GREENBUSH, Maine — The chance to sound off about a 14-turbine industrial wind farm proposed for the top of Passadumkeag Mountain drew between 20 and 30 landowners and other interested residents to a public meeting Wednesday night at the Greenbush Town Office.

Some of the attendees were residents of Grand Falls Township, the unorganized territory in which most of the proposed 42-megawatt facility, Passadumkeag Wind Park, would be located. Others owned property and camps on Saponac Pond or Nicatous Lake, some of the lakes and ponds that can be seen from the project site.

Wednesday night’s two-hour public meeting at the Greenbush Town Office was the first of two being conducted by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, Project Manager Robin Clukey, who works out of the agency’s Bangor location, said Wednesday night.

A second public meeting will be held sometime in early summer but has yet to be scheduled, she said. The DEP commissioner or deputy commissioner will be on hand for that session, she confirmed.

Among the concerns opponents raised during the first two-hour session were the project’s effect on scenic views, the potential for noise and light pollution and anticipated drops in property values — the same issues raised in other Maine communities in which wind farms were developed or are proposed.

Some of the attendees also pointed out that the area is a habitat for eagles and osprey as well as a flyway for geese, ducks and other migratory birds.

Jeffrey Harriman, who until recently lived in nearby Burlington, is a third generation Maine guide who has spent much of his life on Nicatous Lake, where he and his wife Theresa now own Nicatous Lodge & Cabins. He was among those who traveled to Greenbush for the meeting.

“I lived on Folsom Ridge and every morning when I woke up I looked over at Passadumkeag Mountain,” said he said. “It’s part of my life, that mountain. That and Saponac [Pond],” he said Thursday.

He is among those who do not want the turbines to be installed.

“It’s not like you can hide them,” Harriman said of the large turbines used in industrial power generation. “I’m not sure what the state of Maine was doing when they decided to go with them. We’re supposed to be Vacationland, not looking at gorgeous mountains with turbines on them. The sight and sound of these turbines is obnoxious,” he said.

“I’m kind of wound up about it. It’s another place around here dying just because somebody wants to make a buck at the expense of everyone who comes to Maine to look at the natural beauty,” Harriman added.

His family’s lodge and camps face away from the project site, “which is a good thing.” He worries that similar wind projects will pop up to the east of the project site — on top of Horseshoe, Sabao and Duck Lake mountains.

Harriman said the project, if approved, will ruin the views from Folsom Ridge, which he considers “the best views between Bangor and Katahdin. I was within a month of putting a house on Folsom Ridge [before deciding to acquire the lodge]. It would have been right in my face.”

“People in Bangor are going to see it,” he predicted, noting that he can see the glow of Bangor’s city lights, about 15 miles away as the crow flies, from the top of Folsom Ridge in Burlington, which lies due north of Grand Falls Township.

Harriman said Thursday that he does not think the project has many local supporters. “You might find somebody but I guess they didn’t think it was important enough to be there.”

“There’s no good side here for us,” he added, “Maybe the county [of Penobscot] will get money from the taxes but that’s the only benefit I see.”

Bob and Susan Bulay of Old Town also oppose the wind farm and attended the Greenbush meeting to raise their concerns. The couple has owned shorefront property on Saponac Pond since the 1980s, Bob Bulay said Thursday. Besides their own parcel, they are part owners of other nearby land.

They and other camp owners incorporated and have accumulated and protected more than 2.5 miles of shoreline in the area, Bulay said. He said the project would wreck the quality of life he and other camp owners now enjoy at the pond.

“We have quite a vested interest. We have created a playground. … The reason we could achieve this is because it’s been kind of an overlooked area,” he said. Passadumkeag Mountain, he noted, “is our beautiful backdrop.”

“Now, when I go out I can listen carefully and hear the animals in the woods, the beavers splashing, and maybe a frog or a fish jumping. If the project is built, peace and quiet at the Saponac will be replaced by the thrumming of turbine blades,” he said. The dark night sky will be filled with “a continuous line of flashing red and white lights and the reflection in the water of them.”

“This development is not good for anybody and it’s going to ruin our property values,” Bulay said.

Harriman said he tried to get representatives of the developer who attended Wednesday’s meeting to say if the project would be financially viable without tax credits, subsidies and other government aid. He said he did not get an answer.

Passadumkeag WindPark LLC applied for a Natural Resources Protection Act permit and a Site Location of Development permit in February, according to DEP officials processing the application. The project also is subject to approval from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and could be reviewed by other government agencies.

The application and supporting documentation can be reviewed at the DEP’s Bangor office or the Greenbush Town Office during regular business hours. Project documents also can be seen online at www.maine.gov/dep/land/sitelaw/selected-developments/index.html.

Written public comments on the application should be sent to Maine Department of Environmental Protection, 106 Hogan Road, Suite 106 Bangor 04401.

Join the Conversation

36 Comments

    1. Placing wind turbines on Maine’s mountains will not reduce coal
      consumption or stop mountaintop removal mining. Coal is used in other
      parts of the country as a reliable (albeit dirty) base load fuel,
      with some states deriving 75% or more of their electricity from coal.
      Comparatively speaking, New England is a minor user of coal. Maine
      has only one small coal-fired generator, powering a Rumford paper
      mill. It accounts for about one half % of all of Maine’s
      electricity generation. New England as a region gets relatively
      little of its electricity from coal. 

    2. Wind turbines will produce RECs which power plants can buy to keep burning coal when their emissions are out of compliance. Please educate yourself.

  1. Located in an unorganized territory, easy pickin’s. Property values and the scenic value of the region will be gone and it is not for our fear of dependence on fossil fuels. With a little research, one can see that the sacrificing of Maine’s assets are for the federal subsidies dollars and the auctioning of Renewable Energy Credits to out of state polluters.  Explore at http://ppdlw.org/
    You can fight this. Contact your rep. and senator and let them know what you think. Make them explain their views. Contact Rep. Turner at    RepBeth.Turner@legislature.maine.gov   and Sen. Rosen at   rrosen113@aol.com

    1.  In fact, P’keag is even more tantalizing than you suggest, deerrun. I understand all but one turbine is in UT (LURC’s jurisdiction) but they were able to place one turbine outside LURC’s jurisdiction so that the entire project would be judged and permitted by DEP.

      As a site that’s ripe for easy exploitation by out of staters, to the detriment of Maine and Mainers, P’keag mountain is unmatched! To defeat this project the best hope is the scenic impact on nearby “Scenic Resources of State and National Significance”.

  2. Take a deep breath Passadumkeag. There is lots of help available. A good place to start is the website of the Citizens’ Task Force on Wind Power in Maine.

    http://www.windtaskforce.org/page/i-m-new-what-can-i-do 

    It will take you to a listing of a number of local Maine wind groups. A good strategy is to review these sites and contact a group in your area of the state. There is often a good chance that members of that group will be in a good position to give you advice that is most relevant to the area in which you live.

    The Federal Production Tax credit, a massive taxpayer giveaway which the wind industry parasite feeds on is set to expire on 12/31/12. If a project’s construction can begin in 2012, they will be given 10 year’s worth of “free money”. If construction in 2012 can be foiled, they likely will withdraw.

    1.  Hi Penobscot. I think you may have it wrong about the PTC.

      I think a project must be  “generating” by 12/31/12 in order to receive the PTC.

      But I suspect the wind lobby will get the PTC reinstated in the next session, in which case it will probably be made retroactive so P’keag would qualify even if construction has already started at that time.

  3. If you think this is bad, please think about the proposed fifty 500 foot tall wind turbines that the Department of Environmental Destruction has permitted for the Oakfield / Island Falls area. This massive wind “farm” will overlook 2 of Maine’s most pristine wilderness lakes including Lake Mattawamkeag, where President Teddy Roosevelt first gained his love of the environment.  Why destroy Maine’s Natural Beauty in order to fatten the pockets of the wind industry executives and increase the federal budget deficit?  This is corruption on a massive scale – pure and simple!

  4. C’mon boys and girls. When faced with the choices of renewable, conservation, or continuing to use fossil fuels, let’s choose the one our kids will thank us for and the one which is responsible: fossil fuels! Let’s continue fighting wars in the Mideast which cost many lives of Mainers, other Americans, and the nationals in the country we are fighting. Let’s continue to pay money to countries that hate us (9/11 was conducted by SAUDIS!). Let’s continue to warm the planet which we can either pay for now, or later when it will cost A LOT MORE.
       Yes, let’s not accept  the shortcomings of renewables and conservation. Let’s continue doing what we have been doing for the last 40 years. Yes, let’s reject wind. We love our fossil fuels as long as we keep our heads in the sand as to the real and total costs of doing so.
     I have the right to make the stupidest choice possible and dammit, I will! 

    1. Gutting Maine’s scenic protections on the exaggerated belief that mountaintop wind turbines here are going to do anything meaningful about our activities in the Middle East IS a stupid choice, in my opinion.  As a practice, I generally want my choices to be based on some evidence that what I’m expecting to happen will happen.  Covering Maine’s mountains with wind turbines with the belief that it will stop our oil imports from the Middle East (which are already shrinking) lacks any supporting evidence.  It is a faith-based choice, not a fact-based choice.

      1. And, we have our own natural resourses right here in the USA if we’d only utilize them.  We can be self-sufficient as we should be.

    2. There is no justification for this illegal process initiated by LD-2283 (Maine Wind Law of 2008).
       
      If you don’t know about LD-2283, educate yourself on this issue.

      Fossil fuels  for electricity generation are of minimal use in  production here . The fickle trickle of wind produced electrons goes out of state in either case, even if you do not understand this basic  concept of electricity production here.

      This is a scam.

      The mountain is the sacrifice to ignorance.

      1. Very well said.
        It broke my heart to look up across the lake in Lincoln and see those monstrosities and what is it doing for the people in and around there.

    3. Placing wind turbines on Maine’s mountains will not enhance our
      energy security. Almost all of the fuels used to produce our
      electricity are sourced from North America. ALL are readily available
      in North America.
      Educate yourself.

    4. It isn’t the wind power that’s the entire scam.  It’s the profits entirely laid on the taxpayer subsidies.   Like most people, I’m all for it if 1.)  I don’t have to look at it or hear it where I have to pay a mortgage and live, or anywhere near my camp and 2.)  They don’t get a penny of State or Federal money and live or die on the actual profitability of the project. 

      Biomass boilers were a “good” idea, too.  Yet we had to pay Chris Hutchins over $20 million to NOT build a plant in the County years ago. 

    5. How do you propose for renewables to replace baseload generation? The most zealous pro wind propagandists do not even suggest that. If the US did not buy 1 drop more of oil from the Middle East ,China and India would buy it. The US would still be there with the military because it is BIG BUSINESS!!! As far as the Saudis, they own half of Houston. How do we stop dealing with ourselves? How do you think the wind turbines get here? They do not magically appear when Angus waves his wand. There is considerable C02 to build these things and ship them all over the world. Why do you propose increasing industrialization which put us in this situation in the first place? And you talk about the real costs.

  5. Are these really worth it?  I just have not seen the evidence that the power generated is making a difference in the lives of the average Maine citizen.  I care about the environment deeply, especially in a state where the scenic value is a major tourism draw, but I am not seeing solid proof that these are helping.  I never thought that I would say it, but one hydro dam would generate as much power as all these wind farms and concentrate the impact in one area.  Nuclear?  That would be my vote if the partisan bickering would abate.  Energy generation is going to have some drawback, let’s pick the one with the minimal impact and I don’t think it is wind.

  6. “I’m not sure what the state of Maine was doing when they decided to go with them.”
    They were fulfilling the wish list of various Maine special interests.  They were capitalizing on “free” federal taxpayer funded subsidies.  They were demonstrating how politically well-connected people can drive public policy for their own benefit.  They were giving us an example of what happens when  our legislative system is abused to slip something by the people of Maine.  

    1. Applicant:  
      Noble Environmental Power, LLC
      Noble Passadumkeag Windpark, LLC
      c/o Mr. Tom Swank
      8 Railroad Avenue
      Essex, Connecticut 06426

      Landowner:

      Penobscot Forest LLC
      77 Franklin Street
      Boston, Massachusetts 02110

      One more non-Maine company here to exploit our state for their gain?  (And Maine wind power advocates like to call this “homegrown” energy.)

    2. Back in 2008 Noble was over its head in debt. I believe an IPO was attempted but creditors ultimately restructured the debt, taking equity and management and board representation. 

      Current management includes:

      C. Kay Mann, CEO, President
      Mann served as Assistant General Counsel at Enron Wholesale Services and Senior Counsel at Enron Engineering.  (Of course the Noble press release did not mention her Enron tenure, only that she was with GE for a time.)

      John Quirke, Co-founder and Exec VP of Development
      Quirke co- founded Noble Environmental Power, LLC and currently serves as its Executive Vice President of Development. Mr. Quirke served as Managing Director, New York Project Development of Noble Environmental Power LLC.  (So he was in charge of NY development efforts when the NY AG’s office conducted their investigation into whether companies developing wind farms improperly sought or obtained land-use agreements with citizens and public officials, whether improper benefits were given to public officials to influence their actions, and whether they entered into anti-competitive agreements or practices. Ultimately Noble was forced to sign a Wind Developer’s Code of Ethics that the AG’s office developed.)

    3. Former Maine Atty Genl Janet Mills should be investigated for glossing over the Kurt Adams scandal.

  7. When will people get it? Wind will never replace hydro, fossil fuels or nuclear power. Not even along with solar or any other feel good solution!

  8. The DEP wind scoundrels and deceit artists are at it again.

    The public play and non-hearing uncivil Kremlinesque process is about to commence.

  9. Herre we go again, another area of the northeastern uplands sacrificed to the folly of wind, for the benefit of nobody but the developer who cashes in on the subsidies and selling RECs.  Because the wind law, PL 661 gives away Maine’s natural resources and beauty with the heinous “Expedited Wind Permitting” section, this is unstoppable and the wind zealot staffers at DEP are already inking the rubber stamp.

    This project has been in the works for years, but our state government chooses to let the wind thieves do their work behind the scenes instead of alerting the citizens.  Whose government is it?  The wind industry’s or the citizens’?  As ridgeline after ridgeline gets destroyed to put up machines as tall as 45 story Boston skyscrapers, Mainers must raise hell with their legislators about PL 661. 

    Immediate impact can be going on line or call to contact members of the US House of Representatives Ways & Means Committee, which just this week have been assaulted by the wind industry in a desperate ploy to once again continue the Production Tax Credit.  If this credit is allowed to expire, which it should if we are serious about reining in unnecessary spending, projects like this go away.  Industrial wind power has nothing to do with improving the environment or producing needed electricity but is simply a tax subsidy scam.

  10. The project was planned and rubber stamped years ago.

    Organize and fight for your rights, if you have any left , now!

    Infra sound and destruction of land and property value is assured.
    Your area is about to under go an illegal taking , illegal loss of  use and value   and damage to the populace.

    In earlier times this  would have caused a revolution.

    The DEP and private parties involved are in collusion.

  11. If these ventures were the solution to the energy problems that are supposed to be plauging us then it would be a different story.  All these things do is clutter the real beauty of the ares they infect.

  12. A vote for Angus King is a vote to have windmills on every montain in Maine. What do you think he is running for?

  13. Another Maine canoe trip threatened with wind blight. First they have the rude audacity to propose a wind project for the Downeast region which was thankfully rejected. The Oakfield windsprawl threatens the Mattawamkeag and Pleasant Lakes and canoe trips, now the Passadumkeag trip has developers slobbering for subsidies. Notice none of these companies are proposing wind turbines for the Emerald Necklace around Boston. Why don’t they develop their own backyards? Leave ME alone.

  14. I am only spend vacations in mid-coast Maine but looking at the webcams I can’t say the MARS Hill wind project enhanced the beauty of that area nor the ones placed on the island off of Rockland.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *