BREWER, Maine — Undercover police investigating drug use and its link to prostitution and other crimes recently hired four local female escorts who each agreed to have sex for money. The four were then charged, Brewer police Lt. Chris Martin said Thursday.

Misty Ahmed, 27, and Heather Hamm, 28, both of Bangor, and Donna Fonseca, 21, and Karina Dubrowski, 21, both of Brewer, were summoned for engaging in prostitution in the May 17 sting. A fifth person, Anthony Rowe, 23, of Brewer, who is Dubrowski’s boyfriend, was charged with promotion of prostitution.

“We used an undercover officer and basically we called them up and made an appointment,” Martin said of the women. “They were taken into custody and charged after they agreed to perform sexual acts in exchange for money with the undercover officer.

“In each case, the officer asked how much a particular sex service would cost, whether it be full sex, fellatio or something along those lines, and the subject would give a price,” he said. “Money would be flashed and an agreement would be made to perform the service.”

Then the rest of the countercrime team entered the undisclosed Wilson Street motel room and took custody of the women one after the other. The deals were captured on hidden audio and video recorders set up in the motel room.

Brewer police found the women on the website Backpage — listed under the aliases Sarah, Eve, Lexus and Payton — and targeted them under the department’s counterdrug, countercrime task force because “all of them had prior involvements with police,” Martin said.

“There is a direct correlation between addiction and crimes being committed,” he said.

Dubrowski, Hamm and Ahmed all have been convicted of unlawful possession of scheduled drugs within the last seven months, according to court listings printed in the Bangor Daily News. Rowe was convicted of theft by receiving stolen property in March, the BDN archives state.

The Backpage website has more than 60 listings posted under “escort services” in Maine, including links for the four woman charged by Brewer police.

“I don’t think [the charges] will put a stop to it because of the substance abuse,” Martin said. “They’re all still advertising.”

But the sting sends a message to criminals that Brewer is on the lookout, according to Martin.

“If you are going to set up shop here, we’ll be by to talk to you,” he said, adding, “Anything we do is a means to achieve … a safer environment in the city.”

Many Mainers are addicted to drugs, especially diverted prescription drugs, and are breaking the law to feed their addiction, Martin noted.

“That is the driving force behind most of the crimes police respond to,” he said.

Drug addicts are to blame for a troubling increase in the state’s crime rate, Public Safety Commissioner John E. Morris said Tuesday, a fact Brewer police have stressed for a decade, according to Martin.

Backpage features an array of services and items for sale and has an adult escort section that Maine Attorney General William Schneider and his counterparts from across the country say is being used to advertise prostitution services.

Under its adult services section, Backpage connects clients to escorts, body rubs, strippers, strip clubs, domination and fetish providers, transsexuals, male escorts, adult jobs and pornographic websites.

Schneider and 45 other attorneys general sent a letter to an attorney for Backpage last year saying the website’s efforts to limit prostitution ads have proven ineffective.

“Nearly naked persons in provocative positions are pictured in nearly every adult services advertisement on Backpage.com and the site [allows] advertisements for escorts, and other similar ‘services,’ to include hourly rates,” the Aug. 31, 2011, letter from the National Association of Attorneys General states. “It does not take forensic training to understand that these advertisements are for prostitution.”

The recent prostitution charges are not the first time Brewer police have busted women for selling their bodies. Six local women and the owner of a Bangor escort service that had been around for more than a dozen years were caught in a 2009 Brewer police prostitution sting.

The madam, a convicted Bangor prostitute who went by the name “Cinnamon” on Craigslist when she was busted by Brewer officers, now is using Backpage and is calling herself “Delight” in her escort advertisements.

All seven women were charged with promotion of prostitution, a Class D misdemeanor. “Delight” was convicted on four counts and was fined $2,000.

Four women and seven men were charged last year in a prostitution sting in Cumberland County by police who used Backpage, and 47 were charged in Florida during a three-day sting in March when police in the Sunshine State used the Internet site as a tool to catch the suspects.

The website Craigslist removed its erotic services section in May 2009 and shut down its adult services section in September 2010. That same month, several attorneys general, including Maine’s Janet Mills, tried unsuccessfully to get Backpage to follow suit.

Backpage officials have balked at the idea, saying it’s an infringement of their First Amendment rights. A lawyer for Backpage could not be reached for comment on Thursday.

One reason police pursue prostitution cases, especially those involving drug addicts, is to eradicate associated crimes such as robbery, theft and assault, Martin said.

“We’re finding drug addiction and abuse [are] driving criminal behaviors,” the lieutenant said.

Backpage also has been linked to the death of a missing Lewiston woman who advertised escort services on the Internet site and was killed on July 1 by the brother of her madam, according to the police affidavit filed in the October arrest of Buddy Robinson.

Police charged Robinson, 30, of Lewiston with murder in the death of Christiana Melusine Fesmire, 22, after conducting a lengthy investigation that included an undercover prostitution probe involving Fesmire, Brandi Robinson — Buddy’s sister and Fesmire’s madam — and a woman from Canada who admitted to engaging in prostitution using Backpage.

“There is a huge discussion out in the general population that says this is a victimless crime,” Martin said.

“This is not a victimless crime” he stressed, listing spouses, children, other loved ones and the prostitutes themselves — “especially if they are addicts” — as victims.

Join the Conversation

148 Comments

  1. I can see where pimping is a crime..  But prostitution shouldn’t be a crime.. People sell their services all the time. some people get paid by the hour some by the job and others are on salary… Time to legalize it.

    1. I never really understood the ideology of the law anyways. If you outlaw prostitution, how is the porn industry any different? Does that make sense that they are almost the same theory?

      1. excellent point all you have to to do it get a permit to shoot a movie and bring a camera with with now you are paying the “hooker” to do it on camera so now she is a “porn star”

    2. It might make more sense to have a “sting” operation that catches the men who frequent prostitutes.
      These photos, however, should remind us that there is nothing glamorous about prostitution.  It’s not like the movie “Pretty Woman.”  There are almost never any happy endings.  It’s a sad, sad business, full of unhappy people, and generally driven by drug addiction and exploitation.

    3. Laws against prostitution came about from religious pressure to clean up the neighborhood, you know remove the sinful women to save the men from themselves.

      1. And now the prostitution, drug laws, smoking, seat belt, sugary drink,  and most consumer protection laws are perpetuated by both the Dems and Repubs to bring in more revenue and gradually take away more of our rights under the guise of protecting us, so that eventually we will just exist to fund the government. ( which is how they think of us in Washington already).  

  2. If they want to sell their butts….. their business.  That’s from a right winger…Me.  What stinking business is it of the government what they want to do with their bodies?  I wouldn’t want any of my family to do that,  but I ain’t their family.  Let them go….. Bad decisions shouldn’t be against the law…

    1. It is also a public health issue. They can be spreading STD’s among other blood borne pathogens around.  I am willing to bet they are not being checked for illnesses. I just checked that website and they still have adds up, still in business it seems.  And the photos show these are not the glitz and glitter hookers you see in Vegas or on TV.

      1. Exactly the reason to legalize and regulate prostitution which would include regular health check ups for the protection of customers.

        1. In a perfect world, women would be able to do whatever they want with their bodies.  Right?  Does anyone else remember Santorum trying to ban birth control?  If women are viewed as “whores” in the eyes of many who support that ideation just for using contraception, I can’t even imagine something like prostitution would ever be legal.  To each their own, I suppose.  The bigger part of this is all of the issues with drug abuse they also mentioned in relation to this sting.  Where are the charges on that? 

        2. Yes.  And charge the sex workers for a “license” and monthly physical.  Oh,  and require their customers to register too  — so STD’s can be tracked and treated  — and sales taxes collected.  

          The link between drugs and prostitution is questionable:  Not all drug users are prostitutes and not all prostitutes use drugs.  There may be more than a coincidental relationship between the two, but the officer’s simplistic explanation of it glosses over the economic, educational, and emotional  factors that may also be related.   The “arrest, incarcerate and release” cycle of law enforcement is not likely to be effective unless all contributing factors are considered.    

          1. If sex workers needed a license, that would just create a black market.  I say deregulate it all together, along with the drugs. If they could could just pop into a store and for a few dollars and buy the drugs legally (which the FDA could make sure wasn’t cut with something dangerous), then those that are being prostitutes for drug money would have less incentive to.  Those that decide to be prostitutes to make a living could just go on about their business.  If they wanted to attract quality clientele, they could get certified by their doctor. Hang a nice wall certificate up to prove you are clean.  Since the risk of being arrested is removed, they could compete more effectively, and the prostitutes who are unhealthy would quickly be removed from the market.  No need to create another cumbersome, inefficient government bureaucracy, and tax people to run it.  They would be just as obligated to pay their income tax, as waitresses, strippers, bellhops, and parking valets.

