BREWER, Maine — An open house Wednesday regarding the proposed Interstate 395-Route 9 project drew more than 50 residents of Brewer, Holden and Eddington to the Brewer Auditorium.
State and federal officials are inviting written comments from the public on a draft environmental impact statement for the connector — designed to ease heavy truck traffic between the Canadian Maritimes and the federal highway system.
Wednesday’s open house was intended to provide an opportunity to learn more about the project from representatives of the Maine Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Many of those who attended, however, expressed dissatisfaction with transportation officials’ latest preferred route — an alternative known as 2B-2 — and their failure to keep town leaders and residents of Brewer and Eddington informed of recent developments.
Brewer resident Larry Adams lives in a residential subdivision off Eastern Avenue near the 2B-2 route. During the open house, he said the preferred alternative doesn’t even meet the state’s own criteria.
“If this did what it is supposed to do, I’d just say it was my bad luck” to have a home close to the route, he said, later adding, “To me, it’s a shortcut to Walmart for Eddington.”
A potential real solution, he said, is the proposed east-west highway project, a private road he noted would be paid for by those who actually use it.
“I see this as a project for Canadian truckers,” said Albert Gibson, a Brewer resident who serves on the city’s planning board and a homeowner who could be affected by the project.
Tom Smiley, who also lives off Eastern Avenue, was not happy to see a slightly changed 2B back.
“One of the things we’re upset about is that 10 years ago they took this off the table. Now it’s back. It’s not fair to the citizens of Maine to flip-flop back and forth.”
State and federal transportation officials have been studying a Brewer-Holden-Eddington connector since before 2000 and late last year chose 2B-2 as their preferred route.
It would extend I-395 at its Wilson Street junction and roughly would follow the Holden-Brewer line, mostly on the Brewer side, and then enter Eddington, where it would connect to 4.5 miles of rebuilt Route 9. It also is virtually the same as the 2B route MDOT eliminated from its list of 70-plus alternatives in late 2002.
The decision stunned town officials and residents of the three communities when they learned about it in late December. The MDOT quickly issued an apology.
Transportation officials’ failure to involve Brewer in the decision-making process that led to the selection of 2B-2 prompted city councilors to unanimously withdraw their support for the connector.
Russell Charette, the Maine Department of Transportation’s project manager for the connector project, said that while he understands affected residents’ frustrations, as MDOT sees it, 2B-2 would have the least impact on homes and the environment.
He further said that the state is working to improve the flow of communications with affected communities.
“One of my charges is to make sure that we communicate appropriately and effectively moving forward,” Charette said, citing Wednesday’s open house as one example of that effort. He also said he built an email list to keep key players, including town officials, up to speed on the project.
The DOT and the Federal Highway Administration also are officially considering two other alternatives — 5A2B-2 and 5B2B-2 — which are similar to 2B-2, and a “no build” option.
The Brewer session is the first of two planned in connection with the connector. The second open house is scheduled for 1-4:30 p.m. May 2 at the Eddington town office. It will be followed by a formal public hearing set for 6-8 p.m. the same day at Eddington Elementary School.
BDN writer Nok-Noi Ricker contributed to this report



One of these decades they ought to buckle down and build the darn road!
Yeah right through your back yard
as ,long as they pay me well,go for it. ill move.
The state is not going to pay you well for your property AND in case you have not heard, unless you live 200 feet from the Centerline of the new road, you won’t get any compensation whatsoever. How much will your house be worth if it is sitting 210 feet from the centerline of a major, limited access, truck route?
do you mean like 90 percent of the homes in bangor brewer and eddington area?none of them are 210 feet off.
So will my house, that is currently 2 miles away from Rt. 9 be worth more or less than it is today after they put a new highway 210 feet from my living room?
The same most people don’t want to live wilds like you and me they don’t mind being close actually it might be worth more
Sent from my U.S. Cellular Android device
—– Reply message —–
agree with that also. if your gonna build the road, then just do it.
Why dosen’t the State of Maine consider building a bridge across the Penobscot river in Eddington or North Brewer to get to Hogan Road to I-95. Charge a toll to recover the cost. It would make more sense than going all the way around Holden.
no matter what they decide someone is going to be unhappy. they just need to make a decision and build it. there will always be complainers.
Agree. Decide where it’s going and build it. Should have been done in the 80’s when they took 395 across the river. If something like this had been proposed in another state in 1999 (this was) people would be driving on it, but here we haven’t moved one shovelful of dirt. Ridiculous.
Deciding where it is going is a process but deciding whether it is even necessary to build a brand new road when we can’t maintain what we’ve got now, is a better question. I bet you wouldn’t be so quick tongued if they were going to take your house.
Necessity has already been determined for a long time now. This has been talked about since the ’80’s. If you bought your house after that you should have considered this possibility. Removing through trucks and tourists from downtown Brewer and the hills, curves, and school zone on rt 46 will be a huge benefit. On top of that you reduce the load on 1A from 395 to E. Holden.
Yeah, back in the 80’s I should have thought about this out on a quiet little road off of Eastern Ave.
Boy, if we were all as smart as you, we should have predicted stock market collapses, the 9/11 attacks, etc.
Thanks for your valuable input. Could you give me a heads up on some future Superbowl Picks?
Been saying that for years, it was also give quicker access to hospitals as well.
But it would take business out of Brewer and we can’t be having that now, can we?
Better yet, run it through Veazie in the straightest line possible to route 95.
I was thinking that as well. Build an off ramp somewhere just north of Hogan rd.Zip it across in the area behind Sam’s Club over to Veazie and across the river.Looking at GOOGLE map doesn’t appear to be anything much out there?
Because many folks woudl not take the toll road.
i think they outta come off that off ramp bang a slight right after the whiting hill over pass and go for it, dump it into clifton ,the more east the better. And BTW can we just call them option 1 , 2 and 3, geeze louise !!!
The least environmental impact while addressing the alleged Route 9 congestion concerns would be to update and improve Rt.9 and 46. This would also be the fairest thing to all concerned because if a person bought a house on Rt. 9 or 46 they knew what they were getting and paid a substantially lower price for property than someone who chose to live away from those routes (like off of Eastern Ave).
Why build more “new” routes when we can’t maintain the ones we have now?
Not true, in 2004 when I bought a house out here, there was no mention of a 395 by pass, and at a cost of 130k, it was not at a lower price, I priced houses in Glenburn, Orrington, Brewer, Holden, Dedham, Hudson, ect… looked at over 30 houses and the price was about the same, the difference was the tax rate.
You don’t mention if you bought a house on a truck route or not or which one. I am sure there are a few exceptions where a person may have bought on Rt. 9 and paid more than they should have, but they still CHOSE to live on Rt. 9. I CHOSE not to live on 9 or 46 for a good reason and was willing to pay a premium for a quiet area.
I’d be a fan of adding 2 lanes to route 9 and bumping the speed limit up to 65 mph. But I don’t see that happening, so the proposed bypass is the only option. With those power lines, Eastern Avenue is already an industrial wasteland anyhow, who are we kidding?
Anyone would be if they do not live on rt 9.
Obviously you have a very strange definition of “Industrial Wasteland”, and I’m not kidding anyone. I enjoy living near Eastern Ave.
If they would give me 200k for my house and land, I would take it and move, right out of this state.
Where are you moving this time, Jed? Bugtussle or back next door to the Drysdale’s?
Come down here to Mass. That’s where I live and it sux down here. I can’t wait to get out of this state and come up to your beautiful one. You don’t know how nice you have it after living in congestion all your life.
Great idea, infrastructure in ME instead of the sucker punch known as RT 1 when you get off the highways.
By the time either this or an “east-west” highway gets built the price of oil will probably be so high that trains will be the only viable solution.
Why aren’t we studying a revitalization of our rail system?
Fill in that swamp by Lowes and continue the damn road to Rt 9.
A few dead frogs won’t hurt a thing.
eaxctly, same way they put 95 through the alton bog twice, no biggy, saved milllions.
Sometimes you have to look out for humans over animals, Maine has plenty of wet lands…
rigfht on brother
I realize you are just trolling for a fight with an environmentalist, but you should really know that protecting wetlands has little to do with protecting animals.
http://fu.gy/20Y
Landowners within 500 feet of this new Highway should be fairly compensated for their loss of value.
They won’t be. 200 ft from the centerline is the number. Everybody outside of 200 gets nothing. That Came directly from MDOT Russ Charette. Nice, huh?
Is this the route that will take the fewest homes?
It is not the route of all the ones that were studied that takes the fewest homes. I think that the better question though is ” How many property owners will not be compensated for the negative impacts and lost value ? ” In other words, I feel worse for the people who will not qualify for any compensation.
At the very least the towns involved should give these home owners a very significant tax break as their homes will be difficult to sell.
Tax Break? In the city where they disguise tax increases by charging two bucks for a trash bag and pay fines to PERC for not hauling them enough trash?
I guess we can hope so, but don’t hold your breath.
As for homes being “difficult to sell”, I think you have put the nicest face on that situation that you can paint.
They would only be good for a gas station- right?
Actually, No. It’s a limited access highway. No exits between Eddington and I-395
Like I was compensated for windmills that de-valued my property???? Not.
And then called a Nimby to boot.
Too bad, you lose. Join the club.
That road is needed far more than 53 revenue draining, spinning once in a blue moon, ugly ole’ windwills
All depends on whose back yard it is in, doesn’t it????
Thats’ my nightmare, looking across my lake and seeing a bunch of windmills. The road is needed, no doubt. Whe I95 came through Bangor in the 50s hundreds of graves were moved-that was not very popular.