BELFAST, Maine — Alex Steed of Cornish had borrowed nearly $30,000 by the time he received a diploma from the University of Southern Maine. He’s working on paying off his student debt, the recent graduate said Friday, but at the end of every month he is broke.

“I live in Maine, where right now there’s very few job opportunities,” Steed said during a telephone press conference held to support congressional legislation to prevent the student loan rate from doubling. “And I think I have it pretty good, compared to others of my friends, who are faced with having to move out of the state to keep up with the money that they owe.”

The U.S. Senate will vote Tuesday whether to maintain the existing 3.4 percent interest rate for federally subsidized Stafford loans, according to Rob Brown of Opportunity Maine, a grass-roots initiative that aims to address Maine’s educational, economic and energy challenges.

If Congress takes no action, the interest rate on new student loans will double on July 1 to 6.8 percent. That would affect nearly 35,000 Maine borrowers, costing them $34 million per year, according to figures released Friday by Opportunity Maine.

In Maine, the average student borrower graduates with nearly $30,000 in loans, according to the Project on Student Debt’s recent report. That is the second highest average student debt load, after New Hampshire’s average loan of $31,048. However, when taking average income into consideration, Maine has the highest student debt burden in the country, said press conference participant Chris Lindstrom of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.

“Until the economy grows strong again, Congress must help Americans by preventing the interest rate hike,” she said. “Time is running out.”

The 2007 College Affordability Plan reduced the interest rate on need-based federal Stafford Loans from 6.8 percent to 3.4 percent, but the plan will expire this summer unless lawmakers take action, according to advocates of keeping the interest rate low.

But those opposed to keeping the lower rate include Scott Moody, chief economist of the Maine Heritage Policy Center, a conservative think tank.

“These student loans are already subsidized. What we’re talking about is subsidizing another subsidy, making it even bigger than it already is,” he said Friday afternoon. “We’ve been playing this constant, vicious cycle, where we keep subsidizing students to go to college, while the price [of college] keeps going up. It’s not really helping the student.”

Moody described college students as a special interest group that will reap lifetime financial benefits from their education.

“Why is it incumbent upon taxpayers to subsidize that?” he asked. “The Maine university system is already subsidized by taxpayers. At what point do you say enough is enough?

Advocates of keeping the interest rate at 3.4 percent include Jonathan Henry, vice president of enrollment management at the University of Maine at Augusta. He said that more than 80 percent of the school’s 5,000 students are highly eligible for federal student aid.

“Any change in the interest rate is going to impact their ability to repay,” he said during the press conference.

Although Henry said he acknowledges that the increasing cost of higher education in the U.S. has outpaced the general inflation rate and that colleges should do more to keep their costs down, keeping interest rates down is crucial.

“We need to be met halfway, with appropriations that make sense,” he said. “Keeping interest rates down just makes sense.”

Legislation passed in the House last week, but President Barack Obama has promised to veto the bill because it paid for the $6 billion cost of keeping the interest rate lower by eliminating preventive health care funding provided under the Affordable Care Act.

Lindstrom called this “partisan politicking.”

“We were against cutting a preventative health care fund to fund student aid,” she said. “We were disappointed by the partisan politicking around the issue. That’s why we’re asking and urging [Republican U.S. Sens. Olympia] Snowe and [Susan] Collins [of Maine] to do something different.”

On Friday, Obama gave a speech at a Virginia high school about college affordability, encouraging students to tell their members of Congress to work to keep the interest rate lower.

“The good news is, the Senate will vote next week on a bill that would keep student loan rates from doubling. And some Republican senators look like they might support it,” the president said. “I’m ready to work with them to make it happen. But unfortunately, rather than find a bipartisan way to fix this problem, the House Republicans are saying they’re only going to prevent these rates from doubling if they can cut things like preventive health care for women instead.”

Snowe said through a spokesperson that because the legislation potentially could be associated with husband John McKernan’s private business activity, she intends to simply vote “present.” McKernan is chairman of the board of Pittsburgh-headquartered Education Management Corp., which provides private postsecondary education at 108 locations in the U.S. and Canada.

On Friday, Collins said that there is widespread agreement that Congress and the president need to act to prevent the doubling of student loan interest rates.

“Congress and the President must put aside politics and come together to find a responsible way to pay for an extension that would keep these rates low to prevent an unsustainable burden on students and their families,” she said in a statement. “Education plays a vital role in opening the doors of opportunity to all Americans. But, the rising cost of a college education threatens to close those doors. Having worked at Husson University in Bangor, I know first-hand how critical student loans and Pell grants are for many Maine families, particularly for the most economically disadvantaged students.”

Join the Conversation

27 Comments

  1. What happened to all the jobs but no skilled labor. So many electrician Jobs we had to change the law to allow 2 helpers to work under one license?

    1. That was used to hire Illegal Aliens as slave labor for electricians. You pay these slaves $4 per hour under the table knowing full well they can never compete for jobs against the electrician since they are Illegal Aliens and cant get a license..

      1. Yes it will be a net lose of JOBS in Maine before a company from say New Jersey Would have to hire half the help local. This will do nothing to educate people it will only drive down wages. The myth of no skilled labor in Maine.  In the past employers would train people they needed . Fact employer are not willing to pay a decent wage. When Lemforders and BAC opened in Brewer they did not complain about unskilled labor they trained help. I thought it was republicans that always said they the free market of supply and demand work. Pay more for help you will get skilled labor . If you do not want to pay more train your help.

    1. 30k for a degree is nothing; how about getting an education, then remarking on how much it costs ?

      1. Sometimes I question the value of these Degrees .    I personally know people with 4 year degrees that struggle at simple math. Maybe the could do some things with a calculator . But no knowledge of how math works in the real world. Pay 30K why not just do online education and pay someone to take the class in your name? Having an education dose not prove you know how to think . It dose not prove you retained much of what you should have learned in school. 

          1. My issue is the price of education. The wasted Money on sports budgets . Umaine spends like $9,000,000 more on sports that sports bring in.  Another Issue I have is all the requisites for taking classes. One example I hold an extra class amateur radio license . I am also a licensed electrician . The electrical theory of the lic. I hold is so far beyond the scope of what is taught at EMCC but still I must take basic electricity 101 before I can take any classes I want at EMCC. Nonsense We need a way to test people it they are competent in a subject not make them take the classes not needed and give them credit for what they know. A lot of the Games with colleges are not designed to teach people more to drive up cost. It would be like telling an RN she need all the classes to be a CNA . It is not so much about teaching it is more about making money for the schools . If someone studies lets say statistics learned the subject on thier own . We should have a way to test if they know it and let them have credit for the class without paying for it. More education dose not always mean a better job. It also does not mean you know more about a subject than one who has a formal education. I know for a fact some teachers at the technical college level Have no formal education beyond High school . I could give you names .

    2.  Pouring more government guaranteed money into education does nothing but drive the price up.

          1. And everyone having an education is going to make jobs magically appear ? So spend 30k on education for everyone who is going to pump gas or stock shelves , Take care of trash.  We will always have jobs that do not need education . Being in debt will not help people in lower skilled jobs it will hurt them more. Was a time when the best(smartest hardest working) got into college now anyone can.

      1. I said nothing about pouring money into education…………  Do way with sport budgets that run millions more than they bring in  . Let kids learn self study subjects . If they can prove competence in a subject better than 50% that took the class give them credit.  When I wanted to take some classes I hit a way with all the required classes before I could take the classes I wanted . I did not want a degree just to take some classes .  Nonsense   Some classes are at about 6 th grade level but you have to take them first to prove you know the subject.   Seems more like a GAME to make more money off students.  In some subjects I have learned much more than some students who graduated. It will not let me skip the class.

        1.  You don’t understand that I agree with you.  The capitalist pigs in the ivory towers take all of the government money poured into education and increase the price to whatever the market will bear INCLUDING the government money.  The only beneficiary of the government quest to make college more affordable are the colleges.  The students end up paying the same out of pocket expenses they would have without the loans AND they end up with the debt.  Sounds suspiciously like the government generated housing bubble.

          1. Yes I believe government helped create the problem. Not that being said Banks and colleges took advantage of it. I have no formal education . But even I can see that nothing can rise about the rate of inflation for ever. Banks say the were forced to make high risk loans . No one FORCED them too. They always had the option to go out of business. I am selfemployed and if I had to be dishonest to stay in business I would just close my shop. No integrity in this world and Greed. I would much rather hire someone who wants to learn than someone with a college degree who thinks they know more than I do(even if they do).

  2. It is not fair to this country’s youth that in order to get any kind of decent paying job, you are required to have an education.  Nowadays “decent pay” is probably somewhere around $10 an hour.  When you owe $30,000, how are you supposed to pay for rent, food, gas, entertainment, bills, AND student loans, even if you are working 40 hours per week??  Many of the people who I know who have college educations can’t afford to live alone after graduation due to this fact, they move back in with their parents and hope to get ahead so they can venture out on their own someday.  I just don’t understand why we are setting the future of this country up for such economic disaster and failure, it saddens and sickens me.

      1. Hey, oldmainer, how about we cut whatever government subsidy you receive. Judging by your name, you are probably on Social Security and Medicare.  Do you think you paid in over your lifetime what you are now collecting? Not even close! I recognize a senior’s right to live to a ripe old age on our dime, but please spare us your indignation.  Show a little sympathy for the younger generation who are waiting patiently to collect their inheritance.

        1.  Wrong again.  I’m not collecting yet and judging by the way the pigs in Washington are spending I never will.  I’ve paid my bills and saved for myself and been penalized for it by the government drones all my life.  Now those who failed to plan want bailed out again.  Apparently it’s too much to ask that these whiny kids living in Mom’s basement forgo the latest video controller and pay their bills instead.  Time to graduate from diapers to big boy pants.

          1. You seem to have missed my point.  You certainly have not paid a sufficient amount of money into Social Security and Medicare that equals or surpasses what you will collect from each.  Old people are living so long and incurring exhorbitant medical expenses to do so.  These poor young kids today are left footing the bill in an economy that does nothing to reward them.

          2.  And you missed mine.  The way it looks right now I won;t collect anything and I’ve been paying in all of my life. Footing the bill?  The poor young kids are whining about paying their own bills.

            If I had been allowed to keep what I paid into SS and Medicare I would have plenty to support myself.  Instead, the drones in Washington stole it all and gave it to the whiners.

  3. We, as a society, have to make decisions which have far-reaching effects.  Scott Moody and other conservatives like the argument that public support for education allows the costs of education to rise requiring more and more public support.  The logic here is that by withdrawing public support, cost of obtaining a higher education will be reduced.  But what if withdrawing public support is more likely to make obtaining a higher education more expensive and therefore less likely for people in general.  The withdrawal of support could very well mean “death by a thousand cuts”, or as I learned today, something called “creeping normalcy”.

    If you read obituaries, you will notice that people born before World War II were unlikely to have college educations.  People born post World War II, the baby boomers, were far more likely to be college educated.  Are we turning the clock back?  Do we want to turn the clock back?  Here the “creeping normalcy” means an acceptance of less education as society’s norms.

  4. Collins destroyed the Postal Service now she is working on destroying the lives of college students too.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *