not a wise investment if we are thinking about a significant long term capital improvement. To me $15,000 is very significant.
One of the problems we have in Maine though is that the super green technology hasn’t reached us yet..we just don’t have the technical savvy here to serve those of us who would like to go totally green and all renewable. Many of the key products and sytsems aren’t even available in Maine. So right now it’s a challenge.
Timothy..I hope you are on the Energy Committee?
What are these magic products that “aren’t available in Maine”? What technical savvy are we lacking?
Are these magic super green technologies not able to be trucked here? Is some evil corporate devil keeping us from buying them? Are they just in short supply like fairy dust and unicorn flatulance?
Orrrrrr…are they not really economically viable and cost way more than they create in energy?
well..I’m 65 and well past my lifetime of sweat equity and do it yourself so when I need to build something these days, I eed other people to do it for me. So even if I could somehow deliver product here, ther is no one availble with expertise to install it. Also rules like “Grey water” are absurdly stringent here in Maine essnetially requiring a full wtaer treatment and reetetion suystem. ( I wanted to recirculate lall my tub and shower water after a sand based filtration to re use for toilet flushing an dposisbly garde watering). Even if that hadn’t been an ibstacle there was no one here who knew how to do that ( I live in Stonington..)
So they DO cost more than they save in energy.
Spain has the world’s first solar powere plant that generates power 24/7 ! Look under the key words.. “Spain’s Gemasolar Array is the World’s First 24/7 Solar Power Plant!”
I have been eating a lot of beans lately and let me tell you one really should think twice before switching to natural gas.
If your friend paid $15,000 for a new gas furnace he got hosed. I put mine in for half that and it will be paid for by savings compared to my old oil furnace in about three years (I have a year and a half left until it’s paid for). After that it’s like printing money. How would I have been further ahead to have continued to use oil or install an even more expensive, inefficient “green” solution? Your rant makes no sense unless, like most “greens” you don’t really want Maine to have affordable energy, but instead want higher energy prices to drive people out of the state.
hey old mainer..good for you but shouldn’t we have comparables before suggesting our blog host is full of beans?? I don’t think he said furnace only…..and perhaps he was a new gas customer and had to pay for for the installationn from main line to his house????
those who already have natural gas service are very lucky at this moment in time. Those building new or considering a major all gas conversion where no gas line currently exists..another story..that’s the point I thin was being made. that’s the pont I was responding to.
Rolling Stone printed an article on the main person driving the gas boom, and the fracking is just a part of the problem.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-big-fracking-bubble-the-scam-behind-the-gas-boom-20120301?link=mostpopular2
while I agree that fracking is a problem I would Liken it to wind..so PLEASE do not lump wind with hydro and solar,.fracking ruins the water quality and wind kills our earth and sky…
wind is extremely destructive and cost inefficient and intermittent at best which necessitates it being backed up by coal and oil..while killing wildlife and making humans sick..it has not taken long for evidence of this to show up contrary to what the wind propagandists want you to believe..
Not totally well researched as someone else said..google wind watch or wind task force and find out more please about the pitfalls of wind
There are, no doubt, legitimate concerns about the natural gas extractive process. But, problems with fracking don’t somehow make solar and wind power limitations disappear. Given land-based wind power’s average 30% capacity factor, how would the author suggest we fill the voids – especially if he’s suggesting that we start heating New England with wind power.
There’s no shortage of people implying that our current overall energy mix can be supplanted by intermittent energy sources like wind and solar power, but I haven’t seen ONE yet who could lay out the details of how exactly this can be done.
The reason you haven’t seen one is they are all busy crying about not being able to change the laws of physics.
What I read was a lot of supposition and very little fact.
I’ll say what I always do,make it efficient and cost effective, I’ll be on board tomorrow.
All this says is, OMG WE HAVE TO HAVE GREEN ENERGY !!!
What people that write editorials like this fail to disclose is that as far as they’re concerned the GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE HANDING OUT MONEY HAND OVER FIST, regardless of the cost. Pure ignorance.
I’m going to start sending the BDN some pointless editorial, i’m sure they’ll buy it. Not a lot of leaders there. mostly far left leaning SHEEP. And yes, I’ve met a few of the staff.
Be afraid of Maine’s joint Energy and Utilities Committee for there are three foxes guarding the henhouse there:
Rep.Stacey Fitts
Rep. Alex Cornell do Whatever
Rep. Jon Hinck
Why are they foxes? Read here:
http://www.windtaskforce.org/photo/abstain-for-maine?context=latest
I stay strong in my knowledge of what is real and what is not quite right. As an engineering practice I question everything and one concern that I have is The process of fracking so it’s called to me may be a time bomb waiting to go off. displacing hydraulic,hydronic,tectonic pressures of any size should be left to mother nature. I can see someone is going to get their fingers burn’t on this one. Your toying with something you know nothing about.–Got Vision