What’s the matter with Massachusetts that would make Mitt Romney want to pretend he had never been its governor?
Yes, it presents some image problems for the conservative candidate Romney now wants to be. The last time a Massachusetts governor ran for president, it did not go well. Still, it’s what Romney has. Had he not been (to use his preferred term) “CEO” of the 15th-most populous state in the country, Romney would have a weak claim on the Oval Office.
Resume inflation can get you fired, but resume deflation is downright un-American. It goes against human nature to overlook one’s own accomplishments. Romney remains a man of mystery next to the president. Barack Obama’s no Joe Biden, but he has become known to us in some fundamental ways after four years being beamed into our living rooms.
Romney’s tack, however, is not modesty. Reticence this great makes people wonder what he is hiding. To himself and to the world, he’s a businessman, nothing more, defined by his years leading Bain Capital. He willingly ignores whole pages of his CV.
Sooner or later, Romney is going to have to present himself whole — and that includes the parts he would rather airbrush out of his past. This means coming to terms with his most valuable experience as a presidential candidate: being governor of Massachusetts.
Romney will have to take the good with the bad. Yes, he closed a $1.2 billion budget gap — but he did so by cutting spending (largely on education) and raising revenue (largely from the middle class). He also raised the state’s debt by more than 16 percent and created fewer jobs than all but three states.
We haven’t even gotten into social issues, where his current positions represent not so much a flip-flop as a belly flop. During his 1994 campaign against Ted Kennedy for Senate, Romney pledged to be more gay than Kennedy. Running for governor eight years later, Romney favored abortion rights and gay rights.
The one miracle Romney could claim for himself, he dare not mention.
Largely due to the health care reform law passed while he was governor, Massachusetts has the third lowest infant mortality, the very lowest child and teen mortality, and the second lowest teen birth rate in the country. It has the second highest rate of access to health care for children.
A more agile politician could claim that he got the current “Massachusetts Miracle” started. The state now ranks fifth in job creation, with a relatively low 6.3 percent unemployment rate. It is first in the United States in reading for fourth-graders and eighth-graders, and fifth in the world (ahead of Singapore!). It’s the sixth most hospitable location for business. Its rates of divorce and suicide are among the nation’s lowest.
What a party — in both senses. For Republicans, apparently, it’s better to be seen with a businessman George Will calls a “bloviating ignoramus” than with a public official who might remind people that you were once one yourself. Better not to admit to having once required an individual mandate than to explain how it can help provide millions of people with health care. Better not to have actually balanced a budget if it took raising taxes to do so.
The rule is pretty simple: The less public service you have engaged in, the more qualified you are.
In Senate races so far this year, the establishment Republican in Nebraska lost to the Sarah Palin candidate in the Republican primary. In the Indiana race, conservative Treasurer Richard Mourdock beat Sen. Dick Lugar. In the Texas campaign, the candidate of the Republican establishment, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, has been forced into a runoff by tea party backed candidate Ted Cruz. Ever been a moderate? Be afraid. Be very afraid.
It looks as if Romney believes he can get to the White House without reconciling the varied and contradictory phases of his political life. Other politicians have changed their views once taking office, of course. Bill Clinton triangulated with a Republican Congress and reformed welfare.
The issue is not whether Romney as president will contradict the positions of Romney as candidate. Of that we can be confident. But Romney is a man with no fixed positions from which to deviate. It’s harder to accuse someone of intellectual hypocrisy when you don’t know where he stood in the first place.
Margaret Carlson is a Bloomberg View columnist.



Now that the Bain capital attack has failed. Lets move on to Massachusetts and see what we can dig up there. The Obama campaign and these journalist apologists are so transparent.
Businessmen generally do not make particularly good politicians. Their management focus is on short-term results, rather than long term policy planning. Running a business for the benefit of shareholders is very different from running a national economy for the benefit of over 300 million citizens. That is why most presidential candidates with business backgrounds fail to succeed and why those who did get elected haven’t been highly rated. As to the much ballyhooed efficiency of the private sector, many who have worked for or seen large corporations from up close know that they can be just as inefficient as government. After all, that is why Bain Capital became successful.
I think it would have behooved President Obama to have had at least one person in his administration that had business rather than purely academic experience. Not one paid adviser, department head , cabinet person outside of the figurehead business advisory council (which had no power) has business experience. Not one. An economy can choke on life long bureaucrats and academia.
“In Obama’s Cabinet, a full one-third of positions are occupied by appointees who, judging by their bios, have significant corporate or business experience”. See: Politifact.com
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/dec/02/glenn-beck/beck-says-less-10-percent-obama-cabinet-members-ha/
Lawyers, family members and consultants…..I suppose are business people, after a fashion, but they don’t know how a business works. So even though the claim may be true… because of the manner it was presented makes it false. Hmmmm.
There are no CEO’s, no CFO’s …… hows that.
Many CEO’s and CFO’s cannot run a business. A job title does not say it all.
Was it mentioned in the article that the house and
senate in Mass is overwhelmingly dem and that they
wouldn’t let a mouse sneeze unless it benefitted them.
Next you will be telling us Lizzy Warren is a full blooded
Cherokee Indian. Bloomberg Review….hmmm….didn’t
the wonderful mayor named Bloomberg just outlaw large
sodas? Go have a super sized before you can’t.
Oh, Margaret…would any D get the time of day from their base if he/she pointed to his/her time as governor of Idaho and all the great Conservative-ish things he/she did?