        3. Prostitution is the oldest profession in the World. If regulated, I could see an economic boom. In a World as judgmental as the one we live in, everyone needs a little love now and then!

      2.  The charge of “prostitution” is legally valid only when money changes hands.  People can have sex with thousands if they wish, and all perfectly legal (like Magic Johnson who claims to have bedded over 2,000 women)

        The “disease” excuse for banning prostitution is a red herring,

        The original ban on prostitution was created in a desert where  society had different rules, and not much freedom. 

        It is long past time when our society legalized victimless crimes.  If we are a “free country” (as we advertise our brand) citizens should be free to do stuff of which others disapprove. 

        Being forced to follow a leader, cult, or moral policy is NOT freedom.

      3. Public health issue?  How do you get the STD if you don’t have sex with them?  We have bigger public health issues in public bathrooms and schools with people passing disease on but we manage it somehow so we don’t have to shut them down.  

        So now I need a nanny government to make sure the people i choose to engage in sexual activity with are STD free?  That is so ridiculous.

        Leumas, any right winger should agree with you.  Policing this is big government meddling in the personal lives of consenting adults.  

        There was a story a few years back about a prostitution bust.  A married couple hired a professional hoping to spruce up their love life….Ended up getting busted with their names in the paper….How is that in anyway illegal?  Consenting adults.

    2.  Yeah butt, yeah butt the State and Feds aren’t getting their share of the “pie.” You see without regulations, licenses, inspections and  making sure income taxes are paid nobody is making money except the pimp.

    3. Bad decisions shouldn’t be against the law? I agree with your points about prostitution, but stating that bad decisions shouldn’t be against the law is a bit general. I would argue that most crimes are the result of someone’s bad decision (murder, robbery, drunk driving). Surely you must feel the same way?

  3. I have never once seen a male who has been charged with beating his girlfriend or wife have his picture in the BDN.  It is a huge embarrassment to have your picture in BDN for all to see for some crime committed–and suspected prostitutes (not even convicted) are commonly on display. 

    Where are the wife beaters?  Why are we treating alleged prostitutes with this cruel and humiliating practice, a medieval style of public ridicule, and not those who smash their fists into the faces of those they supposedly love?

    BDN should be ashamed of this practice, and they do it because it draws attention and probably increased readership, because people love anything having to do with sex and young women.

    It’s pathetic.  I dare you to put up the faces of those accused of domestic violence and maybe it will help stop that practice.

    Yes, I have seen women who are charged with battery on display in BDN, but where are the males?

      1. The issue is photographs, the alleged prostitutes, it seems, are always photographed. 

        Domestic violence, then, should always be photographed.  Is it?  Not even close.

        For instance, here’s a guy who beat up his girlfriend and killed her kitten.  A real winner, right?  Is his photo posted for everyone to see?  Nope.

        http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2012/06/05/news/lewiston-auburn/state-files-complaint-against-inmate-for-hatred-against-women/

        The prostitute pictures draw readership–but the ones we should be publicly shaming consistently are the males who curl up their fists and beat on those who they are supposed to love, including children.

        And, you have to laugh or cry at this one: a couple is accused of beating on each other, and the woman gets publicly shamed for all to see in a photo, but not the man:

        bangordailynews.com/2012/02/13/news/bangor/fighting-couple-arrested-for-domestic-violence-assault/

        1.  The issue is that you didn’t do any research before you made your overstated post.  And I clearly demonstrated that.  Your implication that the paper values wife beaters over hookers is just wrong.  I understand where you are coming from, but if you want people to hear and understand you, you need to deal with facts.

          1. You’re not winning the popularity contest on this one, and for good reason.  Your main argument is that I’m passionate about my position; and at this point, I’ve provided more evidence than you. 

            Besides, we all know sex and young women, in combination, sell newspapers.  We all know it.  All the prostitution cases have pictures of the alleged perpetrators next to the BDN article.

            But the right thing to do, the thing that might make a dent in a major felony, is to consistently provide the pictures of men who hit the women in their lives.  The guy I mentioned up above beat his girlfriend and killed her kitten–no picture in the BND next to the article.

            And in a case where both the man and the woman committed violence on each other, whose picture was published and whose wasn’t?  Only the female was shamed with the cruel ritual of posting her picture.

            There it is.  Straight up bias.

          2. They also had a picture of the “pimp” that was arrested. I’ve seen a lot of arrest photos in the BDN, though I’m not sure what the point is as they have only been charged, not convicted. Maybe photos of those convicted of crimes would be more useful and less sensational.

          3.  Spruce, are you, by any chance, a woman?  So am I.  Have you heard?  EVERY news source is biased one way or another.  Get off your high horse.  Did you happen to notice that BDN did, in fact, post a male photo with this article?  I’m all for equality and all, but this is taking it wayyy far.  When you grown up and own the BDN, you post as many pictures of bad men as you want to.  Until then, be grateful you’re able to catch up on any of this news at all.  Oh, and as a side note, Maine needs to get some better looking hookers.  This isn’t doing our state justice when it comes to selling sex for money! lol

          4. had to laugh at that one! i’m in indiana, and they aren’t much beter. plus when you think about it the “hooker’s” appearance fits what the john’s can afford…it’s a sad economy..lol

          5.  you would think if they’re actually making any money on this, they’d do some maintenance work on themselves.  better product, better business, right?  I’m thinking they could probably get some kind of government grant aimed towards small business improvement?

          6. That was my first reaction–holy cow, are those women scary. Sad story all the way around.

          7. I didn’t realize commenting was a popularity contest….Your need for attention categorizes you as an “Attention Prostitute.”

        2. As far as your second piece of evidence, was that not the picture of the guy right below the women…or did someone slip me a hallucinogenic mushroom with dinner?

        3. It is strange that our society places wife-beater above prostitutes. We still have a ways to go.

        4. I know that I’ve seen photos of men arrested on sexual abuse and pornography charges — yes, sex sells newspapers, but I don’t see any particular bias here.

    1. I have seen many articles that display the mugshots in question. But an observation, as I frequent the articles on this site and browse the comments, there seems to always be something you have a gripe about.

      1. Most of us have something to gripe about.  That’s the nature of the comments section!

    2. I’d like to know why they almost never put pictures of men who are inolved with prostitutes.
      I have seen pictures of men who abuse women, but I agree it’s not often enough.

  4. liberals always claim women should have the right to choose what they do with their bodies…Yet to charge a man/women who are lonley money to have sex is a crime… I guess they really don’t want women to have the right to choose what to do with their bodies.. hipocrities,  

    1. The banning of prostitution was started by the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union, the same group who successfully started the prohibition of alcohol. Guess what – these people are NOT Liberals .

      1. That ALL started because women wanted to vote, work and own property if they so chose and stop being beat on.
         Whats really funny is back in the 1800’s some of Bangor areas gentlemen of means use to sneak into row boats either from the Penobscot River or the lower end of the Kenduskeag Stream, likely upstream too, in the dark of night and paddle up or be rowed under tarps to “houses of ill repute”. Many places on the ‘stream’ you could paddle right in under the buildings, it was how they got store stock in from ships on the’ river’.
        Harlow St. was the Red Light District, in the 1800’s  there was the Columbia House, The Fiske, the Glenwood Hotel, the most famous for liquor and women. There was also the Pilgrim Chambers run by madame Celeste next to the YMCA on Hamond St. (the  current YMCA is  pretty much in the same location as the original one).
        Fan Jones was the most famous on Harlow St. she lived on the corner of Harlow and Cumberland St.(across from the Federal Building of today) Bangor High School use to be roughly where the Federal Building of today is and all of this across from todays Bangor Library. It would seem some of the “houses” at least one I know of  painted their chimney’s blue so a man could find them, if they were loggers or sailors new in town.
        The fire of 1911 pretty much put an end to the boozing and red light district.

        1. That is some interesting history. Is there a book about it? If so I would like to read it. If not, you should write one. I bet it would sell well locally.

          1. There are books one is called ‘Remembering Bangor’ by Wayne Reilly
            but I mentioned most of what was written about that. The rest of the book is
            pretty interesting.
            Then there’s a book called Pink Chimneys part fact part fiction. That
            too is interesting. If I had the time I would read every news paper
            at the library and write some books.
            Don’t know if these books are still in print but you might find them
            at a smaller book store or used book store I ‘d try Book Marc or the
            Ellsworth Chicken Barn books and antique store.

    2.  Actually, most “liberals” would be against arresting people for victimless crimes. These women could trade sex for drugs all day long and no one would care. Get cash for it and it is a crime. Adopting a more sane drug policy would be a better solution.

      1. True conservatives are against criminalizing victimless  behavior too. It is all the religious right wackos and the lefty moonbats that want to legislate peoples behavior.

        1. I agree.  The current PBS (Perry/Bachman/Santorum) variety are the danger…

          (Ironic that I use ‘PBS’, huh???!!!)

    3. Cops are liberals?  Who said anything about liberals here? 

      Oh wait… anytime you disagree with anything, you label it as a liberal’s doing.

      1. I know it. I’m getting tired of the “that’s not my opinion so you’re wrong” attitude.

  5. The TV show COPS did a lot of those motel room busts, but it was to catch the johns. Publish their photos in a ‘hall of shame’ forum.

    1. Um, the only john involved in this bust was the “undercover” officer. (pun intended).

      1. All that work and not getting any. Of course none in this lineup are anything like the ones that brought down NY Gov. Elliot Spitzer or Tiger Woods, either! :)

  6. “If you are going to set up shop here, we’ll be by to talk to you,” he said, adding, “Anything we do is a means to achieve … a safer environment in the city.”

    Speaking of safe environments for your city what is the long term goal for stepping up traffic patrols on your side of the river for speeders and red light runners? Enforcing that would make the city safer and you would sure bust more then 5 people in one day and also takes less time to do even.

  7. Can they post the price for each service.  for future reference on the average in the Bangor area.

  8. If my wife has her haircut, makes a wig and then sells the wig … is that prostitution? Is the hair still considered as “body parts”?

  9. OBAMA says the private sector is doing just fine! Seems like these hard working girls are a prime example of the job growth in the Bangor area. And to think that some say the stimulus did’t work?   

    1. Wasn’t it LePage who said Maine is open for business?  Turning this into a liberal / conservative issue is plain stupid.

    1. Recent grads from Brewer and Bangor High.  No Jobs  Got to work,  somehow,  in Maine.

  10. What’s fellatio,  and why would you go to a prostitute to get it? 

    Is it something you can get at home?

      1. Ok, I think we’re narrowing in on it.  It’s something you can get at home, but not after you’re married.  Is that right?

        1. I never imagined the day when the BDN would print the word “Fellatio”. #thisdayinhistory

    1. It is widely available during the courting phase and may linger through the honeymoon period. However, it is generally nonexistant beyond marraige, at least for heterosexual couples.

      1. Well, that’s the clincher.  Thank you for refreshing my memory and answering my question.  It’s been a long time.

  11. undisclosed wilson street motel… my money is on the motor inn. Any one else care to speculate lol?!

  12. Oh and who cares… its prositution. Consenting adults doing what they want….

    Hey BDN we have 15.8 TRILLON dollar debt we go another 100,000 in debt every 4 seconds. That is a lot more alarming and far reaching then 4 hookers and a pimp in a brewer motel.

  13. If it were legal, the drug use, disease and violence would vanish. 

    It would be come a massive business for the entire country.

  14. Time to Legalize Prostitution and Drugs. The State and the Feds can regulate both and make a ton of money on taxes. There would be NO National Debt. Taxes on the working poor could go to nothing.

    1. Ha ….. institutionalize hookers … for the children and the poor, of course. 

  15. it is the leaders that must fall. the corrupt members of the baby boomer generation who have made this life all about their own penises. it is the men soliciting these women who ought to be arrested even if it creates a power vacuum in downeast maine. we need leaders with good values. its men who abuse young women and boys for sex that begin these cycles that become drug use and it leads to other crime, but it all begins with a young child who is abused and forced to keep quiet about it. 

      1. Get use to it. This is the new world of LePage has, for the state of Maine. Prostitution and Drugs are the only jobs LePage has created.

    1. I’m not sure what your point is.  These four women were arrested and charged with prostitution.  Do you claim that they were abused as children and forced to keep quiet about it?

  16. I feel so sorry for these girls.  They are slaves.  The sex trade is a billion dollar industry,  just like all those drugs people seem to need.  Users are slaves.  I wish that the way out for them was clear.  Getting away from the drug and starting over must seem impossible.  People can change.

  17. Why are they making such a big deal about Backpage? Nobody hassles the Yellow Pages, and they have ads for “escorts” too. And the yellow pages reviews all their ads before printing, but still runs them, and re-prints them year after year. Backpage is more like a bulletin board down at the supermarket. If someone went down there and posted an ad for escorts on the bulletin board, would they hold the supermarket responsible?!?!?!

    1. I agree, go after the Wall St Thugs and Crooks and prosecute them. They are the real prostitutes of America.

  18. I honestly can not believe the comments on this article! Make prostitution and drugs legal and the violence and disease would vanish?! This would not change that – probably only make it worse because the government will put high taxes on drugs and make it even less affordable for these drug addicts to buy forcing them to steal and commit other horrible acts! Not the solution here. Get it together people…

  19. Just legalize it already. You are never going to stop prostitution. Tax, regulate and move on.

  20. Seriously, what is wrong with you people who think that legalizing prostitution and drugs is a good idea?? It’s whats ruining the society and the United States, and it certainly would continue to ruin society even if it is legalized. People would still continue to lie, steal, cheat and murder to feed their addiction…the drugs may be easier for them to get if they were legal but what about the other illegal activities they may be committing to get their “legal drugs”. Most of these comments go to show how trashy/disgusting Maine is becoming when you have people saying that drug use and prostitution is not a big deal and should be legalized. Too bad we have all these immoral individuals who are ruining our beautiful state with their addiction, and if you agree with what they are doing and want to see prostitution and drugs legalized you are just as guilty and immoral as the addicts. 

  21. Wha…..?  STRAIGHT people engage in sodomy, too?  Well, they shouldn’t be allowed to marry, either, then!!!

  22. My heart goes out to the families of all of them. They r still someone’s daughter, sister, friend. In the case of the male, he is also someone’s son, brother etc..Takes a toll on the families. Believe me, I know..

  23. Escort service is legal just like massage.  This is the reason why backpage.com escort section is allowed by the government to exist. Many times escorts cross the line from escort service to prostitution when they agree to payment for sexual services.  Many escorts are greedy and request the client to pay extra for certain sexual services on top on their escort fee. This is how they get busted for prostitution. Escort service is legal because the client is paying for time and companion and not for sex. When there is payment for sex, then it becomes a crime. Read the state laws concerning prostitution and you will understand that there must be an agreement made to exchange anything of value for sex or payment for sex before the prostitution charge will stick.  Taking a woman out on a date, buying her gifts, and having sex with her is NOT prostitution if there is no agreement made that the gifts are for sex. If there is an agreement made that the gifts are for sex, then it is a crime. You can expect sex in your mind and it is not a crime. When you expect sex verbally or in writting for the gifts, then you commit the crime of prostitution.

  24. Escort service is legal just like massage. This is the reason why backpage.com escort section is allowed by the government to exist. Many times escorts cross the line from escort service to prostitution when they agree to payment for sexual services. Many escorts are greedy and request the client to pay extra for certain sexual services on top on their escort fee. This is how they get busted for prostitution. Escort service is legal because the client is paying for time and companion and not for sex. When there is payment for sex, then it becomes a crime. Read the state laws concerning prostitution and you will understand that there must be an agreement made to exchange anything of value for sex or payment for sex before the prostitution charge will stick. Taking a woman out on a date, buying her gifts, and having sex with her is NOT prostitution if there is no agreement made that the gifts are for sex. If there is an agreement made that the gifts are for sex, then it is a crime. You can expect sex in your mind and it is not a crime. When you expect sex verbally or in writing for the gifts, then you commit the crime of prostitution.

  25. If you got arrested for showing up at your escort service
    appointment, and you never agree to exchange money for sexual services, you
    should hire a lawyer and fight it in court. Please do not agree to plead guilty
    because you are NOT GUILTY. By you pleading guilty to escort service or
    massage, you are allowing the government to twist the definition of
    prostitution to mean massage or escort service. If I got charged for keeping an
    escort service appointment and never agree to pay for sex, I will request a judge
    trial because many ignorant jury members do not understand the law because they
    have not attended law school. If you agree with the undercover officer to
    exchange money for sex, pay for sex, or receive money after the undercover
    officer make it clear to you that if is for sex, you are GUILTY as charged

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *