LEWISTON, Maine — The six hopefuls wanting to be the Maine GOP candidate for the upcoming U.S. Senate race held with rapt attention a crowd of about 250 of the Republican Party’s faithful during a nearly two-hour forum at the Franco-American Heritage Center on Wednesday night.

Making appearances were Scott D’Amboise, a Lisbon-based small businessman and a tea party candidate; former Maine state Senate President Rick Bennett, an Oxford resident and businessman; Maine Attorney General William Schneider; Maine State Treasurer Bruce Poliquin; Maine Secretary of State Charles Summers; and state Sen. Debra Plowman.

The candidates touched on many of the hot topics of this year’s election cycle, but time and again came back to major issues: balancing the federal budget deficit and taking on former Maine Gov. Angus King, an independent, in the general election.

The only other individual mentioned as much as King during the forum was President Barack Obama.

“I can’t wait to take on Angus King in the general election,” Schneider told the crowd. “I know Angus King and Angus King is no independent.”

In his closing statements, Summers criticized King’s statement on a national television news show last week that he might not serve on any committees in the Senate to retain his neutrality.

“Can you please tell me what kind of arrogance a person has when they say they are not going to serve on a committee?” Summers asked.

All but Plowman, who was called from the forum early to return to the state Senate to vote, tackled the King issue, berating his terms as governor and pointing out again and again that King started his terms as governor with a budget surplus but left the state with nearly $1 billion budget shortfall.

The candidates proposed eliminating several departments or agencies within the federal government, including the IRS, the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, the Federal Reserve and the Transportation Safety Administration.

All said they opposed the federal Affordable Care Act, dubbed “Obamacare” by opponents. Each said they would vote to repeal it, provided the U.S. Supreme Court did not rule the act unconstitutional later this summer.

Summers and Schneider, both decorated veterans, touted their military service and highlighted their accomplishments as leaders in the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Army, respectively.

D’Amboise noted one thing that separated him from his GOP opponents: He was the only candidate who was in the race challenging incumbent and long-serving U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe before she announced she would not seek re-election. The others joined the fray after that.

Questions for the candidates were pulled mostly at random from a glass bowl by moderator Carol Weston, a former Republican state lawmaker. Weston held some questions for all of the candidates and presented them with several she called “popcorn” questions, which had to be answered quickly.

The candidates also shared their position on abortion rights. Summers, Schneider and Bennett said they were pro-choice, but Bennett said he never supported government-funded abortions. The others said they were firmly against abortion.

All of the candidates said they opposed federal government subsidies for wind energy development in Maine. D’Amboise said he opposed all government subsidies for business.

But the overarching theme for all of the candidates was the federal debt. Each said much more needed to be done in Washington to reel in government spending.

“Now we have a $16 trillion national debt,” Poliquin said, “with no plan to pay it back.” He said his experience working as state treasurer with Gov. Paul LePage to bring Maine’s budget to solvency, coupled with his business experience, made him the right candidate to take on that problem.

“I’ve been working hand in hand with Gov. LePage in Maine and we are fixing this mess,” Poliquin said. “The problems in Maine are the same as in Washington — they are just bigger [in Washington]. What we are doing in Maine is we are spending less, we are taxing less, we are regulating less and we are borrowing less.”

Plowman told a poignant story about working as a state lawmaker to change a policy that saw children in state custody being placed in foster care with strangers instead of relatives. She said she was threatened by the Department of Health and Human Services with a home visit to her own home but stood her ground.

Plowman said the policy was in place because the state received more money from the federal government when children were placed with strangers. She said the issue was being driven by the state’s budget needs and not the needs of children.

“Those are issues that I took on with great risk to myself and my family, because it was the right thing to do,” Plowman said. “It’s not budget-driven; it’s child-driven. When a child lays his head on his pillow in his grandmother’s house and knows he’s where he belongs, I can take some comfort in that because I stood up to DHHS.”

Bennett tackled King and Obama in one answer, noting King had endorsed Obama’s re-election. Bennett outlined four years of federal budget deficits under Obama and said a stagnant economy was hurting working families.

“The average family during the last four years has seen their income drop by $4,300, in real dollars, during Barack Obama’s presidency,” Bennett said. “This is a terrible indictment of Barack Obama’s presidency and Angus King has endorsed enthusiastically these policies.”

Bennett also urged party unity, as did D’Amboise who said while he differed with his opponents on some issues, he agreed with them on many. He called his GOP opponents “good people.”

Those in the audience had their favorite candidates, but many, such as Mike Willette of Sabattus, said they were still sorting it out. Willette said the choice was difficult for him, but he characterized it as a “positive one.”

“I think it’s a great choice,” Willette said. “It’s just a question of which one fills the bill in the end result, but they are all good, as far as my positions are concerned.”

To see more from the Sun Journal visit sunjournal.com

Join the Conversation

56 Comments

  1. There’s a gang of theives if ever I saw one, oops most of them are working for King Paul. 

  2. Good people who will be slammed, mischaracterized and demeaned by the ‘tolerant’ left. Watch for it.

    1. You might also want to watch for people like Poliquin that abusing Maine’s Tree growth program and continuing his own business while being State Treasurer, is  in direct conflict with the Maine constitution, showing that he is clearly all in for himself and the tea party Koch machine. 

      Watch for those people too. 

       He is not  “good people.”

    2. Pointing out the fact that the federal deficit should not be the number one priority of federal economic policy is  somehow an attack on the character of the GOP candidates? If they’re that thin-skinned, maybe public office ain’t for them.   

    3.  Okay then!!!!!!The only good people in this article that have been mischaracterized and demeaned are Angus King and President Obama.  How’s that?

  3. Poor Anes King being attacked by those big angry bully’s the GOP. The legacy if left behind for this . State all those wind mills that he is putting everywhere without a challenge. He is only thinking about us not his own pockets. He loves all of us he doesn’t know what party he represents. This paper is heading For the abyss..

  4. Any one of these candidates would do a far better job than Angus King or any of the Democrats in the field. They all agree that Obama/Pelosicare must go. They all agree that the federal budget must be reined in. It is easy to predict that King would join the Beltway spendaholics and do exactly the reverse. We simply cannot afford him.

    I’m voting for the one with the most experience who offers the greatest level of detail regarding what he/she would do in office.

    1. Having any ties to LePage  it the best way not to get elected. None of these GOP’ers have much of a chance. They attacked King because he is the front runner, and he hasn’t even said much yet. They all know LePage has hurt them politically. It is prob a good thing for them they didn’t get their voter fraud laws passed, because that is the only way any one of them can win this election.

    2. Think Progress: “In January 2009, before President Obama had even taken the oath of office, annual spending was set to total 24.9 percent of gross domestic product. Total spending this year, fiscal year 2012, is expected to top out at 23.4 percent of GDP.”

      “Here’s another interesting fact. Taxes today are lower than they were on inauguration day 2009. Back in January 2009, the CBO projected that total federal tax revenue that year would amount to 16.5 percent of GDP. This year? 15.8 percent.”

      “One last nugget. The deficit this year is going to be lower than what it was on the day President Obama took office. Back then, the CBO said the 2009 deficit would be 8.3 percent of GDP. This year’s deficit is expected to come in at 7.6 percent.”

  5. You got my vote Debra Plowman, the DHHS is the same in Mass. All for money and don’t care about the kids. It’s very sad we’ve become this way.

  6. Of course the Republicans, when talking about the Federal deficit, tout their records as having fought Bush on the 2 wars, the tax cuts for the rich, and the changes in Medicare part D; and how much they opposed these budget busters, and how public they were in their opposition. And, of course, the Republicans talk about how they opposed Bush’s deregulation of the financial system, which brought down the economy and was a major cause of the deficit because tax revenues tanked; and how public they were in their opposition.
      This, of course, probably won’t happen because these Republicans did not oppose these policies. They supported them. And they want us to vote for them?

      1. Worse than that. They talk economy, economy, economy when running for office. When they get in, we get tax cuts for the already wealthy, meaningless bills like the federal Protection of Marriage Act, talk of the death of Christianity and all kinds of social agenda bills. Nothing for the middle class at all.

        Take the current US House of Representatives. Not a single bill for reviving the economy, unless you want to count the tax reductions mostly for the rich, which are supposed to help us somewhere in the future. But bills to strip money from Planned Parenthood come out every week. So all their talk about the economy is for their own party to hear. Thinking folks already know what will follow instead.

  7. Reagan tripled the deficit, Bush 1 doubled it, Clinton ended his presidency in the green, then Bush 2 doubled the deficit again with 2 wars, tax reductions for the rich, and unrestrained corporate largess.  Blame the Democrats?  I think not!  The GOP is nothing but a bunch of revisionist liars.

  8. Paul LePages gravy train. Take from the poor and give to the rich. You want to talk welfare abuse , take a look at the wicked truth and past of this bunch. They have lined their pockets with millions of taxpayer dollars .

    1. Poverty is an industry created by the Dems and they are the ones lining their pockets with taxpayers money… lowering tax rates takes away from the Dems so called non profits.

        1.  Over $1,000,000 of LIHEAP money goes to feed the bureaucracy, and that’s just in Maine no telling how much the Fed behemoth takes in addition to that.  Remember that all that the bureaucracy does is write the checks.  They do not purchase, store, or deliver the oil. 

  9. I am so grateful to all of these Mainers for their willingness to stand up against the decades old leftist partisan policies that have all but destroyed the middle class here in Maine. I am ready to vote for any one of them but one will reveal his or her central core with more clarity and conviction than the others.

    To all the candidates…..For the purposes of this initial “family” challenge put your blinders on and run your own race! Please tell us why you are the best one for the job.

    We’re out here paying attention.  Keep the standard high and you will be heard. Whomever of you wins will assuredly have the full support of all your current challengers as well as enough sufficiently convinced voters that we can strengthen the cause of personal liberty, responsibility and the opportunities our Freedom provides us. Thank you!  

    1. The middle class has been battered by the off-shoring of our manufacturing, taking jobs and income away,  tax breaks for the very wealthy and a war started based on a lie.  This has nothing to do with “leftist partisan policies.”

      We are indeed  paying attention.  Most of us also see the tea-party Koch Brother manadates being held up and put forth by the LePage disaster and crew. 

      The fall is serving up lame duck soup for the LePage mistake. 

      Worst administration in Maine’s history.

      1. “”This has nothing to do with “leftist partisan policies.”””
        ***************************************************

        We disagree. Tell me how your heart, legs and skin (for instance) can function without all the other organs that function as the total body? Specialized logic, cherry-picked for the purposes of partisan politics that fails to see the whole picture is the same thing as whistling past the graveyard.

  10. If Schneider wins this we will sure miss him as our AG.   Good man, great pick by Governor Paul LePage as AG.

    1. I especially liked it when he fought against the bill that will allow me to afford health insurance in 2014. It’s cool, I don’t want health insurance anyway…

    2. In Maine, the Governor does not “pick” the Attorney General.  The AG is a Constitutional Officer appointed by the Legislature, and the majority party usually puts up a member of their own party.  I personally would prefer for the AG to be popularly elected (and thus less politicized), but that would take a Constitutional Amendment.

      1. Right on.  I’ve been advocating popular election of the AG and other officials for some time.

  11. What they say is irrelevant because it’s so obviously untrue. Republicans gained control of the House claiming they’d work hard to fix things and instead we just got attacks on contraceptives and NPR. Look at both Ryan and Romney’s set of wishy-washy proposals and both actually increase spending in areas and increase the deficit as well. They’re serving a few and not the people.

    1. Bennett’s claim cannot be verified by the internet I have. He claims average income has dropped. Among the many pages i looked at, none reported this. Reliable figures show the US ave. per capita income rising from 40,947 in 2008 to 41,663 in 2011.

       Couldn’t find ave. household income like Bennett claims, but I suspect his number if a made up one. Republicans have a very hard time with facts. One Republican belief is that it doesn’t matter what the facts are, if I believe it, it must be true.

  12. King should not be hard to take on.    He could have saved Maine some money during the good times instead of spending.   He thinks wind power is sustainable.   This has been a  notion that never worked in the seventies and he wants to saddle us with a policy that did not work  forty years ago.  This man has had his chance to represent Maine and has failed miserably.

    1.  How is the GOP any different? They want to give tax breaks to the “job creators”, which is just a spiffy new name for the failed Reagan policy of trickle down economics that didn’t work 30 years ago.

      1.  DOH, guess you conveniently  forgot the facts of the amazing turnaround that followed the Carter years and which set the stage for ending the USSR competition. It was wonderful. You need to study a little economic history.

        1. Das funny, that was government spending on the military not economics. Reagan caused the largest gap between the 99% and 1% in U.S. history. Trickle down didn’t work, if it wasn’t for the tech boom we would be worse off then we are now. The Tech boom wasn’t a benefit of trick down either. Microsoft and Apple were started in garages, not by CEO’s. If Reaganomics had continued, the GOP would have gotten exactly what they wanted, an end to the middle class.

        2. Economic history.
          When were the highest interest rates in US history? Hint:after Carter, but before Bush I.
          When have tax cuts for the wealthy increased wealth for the rest of us in the form of economic growth? Hint: the number is between 1 and negative 1.
          How many times have the financial institutions been bailed out by the taxpayers during republican administrations? How many Democrat administrations? I’ll give you this one, 2 Rs and 0 D. Where did all that money go?

        3. I have studied economic history.  The 90’s were much better than the 80’s and did not end with massive government deficits.  Also, Reagan raised taxes multiple times to adjust for the results of his initial tax breaks.  He was too liberal to be involved in todays GOP.  The cartoon Reagan that the GOP has created is similar to the cartoon Obama they have created.  Neither of them ever existed.

  13. Seems that the candidates are giving too much credence to Angus King–wonder if the latter got his signatures in–
    Scott D’Amboise is the one who stepped up two years  ago to challenge Olympia, knowing that her votes were in step with Obama and not in favor of Maine and her people.  He is the one we should support, although the other five are good candidates, despite Summers, Schneider and Bennett being for the killing of our unborn, calling it “pro-choice,” which means the baby has not choice. 

  14. The logo GOP for me, describes this group very well. Especially considering the majority of Americans have figured out, the party of NO only votes yes when it financially benefits them personally and the corporations that they sold their souls to, there by giving them the status of the me,me,me, party. It seems as though “GOP for U.S.” would have been a more convincing logo, although being deceiving at the same time.

  15. “‘Can you please tell me what kind of arrogance a person has when they say they are not going to serve on a committee?’ Summers asked.”

    Translation: How are we going to get our pork if he’s not there with his nose in the right troughs!

  16. Hah!  I find it so amusing that the current adminstationi’s AG,  Secretaries of State, AND Treasury have all thrown their prospective hats in the ring to replace Olympia Snowe – against Angus King, no less.

    Pulhease.

    They have no more chance than ‘the (R)ominee’ does against Obama.

  17. Ya gotta’ love it when the candidate’s spend their time all complaining about how bad things are and attackingthe other candidates’ but show absolutley no plan of their own. That’s Tea Party, any way you cut it. Same for the right-wing GOPr’s. All complain and cry but no reality based plan to work things out. And people wonder why Angus is making headway !

  18. “… D’Amboise said he opposed all government subsidies for business. ..”

    Then D’Amboise is getting my vote. 

    1. you guys are living in La La land.

      if it weren’t for the giant subsidy known as the Fifth Fleet your gas would cost a lot more and American oil companies would be profiting a lot less.

      “… D’Amboise said he opposed all government subsidies for business. ..”

      don’t make me laugh

  19. The closing remarks by Charlie Summers were absolutely spot on! We NEED a senator like Secretary Summers!

  20. Is it true? Did a Republican actually state that he would not support subsidizing businesses. I’m surprised they haven’t excommunicated him from the GOP. But then again, he was ready to challenge Snowe who has openly disdained the extremist, no compromise attitude of her fellow legislators on the basis that she was too middle of the road.

  21. All three of these candidates would make a good senator, but at the end of the day Charlie Summers wins out over Schneider and Poliquin.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *