PORTLAND, Maine — A U.S. District Court judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought against state and federal agencies and law enforcement officers by the long-term partner of a Cyr Plantation man who was fatally shot by police in April 2010 in what the state attorney general’s office later deemed a justified shooting.

Neil Begin was shot by a Maine State Police trooper and a U.S. Border Patrol agent on April 23, 2010, inside the 54-year-old’s U.S. Route 1 mobile home. Sandra Parent, who was Begin’s live-in companion for 30 years and personal representative of his estate, alleged that Begin’s constitutional rights were violated, including his right to bear arms, his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and his right to be free from use of excessive force in the conduct of a search or seizure. She also alleged similar violations of the Maine Civil Rights Act and common law battery.

Parent, represented by attorney Peter Kelley of Caribou, brought the case to U.S. District Court last year. Defendants named were the state of Maine, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Maine State Police Trooper Robert Flynn and border agents Robert Kipler and Rick Romann.

The defendants later filed a combined motion for summary judgment on all three counts and to dismiss the case. The court ruled in their favor with a 27-page ruling issued on Monday by U.S. District Judge George Singal.

The attorney general’s office had ruled in July 2010 that Flynn and Kipler were justified in shooting an intoxicated Begin after they were called to his home to investigate a complaint of criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon.

According to the attorney general’s report on the shooting, Begin ordered Parent to leave and take their 24-year-old son and the son’s girlfriend with her early on the morning of April 23. Begin threatened them repeatedly with a hunting rifle and while they were packing clothes to leave he allegedly grabbed his son by the throat, threw him against a wall and threatened to kill him, according to the report.

After a family member called police, Flynn interviewed witnesses and confirmed with the district attorney’s office in Caribou that he had probable cause to arrest Begin. Romann and Kipler, who were close by, drove to the location to offer Flynn assistance. The officers contended in court documents that this is common practice because of the limited number of state law enforcement personnel in the area. As federal law enforcement officers, they had attended federal law enforcement training academies and numerous training sessions. Kipler, as a federal law enforcement officer, was authorized to make arrests and use deadly force when necessary and appropriate.

Flynn, Kipler and Romann arrived at Begin’s home about 11 a.m. to arrest him on a charge of felony criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon.

Flynn went in an open porch, according to the report, and repeatedly told Begin through the door to show his hands and “leave the gun inside.” He saw Begin through a window running to the other end of the home with a gun in his hand. After breaking down the locked door, the officers saw Begin at the end of a hallway and heard him working the bolt action of a gun, according to the attorney general’s report.

Though the officers repeatedly ordered Begin to drop his rifle, the man refused and told the officers to get out of his house. According to the report, the officers saw Begin moving his left hand to the rifle and leveling it at waist level toward the officers.

“Believing that Begin was about to fire the rifle, Trooper Flynn fired his service pistol and Officer Kipler fired a patrol rifle at Begin,” the report states.

Begin fled behind a wall and a few seconds later reappeared in the hallway with the rifle still in his hands, according to the report. Flynn and Kipler fired again and Begin fell to the floor.

An autopsy later revealed that Begin was struck five times by gunfire and died from a gunshot wound to the abdomen the next day at a Bangor hospital. At the time of his hospitalization, Begin’s blood-alcohol level was 0.248 percent, according to the report.

Much of the attorney general’s investigation was based on an audio recording of the incident, which was captured on a microphone worn by Flynn. According to the recording, Flynn could be heard ordering Begin to drop the gun and telling Begin that he heard him “rack” the bolt action of the rifle. Seventy-two seconds later, Flynn told Begin not to move his hand or he would shoot, according to the attorney general’s report. Flynn and Kipler were heard commanding Begin to drop the rifle throughout the remainder of the audio.

Evidence taken from the mobile home included a bolt-action .30-06 rifle, a semiautomatic .22-caliber rifle and several marijuana plants.

The court found no basis for claims that any of Begin’s constitutional rights were violated or that there were violations of the Maine Civil Rights Act. It further stated that several of Parent’s arguments were not supported by the factual record.

The court ruled that the officers lawfully entered the dwelling, that they had probable cause to arrest Begin on a variety of charges, and that the officers had reason to believe that Begin was hostile toward them. The ruling further stated that Begin’s running to the back of the house with his gun escalated the tension and “the officers’ apprehension of danger,” as well as raised suspicion that Begin possibly was attempting to escape or planned to take up an offensive position against the officers.

The court also found that since the officers did not use excessive force against Begin and did not violate Maine law during the confrontation with Begin, there was no basis for finding liability for battery.

Parent’s attorney Kelley said Tuesday afternoon that he had not seen the ruling but had been briefed on it and was “very disappointed.”

He said Parent had the option to appeal to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston but that he had not yet discussed that with his client.

Kelley contended that Begin was in his own home when he was shot and that the officers could have employed tear gas or negotiation instead of using deadly force, which was an argument addressed in the ruling.

“That the officers potentially could have used tear gas, called for backup from other law enforcement agencies, employed a negotiator, or simply waited for the situation to calm down, as Plaintiff suggests, does not render the use of deadly force unreasonable,” the ruling stated.

Michelle Benson-Fuller, spokeswoman with Customs and Border Protection, said Tuesday afternoon that the agency will continue its work across the nation.

“While the outcome of the Cyr Plantation incident was tragic, when requested, Border Patrol agents will continue to assist our local, state and tribal law enforcement partners where public safety is the primary concern,” she added.

State officials could not be reached for comment.

Join the Conversation

54 Comments

  1. Dismissed as it should be. Glad the officers involved when home safe to their loved ones!

    1. I too disagree with this case… there are other methods of dealing with people that are in crisis situation and killing was not the way to go about it. The officer(s) involved killed a man point blank in his home… they killed a man. What more is there to say…

      1. As tragic as the loss of this man is, he had a choice to have laid his weapon down. He had the option, the officers did not have a choice. They were doing their jobs. At what point do the authorities stop ignoring the behavior of a man such as this. The last thing any officer wants to do is take the life of another.

        1.  You’re right… the man had a choice, but was not in the right mind at the time to make that decision and calm down. Some officers do the job well, but some don’t. People are not always right in a spur of the moment decision and sometimes the end is tragic as such.

        2. The officers had “a choice” regarding whether to go inside the home. The threat (so far) only existed inside the home. They CHOSE to go in there, instead of simply disabling the drunk – with teargas, for instance.

      2. all the rocket scientists are crawling out from under rocks as usual…go back find the story when it all went down, and know this person the officers had to deal with, he was no rookie with a firearm.. put yourself in their shoes, you face the barrel of this mans gun, then you won’t be so quick to judge the officers, the officers were there to protect the people in the home because they were called there, this guys was out to hurt someone that why he was threatening them with a weapon….

        1.  There are plenty of people that threaten to hurt others or cause bodily harm, but they don’t get killed in the process… help is also given for such people that are in major crisis situations as such and they don’t end up at the end of an officer’s barrel…shot dead in their own home.

          1. These Officers did what they had to do….shoudda woudda coudda, there is always an Einstein out there who Knows Better, Has Done Bigger and Better Things, Has Busted down Open Doors, Has Gone to War and Back 25 times, Has Put Wings on Flies, And is trying to Reinvent the Wheel…If your That good , sign up and face the barrel of a Gun there “Big Boi” what are you waiting for?

          2.  I like Einstein… one of the greatest “Theoretical Physicist”  and considered the most influential of all time.

      3. Like to see your reaction of some drunk @$$ pointing a rifle at you. Pretty sure it wouldnt be going to get a coffee and donut and check back later!! Well done Maine officers!!!

        1.  You call a job like this well done when the officers killed a man whose judgement was fogged by substance… like I stated… there were other methods to handle such situation without taking the life of a man.

  2. Should have surrounded the place and waited him out. After he came off of his drunk he most probably would  surrendered. But I guess we’ll never know since the only path law enforcement saw was to end this early with the gun.

        1. in the case of Bing Popkowski he may not have been pointing the rifle at anyone. In experienced and trigger happy warden killed him. They could have taken cover and reduced the situation. But hell they are just wardens , right.

          _____

    1.  I agree with your comment… the officer’s could have waited him out rather than fully escalate the situation ending in death of a man in his home. And as for Mike’s comment…this situation is not one to compare to our troops over-seas at war.

      1. Angelic, when you are getting your butt whooped or getting shot at by someone that has a better rifle than what you have, yes it is a war. Do I expect that you can appreciate this ? NO, since you have obviously never had your head handed to you on the end of someone’s boot or seen your own people bleed out in front of you because you couldn’t get to them in time to save them. Begin was in the process of loading the rifle and pointing at the 3 Officer’s. A 30.06 round at under 25 ft will go thru a human being like a knife thru toilet paper. When bullet’s start flying the difference between WAR and needing to shoot back to save one’s self become one and the same instantly.

        In Afghanistan the local’s chew on the locally grown poppy leaf’s, you know, the stuff that COCAINE comes from. They get all doped up chewing all day and by 4 or 5 they’ve got all the self control of a 3 year old in a toy store. Now, you wanna go toe to toe with a doped up child aiming a rifle that can kill at well over 900 yards and try to make any sense with him, fine. When can we send you to Somalia so you can see the sheer idiocy of your comments and position in a much more practical, and hand’s on, manner ? 2nd Ranger Battalion has a very long list of people who found this out. Please, don’t let us or common sense stand in your way. 

        1. No one will ever really know the truth about the experience of all involved in this case, but it is good that people can get a sense of closure. On a different note… it sounds like it wouldn’t hurt you to reach out and talk with someone about your bad experience with the military side of things. I was just saying that this event is not to be compared to our military troops at war because that is not what this case was about…

          1. When someone is beating you to death and threatening you with a rifle they have in their hand, you come back and tell me what you’re going to do in the next 45 seconds or less. Guess what ? Times up. Now what are you going to do ?

        2. There was no one else in the home which was was known to law enforcement. As this was the case waiting him out was an option. A perimeter could have been set up and the situation diffused. By entering the situation was escalated. By your comments I can see that you would never see a problem with the actions of law enforcement personal.

          1. Where did you get your information?In a Cracker Jack Box? He was threatening his family inside the home…You need to do your homework, The family called for assistance.. Get Your Facts Straight!

          2. He was alone in the house when the police arrived. So you should get your facts straight.

          3. Very Possible that he was alone when the police got there but the police were called there because he was not alone and was threatening his family, which was not the first time….

          4.  They were there to arrest him…not for a gun fight.  Began made it a gun fight after his repeated refusal to put the gun down.  He had his opportunity to surrender, but he chose his fate.  It was either the law enforcement officers or him, I myself am glad that the Cops went home to their families that night.

          5. Again, any of you that want to toe to toe with someone that’s drunk and has a high powered rifle, and is showing every indication of using it, please, feel free to join up and put your money where your mouth is, or might not be if the shooter decides to go target practicing at the noiseist target they can find or hear. Trying to contain Begin with only 3 Officer’s, in a single multi-room and windowed house in Cyr is, by tactical definition, impossible since Begin knew the area better than the Officer’s. Add to this rapidly escalating mess that by providing the shooter with more time to decide who to kill, even themselves, which is not an option, only shows that some folk’s here are practicing for a  ‘Quaterback’ boogeymen Award. Pray real hard folk’s that you never have to make that decision. Some of you can’t. And you are the one’s to be going into the ground first when push comes to shove. I just hope that no else gets in the line of fire when it happens. Sandra Parent managed to get out, with the kid’s. Thus endeth the lesson. Now, go read, ponder and next time know what you are talking about ’cause unless you’ve gone 1 on 1 with someone like Begin, including the weapon, you’re just blowing smoke up everyone’s skirt’s.

          6. Actually sir I have faced down others who were armed so perhaps your quaterbacking of the police  is suspect.

          7.   “Now, go read, ponder and next time know what you are talking about….”  I refer you to this bit of brilliance, oh so intelligent one: ——> “Cocaine comes from Poppy’s.”

        3. I stopped reading after you said that COCAINE comes from POPPY’S. I love it. Really. I do. Oh and I also love the drama in your posts. We aint in Afghanistan, Commando.

          1. Your reply shows you lack any insight. You have just asked me to go back to Viet Nam. On that you have a pleasant day.

  3. Happy ending!!! Glad no one was able to make money off this!!! The officers were just doing their jobs. Dude had several opportunities to surrender his weapon. His loss!!!

  4. They call the police because this drunk man is threatening to kill them with a knife, then sue the police that come to their aid. Just a trying to get rich quick scheme on her part. He got what he asked for. Threaten the police witha a gun, and you should be prepared to be shot.

  5. These folk’s did real good. Am I sorry that Begin was shot ? Yes as are the 3 officer’s. The last thing any Officer ever want’s to do is pull the trigger. But did they have any real choice ? NO ! Begin had a 30.06 bolt action rifle. Those who know fully appreciate that a ‘jacketed’ 30.06 can go thru a concrete wall at 200 yards and still have the power to kill. Begin had the rifle, and was working the bolt to load and fire, in a house made of wood. Begin was also drunk, which means he was completely out of self-control, and could have just started shooting THRU the house, and killing anyone, Kevlar vest included, that was in the bullet’s path, Officer’s as well as Parent and her 2 kid’s, at any time. And God forbid that Begin got out of the house, drunk with the rifle, and wound up in someone else’s home. Now you got a hostage issue with a angry drunk AND a weapon. No, these 3 Officer’s contained Begin, didn’t let the situation get outta control and resolved it. Maybe not the best way but it was the only way that Begin left open to them, with what they had on hand, when it all happened. Time and event’s always overcome paper ‘policy and guidelines.

    The issue of backup was also raised. Folk’s, out at Cyr Plantation ANY backup is at least 30 minutes out from any Agency that has to dispatch it. Getting your butt whooped for 30 minute’s, much less getting shot at, is not pleasent. You people that are coming back from Iraq and Afghanistan know the truth of that 1st hand. That MSP was lucky enough to have 2 CBP Agent’s close-by was both fortunate and a measure of just how seriously these 2 Agent’s take their job, and their Oath of Office, seriously to Protect and Serve. Been there, done that and still lived thru it. I just hope that this finally ends this once and for all. And for the 3 Officer’s, please, go find someone and get ‘it’ out, if not find a way to cope.

    1. You don’t place yourself in that type of situation to begin with…if you place yourself in danger then that is by choice and true that you should protect yourself. It was also by choice that lead the entry of a home to a man in crisis who end up shot to death in his own home. Who truly was the victim under attack? The man who was shot in his home, the officers, or the family involved seeing a husband/father get killed by officers who were called to their home to help protect them?

        1. Yes, it’s the job of an officer to protect and serve.  Just because a man wears a uniform doesn’t give the right to kill a human being nor mean that they are correct in their actions either…

  6. If I had to make the choice to go home to my family or try to disarm a drunk with a history of violence, I would choose to go home to my family. If your going to run around with a rifle and threaten people, you better be prepared for the ultimate consequences.

    1. They didn’t know he was drunk at the time, this wasn’t known until after the autopsy came out. Damn Armchair quarterbacks!

  7. “Kelley contended that Begin was in his own home when he was shot and that the officers could have employed tear gas or negotiation instead of using deadly force…”

    The Attorney General disagreed as he has in the past, and will in the future.  

    These officers burst into this man’s home and killed him.  No attempt whatsoever was made to neutralize the face-off either through negotiation or tear gas.  Was it absolutely necessary to charge into the house and aggravate  an already emotionally disturbed man and ending his life with five rifle and pistol bullets? 

    Maine residents need a full explanation from the state and federal governments concerning recent executions by state police, Game Wardens, and U.S. Border Patrol agents.

      1.  I suppose it seems like it. I didnt read anything about the drunk dude shooting the gun or even about it being loaded. One cop said he “heard the bolt”. Pretty hard to prove in court. Pretty easy to prove they shot him, however. All sounds a bit fishy to me. I dont know the whole truth so I cant really have an opinion. Can you?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *