AUGUSTA, Maine — Alex Cornell du Houx, the state lawmaker from Brunswick who was the subject of a temporary protection from abuse order earlier this spring, told Democratic leaders more than a month ago that he planned to abandon his re-election bid following last week’s primary.

But he took his party by surprise Monday, telling a reporter he hadn’t yet made up his mind about withdrawing and later publicly accusing the party of not supporting one of its own. On Tuesday, Cornell du Houx left for a two-week, State Department-connected trip to Australia.

Cornell du Houx’s plans to withdraw from his race came last month after Democratic Rep. Erin Herbig of Belfast filed a protection from abuse order against him in Belfast District Court. Herbig claimed that Cornell du Houx had stalked, harassed and threatened her after their relationship ended.

Herbig later withdrew the protection order after she and Cornell du Houx reached a private agreement, and Maine State Police ended their investigation into the matter without filing charges or interviewing du Houx.

Still, Cornell du Houx told the House Democratic leader, Rep. Emily Cain of Orono, and Maine Democratic Party officials that he intended to withdraw from his race for re-election following last Tuesday’s primary, according to spokeswomen for the House Democratic office and the Maine Democratic Party.

“Rep. Cain has been urging him privately to withdraw, supporting his own plan that he came to her with,” said Jodi Quintero of the House Democratic office. “He, himself, had said he was going to look at other options in his career.”

Democratic Party officials said Tuesday they’ve been operating under the assumption that Cornell du Houx would withdraw and that they would recruit a Democrat to replace him on the House District 66 ballot.

“If he’s truly not going to run, he needs to actively get out there [with his intentions], so we can get a candidate,” said Lizzy Reinholt, a Democratic Party spokeswoman.

House Democratic officials and officials at the Maine Democratic Party spoke with Cornell du Houx late Monday afternoon and scheduled an interview for him with a Portland Press Herald reporter, under the assumption that Cornell du Houx would tell the reporter, Steve Mistler, of his plans to drop his re-election bid.

Under Maine election law, a candidate can withdraw after winning a primary and the local party committee in the candidate’s district is able to select a replacement party candidate. Cornell du Houx has until July 9 to withdraw. The Brunswick Democratic Committee would then have until July 23 to name a replacement candidate.

On Monday afternoon, “We were fully under the impression that Alex intended to withdraw,” Quintero said.

But Cornell du Houx told the reporter that he hadn’t yet made up his mind. The same article quoted Ben Grant, the Maine Democratic Party chairman, urging Cornell du Houx to step aside, saying that Cornell du Houx’s dispute with Herbig could hurt Democrats in November.

“What we do know are the political facts,” Grant said, “and we do know what a distraction is when it comes to an electoral season.”

Those remarks from Grant sparked an angry press release from Cornell du Houx early Tuesday morning that accused the party of not standing by one of its candidates, highlighted his military background and professional work, and mentioned his legislative accomplishments.

“Ben’s desire for me to withdraw from my re-election bid is a complete surprise to me,” Cornell du Houx said in his release. “It is so unprofessional of him to make a public statement without ever talking directly to me about this incident.”

Later Tuesday morning, an aide to Cornell du Houx sent reporters a press release about Cornell du Houx’s trip to Australia, which said that he planned to lead a delegation of veterans in association with the U.S. State Department and the American Council of Young Political Leaders.

Cornell du Houx couldn’t be reached for comment by phone or email Tuesday morning. His aide also didn’t respond to an email from the Bangor Daily News.

Grant, in a statement released Tuesday, reiterated his desire for Cornell du Houx to step aside.

“For many weeks, Alex has consistently told people within the Democratic Party that he doesn’t plan to seek re-election and we’ve been operating under that assumption,” the statement said. “It’s the best thing for him personally and for the people of District 66.

“The party also needs to be able to move on to the job of finding a candidate to replace Alex, and there is no reason for any further delay that might slow down that process.”

The Brunswick Democratic Town Committee met Tuesday night with Grant to discuss the next steps and plans to coordinate electoral efforts with the Maine Democratic Party. Since the meeting was not public, a reporter was asked not to sit in.

Andy Cashman, the committee’s chairman, said the committee has been making contingency plans for Cornell du Houx’s withdrawal from the race since the possibility of his leaving the contest arose.

“We’re waiting to see what happens and prepare for whatever happens by July 9,” Cashman said before the committee’s meeting at Curtis Memorial Library in Brunswick.

Republican John Bouchard and Green Independent David Frans are Cornell du Houx’s opponents in the House race.

Join the Conversation

38 Comments

  1. The first paragraph needs to be re-written. It is very confusing. Did he abandon his bid or didn’t he?

    1. Yes, I agree. It looks to me like he is still in the election, but it is confusing. Saying something is one thing. Doing it is another. Matt Stone, please revise!

  2. I cant for the life of me see why this guy should quit his reelection bid. He was accused, nothing more. And  the accusers history and  actions make her reliability  questionable , I’m
     being kind. 

          1. I have questions of her integrity based upon representations of her being married all the while being engaged in this relationship with him. He went towards infactuation, not good, but it does happen from time to time especially when one cares more for another then the other does for them. If she were not divorced I see much wrong with her actions. This is from a long time Republican…whatever that has to do with any of this.

  3. I think this has more to do with the fact that Angus King endorsed this kid.  How are they supposed to get Dill over 10% of the vote if they also support a kid who flaunts his ties to Angus King?

  4. I must have missed something. A woman makes accusations against a man, it could just as easily have been a man making an accusation against a woman. The charges were withdrawn prior to going to court. The allegations may or may not have been true. Nothing has been proven. Now the leadership of the Democratic Party is telling the man he shouldn’t run for elective office. So if I make an accusation against Mr. Grant, even if it is not true, and then withdraw it Mr. Grant should give up the chairmanship of the Democratic Party? Shouldn’t this be for the candidate or the voters to decide?

    1. I think the stick in the craw issue is that he stated his intent to withdraw from running to Emily Cain. If true that is where the trouble is. Very few problems just go away on their own.

  5. You don’t like him, then vote him out. I don’t like Flip the Liar Romney so I will vote NO against the Flipping Liar.

    1. Same way I won’t vote for our liar-in chief.
      Never will I vote for a marxist either, so
      Obama is a no go.

    2. How is he lying? And does that mean you won’t vote for Obama who has lied about everything? How’s that hype and change going?

  6. Any body check out his story about working for the State department?  Hard to imagine he could get federal employment at that level–even the cleaning people in federal buildings have to pass background checks.

      1. Currently, federal background checks look at more than just the applicant’s criminal record—they check credit records, tax records for back taxes owed, and a lot of other things—If I remember the prior stories in the BDN correctly, there was a complaint for protection from abuse filed (either rightly or wrongly depending on one’s bias)–and there was an order issued by a district court judge–if this was discovered by the State Department, and it probably would be-I doubt that he would get hired. But on re-reading the story it said he was on a “state department sponsored trip” to Australia—didn’t say he actually worked for the State department. So I guess they may not check his background as carefully as they would an actual employee.

    1. Steve Miltser of PPH confirmed he is leading the trip in his June 19th article.
      No charges, investigation dropped- that’s what this article said.

  7. I hope they run an article tomorrow that the accuser should also withdraw from the race. Sounds like they both made bad choices. Why should one be singled out and told to step down. People have a vote — let them both run and the public will decide. Sounds to me she didn’t handle herself any better then he did.

  8. Angus King loves this guy.  

     “Cornell du Houx also landed an endorsement from former Governor Angus King, a      constituent.  King urges voters of District 66, part of Brunswick to re-elect him because “Alex is doing a great job in the House, working hard for Brunswick – Let’s keep him in.”

    Maybe King could give the “poor boy” another endorsement…he needs some help and the Democrats are trying to erase him from our memories in time for election day.

  9. LePage should step down also as he’s nothing but a bully.  LePage get off your couch and create some jobs.

    1. You mean the waterville country club, seems Paul is seen there quite frequently on the state payroll to boot !!

  10. Again the BDN gets the headline wrong. There was no “abuse case” this was a temporary order that had a hearing date set on May 14. A judge was set to hear the case and decide on the allegations. In the end the issue was withdrawn and dismissed by the court on May 14. Mislter in his PPH article said this as well:Cornell du Houx had been investigated by the Maine State Police, who ended the probe without filing charges or interviewing him.

  11. . According to Cornell du Houx’s press release:instead of researching the facts and sitting down with the state representative of District 66, as the head of any political party should have done, Grant made the issue public again and did act as a judge. No one at the Maine Democratic Party ever asked Cornell du Houx about how his reelection bid was going.

  12. He is his own man. The facts don’t support what is being said, mainly on websites like MA-NE.net. “CAPITOL STALKER”, DISOWNED BY HIS PARTY, NOT QUITTING FOR NOW. I don’t think that is warranted at this point. I think he is a really a good “love sick” guy.

  13. At first glance it appears that the Dems are guilty of racial discrimination against Le Marquis Cornell du Houx because of his French heritage and the possible genetic link to Governor LePage. His faux pas “hors des liens du marriage” avec Madame Herbig can hardly be compared to the baser and more sordid peccadilloes typically associated with reprobates like Barney Frank and Ted Kennedy (God rest his soul wherever he may be). All that is wanting from this Quixotic tale of unrequited lust is the discordant soughing of Angus King’s flaccid endorsement.

  14. I don’t remember him getting found guilty of any crime. From what I understood it was about her getting her naked pictures back, nothing else.. they settled the mater between themselves

  15. Matt Stone: are you aware that the Sun Journal is running an article they say you wrote with the headline : Lawmaker in abuse case says Dems don’t ‘have his back’, flees to Australia?

    Do you know saying he is “fleeing” is potentially liable?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *