Gov. Paul LePage has signed a new mining regulatory bill, but that doesn’t mean mining is new in Maine. In fact, it has a long history in the state going back to the early 1800s, when iron and lead extractions added to the state’s better-known granite and limestone quarrying industries.
While renewed interest in metallic mining of gold, silver, copper and other metals in Aroostook County’s Bald Mountain triggered the new legislation, state officials say it was time to bring Maine’s mining regulations up to date.
“In the 20 years since those rules were put in place, the state has adopted new stormwater management, wastewater rules and quarry management regulations,” said state Geologist Robert Marvinney. “So the old mining rules were ready to be looked at again.”
The bill was signed into law last month. LePage does not set the scene for a sudden wave of swinging pickaxes and mechanical diggers. Rather, it puts into motion an overhaul of two-decades-old state mining regulations that will not be complete until 2014. And then, the rules must get the blessing of the Legislature.
Environmentalists are worried that the law will weaken current mining regulations.
Historically, one of Maine’s best-known metal mining operations was set off by the discovery of iron ore in 1848. It led to the Katahdin Iron Works operation in rural northern Maine, which continued into the 1890s.
Maine’s most recent metallic mining operations were conducted in the 1960s and ’70s. They included a zinc-copper open pit mine operated by Callahan Mining Corp. in Brooksville. Chemicals were used to extract the metals there, and the polluted Down East mine later became a federal Superfund cleanup site.
Kerramerican operated an underground mine for zinc and copper ores in Blue Hill, which operated until 1977.
That same year, Northeast Joint Venture discovered a massive metal deposit at Bald Mountain, which included a copper deposit estimated to be one of the most significant in North America, according to a history of mining on the state Geological Survey’s website.
Bald Mountain is situated on land that was purchased for timberlands by the New Brunswick-based J.D. Irving Ltd. in the late 1990s, said Anthony Hourihan, director of land development for the New Brunswick-based company. Since then, Irving has received inquiries from mining companies interested in Irving’s prospects for Bald Mountain.
Irving set out to find out whether mining would be feasible, and was told it would not be if carried out under the state law dating back to 1991, Hourihan said.
The law “was very restrictive and not reflective of what was considered best practices in the rest of the world,” Hourihan said. For example, it did not take into account new technologies to treat groundwater affected by mining operations, he said.
While new regulations are being developed, Irving will continue looking into whether mining is worth pursuing. Even if it’s found to be feasible, there still would be years of engineering work and permit reviews, Hourihan said.
“It’s safe to say [mining] is five to seven years away even if it’s deemed feasible,” he said.
While metallic mining has remained dormant since the 1970s, Maine produces ample quantities of sand, gravel, slate and peat, among other resources drawn from the ground. Among gemstones, Maine is well known for its tourmaline, the official state gem, and amethyst crystals have been pulled from a vein in the western Maine town of Sweden.
Exploration for metals has continued through the years in varying waves of interest. Companies have checked for deposits ranging from uranium and molybdenum to nickel and silver.
Environmental activists are leery of the new mining overhaul law, saying it weakens groundwater protection standards and cleanup requirements for mining operations.
Emily Figdor, director of Environment Maine, said the new mining law makes changes that could effectively be weaker than current regulations. For example, she said, it changes the definition of “mining area” so less of an area near operation would have to be restored.
“In directing the DEP to set rules, it weakens the framework for mining operations and paves the way for large open-pit mines,” Figdor said.
Currently, Maine’s mining regulations are shared by the Department of Environmental Protection and Land Use Regulation Commission. Those rules will remain in place until the new rules are developed by the DEP staff and then adopted by the Legislature, DEP Commissioner Patty Aho said at the bill signing. Aho promised “a thorough review of the best environmental regulatory approaches around the country to metal mining.”



How many more times are we going to allow business to pollute our water, air and soil for profit and then when they have gotten all the profit they can have the taxpayers clean up their mess?
This bill was advanced and voted into law on the basis of absolutely false information which is repeated in this article. Best practices in metal mining regulation are more closely aligned to what we already have than to what this outrageous law puts in place.
There are no “modern mining practices” that make metal mining any less disastrous in a place like Bald mountain where there are so many headwaters and groundwaters.
The advancements which have been made in metal mining make it more profitable and more feasible to mine a place like Bald mountain where concetratins are very light )by better targeting which areas might contain higher concentrations of gold than others but the basic process and its attendant toxicity to air ( mercury0 and water ( sulphuric acid) have not chnaged at all..those hazards are still there.
This law was ostensibly baesd on Michigans revised stutes..theirs , however, were revised to recognize the higher risks of metal mining and to put stronger regs in place..ours left all that out.
There is only one response Mainers should make to this outageous piece of corporate influence peddling..repeal repeal repeal and repeals we will..
This fight isn’t over
this outrageous peiece of profiteering will not stand.
Huh? The new regs haven’t been written yet, but they’re bad?
When people stop using metals, they can make a case. Untill then, it’s only NIMBY
Show me a strip mining site that is not heavily polluting and damaging to the environment.
Show me that you do not use any metals
Just because I use metals does not mean that any type of mining is ok.
Strip mining destroys the immediate ecology of the area by removing hilltops and burying streams and rivers. The water run off leaches many different types of poisonous chemiclas and carcinogens into the groundwater which may end up in people drinking water.
Yes, we use and need metals but the mining can be done in better, cleaner, more environmentally safe ways. The only reason strip mining is used is to increase the profits from the metals and speed with which the metals are removed frm the earth.
Do some research on existing strip mining sites and then make an informed decision. The type of gold mining they are intent on doing is very ecologically damaging but I think that really doesn’t matter to you.
I see. The rules are yet to be written, but you already know how much damage will be caused.
Mean while, lets not even think about where the resources we use come from, or how they are harvested, as long as it’s not in Maine. I stand by my NIMBY statement.
As for your last statement, I am actively involved in hands on projects concerning our woodlands and wildlife. I took today off from work to plant 100 ceders and 40 hemlocks to help restore winter deer habitat. Just what do you do besides expressing outrage on public forums?
The meeting last week at UMFK in Fort Kent was a joke. The drinking water rule Jim discussed was fine, the water will be cleaner then it was in the 1st place, but when asked the question where is the waste of the treatment going to go he could not answer. To extract gold out of rock cyanide is needed so where is that going to go.. Well we know the ore is going on the Irving train to Searport then loaded on ship and taken offshore to be processed. Where is the benefit to us.. We need to Stop John Martin in his tracks on this one.. he is corrupt and this is personal with him due to owing Irving 250,000 dollars… WAKE UP MAINE