Maine doctors will have access to patient X-rays, mammograms and other medical images regardless of their location as part of a new electronic archive described as a nationwide first.
The archive is expected to free health care providers from the hassle and cost of copying scans to CDs when a doctor wants to review patient medical images taken by another provider.
Piloted by HealthInfoNet, the state’s health information exchange, the archive is being tested by three health care organizations. The pilot kicks off formally on Thursday at MaineGeneral Medical Center in Augusta and Waterville, followed by Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor and Cary Medical Center in Caribou later this month.
An estimated 1.8 million X-rays, CT scans, MRIs and other medical images are generated in Maine each year, according to HealthInfoNet. The three pilot hospitals and Central Maine Medical Center in Lewiston, which was involved in designing the pilot and plans to participate, generate 1.4 million of those images.
Medical images are stored and accessed through a number of different repositories and networks across the state, making it difficult to share them among health care organizations. Providers sometimes can access other providers’ medical imaging networks but may not know to look for a scan in the first place or have trouble finding it.
Easier access will mean doctors don’t have to wait for medical image records and can more easily track changes in patients’ health over time, such as the growth of a tumor.
“The fact that [a patient’s] provider has full access to all the prior images and reports collectively, can go quickly in real time and look through the images, see the trends, see the cancer growth, see whatever it is they’re looking at and then make a clinical decision, is extremely powerful,” said Todd Rogow, HealthInfoNet’s director of information technology.
Difficulty viewing medical imaging records can lead doctors to rely on only the most recent medical image scan, rather than the patient’s full history, he said.
If a patient had a scan at Eastern Maine Medical Center, for example, but later went to another hospital for treatment, his imaging records may have to be burned onto a CD and toted to his other doctor, Rogow said.
Hospitals also use different viewers to display medical records, which aren’t always compatible.
If all goes well with the pilot through the summer, the service will be rolled out statewide by early 2013.
“It opens up the entire statewide inventory of images for our providers,” said David Silsbee, chief information officer at Cary Medical Center. “It’ll be most valuable for our radiologists, since the radiologist is seeing a new [medical image] on the patient here, and they can access all prior [medical images] that patient has had done throughout the state. They can make a much more informed decision about whether they’re seeing a new condition or a pre-existing condition or if a condition has changed.”
Many health care organizations have developed private medical image exchange capabilities but Maine is leading in its effort, said John Halamka, chief information officer of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School in Boston and chairman of the New England Healthcare Exchange Network.
“To my knowledge, no state has implemented a public image exchange,” he said.
HealthInfoNet is partnering with Dell to host the cloud-based archive. Dell will foot the bill for the hardware and storage during the pilot phase and providers will pay for images by subscription after the statewide rollout.
The archive is expected to save $6 million over seven years by sparing providers the cost of storing and transporting medical image records, plus the expense of paying staff to hunt for them.
The service also is expected to cut down on repeat tests would save money and limit patients’ exposure to potentially cancer-causing radiation given off by some imaging scans.
A primary care doctor, for example, could log on to the health information exchange to see if a patient needing a chest CT already was scanned at the local hospital, Silsbee said.
“In a case like that we can save a patient a couple thousand dollars and some radiation exposure,” he said.



Nice idea, but presents a BIG risk for compromising medical confidentiality.
The huge numbers of drs., radiologists, techs., IT persons, etc. that will have access to this system and patient’s medical info, AND possibility that those with access will misuse for their access for personal or curiousity reasons that violate patient privacy! HIPA and other medical confidentiality laws are only good for the few that actually get caught.
Risk of patient privacy being compromised is likely why other Boston etc. hospitals haven’t done this yet.
Hope they give patients the choice of ‘opting out’.
My first thought was hope it was with permission only. Maybe you just need an implant with all your data.
You must go to the website and opt OUT. You are already enrolled. Betcha didn’t know that did you?
http://www.hinfonet.org/patients
As a healthcare provider, in my experience, Healthinfonet is junk. Most patients have no information at all, which makes it useless. The system is extremely glitchy, and is frequently down for maintenance. I’d estimate using HiN is useless in about 80% of cases I load the website.
I’m all for convenience, but potential confidentiality violations are more of a concern than my convenience. Plus, how hard is it really to “lug a CD 2 miles”?
I’d be interested if it could contribute to reducing the cost of care, but with hospitals that aren’t able to communicate whether or not a patient has had a chest CT that costs 2 thousand dollars…I have to wonder if the problem is with convenience, laziness, or sheer stupidity – especially when you consider how many things must be pre approved and recommended by a primary care physician first. How would they NOT know?
Lugging a CD two miles isn’t hard. Heck, lugging a CD 360 miles isn’t hard.
Lugging a CD 360 miles and then having your distant über-specialist’s computer fail to read the disc, on the other hand? That’s hard, and then – as you leave more or less empty-handed to begin the long trek back home, having wasted your own and your specialist’s time – you begin to wonder why you’re using the hand-carried CD method to convey simple graphical data across a few hundred miles in the year 2012.
Next the State will be lobbied by insurance companies to look over peoples medical records. Just wait. The program is probably funded by insurance compaines.
That is precisely my concern. Once insurance companies get access, can they do a ‘background check’ on any potential policy holder and consequently, jack up the premium or refuse coverage altogether simply because an x-ray shows arthritis or a mammogram shows some benign condition? Or how about an otherwise healthy person who once got an MRI for a bum back or knee? While it would be great for health care professionals to get quick easy access to records, the possibilities for abuse of this system are endless.
Of course this will be controlled by insurance…….what in our life isn’t? You are also correct that they have the ability to charge you anything they darn well please for a premium whether it’s your health, car, house or motorcycle. The insurance companies are not regulated at all and run this country!! NOT a good deal for the consumer!!
The new health care law prohibits this practice. Now we just have to wait and see if the SCOTUS upholds the law. If not, insurance companies will continue business as usual and deny care and deny policies based on preexisting conditions.
It would go farther than that when Insurance companies would call employers and “suggest” layoff of employees who raise the rates for a company group. A practice which is clandestine and never admitted.
I live in Houlton, but all of my specialists are down around Bangor. This system should work if it is done correctly. It is a pain to have to go to the hospital, ask for the CD, come back another day to pick it up and then make sure I take it with me.
Every healthcare provider I see, either here in Houlton or down by Bangor ask me on the spot if I want my information to be included in the HealthinfoNet. I can opt out right then and there.
Only medical providers should have access to this. As long as it stays that way, I see no problems with it.
At least with a system like this, you know who is looking at your records by long in info. Can you say the same about the current system?
As has previously been pointed out, this would be a gold mine if it got into the hands of insurance companies. As it is, doctors have already provided confidential patient information, far beyond the need to know, to pharmaceutical and insurance companies; this just made that job easier and, potentially, more tempting to medical providers to make some quick cash. The vast majority of providers are honest and above this, but it only takes one or two to compromise the system of patient confidentiality.
There is nothing stored on computers with internet access that is private.
“It’s just to make the records more secure and readable. We will not share your private information.” I said this would happen from day one.
Right up there with”Honestly farmer, I was just helping that sheep over the fence”.
There goes my privacy….
Just to clarify, these picture archiving systems are closed, available only to physicians caring for the patients in participating facilities. Eastern Maine Medical Center is already offering such an image sharing system with hospitals and health centers who refer patients to us. Our system currently includes 12 active participants, 10 hospitals and two health centers. An additional 14 facilities in our region have interface capabilities with EMMC’s system, so that images can be shared from other picture archiving systems when patients are transferred. This latest development at HealthInfoNet will apply a single statewide approach to regional systems that are already working very well to serve the needs of the patients, reduce repeat imaging exams and consequently the cost of care.
Sorry, meant to mention that one of the hospitals in our system is St. Joseph Hospital, so the example in the article is wrong. Patients don’t have to “lug CD’s two miles” between us. Those image files are shared electronically and available to physicians at both hospitals within the same picture archiving system.
Jill, are you saying that the company doing this integration of archives cannot access their own programs and servers? And that information traveling from point A to point B cannot be intercepted or hacked?
I can’t speak for HealthInfoNet about their product. I have suggested to them that comments posted here indicate lots of concerns about info security and that they need to share more information about their efforts in this regard. Amy Landry, below, works for HIN and she suggests the program’s website below for more information that may help answer your questions. Thanks for the question! It’s important.
HealthInfoNet’s system is only available to health care providers in Maine. The goal is to make it quicker and easier for your health care providers to share your medical information when necessary to support your health care. Insurance companies are not given access to patients’ records nor do they fund the organization. HealthInfoNet receives its funding from the health care organizations that use it to provide care for their patients. Images, just like the other information in the system, are accessed only when needed to support patient care. Learn more at http://www.hinfonet.org. Most patients choose to have their information available in HealthInfoNet, but it’s not for everyone. Patients can opt-out at http://www.hinfonet.org/optout, or the next time they visit a participating provider they can fill out the opt-out form available at registration.
HealthInfoNet’s system is only available to health care providers in
Maine. The goal is to make it quicker and easier for your health care
providers to share your medical information when necessary to support
your health care. Insurance companies are not given access to patients’
records nor do they fund the organization. HealthInfoNet receives its
funding from the health care organizations that use it to provide care
for their patients. Images, just like the other information in the
system, are accessed only when needed to support patient care. Learn
more at http://www.hinfonet.org. Most patients choose to have their information
available in HealthInfoNet, but it’s not for everyone. Patients can
opt-out at http://www.hinfonet.org/optout, or the next time they visit a
participating provider they can fill out the opt-out form available at
registration.
HealthInfoNet’s system is only available to health care providers in
Maine. The goal is to make it quicker and easier for your health care
providers to share your medical information when necessary to support
your health care. Insurance companies are not given access to patients’
records nor do they fund the organization. HealthInfoNet receives its
funding from the health care organizations that use it to provide care
for their patients. Images, just like the other information in the
system, are accessed only when needed to support patient care. Learn
more at http://www.hinfonet.org. Most patients choose to have their information
available in HealthInfoNet, but it’s not for everyone. Patients can
opt-out at http://www.hinfonet.org/optout, or the next time they visit a
participating provider they can fill out the opt-out form available at
registration.