The Minnesota group pushing the proposed amendment to ban same-sex marriage is breaking from a well-tested campaign playbook, launching a more aggressive effort than past campaigns in other states.
Amid an unrelenting assault from the other side, Minnesota for Marriage attempted to wage a boycott of General Mills last week, in part to spook other companies from joining the Minnesota-based food giant in opposing the amendment.
“Each campaign is different,” deputy campaign manager Andy Parrish said while standing across from General Mills’ headquarters during a lunchtime rally. “You have to adapt and change.”
In what is emerging as a high-stakes fight nationally, amendment supporters are refining a formula that has succeeded without exception in 31 other states, to ensure Minnesota doesn’t break that streak.
With more than 18 months to prepare, marriage amendment opponents have assembled an unprecedented and well-financed campaign, vastly outraising supporters while amassing an A-list of powerful and politically collected allies that include everyone from DFL Gov. Mark Dayton to the CEO of General Mills to even some religious leaders.
Minnesota law already forbids same-sex marriage, but amendments supporters want voters to cement it into the state Constitution to prevent judges or future legislators from changing it. Opponents are waging a fierce campaign to defeat the amendment and eventually hope to legalize same-sex marriage in the state.
Minnesota for Marriage leaders are heading into the summer months with a dogged focus on keeping supporters energized and pushing back hard if other Minnesota businesses surface to oppose the amendment.
When General Mills stepped into the fray, Minnesota for Marriage immediately issued news releases that said “the Green Giant, Lucky Charms, Cinnamon Toast Crunch, Kix and Trix have all declared war on Marriage” and that the company was promoting “genderless marriage.”
Parrish, a former chief of staff and top campaign staffer for Republican U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, said of his tactics, “If they want to come out and support one side or the other, we are going to let them know they got customers on each side.”
General Mills officials later said the boycott did not hurt their business. The petition drew about 12,000 signatures nationwide, but nearly as many signed an online petition thanking the company for its stance.
Something different here
Political strategists who have watched marriage amendment fights in other states say something different is happening on both sides in Minnesota. When voters in Maine and North Carolina passed marriage amendments, the campaigns were not marked by high-profile boycotts or other political theater.
“In North Carolina, opponents of the amendment tried to get leading business people to speak out, but couldn’t. It probably wouldn’t have made any difference,” said Gary Pearce, a political consultant in North Carolina. “It was all about religion. People wanted to ban gay marriage because they sincerely thought it violates their view of marriage as a sacred institution.”
Minnesota for Marriage campaign manager Frank Schubert, a California strategist who has led more than 30 successful ballot initiatives, said he never counted on Minnesota being like the other campaigns.
“It’s a popular myth that there’s some grand plan that Frank pulls off the shelf and changes a few words here or there and now it is Minnesota,” Schubert said. “The other side has been operating for a long time. They have raised a lot of money, and we expect they will vastly outspend us at the end of the day. But I have every confidence we will win.”
Minnesota for Marriage says it has identified 65,000 supporters to help with the campaign. Staffers reach out daily to new church groups, which are being counted on as core support. They plan to try to draw in union members, minority communities and the elderly — groups that tend to vote Democratic but who have often opposed same-sex marriage in other states.
Fragile coalition
In past same-sex ballot question fights, amendment supporters found that 40 percent of their votes came from Democrats. But, Schubert noted, libertarian-leaning Republicans tend to reject the marriage amendment as government intrusion. That leaves him to thread a unique and fragile coalition.
“I’ve spent 30 years running ballot-issue campaigns, and I know how to build coalition of people who wouldn’t normally agree on the time of day,” Schubert said. “Part of the reason I have been so successful is understanding that people evaluate issues in a very different way than they evaluate partisan candidates.”
That’s why Minnesota for Marriage has worked relentlessly to coordinate with churches and various religious groups.
Religious observers say church activity is likely to tick up by September. Supportive pastors are expected to preach on the issue, endorse the amendment, even raise money to support the measure.
Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John Nienstedt warned clergy members there should be no “open dissension” of the church’s backing of the amendment.
But there are noticeable cracks in the Catholic coalition.
In May, the group Former Priests for Marriage Equality released a list of 80 former Minnesota Catholic priests against the amendment.
In May, nearly 200 Catholics from across Minnesota met in a Methodist church in Edina to discuss how they’re working within their churches to defeat the amendment. At the event, the Rev. Bob Pierson, a priest at St. John’s Abbey in Collegeville, said he’d be voting no on the amendment.
Minnesota for Marriage also is rallying the roughly 750,000 conservative evangelical Protestants, who have made up a formidable voting bloc in other states that passed the amendment.
The pro-amendment group Minnesota Family Council also helped sponsor a conference in May to encourage pastors to speak to congregants in support of the amendment; close to 175 pastors showed up.
The Rev. Jeff Evans, church outreach representative for Minnesota for Marriage, who heads an evangelical church in Minnetonka, says the group is booked at churches throughout the summer and he expects the pace to pick up by the fall.
In the meantime, amendment supporters say they will rewrite the playbook any way necessary to win.
“It’s my goal never to lose,” Schubert said. “And we are never going to give up.”
(c)2012 the Star Tribune (Minneapolis)
Distributed by MCT Information Services

Join the Conversation

85 Comments

  1. Boycott every company that is pro-equality and see what kind of products you’re left using. It won’t be much. You won’t have too many options for clothes, food or computers. 

    1. But isn’t it corporations that are basically evil and they should be boycotted?  What wrong with the left right now actually supporting corporations?  Truth is the left is very materialistic and they just want every company to pander to the homosexuals aberrant lifestyle. 

      By the way all Americans should boycott General Mills crappy, over processed,  fake food. 

      1. Boycott whoever you want to.

        I have no love for multinational corporations. The support they show for marriage equality is not because they are taking a principled stand. It is because they understand that it is important for a business to be on the right side of history— in 20 years, it will be a source of embarrassment for any business that supported discrimination.

        1. Supporting homosexuals getting married is a trendy cause.  Someday we will wake up and wonder how we ever allowed ourselves to accept such aberrant behavior.

          1. Not before people wake up and realize how aberrant to mankind the Abrahamic religions are.

          2. Marriage is just the latest piece of inequality being addressed by a decades-old struggle we have engaged in.
            Name one other movement where a minority has petitioned our society for equal treatment that ended up being “trendy”…

          3. He/she needs to errect that kind of a narrative in order to feel morally superior. It’s much like the phony “war on Christmas” meme that has little basis in reality.

          4. Believe me I do not feel morally superior I am just as much as a sinner as you are.   I will speak what I believe to be what God wants for us not what I want.   I am sorry that someone is burdened with being homosexual just as I am by being physically disabled, however we are called to think beyond ourselves and rise to the occasion and not give into our limitations and self absorption. 

          5. Shame on you for LYING about what God wants!  Modern Biblical scholars have proven the Bible was intentionally mistranslated relatively recently in order to provide “Biblical cover” for then-rising levels of homophobia.  For example, the word “homosexual” didn’t even exist until 1850.  Many major Christian and Jewish denominations condemn misusing the hate-based mistranslations to attack their fellow Americans and are marrying same gender American couples now.
             

          6. The term “homophobia” was published in an article in the Journal of the National Institutes of Health in 1953.  The article stated the term was already in common use then, 59 years ago.

            And you want to know what it means?  Just look in the mirror, sweetie.

          7. “We are called to think beyond ourselves and rise to the occasion and not give into our limitations and self absorption. ”

            You mean think beyond ourselves to realize that Americans are free to pursue whatever religious or spiritual belief system that they wish or none at all if that is their desire.  And then rise to the occasion and be a TRUE American who embraces this notion of personal freedom and liberty.  

            You have no right to force or expect others to live by your belief system. You want your freedom to pursue this twisted religion of yours, but you don’t want other Americans to have that same freedom. Talk about not being able to think beyond yourself.

            I think Christ would want you to worry about the board in your own eye instead of the love in another’s. He would want you to leave the judging and condemnation to him (although Jesus was about unconditional love and acceptance). I mean after all, wasn’t he more clear about judging others than he was on same-sex marriage? 

            You are so self-absorbed that you have abandoned the constitution and the founding principles of this country. You want special rights to impose your value system on others.

            Your type of Christian are all the same, you want special rights in this country but this country belongs to EVERYONE. And last I heard, our constitution endorses NO religion. There is a reason for that.

          8. The ‘burden’ comes from ‘religious’ people who think they speak for an invisible person who lives in the sky (sounds legit to me) and justify their apathetic and judgmental behaviors by using religion as an excuse.  Believe what you want to believe- by why do your religious beliefs need to be imposed on others?  That would be a fairly self absorbent limitation one would think.

          9. You do realize that there are a lot of religious gays and straight allies, right…?

          10. Ummmm the religious gay and straight allies I suspect are not the ‘religious’ people who spew vitriol and discontent about gay people buy using a book as justification for despising gay people for being…. well…..gay, right?

          11. Of course not, but blanket statements disrespecting Christians don’t differentiate.

          12. My ‘blanket statement’ ( if you actually read it) says absolutely nothing about ‘christians’ or any other specific religious group.   I simply stated ‘religious people.’   My reference was to any and all narrow minded religious people (hence the blanket aspect) who like to use religion via book (which ever agenda driven version of religion and book they prefer- the Quran, the Torah or the bible) to spew hate and vitriol.  If I were to pick on the poor christians- I would have clearly stated I was picking on and disrespecting the poor christians (like I am now.)   Oy.

          13. Okay, play the semantics game then.  You said religious.  I am religious.  Two of my gay friends are ministers.  The supportive people at my church are religious.  Yeah, I know now you mean the “haters” but your hyperbole does a great job of painting ALL gays and their supporters as religion haters.

          14. Alrighty….Last time I checked I wasn’t the official spokesperson for all LGBTQ or non-LGBTQ people regarding religion.  I personally do not care if you or your 2 friends or the people at your church are religious or gay or straight or not religious or tall or short or have college degrees- it doesn’t matter to me unless you and your 2 friends or your supportive church people try to take away someone else’s civil liberties or rights all in the name of your religion.  The point I was making, and the only point I was making was simply this:  many people use religion as a tool to justify treating other human beings badly and unequally- in this case LGBTQ people.  That’s all, that’s it.  If you want to go with the inane stereotype that ALL gays and their supporters are religion haters- knock yourself out.  I don’t happen to know ALL LGBTQ people or their supporters so I’m not going to attempt to speak for them.  

          15. There is a big difference between accepting aberrant behavior and  equality because of someone’s race or gender ( there are only two male and female).

          16. That’s amusing you think this. “Aberrant behavior” would include lifestyle choices like being a mormon, muslim, or jew. It would include living as the Amish do.

            All of which is protected by our Constitution.

            Similarly, there is no justifiable reason to discriminate against Americans who have the “aberrant behavior” of being homosexuals. This is the conclusion reached across our nation whenever people are required to find constitutionally valid reasons to support continued discrimination in civil marriage.

          17. No, there is not. The civil rights act covers religion which is a choice, and a behavior.

            The idea that it must be innate is moot thanks to the special rights of fundies.

          18. Says you. The truth is that in a very short amount of time, gay people will have equal rights and we’ll wonder what the fuss was about. Ask any young person — you’ll see that bigotry and hatred is not ever going to come back in vogue.

          19. So many young people are so lost.  They are dropping out of college, not getting drivers licenses, still living at home, multiple piercing and tattoos, working crappy dead end jobs.  They will accept aberrant behavior because they are so lost themselves. 

          20. Now you’re just arguing against yourself. There once was a time when it was young people rejecting sexism and racism and many in the older generation were trying to maintain it. Claiming children are lost and they just don’t understand. So you can claim their is a difference between these kinds of discrimination, but you just look hateful and silly — holding onto very bad aspects of the past.

          21. No you are trying to confuse matters.  There is a big difference between rejecting racism and sexism and you wanting to accept aberrant behavior.  Plus I don’t think Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B Anthony were still wet behind the ears when they were fighting for women’s equality. I don’t believe Harriet Beatrice Stowe was a twenty something when she called our nation’s attention to slavery and I do believe Martin Luther King was a husband and father when he was a civil rights leader.

          22. My point is that there were plenty of sexists and racists who believed they were in the right. In fact, those beliefs were once the norm. Their arguments sounded a lot like yours too! Tides are turning towards equality for all though. Sorry that bothers you.

          23. Ever notice how there is no sense of history from the anti-gay people?  Or, really from any anti-civil rights person.  They cannot seem to draw a parallel between today’s SSM issue and any of the issues of the past.  It is not that they see the issue and disagree – that would be one aspect.  But, they simply cannot piece together this civil rights battle as being very similar to battles of the past.  They only exist for today.  There is no sense of history.

            And, when history is mentioned, it is of the Sarah Palin modified-history ilk.  It is all very strange.

          24. I think they fear the loss of the white majority.  That, somehow, the USA will become “non-white.”    But, how different is this attitude than what we have had throughout our history?   Italians, Jews, Polish, Irish, blacks, and you name it, and they were at our shores.  We survived just fine.

            Has it ever occurred to this crowd that perhaps the destiny of the USA, in fact, is to be the melting pot of humanity?  That California and some Southwest states might become minority white?  What is so wrong with that?

            Why do we, the “white folks” of the USA believe we “own” this country?

          25. It’s clear that you believe GLBT struggle for equal civil rights is different from past groups’ struggle for equal civil rights.

            It’s only different in the time it is occurring, and the minority seeking equal rights.

            It’s still just as valid a struggle, and just as much about equal civil rights.

          26. Keep up the good work.  You’re the only logical Christian in a sea of emotional atheists.

          27. Anti-gays routinely attack the Freedom Of Religion of anyone who rejects and condemns their hate-based mistranslation of the Bible.

          28. That’s a good point.  A few on here would love to go back to pre-2005 days where it was legal to refuse service or anything else to someone here in Maine if they’re perceived as gay.  They didn’t use the freedom of religion angle so much back then, but man, what they would give to let their prejudice rule over the land.  Denying service to unwed mothers, gay men, black women, or whoever else you state your religion allows you to dislike (or worse) is NOT freedom of religion.

          29. I actually have a very deeply rooted spiritual practice based around The Creator. MANY of those who are seeking same-sex marriage or those who support them(that’s me) are spiritual or religious people. From what I have observed is that people in the GLBT community tend to lean more toward the spiritual side than the atheist side. 

            Unfortunately many Christians think that they are the only ones who believe in a higher power or God. I know many people who are not Christian but who believe in God or The Creator. They just want nothing to do with a twisted religion based on lies and manipulation.

          30.  hitler,  mussolini,  Franco,   Dr. Mengele,   Adolph Eichmann were all xtians.

            Stalin was a Russian orthodox who went to the ROChurch seminary

            Aethiests dont hate people and dont start wars,

            Japan btw was a follower of their emperor who they thought was a god.  It took a nuke to end that BS

          31. What a waste of your energies, then, to spend so much time railing against committed, monogamous families who wish to protect their lives with civil marriage.

          32. Any more items on your laundry list?  How about those of us who haven’t done (or aren’t doing) any of your list if ills, but still support SSM?

          33.  For something different, a change, Google First Scandal.  It’s relevant.  And it really is all about sex.

          34. My children all went to college, one served in the Army. They all have their licenses and live in their own apartments. None of them have piercings and only the Army guy has tattoos. They are all very successful as most of their peer group.

            EVERY one of their friends who are equally successful will never support or carry on this movement of hatred and bigotry. They welcome and embrace diversity. 

            Unfortunately, many of the young people have been indoctrinated into Christianity cannot think for themselves and will carry on this movement of hatred.

          35.  Dobson said it well – give me a child by the age of seven and I’ll make him a christian for life

            a child who doesnt have the life experiences and guts to say BS

            Dobson didnt say what kind of xtian – his group btw just escaped being on the SPLCs hate group list.

            Why are so many pastors anti gay – they get the people riled up and more money comes to the collection plate.

            While these bad people clearly forget that money is the root of all evil

          36. You’re correct, Jay C. Psychologists have identified homophobia as a mental disorder since 1953.

          37. And homosexuality was once a mental disorder until all the homosexuals in psychology decided  “Umm we better change that one, because mentally ill people won’t want to be treated by mentally ill people”.

          38. Tiresome anti-gay LIE we’ve all heard a thousand times before.

            But thanks for confirming, at least to yourself, that you suffer from the mental disorder homophobia.  Get treatment, your homophobia can be cured.

          39.  Ccman – only the maggots can fix extremist xitans.  theyre mind  are as sset in stone as the grand canyon.  One of the big issues is they take pride in their beliefs.  A deadly sin.

          40. Is THAT how it happened?  My dear, I guess I misunderstood all this time!  I didn’t know that the gay mafia had infiltrated the sciences so thoroughly as to completely take over the American Psychiatric Association and, in an unprecedented move, completely REDEFINED this mental illness as NOT a mental illness!  I had forgotten that until that point in 1973, all psychiatry had been frozen and unchanging since the 1880s.

          41. hTrendy?  Aberrant?  Sonds like you’ve accepted that SSM will come wether you like it or not.

          42. Just like we woke up and repealed laws that allow people of mixed races to marry? Once upon a time, not so long ago, people called that “aberrant behavior.”

          43.  tehy also claimed that by forbidding black men to marry white women, they were protecting the sanctity of the white race

            they allowed black women to marry white women because those bad people saw it as a white raping a negro.  which the slavers did on a regular basis and justified per their bible the selling of thier own children into slavery

            little different then islam.

          44. Supporting bigotry is a trendy cause. Someday we will wake up and wonder how we ever allowed ourselves to accept such aberrant behavior.

        2.  prob 10 years.  iceland went from virtually every gay in the closet to partnerships as second class marriage in 20 years.  15 more  to 2011 and they voted in marriage 49 to 0 in parliment.

          ultimately we need a museum in each city which focuses on religious hatred and bigotry.

          Everything from denying inter-racial couples marriage which supposedly protected the sanctity of the white race – to hating gay peopel and babbling about the sanctity of marriage.

      2. Wow, too bad people like you just DON’T get it. Corporations in and of themselves are not evil, corporations that seek to DIRECT government in REPRESSIVE, REGRESSIVE legislation are “evil” for lack of a better word. The rest of your opinion is based on the ignorance fostered by your adherence to a book written BY MEN, to foster a political and social agenda. You base your position on writings in the OLD testament, claiming that homosexuality is an abomination. That SAME Old Testament declares working on the Sabbath and Adultery as abominations as well, and are considered, by the OT, to be worse offenses than homosexuality, yet you who claim to be the arbiters of all that is moral and holy not only let that slide, but CELEBRATE those of you ilk who take part in such actions. HYPOCRITE!

        1. You might want to get the word out to you your lefty friends that corporations in and of themselves are not evil.  You explained it very well and I agree with you.   However, since you seem to be quite literate and open to understand truth study   John Paul ll’s Theology of the Body, you might have a better understanding of the Church’s view on the OT.

          1. You might want to work on your habit of making blanket generalizations toward what liberals, conservatives, gay and straight people believe.

          2. Anti-gays do always claim “everyone” shares their overarching hatred and fear of LGBT Americans.  We all know better.

      3. No, corporations are supporting equality. They realize they can never compete in the market without the talent and skills that gay people and their allies provide.

      4. Wow.  Extreme stereotyping (again).  Actually, General Mills is at the forefront of producing good foodstuffs.  Fake?  Hardly.  All the more reson to buy General Mills foods,espceially cerals.

      5. Adjust your tinfoil hat, I think it is cutting off the blood supply to your brain. I have never heard such foolish nonsense.

      6.  teh aberant lifestyle of people like you who hate part of gods creation.

        youre welcome to put yourself on the highway to hell or purgatory.

  2. I count myself among the “libertarian leaning Republicans” who reject the idea of these marriage amendments as government intrusion.

    Sincerely, I hope that the Republican party abandons its opposition toward treating gays and lesbians equally. It is a wedge issue that the Democrats currently enjoy and exploit, and it’s an embarrassment to fiscal conservatives such as myself who understand that civil marriage must be extended to ALL per our 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause.

    1. I was a GOP guy for over 30 years.  But, I switched to independent.  The GOP I knew is dead and I see no rising stars to get us back to normal.  The GOP used to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal.  Now, it is off-the-scale, jumped-the-rails, bible-thumping religiously and fiscally conservative.  Just plain bonkers. 

      But, the GOP let it happen.  It sold its soul to the devil and allowed the religious crowd in just to get the votes.  Now, those chickens have come home to roost.  It’s time to pay the piper.

      (I’m running out of cliches.)

