WISCASSET, Maine — The survivor of a deadly knife attack in Waldoboro in April 2009 was awarded a nearly $3.7 million judgment in Lincoln County Superior Court on Friday.
Tracey Neild was nearly decapitated when Corina A. Durkee and Earl D. “Buddy” Bieler III attacked her and cut her throat. Neild’s companion, Rachel Grindal, was killed in the attack, which the Maine assistant attorney general described in the 2010 murder sentencing as a bloodbath.
“Tracey survived a vicious attack that left her permanently disabled and her friend dead,” said Sumner Lipman, who represented Neild in the case. “She will never escape the brutality of the night she was attacked, but today the people responsible have been held accountable for the pain and suffering they inflicted.”
Justice Jeffrey Hjelm awarded Neild $2 million in general damages, $384,512 for medical expenses to date and $274,560 compensation for lost income. She also was awarded $1 million in punitive damages because her attackers acted with malice. The total award was $3,659,072.
It was one of the largest civil judgments ever awarded in Lincoln County, Lipman said.
Neild, 35, still can speak only in whispers after her throat was slashed three years ago by two people she had thought were her friends. But she was able to use her voice last week when she faced Bieler, now 27, and Durkee, 45, in court.
“It was hard,” Lipman said. “But obviously we felt it was important they be held responsible.”
Neild, who declined to speak with the press, still lives in Waldoboro. When asked how she is doing, Lipman said she is still suffering from pain and anxiety caused by the attack and will never be able to return to work or a normal life.
“She’s still alive, but she’ll live for the rest of her life with these disabilities,” Lipman said.
He said it was unclear how much money Neild actually might receive. In 2010, Durkee’s criminal defense attorney requested the state pay $4,000 for his client’s mental health evaluation, stating that the court had found her indigent after reviewing her finances. That request was approved.
“It’s more a matter of principle, that they were responsible for what they did to her,” Lipman said. “Tracey was pleased, because she felt vindicated in that the judge found they were responsible, and put a figure on it. But also, the money isn’t going to take away her injuries.”
MaineCare and the Maine Crime Victims’ Compensation Program have helped Neild with her many medical bills, but certain bills are not covered, according to the attorney.
“She has tremendous financial obligations,” Lipman said. “But she’s lucky to be alive. It was their intention to kill her.”
He said that during last week’s hearing, Bieler and Durkee acted as their own attorneys.
“Buddy [Bieler] said, ‘I’m sorry. I know I did it,’” Lipman recounted.
But Durkee did not apologize to Neild or accept responsibility, and instead tried to delay the hearing, the attorney said. Her request was not granted.
“Neild is also entitled to general damages for past and future pain, suffering and loss of enjoyment of life,” Hjelm’s judgment, dated June 5, reads. “Neild’s injuries were grievous. She has undergone many surgical procedures, and more are anticipated. She can now only speak in a whisper. The deep psychological scars of the terrible attack are documented in the evidence.”
At the time of the attacks, Neild had been a student working to obtain a degree in social work. If she had gotten that degree, she expected to earn an annual income of $30,000, Hjelm wrote in the judgment.
But that quest was interrupted on the night of April 19, 2009, when Neild and Grindal were violently attacked in Neild’s driveway by Durkee and Bieler, who at the time were romantically involved.
The couple had mounted an hours-long crime spree which began when Bieler tried to collect on a drug debt from a woman in Warren.
Then Durkee and Bieler had gone to Goodnow’s Market in Waldoboro, where Bieler brandished a handgun at the cashier and stole some alcohol. They then went to Neild’s Controversy Lane home to collect some money they thought she owed them.
No one was there, so Durkee and Bieler entered the home without permission, went through Neild’s drawers and cabinets and stole some items, according to court documents filed in connection with the murder trial.
When Neild, Grindal and a friend named Shantelle Quint arrived at the home later that evening in Grindal’s minivan, they interrupted the burglary. Neild confronted Durkee, who was sitting in Neild’s car, by pulling her out and telling her to leave, according to an affidavit Neild filed in the civil lawsuit against the two. Bieler then grabbed Neild and threw Quint to the ground while Grindal was in her minivan.
Bieler got into the van, where he forcefully threw Grindal’s 2-pound dog into the dashboard. He stabbed Grindal in her torso and neck, Neild said in the affidavit.
Although Neild has stated her belief that Durkee jumped on her back and cut her throat, DNA and blood spatter evidence collected at the scene showed it was Bieler who wielded the knife.
Meanwhile, Quint fled the scene, pursued by Bieler. She made it to the next-door neighbor’s house and begged them to let her in because “two crazy people are stabbing two other people,” according to a motion filed in 2010 in the criminal case.
Both Durkee and Bieler ultimately pleaded guilty to murder and attempted murder charges. Bieler was sentenced in May 2010 to serve 55 years in prison, and Durkee was sentenced to 15 years in prison for her role as an accomplice.
BDN writer Christopher Cousins contributed to this report.



This may be a stupid question – and if so – I apologize, but where is all the money coming from that she has been awarded?
I don’t think it’s stupid……I was wondering the same.
I can see when a lawsuit is brought against a huge corporation or law firm that they can pay. But I am just speculating that between the two that have been held responsible for her injuries they probably don’t have $37,000 let alone $3.7 million.
Me too…
Pyrric Victory though it is, it is still a victory. If by some future and further injustice either of the criminals gets parolled, they will not have a penny to their name. Karma would be sweet if one of them has an inheritance down the line.
—
May this debt follow them all the remaining days of their lives.
I suppose maybe if one of them wins the lottery. other than that a total waste of time and money to sue them.
It is a show pony. She may get a little something if the two have anything but being the state is footing the bill for them I am guessing she will get zip.
Good question.
This is a monetary award which is rendered regardless of ability to pay. The extreme and horrific injuries this woman sustained merit a large financial award, which she will probably see very little of. The two who are serving time for this horrendous act will have to forfeit a certain percentage of what they make in prison and if by some miracle they have money when they get out of prison, it will go to the victim. We can all hope that these scumbags win the lottery because they would have to turn it over the victim. Here’s an idea, lets buy lottery tickets and send them to these two losers in prison. How nice would it be if they won a million dollars and had to forfeit every red cent. That would be a minor vindication compared to what this victim has suffered through but it would at least represent a sort of karmic justice.
She won’t see a penny unless the people who did it own homes or land that she can take.
If or when these people get out of jail she can make a claim on any income.
I think bills from things like this should be handed to the people who did it not the victim.
It’s situations like these that make me believe in the Death Penalty. Our crime rate is growing by leaps and bounds.
1. Results are inconclusive on whether or not the death penalty actually deters violent crime. 2. Maine’s crime rate is not growing by leaps and bounds. http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/mecrime.htm
Edit: I’m sorry if this came across as condescending, I did not intend it to be. I think that it is an interesting discussion to have, on the validity of the death penalty and its potential beneficial effects. However, I think it is important to recognize that Maine is a relatively non-violent state, and has been for a long time, and all indications are that it will continue to be a relatively non-violent state for years to come. With that being said, I’m not sure what need there is for a death penalty. I’d be interested to hear more from you about it.
The problem is everyone just assumes that crime is increasing, when in fact it is decreasing. The internet and our insatiable thirst for all that is evil and wrong has combined to give the “perception” that only bad things are happening throughout the state and world. We now hear of a stabbing in Lewiston within hours of it happening, when fifteen years ago it never would have been news in this area. Perception and reality are two totally different things, we must never forget this.
cite your evidence as proof that crime is decreasing. where I live it has increased10 fold.
…..
I’ve lived in Bangor 60 yrs…we had one murder in 1963, and nearly no crime other than that for many years before and after. 10 yrs ago, local crime rose greatly, and has continued to. Coincidentally, that is when the methadone clinics opened in this area bringing hundreds to Bangor who were still actively using, along with the one or two who were getting treatment. There are statistics on increasing crime locally, as well as statewide. We never had a Bangor convenience store or pharmacy robbery 10 years ago…now they happen regularly….often drug related. If you check the court news, there are more drug related crimes than any other kind….10 yrs ago that column was all driving offenses.
It seems like there is more crime because the BDN reports on anything now …..just know if you do anything against the law you will be in this paper no matter how small the crime …
Which murder was that in ’63’ ?
A housekeeper at the Bangor House, middle age lady, still remember her name as it was a huge story….Effie McDonald, had not an enemy in the world, strangled, and no leads on her killer ever…maybe even the boston strangler they suspect came here for a bit….as his murders were going on at that time.
a judgement is one thing…collecting it is another.
While these two are in prison whats going to stop them from claiming this debt and filing bankruptcy? This sounds a little crazy. Plus it doesnt sound like he’s getting out and if she gets out she’ll be getting all kinds of State assistance until she finds a men and everything will be in his name.
In case someone is interested in their story or make a movie out of it then she will get paid. But you are right, we can not get ketchup out of a turnup…
Good luck collecting.
good for you tracey, i’m sure it doesn’t take away the pain and trauma you’ve gone through and still continue to work through. love to you!
Murder a man and burn his body = 7 years in jail.
Bieler got 55 years for murder. Excessive length of prison term.
Durkee got 15 years for accessory charge. Excessive term also.
With that in mind Bieler and Durkee may have been victimized by the judicial system.
A retrial may be in order.
Clearly a psychological evaluation is called for ….. of the Maine Judicial System.
There’s such a thing as an excessively long prison term for stabbing somebody to death? Er, I think not.
Escuse me, but if you think these are excessive terms for muder, attempted murder, and a page of other crimes, you are off your rocker! What about those that love thes women..There’s no way the slate gets cleared here. And further more, if you don’t think a seven year term for the crime in Bangor is the outragouse term, try being a loved one to the man who suffered the beatings and burned. Makes me wonder what value you have on the victims of these crimes. The gbreatest ssychological effect probably came from this very outcome, and now it’s in the hands of fate. God bless you Tracey Neild, keep moving forward, making your life matter. You have a great one in front of you.
“Einstein” is off his rocker… if you see any of his other comments they are off the wall, they make no sense, and 9 out of 10 times don’t even pertain to the actual article. I’m not doctor but I think he is certifiable, ;D
The brutality and total disregard for human life, in addition to the burglarly and crime spree should have warranted life in prison for both criminals. This crime is one that all teens who even think of experimenting with drugs needs to hear. This is a prime example of where drugs will take you. Why is a 44 yr old an accessory….instead of a murderer ? She killed either way….with or without the weapon ? This is sickening….please will someone publish her story that will warn our teens that drugs kill…and use these heartless criminals to get that point across before the money hungry dealers convince them it is only recreational ?
You are right. In this state, or probably any other for that matter, if you are involved in a crime where someones life has been taken as a result of that crime, (murder) then anyone involved in the crime is responible for the death, no matter who pulled the blade, or the trigger. The probable probable conclusion here is that there was some bargaining involved here. Isn’t it a hame that our judicial system uses our victims as bargaining tools..Oh I know, for the greater good..I get it. But having known some of these people as neighbors in my town, It hits home. Have a good life Tracey Neild, and don’t look back. Look into the eyes of those who love you, and are so glad that you are still with us.
wow the system in maine is flawed two men try to kill two women and succeed in killing one and they get 15 and 55 years people go to jail longer for victim less crimes i think a life sentence witout parole is the correct sentence for these two monsters