GETTYSBURG, Pa. — Rick Santorum cleared the way for Mitt Romney to claim victory in the long and hard-fought battle for the Republican presidential nomination Tuesday, giving up his “against all odds” campaign as Romney’s tenacious conservative rival.
Santorum’s withdrawal sets up what is sure to be an acrimonious seven-month fight for the presidency between Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, and Democratic President Barack Obama, with the certain focus on the still-troubled economy.
In a preview of the personal attacks that lie ahead, Obama’s campaign manager declared that Americans neither like nor trust Romney, and the Romney camp said the fight had always been about defeating Obama, not GOP rivals.
“This game is a long, long, long way from over,” Santorum said as he bowed out of the contest with Romney. “We are going to continue to go out there and fight to make sure that we defeat President Barack Obama.”
Santorum had been facing a loss in the April 24 primary in Pennsylvania, the state he represented in Congress for 16 years, and where the Romney campaign planned nearly $3 million in ads against him.
Whether or not there are lingering hard feelings, Santorum didn’t mention Romney, who has been the front-runner for months and was far ahead in the race for the 1,144 delegates needed to clinch the nomination at the party’s convention in August.
Romney has tried to ignore his GOP rivals and campaign against the president since he first entered the race last year with a pitch focused on the recovering but still frail economy. But Romney was forced to go after Santorum and former house Speaker Newt Gingrich after Santorum showed strength in Iowa and Gingrich in South Carolina early this year. Then Santorum kept on, memorably winning three Southern primaries.
Romney’s campaign has long been the best funded, the best organized, and the most professionally run of the GOP contenders.
Despite Santorum’s refusal to get out of the race earlier — and Gingrich hasn’t officially dropped out yet — Romney had already begun looking ahead with a unifying message. He told Pennsylvania supporters last week that “we’re Republicans and Democrats in this campaign, but we’re all connected with one destiny for America.”
And Obama has turned squarely to face Romney, recently assailing him by name, as his campaign has worked to paint Romney as a rich elitist who will win the nomination only because he buried his opponents under millions of dollars in negative advertising.
“Neither he nor his special interest allies will be able to buy the presidency with their negative attacks,” Obama campaign manager Jim Messina said Tuesday after Santorum left the race. “The more the American people see of Mitt Romney, the less they like him and the less they trust him.”
In response, a Romney campaign spokeswoman insisted that “for Mitt Romney, this race has always been about defeating President Obama, and getting Americans back to work.”
But Romney still has had to wage a drawn-out nomination fight that’s seen candidate after candidate try to block his path. That has highlighted Romney’s problem with the most conservative voters. As recently as last week, activists huddled with Santorum to try and figure out how to keep him in the race, and Gingrich was still insisting Tuesday that his campaign represents the “last stand for conservatives” as he vowed to stay in the race until the convention.
Claiming a victory of sorts, Santorum said Tuesday, “Against all odds, we won 11 states, millions of voters, millions of votes.”
That took its toll on Romney. It all started in Iowa, where vote counts initially showed an eight-vote Romney victory — giving him momentum and headlines. But weeks later — after the campaign had moved to South Carolina and Romney was battling Gingrich — Santorum was declared the winner.
Romney’s campaign left Santorum for dead as he beat Gingrich in Florida and won in Nevada. But he lost three states — Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri — to Santorum on Feb. 7, breathing new life into the former senator’s insurgent candidacy and forcing Romney to compete for two more months. Santorum eventually won contests in Tennessee, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Kansas, Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana.
The battle forced Romney to spend more money attacking Santorum with negative ads in big Midwestern states like Michigan, Illinois and Ohio, where he won increasingly large victories.
Now, he must rise to the daunting challenge of taking on an incumbent president backed by what’s expected to be one of the most sophisticated re-election campaigns in history. Longtime Republican strategist Ed Gillespie joined the Romney campaign this month to help, but the team hasn’t been able to expand much beyond the small core group of loyal strategists that waged the primary.
Obama’s campaign has a sizable cash advantage over Romney’s, having more than $84 million in the bank at the end of February, Federal Election Commission records show. Romney’s campaign had about $7.2 million. Those filings show Romney has a fifth the paid staff of Obama’s campaign. He had yet to tap the resources of the Republican Party that will become available to the party nominee.
Santorum’s exit doesn’t greatly change Obama’s calculus. The president and his campaign have been expecting to face Romney all along and have already been targeting him. Yet the departure of Romney’s chief GOP rival means this is the point where the Obama campaign will engage even more heavily.
From the White House, Vice President Joe Biden has led the political fire against Romney, and over the past week Obama has started tying his speeches about economic fairness to Romney — directly, or in the coy way he chose Tuesday, warning of old, failed economic ideas from a candidate “who shall not be named.”
Obama’s speech in Florida, amid a full day of fundraising, was partly designed to draw a contrast between himself and Romney. The president is building his re-election campaign on the theme that he would help everyone succeed while Romney would cater to the rich and leave many people to struggle.
“This election will probably have the biggest contrast that we’ve seen maybe since the Johnson-Goldwater election, maybe before that,” Obama told donors at a campaign event. In his 1964 race against Republican Barry Goldwater, former President Lyndon Johnson carried 44 of 50 states and won 61 percent of the popular vote, the largest share of any candidate since 1820.
Romney trails Obama in organizing in some key battleground states such as Ohio and Florida, though Romney aides point to networks of supporters and volunteers that remain in place since his winning primary campaigns in the two electoral prizes.
The same is true in Iowa, where Romney nearly won the January caucuses, and New Hampshire and Nevada, where he did win in the primary campaign’s early days. The five are in the top 10 most competitive since 2000, and were all carried by Obama four years ago.
Other more typically Republican-performing battlegrounds Romney is eyeing at returning to the GOP column include Colorado, Virginia and North Carolina, which Obama flipped after consecutive GOP victories.
So far, polling shows people tend to like Obama more than Romney. Yet the public’s top issue is also Obama’s biggest vulnerability. Despite recent improvements in the public’s outlook, ratings of Obama’s handling of the economy remain in negative territory. According to a Washington Post-ABC News poll released Tuesday, Romney and Obama are about even on which candidate Americans trust more to handle the economy.
——
Kasie Hunt reported from Washington. Associated Press White House Correspondent Ben Feller, Deputy Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta and writers Jack Gillum in Washington and Thomas Beaumont in Iowa contributed to this report.



Now the REAL campaign begins! Thank goodness.
Bachmann, Perry, Cain and now Santorum all tea party darlings and all now residing on the trash pile of political irrelevancy. Every day more and more Americans reject not only the darlings of the tea party but more importantly their flawed ideology.
Your post has no basis in fact nor reality.
Under the hot lights of public inspection seems the Teas have all dried up. Time for the status-quo Republican to step forward. Hey, anyone seen Mitt bumbling around? It may be time to change his batteries.
Mitt is busy shaking that ol’ etch a sketch. Now that he has the nomination in hand let’s see how long it will take him to slide to the middle to get away from the radical right tea party nutcases.
He better shake that ol’ Etch-a-Sketch long and hard to cover up all the old lines showing the box (Top/Bottom/Left/Right/Middle) he’s drawn himself into during his life away from buying companies and firing people who provide “him” service or simply save “him” the cost of paying them. The perfect gift for Mitt might be an Etch-a-Sketch that runs on batteries…just like him. Wait! I just had an idea. To appease the greenies Mitt can Go Solar! Solar Mitt, “To infinity and beyond!” Add a little internal combustion engine and he’ll not only run forever but will become indistinguishable from a Chevy Volt. With the same low sales to boot.
Mitt likes firing people. He said so himself. It should be interesting watching him try to get the female vote. I wonder if he will make a big donation to Planned Parenthood?
Here is the complete quote:
“I like being able to fire people who provide services to me,” Romney
said at a Monday breakfast in New Hampshire, when talking about health care. “You know, if someone doesn’t give me a good service that I need, I want to say, ‘I’m going to go get someone else to provide that service to me.'”
Source – http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57355212-503544/mitt-romney-i-like-being-able-to-fire-people-for-bad-service/
Have you ever stopped going to a restaurant, garage, grocery store, etc…because YOU received poor service?
Here is an article about Bain Investment written by Charles Riley of CNNMoney (http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/10/news/economy/romney_bain_capital/index.htm ) Staples, Domino’s Pizza are two success stories when Romney was there. In all, ” 22% of the companies declared bankruptcy or closed within eight years
of Bain’s initial investment. And poor performance led Bain to forfeit
its investment in another 8%”. That means 70% did not go bankrupt or close their doors.
And here is the complete quote as reported by CBS News: “I like being able to fire people who provide services to me,” Romney
said at a Monday breakfast in New Hampshire, when talking about health
care. “You know, if someone doesn’t give me a good service that I need, I
want to say, ‘I’m going to go get someone else to provide that service
to me.'”
Source – http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57355212-503544/mitt-romney-i-like-being-able-to-fire-people-for-bad-service/
lOl !!!!
However, Romney is a mega-millionaire who hides his holdings and made his money through Bain, destroying American jobs and taking them to China.
Corporatocracy is as powerful as ever, and Romney super-PACs have the cash to mangle our already failing democratic process.
We’ve come to the culmination of corruption: the ultra-rich attempting to seize the Presidency directly.
Fear not. Obama is a shoe in.
We will see….We will see
Oh and NAFTA did not take jobs out of the country. rich attempting to seize, like Angus King?
Here is an article about Bain Investment written by Charles Riley of CNNMoney (http://money.cnn.com/2012/01/1… ) Staples, Domino’s Pizza are two success stories when Romney was there. In all, ” 22% of the companies declared bankruptcy or closed within eight years of Bain’s initial investment. And poor performance led Bain to forfeit its investment in another 8%”. That means 70% did not go bankrupt or close their doors.
It will be fun to watch Romney and his supporters lose money,as they spend and spend, only to lose it all in the end. I don’t think Romney will ever get a chance to do his favorite thing.Fire Americans!
I would agree with you, except that you are criticizing Romney because you support Obama.
Glad to see this guy out of the race. Hopefully he’ll head back to the 1950’s where he and his supporters belong.
I’m not sure the 50’s are the place for him either ….
remember he’s the guy that said he didn’t believe in the separation of church
and state … how American is that when you don’t believe in the Constitution?
You mean an establishment of Religion. Show me in the Constitution where the exact words say “separation of Church and State?”
Unfotunate you think because of a childs sickness he is out of the race. If you are so glad of such a thing, maybe we should be back in the 50’s.
1950’s??? More like the 1550’s.
Personal liberty and responsibility is a flawed ideology? It is sad to see how the idea of statism now rules the left in this country. Liberals are supposed to be liberal, ironically they are the exact opposite of liberal, what happened?
This article doesn’t mention it, but he is suspending his campaign due to the severe illness of his daughter. Say what you want about Santorum, but when he says his family comes first, he apparently means it.
Or it makes a convenient excuse to duck out and save some face when he was facing a double digit loss in his home state.
It was the type of “excuse” that the likes of John Edwards was unwilling to make to suspend his campaign when his wife had cancer. He dragged her out on stage and said she really wanted him to keep going, even as she went through chemo…oh and he was catting around….
One never knows for sure with politicians, but it just might be we just lost a candidate who actually lives according to his principles.
Pretty sure John Edwards said he was stepping down for family reasons too. It is what all the crooks do.
I will be looking for another party to support- Obama & Romney are one in the same.
The Libertarian Party.
Guess the god changed his mind on telling Santorum to run for president.
Hoping that his precious daughter recovers. But don’t forget that Santorum, as a former Senator and Representative, is likely fully covered by the kind of excellent health insurance he would happily deny ordinary Americans. If he weren’t a self-righteous hypocrite, he’d pay for every cent of his daughter’s care out of his own pocket. But surely he won’t. True, he made so much money after leaving office when defeated for a third Senate term that he can cover all costs.
If he didn’t have the federal insurance from his time in Congress, he would most likely have private insurance that would offer a comparable coverage. So, either way, he would not be paying out of pocket for his daughter’s care.
Santorum would not happily deny anyone coverage.
Republicans won’t deny coverage, as long as they have the money to pay. If you have a child with pre-existing conditions or severe ongoing medical conditions, most people can’t even begin to pay the premiums that the insurance industry will demand.
Well said.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Zy23pvkobU
The Santorum’s daughter suffers from Trisomy 18. Down Syndrome is Trisomy 21. If you do some research on little Bella’s condition you might be surprised that Mr. and Mrs. Santorum would have the time and energy to conduct a political campaign.Their large family must help out a lot. I would guess that a combination of factors is causing him to pull out of the race at this time; the little girl’s health and the concern that if he lost the primary in his home state of Pennsylvania -any chance at the nomination in 2016 would be over.
Thank God ….. We are undoubtedly safer with this guy gone.
How fitting he surrendered at Gettysburg !!
Nice to see Liberals are happy that a man’s daughter is in the hospital.
Ya better face it, the rightwing clowns are going down hard …. this is pure politics and nothing personal so get over it. If the rightwing is looking for sympathy we have a saying in Maine about that, ….. If you’re looking sympathy you can find it in the dictionary between ….. two particular words.
Yea, I have had to face it lately that Maine is now becoming once again part of Massachusetts.
So it’s his child or Maine becoming part of another state
again? …. You make a strong argument for the clowns.
No, the Southern half of the State is become so Liberal it misewell be part of Massachusetts. They tend to be referendum happy. Not sure if they have seen one they did not like to pass.
>>>>
I would be happen to see the one in the White House gone also, though no through his child being sick. Though I know some would disagree with that, some would be glad to see him gone if his child got sick. So the difference is miniscule in saying someone is glad he is glad he is gone, seeing the reasoning. Though maybe Romney could run him as VP.
As a Republican I’m am glad he Stepped down.. Next Mit. Let Ron Paul take it All… RON PAUL FOR PRES!!!!!!!
Unfortunately it wont be Ron Paul. I wish, but this country has strayed too far away from the ideas of our founders. No matter what the political party, the ideas of Keynesian economics has found its way into the policies of our politicians. We have become a country where the majority believes that government is the answer to everything. Ideas of personal liberty, and Austrian School economic theory have long since been forgotten. They will likely never return.
How long before a socially conservative 3rd party candidate announces? Maybe it’ll be Santorum.
Why there you go. There is a third party. The Tea Party. Oh that’s right. They wouold much rather tie up the Republican Party.
There is the Green Party, Libertarian Party, even a Communist Party. All of whom seem to have the gumption to stand on their own.
Oh, what great news!
I don’t like him,but it is hard not to admire a man who puts family first. He is too much of a loose cannon to be CIC (as are any of these clowns Republican, or the current denizen of the White house) but kudos for taking care of what’s important.
Sorry for any typo’s, got a new I-pad 3. Getting used to it.
>>>>
While I agree that Santorum is out of touch, and while Mitt is not my preferred candidate I do not see how he is out of touch.
you must be a billionaire as well?
I am a trillionaire actually.
Being a good friend of mine, Mitt and I often times will burn piles of hundreds in front of homeless people just to watch them cry.
good for you,and Mitt, the rest of us hate you, and your ideals.
Would it make you feel better if Mitt or I gave you a few stacks of hunneys (that’s what rich folk like myself call hundreds) to burn?
>>>>
His comment about not being concerned about the poor? Did you actually hear him say that or did you hear someone paraphrase that on MSNBC? Please provide a link so I can dislike Mittens as much as you.
>>>>
Shows how good his word to “fight to the end” really is. I suppose he didn’t really mean it. As much as I despise this guy’s politics, his family support, if real, is a very admirable quality.
I am waiting with baited breath for the campaign fraud news, I am sure it will be well deserved.
Awwww! Well, that…”to the end”, thing really was not going to happen. With Rick’s demise in the polling in his own home state of Pennsylvania going south as fast as possible, it could be time to get out of the race. This, combined with Rick’s ill daughter and finance problems, was the best deal. Newty had bankruptcy issues to deal with also, and nobody liked this guy too much. Ron Paul is okay, but he is not presidential material. Neither is Romney; prophets don’t make good presidents.
So who can we vote for? Nobody, as I see it. We are either liberal and as far leftist as we can go with Obama, and too far right Conservative with Romney and there is no central position here. But I can tell you folks this much, that it seems every election season for president, the chances of getting a viable candidate – Democrat, “Green”, Independent or Republican, the choices get worse and worse all the time. So do the voters’ choice as to whom they pick.
What’s worse, is that Electoral College thing which is archaic and the everlasting way delegates are chosen in today’s US politics. What happened to the “popular vote”, anyway? So here we go again.