      I do not see how the GOP gets back to normal.  The current politicians are just pandering to their base in an attempt to stay in office.  Senator Snowe bailed and I cannot blame her.  It has become embarrassing.  The GOP went from NPR to PBR, from class to crass, and from educated thinkers to mindless sheep without an original thought amongst them.

      1. In my lifetime, I have seen no evidence that the national GOP party is fiscally conservative.

        Every conservative Presidential administration has blown out deficit spending sky-high. It wasn’t until Obama that a Democrat could make that claim.

        1. I have to agree.  The difference seems to be as to where they spend the money.  Reagan ramped up Defense spending which admittedly pumped up a lot of private defense contractors, suppliers, and so forth, fairly far down the food chain.  The Democrats want the money spent on infrastructure and public works projects.  That seems to be about the difference.  In other words, not much. 

          However, what turned me off completely is the social conservatism.  None of it has to do with one dime of expense and yet they are wound around the axle about it.  For a group that touts no government interference, today’s GOP is in everyone’s private business.  Same-sex marriage in Maine is estimated to bring in an additional $22M annually in tourism and business.  Despite this factor, it is more important to the neocons that the tenets of their particular flavor of religion is not offended.  The irony here is that legalizing SSM has nothing to do with their religion.  It is all about the issuance of secular state-sponsored marriage licenses.  This could not be any plainer.  I do not know if the neocons actually know this but do not wish to admit it, or they have dumbed-down to the level that they cannot understand basic civil law.

          1. The cynic in me thinks social conservatism simply needs a group to oppose in order to be relevant to the constituents they pander to.

            And the historian in me is amused that no neocons seem to remember that the party of social conservatism used to be the Democrats.

          2. Quite right.  The “Dixie Democrats” were the social conservatives.  They thought Jimmy Carter would be their religious savior poster boy.  Turned out, he was more normal than they thought.  Reagan wooed the Dixies, sold the soul of the GOP to that crowd, Jerry Falwell waddled onto the scene, and the rest, as they say, is history.

  3. Just back from a weeks long trip out west including through Minnesota.  I had heard about this devilish mission and saw news items and TV ads for and against.  I hope the Maine referendum passes and,I hope the MN amendment fails.  I plan to futther support General Mills trough purchases of excellent products and in any other way that I can.

    Those churches supporting the amendment should tread carefully, since support from the pulpit or other official support could jeopardize their tax free status.  Cheers for the Catholics who oppose the amendment.

    1. Just got back from a shopping trip to restock the pantry and fridge after a long trip.  Bought (gladly) some General Mills products and would have bought Green Giant veggies if the kind I wanted had been aavialble.

      1. Baby LeSieur Peas?  Yum!  Don’t put them in the microwave, cook them in simmering water, they come out nicer.  I have a friend who is from Elektra, Texas, and he taught me to take a forkful of mashed potatoes and then shove that into my peas, so I get both in one bite. 

  4. Don’t they have anything better to do than try to stop people they don’t even know from getting married? Jimminy CHRISTMAS….get a life!

  5. “Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John Nienstedt warned clergy
    members there should be no “open dissension” of the church’s backing of
    the amendment.”

    No wonder he’d want to HIDE his organizations’ violations of IRS regulations and campaign finance and disclosure laws, since Catholic bishops elsewhere have been caught RED-HANDED committing criminal acts to poison our political process.

    The federal judge who revoked the 2008 California anti-gay H8te Vote that deprived LGBT Californians of existing marriage equality had in his possession a letter Catholic bishops wrote to Mormon leaders agreeing to hide from public scrutiny and refuse to report their illegal cash and in-kind contributions to the H8te Vote as required by California law. The letter serves as proof they knew by refusing to report these massive contributions they were violating campaign finance laws, as well as the letter itself being an act of criminal collusion.

    We can be sure the same culprits are violating Maine law again, just as the Maine Ethics Commission caught anti-gays in 2009.

  6.  “When voters in Maine and North Carolina passed marriage amendments, the
    campaigns were not marked by high-profile boycotts or other political
    theater.”
    Ummm… actually, Maine doesn’t have a marriage amendment. Maine voters did veto the same-sex “marriage” legislation passed by the legislature, which is different than passing a marriage amendment.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *