Activists from the Maine Tea Party can largely be credited with Gov. Paul LePage’s election in 2010. And Maine supporters of libertarian presidential candidate Ron Paul took over the state’s Republican convention in May and chose a slate of Paul supporters as Maine’s delegates to the National Republican Convention next month in Florida.

But the Republican nominee for Maine’s open U.S. Senate seat, Charlie Summers, seems unlikely to benefit from the energy of those two segments of the Republican party, which have played a growing role in Maine Republican politics in recent years.

Summers, Maine’s secretary of state, prevailed in a six-way Republican primary last month and is facing Democrat Cynthia Dill and three independents, including former Gov. Angus King, in the race to replace retiring Maine Sen. Olympia Snowe.

“Certainly out of the candidates running, Charlie Summers is the best one running, but not somebody I’m getting behind or endorsing,” said Brent Tweed, a Paul supporter from North Berwick who was elected chairman of this year’s state Republican convention. “Right now, there are a lot of important issues, and I don’t really hear anybody talking about them.”

Tweed said he’s concerned he hasn’t heard more about serious deficit reduction and returning the United States to a “non-interventionist foreign policy.”

“When we do get involved overseas,” he said, “we need to follow the Constitution and actually declare war before going to war.”

Activists who have been involved in Paul’s presidential campaign and the Maine Tea Party say they’re more likely to vote for Summers in November than any other candidate, but not with a level of enthusiasm that would motivate them to get involved in his election efforts.

“I’m certainly not going to vote for Angus King or the Democrat,” said Pete Harring of Auburn, who founded the Maine Tea Party and runs a Maine Tea Party website. “That doesn’t leave me much of an alternative, does it? Basically, that’s what it boils down to.”

While Tea Party members don’t have an ideal choice on the ballot in November, Harring said they’ll stay involved in Republican politics and remain focused on their long-term objectives.

“Many Tea Party and Ron Paul people have put ourselves into the structure of the Maine Republican Party with a long-term goal of getting good, constitutional, liberty-minded people,” he said. “In order to do that, you need to maintain a Republican presence.”

For his part, Summers said he’s not sensing a significant enthusiasm deficit among Republicans.

“I think that the party is incredibly enthusiastic,” he said. “The perspective which I come from, I think, is much more in line with the average working-class person whether they consider themselves to be a member of the Republican Party, the tea party, the Ron Paul faction.”

While Summers has the vote of Eric Brakey, the former Maine state director for Paul’s campaign said he’d be more excited about the Republican Senate candidate if he supported a full audit of the Federal Reserve and favored bringing all U.S. troops home from overseas.

“We’re not judging Charlie Summers based on his personality,” Brakey said. “We’re judging him on the issues. If he does come and meet us on those issues, I would be happy to support him.”

Summers said he’s open to a full audit of the Federal Reserve, a move supported by Paul as a way to bring more transparency to the country’s monetary policy. But he said job creation and government spending come first on his agenda.

“Once we tackle those issues, I think we move to No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, on down the line,” he said. “There’s obviously a myriad of issues and concerns to deal with.”

But bringing all U.S. troops home from overseas assignments is a separate matter, said Summers, who serves in the U.S. Navy Reserve and has been deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq.

“It’s easy to say, ‘Let’s bring all the troops home,’” he said. “It’s a much different thing to actually effect that and do it in a way that doesn’t jeopardize our national security interests.”

For Maine state Rep. Aaron Libby, a Waterboro Republican and Paul supporter, bringing the troops home is a financial matter.

“We can’t afford it,” he said. “The country’s broke, and we’re putting this debt on future generations.”

While Libby will vote for Summers, he said, “I’m probably not going to be too involved in the race.”

And if Summers succeeds in November, Harring said, “we’ll see what happens with him, and if he doesn’t cut the mustard, then we’ll get rid of him in six years.”

Join the Conversation

95 Comments

  1. It’s a new Republican circular firing squad – an attitude that, if not changed quickly, will allow the liberal Democrat Angus King to walk across the November Finish Line without mussing his hair!

    1. Well yes Donna I am. However the likes of Pete Harring are not actually libertarian at all. They are Republican loyalists first and think about liberty second.

      1. Mr. Dodge, do you believe that our government,comprised of Democrats and Republicans and Independents, should play a crucial roll in  taking care of the best interest of their constituants or do you think people should be left to their own demise?

        1. Your loaded question insinuates the population are incapable of surviving without government intrusion.

      2. I had a lot more liberty before jerks like you cut my retirement benefits. Nice going buddy.

  2. Some tea parties are not at all enthused about Wrong Paul but are supporting Summers for US Senate.  We know what is at stake.

  3. All that these people have in common is what they oppose:  anything progressive. 
    Summer’s problem, the same as the whole GOP’s, is that he can say’t what they are for, except more of the same that caused the continuing world wide economic collapse.  

    1. The world wide collapse is due to overspending (too much debt) and not enough ambitious      workers – a progressive problem.

      1. The world wide collapse was caused by over-borrowing from privately owned central banks which conjur the money they loan out of thin air because it never existed in the first place except as digits on a computer screen and those private banks charge compound interest on money they never really have to lend out in the first place to the countries who happily enslave themselves to be in their debt and under a system of currency that is privately owned and not accountable to the general public, all because the public accepts it as being backed by “God.”

      2. If by not enough ambitious workers you mean those that are willing to work for substandard wages with no benefits, can I take it that you are having problems getting enough illegal immigrants to work for you?

  4. We Independents aren’t very enthusiastic about him, either. Maybe if he could bring himself to tell the truth…. Naw!

  5. What is there to be excited about?  What Charlie offers is a nice suit and recognizable haircut.  His big issue in his very short tenure as Secretary of State was to conjure up a bogus crisis regarding voting access.  He fared miserably in this.  Shame on him and shame on the members of the legislature that were willing to advance this anti-democratic agenda.  If Charlie believes governing means using your given power and authority to secure future political wins by reducing the voices of the poor, elderly and disabled in our elections, he is not only unappealing as a candidate, he is ethically unfit to hold office.

    This says enough about the man and his candidacy.  I need not rehash the dubious ethics of running while serving in his office or re-examine his certainly ineffective solution to teen driving fatality.

    Charlie Summers offers nothing.  He defines empty suit.  Don’t judge him by his ads, judge him on the most significant issue upon which he has taken a public stand.  This reveals far more than paid advertisements ever can.

    1. He is better than Angus. Period. if there were NO other options, I would vote for Charlie rather than Angus.

    2. When will we see BDN op-eds about Angus King’s profligate spending (he increased state spending by 80+% during his eight years) and the clearly crony capitalism in his wind power dealings? He profited by putting the risk of his dealings squarely on the taxpayer – friends in high places, etc. These things the Tea Party finds abhorent.

      This week, we were treated to Bollard Busby’s idiotic idealogical rantings against Summers about gay marriage, and now this slam piece quoting a small handful of Tea Party members.

      Charlie did not declare war on Iraq  nor Afghanistan – he simply served his country with distinction. I am confident that, because he has witnessed war first-hand, he will use acute judgement before voting to declare war as a U.S. Senator.

      We know the TP will vote come out in droves against Obama, and we know that Angus is far too big a spender to attract any of their votes, so Charlie will in fact see overwhelming TP support on November 2. This is obvious to anyone smart enough not to fall for this red herring op-ed.

      1. I feel the same way about Dill & King, both bought & paid for by Quimby.
        The old girl figures she doubles down, thinking one has to win…

  6. The chairman of your own party’s convention can’t endorse you?

    So long Charlie.

    1. That would tell an ordinary person something, but old Charlie’s got such an oversized ego, he has to be hit in the head in order to “get it.”

  7. So, did the TP have any candidate in the primary they were “‘enthused” about in the primary?  Guess not since if they are so powerful, they would have elected them.  Are they days as king makers and brokers over?  Sure hope so.  How sad (Not).

    1. Actually I don’t believe the Tea Party puts forth any candidates under their own name. They would rather be a parasite to the Republican Party. Apparently they don’t have the integrity of the Greens, Libertairians, Communists, etc. who run their own conventions and put forth candidates under their own name.

        1. As far as I know there is no party called the “Progresive Party”. Now on the face of it progressive means forward leaning, advancing toward a higher goal, etc. Now can we call the Tea Party regresive, wanting to return to the days of our founding fathers? Back to the good old days when only white men with property were permitted to vote? Black people were slaves?

          1. You no nothing of people who support the ideas of the Tea Party.  They  are Dems, liberals, conservatives, Republicans, black, white, hispanic, asian.  They are people who support the constitution and have seen this country go so far to the left they want some personal responsibility brought back.  On the other hand it’s you who want all of us to be slaves to the government , have no personal responsibly and be the thought police.   

            Why don’t you go out and talk to some of your neighbors, relatives and friends who support the ideas of the Tea Party.  My suspicion is they don’t want to tell a closed minder person like you what they really think.  It’s people like you who only get your views from the BDN, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, ABC, CNN, PBS and the Maine People’s Alliance.    I guess I should mention 103.1 or WERU, but I think they preach to the liberal choir since most Mainer’s never even heard of those stations much less listen.

          2.   I do not have a TV so obviously I can’t watch news programs.  I do have a radio in my car so I listen to WERU, MPBN, 103.1 and 103.3.  Two of the stations are progressive radio, one is liberal to moderate and one is conservative.   So, what makes me closed minded?

          3. LOL! “They  are Dems, liberals, conservatives, Republicans, black, white, hispanic, asian. ”

            You’re too funny. If all them are part of the Tea Party, why do you spend half your time screeching about several of those groups? You’re full of baloney. 

          4. Find me one example of a tea party endorsed candidate that advocated slavery, an end to non-white suffrage, or an end to non-property-owning suffrage. The rhetorical technique you use is called strawman and it’s absolutely repulsive.

          5. Did you reply to the wrong comment? I responded directly to another comment and even quoted them. That’s not the definition of a straw man argument. I didn’t mention slavery at all. You brought it up randomly. That’s what a straw man is. Keep your phony cries about things being “repulsive” to yourself. 

          6. Wow do you have a life?  Sure hope you get dressed today and get out and enjoy the sunshine.  Maybe do something nice for a conservative neighbor.

          7. Excuse me for treading on your territory.  I guess only you can accuse people of being liers and personally attack people who don’t “think” like you?  Did you get dressed yet or on your still hammering at the computer putting your two cents to everyone’s post? 

          8. Again, all you have are personal attacks. I think you are lying when you try and claim that the Tea Party is so diverse considering the fact that many of your posts include attacks on the very groups you claim make up the Tea Party. It’s obviously a lie and that’s all you have along with your personal attacks. Talk about desperation. 

          9. Excuse me, when have I ever screeched  about any of the several groups I mentioned.

            Now I know not to take you seriously.  You make things up.  You have chosen this forum to make yourself feel superior  because you must likely suffer from some type of inferiority complex.

          10. Maybe you should expand your info source beyond Fox and Rush Limbaugh.

            I have personal responsibility, I also believe that people need to take respnosibility for their actions. I believe that people need to be responsible for their children and teach them self relience and responsibility.

            There are things that we as a society need to share responsibility for. The education of our children, the security of our nation, the maintenance of our roads. The health of the citizens of our nation.

            I don’t believe in the return of the times of our founding fathers. The time when women were not much more than breeding stock, were denied the vote, and the right to inherit property. When you needed to be a property owning white man to have the vote.  When slavery was legal,

            I do believe that the constitution is a living document that is capable of accepting amendments that evolve with time to adapt to modern times.

            I did attend one meeting of the Tea Party. I at was one of the youngest people there at 66. They put on a film from the John Birch Society and wanted to teach us all about the constitution. Not one  original idea or thought patern. Just an apparent desire to return to the glory days of our founding fathers plus a healty sprinkling of stop Obamacare/make Obama a one term president.

            I kicked my self for wasting a couple of hours there and left.

        1. What is funny is that all but a handful of Republicans in the Senate and Congress have all signed Grover Norquists pledge. Tea Party spouters and all. Charlie Summers claimed he has signed it twice? Does that signify that he is a born again Norquistite?

  8. It’s all fine and good until they have to move beyond having a common enemy. They all hate Obama and liberals, but then when you start trying to find other similarities, it’s difficult. They’re just all these different fractions of radicals. Some want to bomb the whole world and some want to be isolated from the whole world. Some want liberties for everyone and then some can’t agree whether “everyone” actually means everyone.

          1. I usually don’t respond to items like that one, but ralph.. seemed be injecting a little welcome levity into the discussion, so caught me in a good mood.  I see the original KoolAid chestnut got deleted so you may not have seen the origin of the exchage.  Time to lighten up.

      1. The Dems threw in a 2nd rate candidate so that there would not be a repeat of the Gubenatorial fiasco. Libby Mitchell is hiding under a rock in shame at the damage she caused by not bowing out gracefully when she had the chance.

  9. Democrats aren’t enthusiastic about Dill pickle.  They’re already supporting Angus, so where’s the story about that?  Oh ya, the BDN just likes putting down the right because, after all, they are the Bangor Democrat News.

  10. Notice how the BDN runs these negative articles on non-democrats?  First it was Angus King’s money, and now the lackluster support for Summers.  Dill?  really?

  11. Sorry Charlie. This kind of stuff does not beget votes. You’ve lost mine. Take a freaking hike!

  12. Be smart Summers. Bring our troops home. It’s a lost cause as it is. I would much rather see our borders protected. Not borders elsewhere…

    1. If elected Summers will become another Mitch McConnell butt boy whose focus will be on defeating any legislation proposed by the Democratic Party. Blocking any appointments made by President Obama, while not comming up with any viable alternative suggestions of their own to mend the problems this country has.

  13.     Charlie the Lockstep Monster is a Corporate Republican, you know, the ones who “really” control the show! Thats why Romney was the choice regardless of the Tea Party Movement.

    They only want the Tea Party for votes and they are playing them for all they are worth.

        My advice to the Tea Party would be to embrace the Democrats and try to influence them though diplomacy for defecit reduction and  “non-interventionist foreign policy.”! After all it was the Republicans that ran off to the wrong countries starting wars rather than “defending” the country and rang up enormous unstistainable defecits. You guys need to realize who the REAL enemy is, you made a huge mistake sideing with the Republicans! , give up trying to run the show as the Corporations will chew you up and spit you out in the long run.!

       The embattlement approach is only alienating them from the public and any any meaningful change that they seek. The corporate wing loves this as they can just discard the radicals when they are done using them.

    They ONLY want you guys for Votes!

    1. I feel the same way about Dill & King, both bought & paid for by Quimby.
      The old girl figures she doubles down, thinking one has to win…

  14. Charlie Summers is the Harold Stassen of Maine Federal politics. The fact that any group of people is unexcited about him is hardly surprising or news. What is surprising and more than a little puzzling is that anyone IS excited about his campaign.

    I don’t pretend to speak for all Tea Party activists and/or Ron Paul supporters, but since I am both, I suppose I’m entitled to speak from a position of being representative of at least some portion of the group. I will not support Charlie Summers because his support of liberty and freedom is anemic and shallow, consistent with his status as being the handpicked candidate of the old line Republican establishment that was so disappointed when Snowe decided to withdraw.

    In this US Senate election, I will be supporting the consistent, principled voice of freedom and liberty, Independent and endorsed candidate of the Maine Libertarian Party, Andrew Ian Dodge. There are those who will say that’s a foolish choice, that he can not win, but as discussed at the start of this post, neither can Charlie “Stassen” Summers. I frankly believe that in a race this crowded and cuth throat a principled voice like Dodge’s can rise above and pull out a victory, but in any event he is the ethical choice for true advocates of liberty.

    I do find it interesting, however, that in writing an article about The Tea Party and Ron Paul supporters, the BDN managed somehow to avoid mentioning at all the one candidate in the race whose positions and previous associations in politics most closely aligns him with the positions of those groups. In fact, a review of BDN articles on the Senate race makes it appear that you are allergic to even mentioning Dodge’ss campaign in print.

    Which sort of begs the question: Are you reporting the news or manipulating it?

    1. Oh no! Like Stassen, are we going to have to put up with Charlie Summers for more than a dozen unsucessful runs for office?

    2. Your comment begs the question: do you know the difference between the news sections and the opinion one?

  15. Let’s have a Cynthia Dill story.  How is she faring within her party?  Wow the Dems really choose a real winner with her.

  16. How does the “Tea Party” feel about Kevin Raye? Does he represent that set of values?

  17. What the liberty movement is looking for in a candidate is someone who stands for individual liberty, limited constitutional government, sound money, free markets, and a non-interventionist foreign policy.  Our current US debt is 16 trillion and our unfunded liabilities are estimated at over 100 trillion.  Our annual US deficit is over 1 trillion per year.  We are headed for disaster if serious action is not taken to reduce government spending.  This will require cutting entire agencies and changing our foreign policy.  The only way to avoid our dire predicament is by educating the public and electing candidates who share the liberty movement values I listed above.

    I recommend reading the following: “The Law” by Frederic Bastiat, “Economics in One Lesson” by Henry Hazlitt, “The Revolution” by Ron Paul, and the articles listed here: http://lewrockwell.com/wenzel/wenzel184.html

    The key to electing candidates that reflect the values above is by having a public who holds these values.  The ideas of liberty are very new in the history of human affairs, however I am optimistic over the long term that our ideas will triumph.  The founding of our nation in 1776 is a testament that people are drawn to the ideas of liberty.

  18. Just pick anyone who is better,and write him in,but make sure everyone else knows who his name is.We really need to improve the representation on the hill,people.C’mon Chop,Chop!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *