Last fall, Gordon Yeager, 94, and his wife, Norma, 90, died together, holding hands in the Iowa hospital where they had been taken after a car accident. The final chapter of the couple’s seven-decade love story made headlines around the world.

What the fulsome tributes to the couple’s 72-year marriage generally failed to note was that the crash nearly ended another long love story. The Yeagers lost their lives after Gordon failed to obey a stop sign and plowed into the car of Charles and Barbara Clapsaddle, who have been married for 38 years. Charles was uninjured, but Barbara’s neck was broken. Fortunately, she can still walk. After a long hospitalization and rehabilitation, she has returned home where she slowly continues to recover.

The collision had all the hallmarks of a car accident caused by an aged driver. When old people are involved in fatal crashes, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reports, their victims are most likely to be themselves and their equally elderly, frail passengers. Intersections are particularly perilous. According to a study in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention, intersection crashes accounted for about one half of the fatalities in accidents among drivers 85 and older. The study found that when drivers 70 to 79 were involved in intersection collisions they tended to misjudge whether it was safe to proceed. Those 80 and over simply failed to see the other car.

As the boomers head toward senescence, the old will account for a growing percentage of the population, and thus an increasing proportion of people on the road. Most elderly Americans will end their lives with a valid driver’s license in their wallets. According to the the highway safety institute, there were 22 million licensed drivers aged 70 and older as of 2008, representing 78 percent of that demographic group. The problem is that — lacking the Driving Miss Daisy option — there’s no clear personal, societal, or policy solution for what to do about older drivers. As many children of elderly parents know, it can be agonizingly hard to get older drivers who are no longer competent to hand over their keys.

The stories of the carnage caused by unfit older drivers are sobering. There was 86-year-old George Weller, who drove through the Santa Monica farmer’s market in 2003, killing 10 and injuring 63. Two years ago, an 81-year-old Florida woman failed to yield when merging onto the highway, smashing into a bus carrying seniors on an elderhostel trip, killing at least two and injuring dozens.

Despite these dreadful incidents, it’s wrong to assume that our streets are about to become the setting for the Cataract 500. Though the toll remains enormous, a fortunate trend over the past 40 years is that the roads are safer for everyone, with a national decline in traffic fatalities from a high of 54,600 in 1972 to about 33,800 in 2010. The reasons for the improvement are numerous, from a crackdown on drunken driving, to safer car design, to seat belt laws, to the introduction of graduated licensing for teens. Older drivers, too, are less likely to be involved in traffic fatalities than in years past, with recent evidence showing a welcome and unexpected falloff.

Anne McCartt, senior vice president for research at the IIHS, says older drivers are often unfairly demonized. For one thing, they are less likely than other groups to speed and drive drunk. And no group of drivers is more hazardous than teenagers, with their combination of inexperience and recklessness. But while teens mature and become safer, increasing maturity has the opposite effect on the old. Once people turn 70, their crash rates start to tick up. After 80, the acceleration is marked. Octogenarians on up have a higher collision rate per mile traveled of any age group except for teens, and their rate of fatal collisions per mile traveled is the highest of all drivers.

More than one half of U.S. states impose restrictions on license renewals for older drivers. In Alaska, drivers 69 and older must renew in person, not by mail. Washington, D.C., requires a fitness-to-drive statement from a physician starting at age 70. In Illinois, those 75 and over must take a road test. In Iowa, where Yeager lived, the renewal cycle is accelerated from every five years to every two years for drivers 70 and above.

McCartt says studies on the effectiveness of these screening procedures have been mixed and that there is no certain way to identify the highest risk driver. “For most states, and most people in highway safety, the goal would be keeping older people driving as safely and as long as they can. Taking a license away is a major thing to do. It has a big effect on mobility and independence and states need good evidence before they impose this.”

Motor vehicle administrators can also issue licenses with specific restrictions. For example, drivers can be confined to a certain number of miles from their home, or even allowed to travel only to church or the grocery store.

As older drivers decline physically or cognitively, many do loosen their grip on the wheel voluntarily. The IIHS reports that those 70 and over drive less than half as many miles annually as middle-aged drivers. Numerous studies show that many older people restrict their time on the road by no longer driving at night, avoiding freeways, or staying home during bad weather.

My father-in-law died at 98 with a valid driver’s license (it expired on his 100th birthday), but he didn’t get behind the wheel for at least the last five years of his life. After a series of conversations with his children about their concerns that he was getting too frail to drive, he finally conceded it was time.

That’s the ideal — self-recognition and the support of loving family leading the older person to accept it’s the end of the road. The AARP’s suitably depressing multimedia guide, titled “We Need to Talk,” envisions such a world, one in which seniors quickly move from resentment that their driving skills are being impugned to gratitude that their children care.

But many old people do not go gentle into calling a cab. When rational discussion fails, the Hartford insurance company suggests Stuxnet-style subterfuge: disable the car, file down the keys, and cancel the vehicle registration. Even then, after a lifetime of being law-abiding, the company acknowledges elderly motorists may go rogue: “Drivers may continue to drive without a driver’s license, car registration, or insurance coverage.”

Sometimes the problem is that the older parent is drifting away mentally, and facing this loss is just too painful for everyone. Writer Nancy Palmer’s mother, then in her 70s, was increasingly forgetful and had gotten lost driving home a few times. The family took her in for an evaluation and raised the possibility of taking away her license. “But she said the most poignant thing,” Palmer recalls. “She said, ‘I’ve been driving since I was 16.’ ” So the family backed off.

One morning Palmer’s mother got in her Volkswagen Golf, went to the gas station to fill the car, and disappeared. At midnight, the frantic family got a call from the police two counties away, in Maryland. They had spotted Palmer’s mother driving erratically. She refused to stop when a police car approached with a bullhorn. Finally, the officers blew out her tires with spike strips. That was the end. Palmer’s mother continued to ask for her car keys but her children told her the car was too damaged to drive.

Grown children who struggle to get their parents to hand over the keys can turn to the parents’ physician for help. But for one middle-aged woman, her 85-year-old father’s doctor turned out to be another roadblock. The woman’s father, who lives in Maryland, suffers from advanced Parkinson’s and freezes while behind the wheel, but he insists on driving himself to visit his wife, who’s in a nursing home. She begged her father’s doctor to report him to the state’s motor vehicle department. The doctor, though, said he’d only send a letter if the father agreed, which he did not. “It seems that the whole system is biased toward the rights of the driver, not the right of the public to be safe,” she says.

It turns out only a handful of states require physicians to report such impaired drivers, though in most states doctors who reach out to the motor vehicle department are protected from liability by a good faith exemption. The chief of the medical advisory board of Maryland’s Motor Vehicle Administration, former trauma surgeon Carl Soderstrom, would like to see physicians think about their patient’s fitness to drive as part of a health assessment. While doctors in Maryland have no legal obligation to report unfit elderly drivers, Soderstrom says “we believe you have a moral obligation.”

Gordon Yeager was one of those old drivers who just refused to get the message, and his story illustrates how difficult it is to take away the license of someone who’s determined to keep it, even in a state like Iowa with a strong monitoring program. Not that his son, Dennis, 52, was overly concerned. “I would ride with him to breakfast once in a while,” he said in an interview. “Truthfully, he gets older and you wonder. A car would come up, and I was thinking, ‘Is he going to stop?’ But he did really good.”

When Yeager showed up last Oct. 7 at his local motor vehicle division, the condition of the 94-year-old concerned the employees. He was told he needed to take a road test. He failed. In Iowa, flunking drivers are given a suspension notice and a temporary permit — they have 30 days to retake the test and can do so as many as three times. So Yeager drove home, planning to try again. Dennis Yeager says his father told him he was “set up.” The elder Yeager claimed that at an intersection the examiner instructed him to get into a right-turn-only lane, then ordered him to drive straight. “That is not possible,” says Kim Snook, director of the office of driver services for the Iowa Department of Transportation. “Never have we used tricks to fail someone.” Five days later, Yeager and his wife were dead after crashing into the Clapsaddles’ Mustang.

Charles Clapsaddle, 65, is now caring for his wife Barbara, 60, who has racked up more than $250,000 in medical bills. He says of their ordeal, “We’re not bitter. We’re unhappy the other couple was killed. But they should not have been out driving anyway.”

Join the Conversation

33 Comments

  1. Yep get the white haired old geezers off the road. They probably wear glasses too. It ain’t safe for them to be out there. What with all the fantastically experienced kids running around with giant bass speakers booming out a warning that they are within a mile of you. Staying in direct communication with their social network via texting and tweeting. (Textin and a tweetin) brings back memories of a rock & roll tune ‘reelin and a rockin’. But I digress.
    Yep we have to clear the roads of all those inexperienced old drivers. By golley they have a lot of nerve expecting the younger generation to be distracted from their need to go 20 mph over the limit because they were too busy to leave for their OH so important next stop on time.

    When the number of accidents created by older drivers innattention come close to those created by younger drivers, I’ll start worrying about this dire problem. Until then I’ll stick with my experieince over these young drivers.

    1. Good response.  The article is yet another attempt to demonize a segment of society based on a relatively few cases.  Just like all people on welfare are cheats becuase a few dump a case of water for for the deposit money. 
      The stupidity of the American public is staggering.

    2. Both problems will persist until we loosen the yoke of the automobile on our lives. I am seeing more and more books and articles about alternatives to habitual driving and lifelong car ownership. This Sunday the New York Times will feature an editorial discussion about this very topic. The American “love affair” with the automobile is more like an unhealthy addiction.

    3. My father parallel parked his car and when he opened the door it was taken off by a 90-something year old man who couldn’t see past the steering wheel.  Luckily he didn’t get out of the car and was not hurt.   

      Thae old man had no business behind a wheel and when you’re too old, you are too old to drive.  Do the right thing and give it up.  Old folks should be tested annually and if they fail they lose their license.  Driving is a privilege and everyone deserves to be safe on the road.

      1. I have parallel parked for over 50 years. I was taught the first time that before you open the door, you look to see if anyone is comming. Nothing against your dad or you but the mistake was your fathers.

        You don’t have the right of way to open your door into the path of a moving vehicle.

  2. And, there are elderly drivers who drive safely.
    Whether someone is fit to drive safely is an individual matter. A close friend’s son was killed by someone texting on a cell phone. Inattention is a key factor. Let’s not single out any one group as being the culprits in accidents. I often see  law enforcement officers on the side of the road waiting for the speeders. If we wanted safety on highways, those officers should be driving amongst the other cars looking for the weavers and those not holding their own lanes. In states like Maine, citizens need a drivers license in order to live independently. Taking a license away should be based on the driver’s record.

  3. I’ve seen workers at the DMV bend over backwards to help elderly folks get through the renewal process.  The state workers miss many opportunities to refuse to issue renewals when it’s painfully obvious that some folks shouldn’t be trying to renew !  Does the state have any liability here ?

    1. Would you prefer the workers at the DMV be ignorant toward the customers who pay their salary? Please don’t try and gain employment where dealing with the public would be required.

      1. That isn’t what poor was saying at all.

        I’ve seen this too, sometimes it’s obvious, but nobody wants to be the “bad guy”.

  4. If you response is like some, it just shows that the problem is far from being solved.

     ‘I’m not the problem. Let’s blame someone else. I won’t face reality. I’ll push back and thump my chest in righteous indignation at someone who even thinks I might be getting old’.

    That’s what got us to this point. I believe that all drivers over the age of 55 should be re-tested. If a doctor doesn’t turn in or at least report someone with health issues that would hamper their driving then he should be held accountable. 

    Don’t like it??  tough!!  It has gotten so far out of hand that it needs a severe penalty to fix it now. 

    The young is another issue altogether and should be addressed as such. 

    Oh, and by the way, I am over sixty!!

    1. Here is the thing, you can be a poor driver at any age.

      If, as a society we are truly interested in road safety, we need to retest after the initial license.

      Why not do it on a periodic schedule that is easy to remember: ten year anniversaries from your very first license?

      Thus, start at age 16 for example.   Then, at age 26 you get another written, vision, and road test.  

      Same at ages 36, 46, 56, 66, 76, 86, 96, 106, etc.  You fail, you have 30 days to study up, get retrained, get new eyeglasses so you might pass again.

      People can be a menace on the road at any age: drinking problems, arrogance, inexperience, simple lack of knowledge.

      Expensive, you say?  Factor the cost of hospital bills, rehab, police, ambulance, fire, road workers, etc.  Not to mention deaths.   What is THAT cost?

      Within a generation or two, the culture behind the wheel would change, and people would stop thinking they could drive * just fine after a few drinks…* and other poor presumptions.

      If we are truly serious about road safety….

      1. If drivers of all ages would obey the speed limits, not pull up so close behind vehicles that they almost touch, not pass on the right in safety lanes, because they can’t wait 3 seconds for the driver ahead to make a left turn, not demand that people turn right at a stop sign, come to a stop before they miss an opportunity to turn right on red, and not use electronic devices while driving, the situation would be much better.

        Enforcement is the only way to bring drivers back into sensible, pleasurable driving habits.  Public Service Announcements used to do a good job of reminding people how they should, and should not, operate their vehicles.

        I often wonder  if everyone had to drive a standard transmission vehicle, if  just that would cut down on bad driving. 

  5.  My Aunt was 92 last time she renewed her license and she could drive circles around these kids that think yellow means speed up and red means nothing.  This guy was 94, how many other accidents has he had?  BTW having kids I know what you do to a car and I’ve had more than one totaled because someone ELSE did something wrong.  Yet we could never find the other driver.

  6. When an elderly person loses his or her license, they also lose their independence. This causes problems for them getting food and possibly medicine. It also puts a burden on family or someone to provide the occasional transportation that everyone needs. Some form of public transportation?

    1. I should add, my comment is directed to the geographic conditions of Maine, not a major city where much is within walking distance.

  7. My mother drove till she died at age 95. During her driving career which spanned  7 decades she acquired one ticket (on the  Passamoquoddy reservation 30 years ago. She was never involved in an accident.  My father drove till age 90, then voluntarily gave up his license after driving for 6 decades and NEVER getting a ticket or being involved in an accident.

    Heavy trucks are involved in the same number of fatal accidents as are elderly drivers…. Why is the scrutiny so unequal… Could it be than older folks are no longer profitable?

    1. BTW the cartoon which accompanies this article is offensive and violates the BDN’s policy on posting in this forum.

      1. An old joke:
        “I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like Grampa… [pause] …not screaming in terror, like the passengers in his car.”

  8. Excellent article, Emily!

    May I add that Keeping Us Safe now has Certified “Beyond Driving with
    Dignity” Professionals trained and deployed throughout the country. 

    If any of your readers are concerned about an elderly loved one’s safe
    driving ability, please contact us at 877-907-8841 and we will connect you with
    the closest “Beyond Driving with Dignity” Professional. 

    We also offer a workbook titled “Beyond Driving with
    Dignity; The workbook for the families of older drivers”. 

    Visit our website at http://www.keepingussafe.org to learn more
    about our programs and about how to become a Certified “Beyond Driving with
    Dignity” Professional! 

  9. Yeah, meantime there’s an article today about an 80 year old woman who flew and landed the plane her husband was piloting before he collapsed and died from a heart attack. As with anything, it all has to do with the INDIVIDUAL, not the category everyone wants to throw people into.  Besides, with the economy the way it is, we’ll all be working into our 90s since we can’t afford to retire…..how will we get to and from work if we can’t drive????

  10. I am interested in ways to reduce the impact that bad drivers have on other road users, regardless of the demographic they come from.  Cars are useful but can be extremely dangerous in inattentive or incapable hands, and being able to operate one is (or should be, anyway) a privilege not a right.  I don’t think it is unreasonable as a society that we require drivers to demonstrate that they are experienced and physically able to drive safely.

    Anyway, this article is national (from Slate) and not specific to Maine.  Maine (probably due to our significant percentage of elderly residents) already has some decent restrictions in place, requiring vision tests starting every other renewal at age 40, and at every renewal after age 62.  Also, the renewal interval reduces from 6 years to 4 after age 65.  I think this is reasonable and reflects the realities of aging.  I don’t think it is discriminatory at all.

  11. If everyone just paid attention we would be much better off.  When I drive, I drive-no texting, checking facebook, reading the paper, looking for something on my floor etc etc.  In case I absolutely need to make a call, my car is equipped with bluetooth and automatically connects to my phone.
    I drive to work at 6am and always wonder why a lot of people HAVE to be on the cell at that time in the AM…..who is that important?

  12. I have been with riders of all ages, and if they are going to take unsafe drivers off the road there would not be many driving.

  13. Solution = full implementation of Obamacare.  No more elderly people results in no more elderly drivers.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *