BANGOR, Maine — There wasn’t much desire shown Tuesday afternoon for changing Bangor’s governmental structure at the City Council government operations committee meeting.

And after six councilors and three residents shared their comments, it was apparent that the consensus was this: The system isn’t broken, so don’t fix it.

Tuesday’s public workshop drew six councilors, seven residents, three television reporters and a newspaper reporter, but it failed to draw many members of the public or much support for a political system employing the direct election of a mayor by Bangor’s residents.

“You can probably create a problem where a problem doesn’t really exist,” said resident Charlie Birkel. “I don’t see a problem with our city’s current system of government.”

Resident Gary Watson summed it up even more succinctly.

“Someone told me, ‘Don’t fix something that’s not broken,” Watson told the councilors and city staff members in council chambers.

Birkel and Watson were two of just three residents who spoke publicly at the meeting.

Birkel agreed with Councilors Pat Blanchette and James Gallant that all wording referring to Bangor’s mayor in the city charter should be eliminated and changed to chair, chairman or chairwoman.

“I think it would be good to eliminate our gray area,” said Gallant, who later suggested that councilors be given laptop computers and cell phones to better comply with Freedom of Information requests from anyone wanting to be privy to official council communication.

Several councilors agreed that a better course of governmental tweaking would be to change the process by which the City Council elects a mayor/chairman.

“The second problem is all the arm-twisting, emails and phone calls that go on before the vote for chair,” said Blanchette.

Councilor Geoffrey Gratwick suggested having City Solicitor Norm Heitmann research alternative systems for picking a chairman/chairwoman/mayor.

“I don’t like the backroom deals and late phone calls,” said Councilor Charlie Longo, who has led the effort to hold meetings on the viability of Bangor selecting a mayor through a public election.

“I don’t have a dog in this fight, but I thought the conversation was important to have,” Longo said.

Blanchette suggested having chairman candidates tell the public what their plan, vision and priorities are at a meeting or forum and then have councilors vote publicly.

“I think the question is more about what we want in a chair and what their powers should be,” said Councilor Ben Sprague.

Most agreed there was no need for public election of a mayor.

“Unless there’s a groundswell of public support, I see no need to make changes in our government,” said Councilor Joe Baldacci.

Join the Conversation

27 Comments

    1. Where would we be?  We would be talking about issues that actually matter, like improving infrastructure and bringing new businesses into the area so people can start working again.  

      1. This way the council can feel better about themselves, and have something to pat themselves on the back thinking they actually accomplished something while they’re hanging out at the Sea Dog! Telling us how wonderful they are…

    2. Perhaps now that  you have this out of your system, maybe you can rededicate some of that energy toward substantive issues affecting the city that would draw public comment from more than two residents.

      1. This system is the good old boy system and it has been broken for years.  I was hopeful with some of the young new members that this would change.  The only one that advocates for the taxpayers is Charlie and I will vote for him again if he runs and the rest no way!!

        1. Don’t be silly, he is young and  ambitious , a budding  professional, 
           and will run for a State office,  next if he can’t  be Mayor. 

  1. So as usual, the city’s inconsequential operations policies are cared about by less than 1/100th of 1% of the population.  Nice.  Also funny how often a similarly laughable number of citizens can dictate policy dialogue through their bloviating rants (occupiers). 

  2. “Birkel agreed with Councilors Pat Blanchette and James Gallant that all wording referring to Bangor’s mayor in the city charter should be eliminated and changed to chair, chairman or chairwoman.”

    Note to the above and the paper, the charter doesn’t make any references to “Bangor’s mayor.” It merely states that in cases in which a state law refers to a mayor, the City Council chair has those duties.

  3. Charlie makes his own press. Grandstands for the press. Nobody thought this was important The press can’ t recognize real news and issues. The press should only cover him in the entertainment section. Charlie is more suited for the Dan Cashman Show than Council Chambers. Perfect show for Dan: Charlie Longo and John Hanson as guests–puppet and puppet master together.

  4. The BDN is the most chronic offender when it comes to making references to Bangor’s non-existent Mayor.

    Council member Gallants request that the taxpayers provide him with a cell phone and a laptop is certainly an interesting request from a tea party candidate. Though it begs the question: why he can’t use his own phone? What’s next? Do we need send a car to get him to city council meetings?

  5. “I don’t have a dog in this fight, but I thought the conversation was important to have,” Longo said. ”

    Then why did you bring it… another opportunity to have your name in the paper?

  6. I personally don’t consider Bangor a “city” so much as a very large town. It doesn’t need a mayor. It’s not like it’s NYC, Boston, L.A., or Portland-Oregon (the real Portland).

  7. Charlie is the only one on that council that I feel works for the people.  The rest of the council members all seem to have their own agenda.  I personally do not see any good changes with some of the new members on board and as far as paying for a laptop computer and cell phone out of my tax dollars is wrong.  If Gallant wants a cell phone and lap top then he needs to buy his own it should not be up to the taxpayers to provide these items to him.  Now that is something that should be on the ballot!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *