As state treasurer, and a commissioner of Maine State Housing Authority, I was relieved last week when the limited review by the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability found “no indications of fraud” in its narrow assessment of the 2007-11 MSHA expenditures for sponsorships, donations, memberships, conferences and travel/meal expenses.

Unfortunately, the OPEGA report clearly confirmed a pattern of wastefully spending taxpayer dollars at MSHA.

About $458,400 was spent on sponsorships and donations to 73 organizations, some of which “did not appear to have a direct or clear connection to Maine Housing’s mission.” About $115,000 was spent on conference registration, travel and meals for 62 employees attending 89 mostly out-of-state events, with “some conferences seemed only indirectly related to the [MSHA] mission.”

About $309,400 was spent on all-day team building events, diversity training, holiday-retirement-birthday celebrations and other professional development activities, with OPEGA questioning if some expenses were “necessary uses of Maine Housing funds.”

I reject the argument that such spending should be measured against the MSHA $14 million annual operating budget. Any amount of wastefully spending someone else’s money is just what it is — wasteful spending. This is Maine; every dollar counts. Plus, the money doesn’t belong to government. It belongs to the Maine taxpayers, and they work darn hard for it.

Beyond the demonstrated pattern of wasteful spending at MSHA, there’s an important question not asked in the OPEGA report: Did MSHA lose its focus to help as many of Maine’s most vulnerable families as possible with their critical housing needs?

The public debate over the past six months about the cost and availability of affordable housing in Maine has revealed two stunning facts. First, some 1,100-square-foot apartments have cost taxpayers up to $292,000 each. Second, there are roughly 6,500 disadvantaged Maine families on waiting lists to move into subsidized units. Another 800 fellow Mainers sleep in homeless shelters on any given night.

The new MSHA board is acutely aware of this growing problem and is addressing it. The board has been working quickly and diligently with the staff to rewrite the building standards to drive down the cost to construct low-income housing in Maine.

Expensive solar hot water heaters are no longer required. Costly and unnecessary green building standards have been eliminated. Extra consideration is given for projects located within roughly one-quarter mile of a bus stop, instead of more expensive in-town locations.

Bonus points are awarded to projects that include financial incentives to reduce the cost to build the low-income apartments, so more can be built. Cost over-runs are no longer regularly approved. We expect the effect of these changes to be lasting: help more at-risk Maine families while treating the taxpayers fairly.

The new board is closely examining MSHA’s speculative carbon-trading scheme developed over the past few years, which hopes to generate funds to weatherize Maine homes. Is more than a million dollars spent on computer systems and carbon consultants worth the cost and distraction?

The board is working with the staff to correct the horrid living conditions discovered at many Section 8 apartments across the state. MSHA has known about these problems for roughly four years. Section 8 units are subsidized by taxpayer dollars. MSHA is paid by the federal government to ensure that our most vulnerable families have safe and livable Section 8 apartments to call home. The authority failed miserably in this responsibility.

The work at MSHA is important and serious business. The authority is often the last buffer between our most vulnerable families and homelessness. The new board is being truthful about the authority’s problems and is helping to fix them.

Thank goodness the narrow OPEGA review showed no illegal activity. It did, however, confirm wasteful spending of limited taxpayer dollars. And, sadly, MSHA itself has shown how needy Maine families can be overlooked when an organ of state government takes its eye off the ball.

Bruce Poliquin is the state treasurer of Maine and a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate.

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

  1. I don’t understand Bruce Poliquin. He is a tea party darling but his emphasis on eliminating green energy projects is extremely wasteful of both future tax revenue and environmental protections. He appears to be the personification of  the cut spending now and pay huge consequences in the future politics…typical tea party shortsighted blindness.

    1. Would those green projects be the increasingly unpopular wind projects? 

      Or the Federal 522m loss on Solyndra? 

      Maybe it’s the Mass taxpayers that got stuck for 32m for Evergreen Solar? 

      Possibly that’s why people on the Turnpike toll story got so many ‘scare off the tourist’ remarks?Many of my Mass friends don’t want to see that. Neither do I (and I’m expat County). 

      Typical pie in the sky left wing “I want it now!” attitude. We can afford it! I want that house now! Whoops!

      Slow down. When the market makes it worthwhile, it’ll happen. The nanny govt obviously isn’t able to do it when they snap their fingers, so maybe Poliquin is just being cautious.  :)

  2. Give it up,Bruce!!! There was no fraud. You should be the last person accusing anyone of wrongdoing.

  3. So he has no celebrations for those under his supervision? No money spent on professional development? Does no diversity training? What expenses does he himself receive reimbursement for? I do applaud the curtailment of lavish spending. That is necessary. It needs to be austerity for all in these difficult financial times. But there is a responsibility to see that employees have the tools they need carry out their jobs. And, like many of us investing in upgrades that will make our homes more energy efficient the state needs to ensure that new housing has what it needs to save the taxpayers money on fuel assistance, water usage, etc. So I wonder what costly green building standards have been eliminated. Maybe this one: The building envelope must be sealed to prevent air leaks. http://www.mainehousing.org/docs/housing-development/2008greenbuildingstandards.pdf . The document lists them all with cost ranges. In my initial scan I did not see anything outrageous. Just sensible. Oh, those solar water heaters? They pay for themselves. “If you’re building a new home or refinancing, the economics are even more attractive. Including the price of a solar water heater in a new 30-year mortgage usually amounts to between $13 and $20 per month. The federal income tax deduction for mortgage interest attributable to the solar system reduces that by about $3–$5 per month. So if your fuel savings are more than $15 per month, the solar investment is profitable immediately. On a monthly basis, you’re saving more than you’re paying.” http://www.energysavers.gov/your_home/water_heating/index.cfm/mytopic=12860  So, this is just pomp and circumstance from a political candidate? Once again leading us to believe something that is not quite correct is actually factual in their imaginary real world. Is there anyone out there that will tell it straight?

  4. “The board has been working quickly and diligently with the staff to rewrite the building standards to drive down the cost to construct low-income housing in Maine.”  
    translation: LePage’s buddies are getting paid with our taxpayer dollars to think about building some cheap pre-obsolete boxes so they can skim more off for their already overstuffed larders.  

  5. He knows how to save his OWN money ask the taxpayers he jilted money out of in his fraudulent tree growth plan. I know he plans on paying back the taxes he owes, and releasing the plan he has (had) for his timber harvesting………Yeah  that will happen when Speaker Nutting repays us the taxpayers the 1M+ he owes us.

  6. “This is Maine; every dollar counts”. This from a man who abuses the Tree Growth laws, and now when caught, proposes to put his 10.2 acres under “Open Space”. You are living in a glass house Bruce. Quit walking around naked. 

  7. Tax cheat 

    Political Witch Hunter 

    Shameless self-promoter

    No Senate seat for you

    Yessah

  8. Two thumbs down.  Never gonna make it.  Stop taking campaign contributions now because it just makes you look bad.

  9. “[…] Any amount of wastefully spending someone else’s money is just what it
    is — wasteful spending. This is Maine; every dollar counts. Plus, the
    money doesn’t belong to government. It belongs to the Maine taxpayers,
    and they work darn hard for it.”

    That is the message that will win the Senate election.

    I am not running for the Senate.  I can say it.  It is not just wasteful spending, it is profligate spending bordering on theft.  Maine politicians vote -to borrow money- because the lending institutions make large campaign contributions.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *