WASHINGTON — The Obama administration moved Friday to further insulate religiously affiliated hospitals and universities from paying for birth control for their female employees if they object to providing the coverage on moral grounds.

The new proposal, which follows a compromise announced by President Barack Obama last month, seeks to quell lingering objections from religious groups about a provision in the new health care law requiring employers to offer women contraceptive coverage without co-payments or other cost-sharing.

Under fire from leading Catholic hospitals and other institutions, the administration has proposed shifting the cost of providing birth control coverage onto insurance companies, while prohibiting those insurers from passing the additional cost onto employers.

But it was unclear what this would mean for large, religiously affiliated employers that self-insure rather than hire an insurance company to assume the risk of providing health benefits to their employees.

In a notice released Friday, the Department of Health and Human Services suggested these self-insured employers could pass the cost of the contraceptive coverage to whoever administers their health benefits. Large employers typically contract with an insurance company to handle billing and other administrative tasks associated with providing health benefits.

These administrators would then use funds from other sources, such as rebates they might receive from drug makers, to offset the cost of the contraceptive benefit, according to administration officials.

The Obama administration also suggested that new national health plans to be set up under the law could be required to offer supplemental contraceptive coverage to employees of religiously affiliated employers.

The proposal drew quick praise from women’s rights advocates and other groups that support broader access to contraception, including Planned Parenthood.

But it is unclear if the administration will satisfy major religious groups such as Catholic Charities USA and the Catholic Health Association of the United States, representing Catholic hospitals.

“We have to spend time reviewing it,” said the group’s president, Sister Carol Keehan, a leading backer of the new health care law who has been working with the administration to protect her members from having to pay for contraceptive coverage.

Few expect the proposal to win the support of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which has led the fight against the requirement. That group is also reviewing the proposal, according to a spokeswoman.

Contraceptive coverage — which is now standard for most health plans — does not add significant costs to a typical premium, according to insurance industry officials. There is some evidence that it may actually help reduce overall costs by preventing expensive and unwanted pregnancies.

But the additional benefit does add an upfront cost to an insurance policy that would have to be shouldered by insurers under the administration’s plans.

In a separate regulation posted Friday, the administration indicated that student health plans at religiously affiliated colleges and universities that do not self-insure would also have to cover contraceptives without cost-sharing, but the costs would have be borne by the insurers.

Those plans that do self-insure are not subject to the contraceptive coverage mandate.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. It’s stuff like this that tell us all that the GOP/Tea Party has come completely unhinged from the reality of the world around them. If anyone had told me 40 years ago that a political party would be fighting against the public’s right to access and use of contraception I’d have laughed and thought they were insane. Today in my old age, that reality doesn’t seem so funny. On the plus side, it’s really going to do a number on the GOP/Tea Party come November so I guess it’s true, sometimes you got to take some bad to get a whole lotta good.

    1. Since when has the Catholic Health Association of the United States and Catholic Charities USA and the US Conference of Catholic Bishops been part of the TEA Party/GOP? The leader of the Catholic Health Association is cited in this article as a major backer of Obama’s health plan.
      Maybe your angst toward the TEA Party and the GOP comes from being deliberately misinformed on who is really saying what. This article doesn’t even mention the Republican party or the TEA party–neither of which have ever come out and said they want to deny anyone access to contraception.

    2. Birth control isn’t expensive. You can go to any Planned Parenthood or other clinic & get it free or almost free.  Go to Walmart & get the pill for $9.00/month.  This is not about a war on women; it is not about a war on women’s health issues.  It is a power ploy, pure & simple and a war on religion.  If the Obama administration gets away with this, look out.  Can  you imagine if he was proposing that Muslim women could not wear the head scarf?  The White House would be burned down.  But Christians are just supposed to take his B.S.

  2. The “public’s right to access and use of contraceptions” has always been there, but it seems that dumbed-down Mainers and Americans do not understand that taxpayers, employers, insurers  having to pay for this “right”  should not be a mandate.

    1. Thank you. My thoughts exactly. If anyone wants to use contraceptives, fine, but why in the world should someone else pay for them? You want to use them, YOU pay for them.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *