PORTLAND, Maine — Arsenic levels in bedrock well water have been found at a rate greater than three times the national average along a corridor stretching from eastern Maine to northeastern Massachusetts, according to a U.S. Geological Survey report released Monday.

“In eastern New England, like along coastal Maine, is what we call ‘the Arsenic Belt,’” Sarah Flanagan, one of the report’s authors, told the Bangor Daily News on Tuesday evening. “It’s a poison that takes a long time to show effects. You could drink well water with detectable levels of arsenic for 20 years and maybe not show any signs of it. But if you drink it long enough, bladder cancer and diabetes are among the consequences of low levels of arsenic.”

Additionally, bedrock wells in a significant portion of western Maine produce water with what scientists are describing as an unusually high uranium concentration, the study found.

The report features analysis of water tests from nearly 5,000 bedrock wells across New England, northern New Jersey and southern New York state — more than 4,700 public-supply wells between 1997 and 2007, as well as 117 private residential wells between 1995 and 2007.

Within that sample size, of the approximately 2,000 wells tested for arsenic, 13 percent were found to have more of the naturally occurring poison than the maximum concentration level allowed by federal environmental regulators for municipal drinking water supplies, a threshold of 10 micrograms per liter. The national average testing rate is about 7 percent, Flanagan said.

Of the 492 wells tested along the ‘Arsenic Belt’ — a stretch of what scientists know as calcareous metasedimentary bedrock — the rate found to have more arsenic than the federal cutoff jumped to 23 percent, she said.

“Water designated for public use [by cities and towns] is treated to levels mandated by the [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency],” Flanagan said. “But the private wells are not regulated by either the states or the EPA. We think the people most at risk are the people who rely on bedrock wells and have not, for one reason or another, gotten their water tested.”

In a splotch of peraluminous granite predominantly in western Maine, the study found nearly 45 percent of the bedrock wells tested had rates of radioactive uranium greater than the 30 micrograms per liter allowed in public drinking supplies. That localized uptick compares with a rate of 14 percent across the rest of the study area.

Flanagan said some of the elements included in the report — such as iron and manganese — are easy for homeowners to detect in their well water because they stain laundry and discolor pipes.

“But with arsenic and uranium, you wouldn’t taste it, you wouldn’t smell it, and you wouldn’t see it,” she said. “The only way you’d know if you have high levels would be if you tested.”

She said state agencies such as the Maine Department of Environmental Protection are well equipped to answer questions about well water tests. Flanagan said water can be treated for nearly all naturally occurring elements and said many of the study’s results simply provided documentation to confirm levels long assumed by researchers because of underlying rock in the region.

“It’s just the way the rocks are — the way they were formed and deposited — there was just more arsenic in some areas,” she said.

Flanagan added that the report included some good news as well: The report found “virtually no pesticides” in the well water tested, meaning the vast majority of Maine’s bedrock wells are not being infiltrated by man-made chemicals.

Interestingly enough, she said, traces of seawater still can be found in some bedrock wells south of Augusta, lingering remnants of when a larger portion of the state was under water more than 12,000 years ago.

“It’s kind of hard to believe that the seashore was up in Augusta at one point,” Flanagan said. “One consequence of that is that old seawater could be found in bedrock wells.”

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

Join the Conversation

47 Comments

    1. Not all “town” water is from above ground sources.  Disgusta’s public water supply comes from wells.

  1. Is there any way to blow this thing up, so it’s actually viewable???  Yes, I clicked on it…it’s still hard to see our exact locations…

    1. Get your water tested and stop relying on useless media information…the test is only about a hundred bucks and then you will have definitive answers.

      For about 2K you can purchase an anionic water filtration/softening system that will clear up arsenic and other anions, such as uranium 

      If you do the math to evaluate the cost versus purchasing bottled water for drinking, the investment pays for itself in less than three years, assuming you have a small family of 4 to 6 people.

      1. I agree.  After a lifetime of watching my grandparents deal with rust (iron) in the well water, I had all the plumbing redone, a new well, and new septic installed.  I went with a water softener (largest I could find) and finally solved our problems.  Mine won’t do anything about arsenic but my point is that you can get home water treatment for many issues.

        As far as lab tests go, we have a yearly lab test for a variety of conditions.  I found a local Indian tribe company that does a great job at a great price.  Very professional.  New equipment, etc.  Can’t recall the name right now, but how many Indian tribes do water testing as a business? 

        Yes, by all means, get it tested, and I’d suggest yearly.  I think I pay less than $100 for a slew of tests.  They will mail you a kit and you mail in the water samples.  Easy.

      2. FYI, an anionic water filtration or softening system won’t work for the levels we had.  We were at 2700 and 3500  and the systems don’t work on more than about 600.  Definately recommend the more complete water test as the cheaper ones don’t include a test for arsenic.  My neighbor and I had the highest levels in Maine a few years ago.  Had been drinking the water for 20 years.  State and Feds set up in our basement.
         

    2.  After you click on the image, with a mouse that has a mouse wheel.  Hold down the control key and roll the mouse wheel up.

      Good also for increasing or decreasing size of page on your screen.  Mind you this only works per page you have visited and used this feature.

      1. thanks i figured out that part but which color is the dangerous one for arsenic? is it the light blue?

      2. I did try that, but unfortunately, my old eyes aren’t what they used to be.  :(  I use Google Chrome, which is a fantastic browser (I also have FireFox, Opera and IE installed), but none of them really showed it very clearly (didn’t expect them to, see the image is still the image, and the resolution and size doesn’t change any.)  

        Maybe I’ll drop them an email, maybe they’d be willing to re-run it, or share it at a higher resolution.  :-)

        Thank-you for your suggestion!

      1. I’ve done all that.  The copy they put online is just to low a resolution to really be useful.

    3. click on the thumbnail to bring up the image, then right click on the image to save image to computer.  Then open from where you saved it on your computer.  Most programs have a way to enlarge the view.

    4. You have a browser tool that allows you to zoom in and out on any page you have on your screen. They’re in different places according to the browser (and updates) that you’re using. I’m using Google Chrome, and the tool icon is a wrench in the top right corner of the page. I zoomed to 200% and was able to view the chart as one would a map.
      So can you. Good luck. 

    5. You have a browser tool that allows you to zoom in and out on any page you have on your screen. They’re in different places according to the browser (and updates) that you’re using. I’m using Google Chrome, and the tool icon is a wrench in the top right corner of the page. I zoomed to 200% and was able to view the chart as one would a map.
      So can you. Good luck. 

      1. Done all that.  The resolution of the image is just to low to be very useful.  Thanks anyway.

  2. “The report found “virtually no pesticides” in the well water tested, meaning the vast majority of Maine’s bedrock wells are not being infiltrated by man-made chemicals.”
    ***********************************************
    Just who’s an enviro-wacko supposed to blame for their uranium or arsenic level? 

    Oh, nevermind….we probably already know. Can’t be God though (as much as an atheist might wish) as a statute of limitations probably cancels out that thought.

  3. On the positive side… If you water your vegetable garden and flowers with the tainted well water I find it will kill the insects.

  4. According to EPA tests, New Mexico had the third highest levels of arsenic in the country,but was way below the national average for deaths due to arsenic.

  5. How much did this foolishness cost the taxpayers?

    [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency],” Flanagan said
    “But the private wells are not regulated by either the states or the EPA.”  Oh no I see another regulation and tax coming!!!

    1.  I think their point was if you have well water you should pay to have it tested as a good idea since is not required to be tested by the government.  Not that there need to be a law requiring it. 

    2. nope, you are welcome to poison yourself and your family all you like. of course usually the first ones to complain about government “interference” are also the first to complain the government didn’t protect them when they get screwed.

  6. Its time  to start a group to fight Nature. We will sue mother nature… Send donations to DNC and they will have a talk with her, maybe come up with a compromise. and all will be well 

    1. nah, we don’t need no stinking regulations, now if you will just tell me where you live so I can dump everything closeby when I get my septic tank pumped – send donations to the RNC

      1.  regulate mother nature??? I said the dems could compromise with her.  Your septic tank needs to go to a pumping station..

  7. You seldom hear of Maine people being posioned by their water,,, unless it’s city water that has had all those yummy chemicals added.

  8. What is going to happen when all of that calcium chloride that they put on the roads in the Winter gets in to our wells.  Can they fix that??  Look what it does to the bottom of a vehicle in one winter.  Lets go back to using sand!!

    1. God,  Mother Nature,  your mother for  given you life when she had a right to abort you. The first 2 I don’t have their address. on the other hand you have your mothers…

  9. Okay, then where are the CDC statistics showing a bladder cancer or diabetes incidence way out of the norm here in coastal Maine?

    No?

    Irresponsible fear mongering.

      1. That article was published ten years ago and references a four-year study that was supposedly starting then. Do you have the results or a more current link?

  10. This may or may not be helpful, depending upon your technical ability, but, you can:  1- Go to the following web page (which I found by Googling “Maine geologic kml”);  2- Download the “megeol.kml” file on that page to your PC;  3- Open the KML file from Google Earth (if you have that program installed on your PC) by choosing “File > Open” and selecting that file on your PC; and  4- Search for your address in Google Earth, and see if it’s within the arsenic bedrock area, which shows up as a light green color on the “megeol.kml” map (you’ll see it’s the same shape as the blue area in the map above.)  http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/state/state.php?state=ME

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *