As I campaign across Maine, I find that the usually discerning Maine voters are more demanding than ever of those of us seeking office.
This makes it challenging for a candidate, but that is the way it should be. I am heartened that voters are not settling for glib, easy answers in these difficult times. Politicians will solve the big problems only when the voters tell them they must.
In his oped “We must disenthrall ourselves” (BDN, May 19, 2012), Angus King, an independent candidate for U.S. Senate, repeats the obvious — the U.S. Congress is “broken” — but he only offers up his self-proclaimed independence and personal judgment as a solution. His main point is to explain why he will not answer even the simplest of questions: which party will he caucus with and why he might not serve on a committee. His answer really comes down to: “Trust me.”
While citing the dysfunction in Washington, he offers no proposals to fix it. On the issues, he says he will vote “[his] conscience and with [his] best judgment for the interests of Maine.” It seems he expects us to trust him on exactly what that might mean. He likes to say that he will call them as he sees them. Again, he seems to expect us to rely on his superior judgment.
Let me be clear about where I stand. I am running for the U.S. Senate because I believe this to be the most important election in a generation. Our nation is at a tipping point because of rampant overspending by our political leaders — of all political persuasions. Our bonded debt is approaching $16 trillion. Even the Chinese have stopped buying our paper. The only bank foolish enough to buy our debt is the Federal Reserve. On top of all this, we have unfunded liabilities in federal employee retirement, Social Security and Medicare — all adding up to more than $100 trillion.
For me, everything must be on the table for spending review. I would start with corporate welfare — subsidies and special tax advantages for well-heeled corporate interests that can afford the lobbying clout to buy special favors. Included in corporate welfare are not just bank bailouts and loans to energy companies such as Solyndra but also crop subsidies for multinational agribusiness, loans to Boeing and GE from the Export-Import Bank, and cash-for-clunkers-type programs. While eliminating corporate welfare will not solve our spending problems, it is important to take a stand against crony capitalism.
Here are a few specific reform ideas I will support in writing to help fix the U.S. Senate:
• Pass a budget. The U.S. Senate, while spending a trillion dollars plus each year more than the revenues coming in, has refused to pass a budget for four years. This is an outrageous failure of leadership. I believe that if Congress does not pass a budget, they should not be paid.
• Pass a balanced budget amendment to our Constitution. It is the only way to tie the politicians’ hands when it comes to more spending.
• Filibuster reform. The noble idea of the filibuster created by Jimmy Stewart in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” is fiction. One lone, passionate senator speaking on the floor until hoarse is not the way it works. Now the filibuster can be invoked before legislation is even brought up for consideration. That is silly and should be changed.
• Nongermane amendments. Senators too often tack on amendments to legislation that are totally unrelated to the question at hand. This allows major legislation to be held hostage and confuses the public about why a bill may be supported or opposed.
• Holds. Individual senators now can anonymously put holds on executive branch nominations or legislation. These should be abolished, except perhaps for very short periods, and even then the name of the senator putting the hold on and the reason should be made public.
Maine people recognize that King already has endorsed President Barack Obama, whose economic policies have left the average American family with $4,300 less per year in earnings than they had four years ago and left our children with $5 trillion more in debt. As governor, King repeatedly passed majority budgets with the Democrats, shutting Republicans out of the process.
Mr. Independent? I think not.
It is time to “disenthrall ourselves” from glib politicians who won’t address the issues or propose solutions and simply ask us instead to trust their judgment. Unfortunately for Maine, we trusted Angus King in the past. The result was massive government spending. Left without answers and only the option to trust his judgment, once Maine people thoroughly review his record, I believe the answer to King will be simple: Thanks, but no thanks.
Rick Bennett is a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate. He lives in Oxford.



Mr Bennett, Debra Plowman has called for a militia to protect citizens from the government. Do you support Ms Plowman’s views?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llLmRwqPzk0
I really wish Mrs. Plowman would give better detail on just what she envisions the militia that she is in favor of looking like? Would it resemble The Army, The Navy, The Air Force? Would it be a combination of all three? Or would it be a bunch of poorly trained and equipped old guys dressed in three corner hats trying to take on the most powerful military in the world? Some time you have to wonder about the sanity of some of these politicians.
We’ve always had a great Defense and we’ve always been well-trained. There is NO excuse for the explosion in dollars we’ve been throwing and wasting on Defense.
You know it would really help if you commented on what I was commenting on which was Mrs. Plowman saying she wanted to form a militia to protect us from the Government. It really does help if you read the entire comment rather then just what you think it said.
Do you have a relevant and on topic comment?
If you don’t like my comment how about you grow a couple and tell me about it?
So the best you can do to attack Rick Bennett, Senate candidate and author of this Op-Ed, is to attack one of his primary opponents and try some weird guilt-by-non-association rhetorical backflip? That’s brilliant political strategy right there. Bravo to you sir.
There are three types of voters in Maine. Those who want more form gov. Those who want much less gov. Those who simply do not care.
I have two more types of voters for you — those that believe your brand of nonsense and those that ignore it ;)
That would be those who want more gov and those who do not. I mentioned those. I tell you what stand at a polling place this election ask any person who they voted for and then ask WHY. You will see very fast why what I stated holds water.
Mr. Bennett – good start. Now tell me more.
You got my attention – especially on corporate welfare and your honesty about our debt and spending addiction.
Where are you on second amendment issues?
How about the 10th amendment — and issues like Obama care? Will you vote to repeal it?
Do I agree with every point?
I’m not sure yet – but at least I can see some specifics and make a decision based on something more than platitudes.
There is one issue we agree 100% on–and that is the last thing we need is Angus King—we have Senate full of them—and good for you for reminding us why!
I completely agree with Mr. Bennett, especially on two issues:
1) We need to pass a budget in Washington!!! This is OUR money!
2) A balanced budget amendment would serve to protect everyone – especially the people that depend on the government for assistance for legitimate reasons!
Are you kidding! Angus King is the only rational choice for impartial judgements on Maine’s behalf in Washington! I am just incredulous that anyone will NOT see through Mr. Bennette’s republican, partisan snipes. This attitude is percisely why we need Independent Angus for Maine!
Abigail Norling
Norridgewock
Pick a side, this isn’t switzerland, Angus is a dem all the way anyways.
lmao!!!!
Mr. Bennett, have you signed or plan to sign Grover Norquist’s tax code (no new taxes ever for anything)?
GREAT QUESTION!
Give me a break. “Tax pledge” Are you kidding me? Are you trying to say that taxes and federal government spending are even connected?
They are not.
Norquist needs to update his strategy and get a spending and deficit pledge. That is where the damage is being done.
By the way, Bennett signed the pledge while in the Maine Legislature —where it actually matters,
I will not vote for anyone who has signed the traitorous pledge to Norquist. Norquist, the man who recently said that all that is needed in a president is someone with ‘digits’ to sign the bills placed in front of him. Is Norquist running America? Seems like he runs the Republicans.
It’s high time for more independents in Congress; the sorts of politicians neither party seems to appreciate any more.
Mr. Bennett is right on the money, we have trusted Angus in the past, unfortunately people dont realize that he has burned this State time and time again.
If Mr. Bennett has what it takes to go toe to toe with King, he has my vote!
From the London Observer, but apropos to Maine and the US today:
“At the heart of this calamitous strategy is a wholesale misdiagnosis of how the market economy functions and a complete failure to understand why the financial crisis took place…. For a generation, business and finance, cheered on by US neoconservatives and free market fundamentalists, have argued that the less capitalism is governed, regulated and shaped by the state, the better…. The lesson of the financial crisis is that this is complete hokum that serves the political and personal interests of the very rich. It has been an intellectual carapace to permit the creation of dynastic personal fortunes while dismantling the social contract…. ”
“The lesson of the financial crisis is unambiguous. Risk – the existence of incalculable unknowns – cannot be handled by markets alone. It has to be socialised…. For 20 years, the titans of high finance assured governments, central banks and regulators that no longer did they have to worry their bureaucratic heads over systemic risk in finance…. The genius innovators of finance, informed by Nobel prize-winning free market economists, had created new financial instruments that worked so effectively distributing risk around the financial system that banks could grow their balance sheets to hitherto unheard of levels, underwritten with ever-less capital.
It was dangerous nonsense, but it did serve to make those at the top of finance very, very rich….”If your campaign offers nothing but the same lunatic fascination with propping up the scheme that has redistributed wealth, income, and opportunity to the very wealthiest in the State and the nation, as repeated tax cuts to the wealthiest ensures, YOU ARE THE PROBLEM. How about some honesty? The “rampant spending” you decry from the Obama Admin — not that I justify the many perverse things this admin has and is doing, but speak the TRUTH about actual govt spending, taken from the BEST DATA available on actual spending — has been in response to a GREAT RECESSION. In case you haven’t noticed, and many wealthy in the political class HAVEN’T, the financial crisis has left millions of Americans in dire straights… not that that matters much to you… so long as YOU are doing well. ANY measure of govt spending by this admin whether it be from the Fed, the GAO, the CBO shows LESS spending from this admin, IN SPITE OF THE RECESSION AND STIMULUS SPENDING, than the previous ramping up of spending for illegal WAR and crony capitalism in the war efforts and security state industries by the Bush regime. Couple that with massive tax cuts to the very wealthiest, as EVERY analysis of any credibility shows, contributed the LION’S SHARE of the deficit. HOW ABOUT A MODICUM OF HONESTY? Is that too much to ask. Apparently so.And while you are at it, how about an end to the smearing of opponents you REPUBLICANS have distilled to an art form?
Even though one of Bennett’s statements seems to be spot on, the biggest, by far, corporate welfare is for oil. Where does he stand on oil subsidies? Solyndra was a drop in the bucket compared to what the oil industry receives. Much of the disfunction in Washington has been caused by his fellow republicans who refuse to compromise on anything and have clogged the wheels of government. Adding another Tea Party republican to this morass is simply a waste of a precious vote. They are the problem, not the solution. As a Norquist devotee, he has cast a shadow of suspicion and doubt over any positive sounding pap he may have regurgitated. Attacking Obama for our economic woes is totally ridiculous given the mess generated by eight years of Dubyuh – the man who started a war just to get re-elected, knowing full well that this country would not turn its back on its president during war time.
IndependentLY wealthy Democrat and 1%er King Angus has already donated $5,000 to re-electing Democratic President Obama in the last eight months and $6,000 to the Democratic National Committee just so far in 2012. King, of Maine, says he is not sure if he would caucus with the DEMs or GOPs if elected to the U.S. Senate. Really ??? Who exactly is supposed to be fooled by this boldfaced lie to Maine voters ? ! ? King Angus II has a son named Angus. Guess who Angus III used to work for, before working for the Clinton Admin and then for First Wind? Hold your breath – Li’l Angus worked for the dreaded Bain Capital.
Please … ANYONE … tell us what were the great accomplishments of King Angus in 8 years as Governor here in Maine apart from some Apple laptops for children in school plus leaving Baldacci over $1.5 BILLION of annual debt after King inherited a large annual state surplus …. because King did way TOO MUCH UNAFFORDABLE SPENDING for 8 years !.
Typical Rick Bennett – simple Republican talking points never any real solutions.
1. The US government has had a budget passed by Congress every year. The non-budget is simple Republican nonsense – their normal combination of propaganda, lies, mischaracterizations, and stupid far-right off the screen assumptions.
2. Republicans have filibustered at a record pace since 2010. Never in history has the US government be prevented from dealing with a crisis by one party’s extreme and false ideology. If its broken, Rick Bennett helped break it.
I will not vote for King, but I certainly will vote against any Republican who does not pledge to resign if he does not support tax increases on the wealthy and spending cuts to corporate welfare.
What bizarro world do you live in. The Senate has not had a budget in 4 years.
Balanced budget amendments can be dangerous if the remedy is always to raise taxes to achieve balance.
I envision an “unless in the case of an emergency” loophole big enough for politicians to drive a truck through. Zero-based budgeting would be a good idea, though.
Instead of an opinion piece on Maine voters this is nothing more than a “vote for me (and against King) because…” campaign piece. I hope that BDN offers this free advertising to all the candidates.
As for his specific comments, while I agree in theory with his reform proposals his insistance that King declare his caucus intentions doesn’t bode well for Bennet putting the good of the nation ahead of the interests of his political party.