WASHINGTON — Call them been-around-the-block Senate hopefuls.

Four of the most contested U.S. Senate races in 2012 feature a former officeholder who hasn’t been on the ballot for a dozen or more years. As majority control of the chamber might come down to a seat or two, the question of whether voters again embrace them — and which ones — may be decisive.

The comeback candidates are former Maine Gov. Angus King, I.; former Sen. and Gov. Bob Kerrey, D-Neb.; former Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson, R; and former North Dakota Attorney General Heidi Heitkamp, D.. Though they can tap the benefits of name recognition, they haven’t been battle-tested in years. Kerrey and Thompson, in particular, have reputations as pragmatic centrists and are re-emerging in a polarized election year.

“The world has changed enormously, and these candidates have to show that they get that,” said Jennifer Duffy, Senate editor of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.

A quest to return after a hiatus is atypical, though not unheard of, in Senate elections, said Don Ritchie, associate Senate historian. Most recently, Sen. Dan Coats, R-Ind., of Indiana returned in 2011 after a decade away from the chamber spent lobbying and serving as U.S. ambassador to Germany, Ritchie said. Coats was previously in the Senate from 1989 to 1999.

“It gets in the blood politically,” Ritchie said. “People think they’ve left it all behind, but then they hear the siren call again.”

That doesn’t mean it will be easy. Kerrey last ran in 1994 and faces “carpetbagger” criticism in Nebraska after a decade of living in New York City. Thompson, who left the Wisconsin governor’s office in 2001, leads polls in the state’s Republican primary, though he faces attack ads from conservative groups.

In North Dakota, Heitkamp left office in 2001 and is running in a Republican-leaning state. King, an independent who hasn’t been on the ballot since 1998, is the front-runner in polls in Maine and if elected could choose which party leads the Senate if control comes down to one vote.

Republicans currently hold 47 seats in the 100-member Senate and have advantages in trying to gain the majority. Democrats are encumbered by a sluggish economy and hold 23 of the 33 seats on the ballot this year. Also, seven Democratic incumbents are retiring, compared with three Republicans, yielding open seats that pose opportunities for the rival party.

The electoral fate of the veteran candidates will rest on factors including how their past positions play in 2012 and to what degree state politics have shifted. All four states have tilted more Republican and more conservative in recent years.

Kerrey, a former Navy SEAL who served in the Senate from 1989 to 2001, has the toughest battle of the four, said Stu Rothenberg, editor of the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report. Kerrey lived in New York City since leaving the Senate, where he was president of the New School, a Greenwich Village institution that touts its progressive and experimental teaching.

After reversing a decision not to run in late February, Kerrey used a friend’s guest house in Omaha as the address for his voter registration, then survived a Republican Party challenge to his residency that went to the Nebraska Supreme Court. The matter is a central criticism of his candidacy.

“Kerrey is a dramatically weaker candidate than he was a decade ago,” Rothenberg said. “Back then he was Bob Kerrey, the guy who didn’t fit into the Democratic stereotype. He was young and dashing. Now he’s the guy who’s lived in New York the last decade that thinks he can just pick up and run back to Nebraska.”

While Kerrey was known for bipartisanship in the Senate, some of his past positions might be a tough sell in a state where President Obama received 42 percent of the vote in 2008. Moderate Democrat Ben Nelson decided to retire from the Senate seat rather than face Nebraska voters again. Kerrey has spoken in favor of Obama’s health-care overhaul and supports a cap-and-trade system to limit greenhouse-gas emissions.

A Public Policy Polling survey conducted March 22-25 found Kerrey trailing state Attorney General Jon Bruning, his most likely Republican opponent, by 17 percentage points.

Kerrey, who declined to be interviewed, is battling TV ads by Bruning, Americans for Prosperity and others contending he’s an opportunistic outsider. He has done little campaigning in the state though has been airing ads that tout his ties to Nebraska and past reputation for bipartisanship.

Former Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel, R, said Kerrey has longevity in Nebraska and a knack for retail politics. Still, said Hagel, who won his seat in 1996 after he had lived 20 years outside the state, it won’t be easy for Kerrey.

“He doesn’t have the same liability I had,” Hagel said. “But he’s going to have to work very, very hard to pull this off.”

Thompson, who left the Wisconsin governorship in 2001 and served four years as President George W. Bush’s Health and Human Services secretary, has the broadest statewide name recognition of the candidates in the race for the seat of retiring Sen. Herb Kohl, D.

His election bid is a test of whether Wisconsin voters will support a centrist Republican two years after Scott Walker was elected governor on pledges to slash taxes and spending, said Charles Franklin, a pollster and visiting professor of law and public policy at Marquette University School of Law in Milwaukee.

As governor, Thompson overhauled the welfare system and established a school voucher program, which he promotes to conservatives as accomplishments. Still, some of his past positions — including expanding Medicaid spending as part of a state health-care overhaul and more school funding — are anathema to some conservative groups and Republican voters.

“The party has shifted in the time since he left office,” Franklin said.

Thompson led a field of Republican primary contenders in a March 31-April 1 Public Policy Polling survey, with 38 percent supporting him. Former U.S. Rep. Mark Neumann, his closest opponent, had 25 percent. Neumann is backed by the Club for Growth and a political action committee run by Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., a tea party leader.

Thompson had a narrow lead over U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin, the only Democrat running for the seat, in a March 26 Rasmussen survey. He had the support of 48 percent of 500 likely voters surveyed, while she received 44 percent.

In North Dakota, Heitkamp seeks to replace retiring Sen. Kent Conrad, D, in a likely contest against U.S. Rep. Rick Berg, R. As attorney general, she represented North Dakota and 12 other states in a lawsuit against tobacco companies that became part of a 1998 settlement.

Heitkamp has remained active in North Dakota politics in her years out of office. She has worked on three ballot initiatives, including one that required money from the national tobacco settlement to be used for tobacco cessation programs.

Though she has a slight edge over her leading Republican opponent, Rothenberg said, Heitkamp faces risks because Obama won 42 percent of the 2008 vote in North Dakota. Heitkamp said in an interview that she’s confident of her chances.

“North Dakota has always been a state that splits tickets and votes its interests,” she said.

In Maine, former two-term governor King leads in polls in the race to fill the Senate seat of retiring Republican Olympia Snowe. In a March 31-April 2 survey by the Maine People’s Resource Center, 56 percent of 993 registered Maine voters said they would vote for King over the next closest contender, Charles Summers, R, who had 21.8 percent.

King is stressing his independence and highlights an abortion-rights, pro-environment agenda that helped keep Snowe in the Senate for three terms. Republican Gov. Paul LePage’s election in 2010 on the strength of the Tea Party movement doesn’t reflect a lasting shift in voter sentiment to the right, King said in an interview.

He said he’s working to connect with a younger generation of voters and adjusting to a changed world of campaigning that has him hiring a full-time aide just to manage Facebook and Twitter outreach for his election bid.

“I’m going to be asking people to vote for me who never have before, that’s for sure,” he said.

Join the Conversation

42 Comments

  1. Angus King is a politician that has had  his hand in the taxpayers cookie jar since before he came to Maine.
     He took over the reigns of this state when it had a fiscal surplus, and left office with the state in the red for billions.
     His election to represent our state will result in one more straw added to the load that eventually will break the back of our economy.

    1. Maybe Angus should have gotten into the business of ripping off college students the way John “JOCK” McKernan is doing.  Check out who’s investigating and suing Education Management Corporation this week!

      1. Uncle Paul keeps bringing this up, but the fact is, Jock IS NOT RUNNING FOR OFFICE!  Angus is, and he is tainted.

        1. Is Angus King more tainted than Robert Nutting?  Nutting seems to be well thought of by state Republicans doesn’t he?   Politicians are only tainted when Republicans tell us they are.  Isn’t that correct?

          1. You offer nothing but “red herring” arguments.  Angus is tainted and you cannot defend that so you throw mud in other directions.  I am, for the record, no fan of either Jock or Nutting.

  2. Espousing an agenda of incomparable mediocrity, King, the environmental Khan of western Maine, has done more to improve his bottom line while pilfering the pockets of unsuspecting taxpayers since his disastrous sojourn at the Blaine House. This dyed-in-the-wool Liberal is a brazen proponent for infanticide, profligate spending and the welfare state. A cursory reiteration of King’s misadventures would be too exhaustive to enumerate in this short space and time; yet, one would do well to remember that he is no friend to folks who have to get up each day and work for a living.

      1. Like who? the BDN and almost every other “news” source in maine will not report on the other candidates.

        1. I know them all – they’ve been around for years – their political positions they have mostly already taken. 

    1. Glad you didn’t continue.  I’m  exhausted, leaping over your verbal hurdles. Pulled a muscle on “profligate.”

    1. the current senators hardly have republican values at heart. Their voting record is very clear on that.
      They’ve voted more like democrats for years now.

      maybe we’re just sick of corrupt politicians that will tell us all one thing, make us feel all warm and fuzzy, then stab us in the back.

      1. Then why didn’t the far right candidates with the House races last election? I notice Pingree and Michaud easily won their seats.

        1. The dying gasp of a nearly defunkt labor union flunkie; and the scary power of a billionaire who just bought 75% of the Maine Media group. 

          Neither democratic; but certainly totalitarian as in Nazi Germany’s National Socialism. 

  3. PoliSci 101 tells us that name recognition is huge, but I believe King will win primarily because he is the most intelligent, balanced candidate in the race.  It’s not possible to find a candidate that thinks “just like me or you” on every issue, so we have to vote for the person who can think critically, but measuredly, balance competing interests and strive to move Maine and this nation forward.  I believe Angus King has what it takes to be a true statesman.  Looking forward to voting for him – again!

    1. Re “I believe King will win primarily because he is the most intelligent, balanced candidate in the race.”

      What are the specifics leading you to believe that Angus King is the ” the most intelligent, balanced candidate in the race?”

      1. Intelligent:  Dartmouth undergrad, U. of Virginia Law School – two of this nation’s most prestigious educational institutions.  Articulate.  Successful.

        Balanced:  Socially moderate (pro-choice, supports basic safety net for our most vulnerable populations), fiscally conservative & pro business (vetoed labor backed changes to worker’s comp system and minimum wage increases above federal minimum).

        I also believe he is balanced because when I saw him in action in Augusta, he seemed to never pre-judge an issue.  He listened to both sides before voicing his own opinion, and always wanted to hear from the experts first-hand, not filtered through handlers.   He listens hard and asks really good questions. Open minded, intelligent, balanced.

        1. …and then his image of open minded fairness was first destroyed by the CAR TEST debacle and then shattered by his insistence on the toxic fuel additive, MBT, despite lawsuits on the West Coast showing how harmful it it when introduced into a water supply.

          He was closed minded, belligerent, and doctrinaire.

          His extensive ‘crony capitalism’ in regard to the Wind Energy Act are becoming folklore examples of corrupt government for our own good…uh huh!  

        2. Re “He listened to both sides before voicing his own opinion..”

          He may have listened to all sides, but whether any such listening affected his decision is unknowable unless he points to instances where his mind was not made up prior to his listening.

          Re his being pro choice

          How does he reconcile this with leaving open the door to voting with the Republicans in organizing the Senate?

          Re “supports basic safety net for our most vulnerable populations”

          As far as I can tell there are few if any candidates who do not support “basic safety net for our most vulnerable populations”.

          1. Seriously LP, I am not enrolled in a political party, but I know a lot of registered republicans who are pro-choice – or at least, their vision of limited government includes keeping the government out of  people’s reproductive decisions.  The caucus door is not closed to King because of that one issue; it wasn’t closed to Olympia.

          2. RE “The caucus door is not closed to King because of that one issue; it wasn’t closed to Olympia”

            The problem would be that  King’s vote could give the Republicans control of the Senate which would enhance the likelihood of legislation restricting choice.

          3. No matter which caucus any  U.S. Senator participates in (and Independents don’t have to join a caucus at all), on the floor of the Senate their vote is their’s and their’s alone.  They are free to vote their conscience on reproductive rights, or any other matter.  So no, King’s vote will not enhance the likelihood of legislation restricting choice; he won’t vote to restrict it.

          4. The issue is that there exists  a small but real  likelihood that King’s vote could determine whether the Republicans or Democrats control the Senate.    Were the Republicans to preside, whatever the Senate does will be much further to the right than were the Democrats to be in charge.  

            If you believe Angus King is so far superior to the candidates whose party affiliation is there for all to see, that you are willing to delegate to him the choice of which party controls the Senate,  it is of course your right.

            At bottom, it is, however, difficult to understand  the basis for your having such great faith in a person whose purported failings  have been laid out in comments attached to this and related reports and which such purported failings have not been disputed by his supporters.

        3.  Fiscally conservative?  Were you drunk for the eight years he was in control? Angus grew the size of Maine government more than any Governor in our history!

  4. Hey BDN, we know that you want your favorite corrupt politician to win, but how about reporting on some of the other Maine candidates?

    Why don’t you report on the fact that Mr. King has gotten quite wealthy on the programs that he set up while in office? Like his being on the board of directors or First Wind?

    We the people want true, unbiased journalism, please don’t let us down. 

    1. Maybe Angus should have gotten into the business of ripping off college students the way John “JOCK” McKernan is doing.  Check out who’s investigating and suing Education Management Corporation this week!

  5. Come the next election, all incumbent office holders and prior office holders need to be voted out. There needs to be new blood in the political spectrum, and a new way of doing things in a changing world that will crush the taxpayer at the whim of government. Vote Tea Party!

    1. Did you forget what happened to the Tea Party House candidates last election in Maine? They were clobbered. 

  6. Is the Senate majority determined by party registration or who they caucus with?

    The Senate is likely to be more evenly split next year so if the D-R or R-D split is 49-48 do the the 3 independents (assuming King Angus wins) determine the majority party?

    1. “Independents” have the choice of going it alone or with a party.  If they choose to caucus with a party that determines control.

  7. Will Angus go to the US Senate as the wind power Senator from
    Maine?

    If elected will he be pushing for even more federal subsidies
    for wind power, subsidies that helped Angus and his partner ruin a Maine
    mountain and line their pockets with our tax dollars?

    It was recently revealed that King and Gardner got a very
    questionable loan guarantee from the US Department on Energy for their wind
    power project.

    Is it his mission to push for more federal loan guarantees for
    wind power friends so more pockets are lined at taxpayer expense?

    Recall that every Democrat Representative in the Maine House
    recently voted against Gov LePage’s bill to remove the 100 mega watt cap on
    hydro power in Maine. They did this to eliminate lower priced electric power
    alternatives and to provide a clear field for more wind turbines on our scenic
    mountains.

    Their action was counter to the interests of every family
    and business on the Maine electric power grid.

    In similar fashion, US Senate Democrats have made
    several attempts to renew the Production Tax Credit in support of wind power and
    one has to wonder if King looks to be just another misguided wind
    power supporter in the US Senate.

    He may go to the Senate as an Independent, but his history of
    wind power involvement and connections make it impossible to distinguish him
    from a misguided wind power Democrat.

    Maine deserves better!

  8. The society section of the PPH showed photos of a gathering of Portland’s IMMIGRANT RIGHTS LAWYERS, and featured was Angus King, whose desire to loosen the barriers to immigration are well known.

    Opposite the photos were some of a real estate/development group…alas, Angus and Mary’s photos were conspiciously absent.

    Old liberals never die; they try to enter what remains of LIBERAL HEAVEN in Washington, D.C.

    1. And some ex-Maine governors just rip off unsuspecting college students.
      Maybe Jock McKernan will be dribbling his basketball on the prison courtyard.

  9. Key to control; coming from king means a return to an overregulated state government.
    There are already Maine companies planning a move if he gets elected.

  10. Why can’t we elect someone new who should know how the people of  Maine live. Not the one’s who already have put the shaft to us.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  11. Look at what Treasurer Bruce Poliquin has done for you and the State of Maine.  Reduced tax burdon, found significant waste and fraud, gone head to head with the unions, and has made this State more business friendly which will create good paying jobs in the future and make a better place for our children.  Why wouldnt we want that at the Federal level?

  12. Headline suggests that Angus King is a key to getting control of the Senate. Electing Angus King would keep control of the Senate in the hands of the Democrats! No matter what else you can say about him, electing him would NOT give control of the Senate to the Republicans, and that is what we need!

    Fiscally and constitutionally conservative Republicans must  take over the Senate. Electing Angus King will NOT accomplish this….

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *