BANGOR, Maine — The proposed sale of Eastern Maine Medical Center’s dialysis clinics to a for-profit corporation roused concerns Tuesday about the safety of patients seriously ill with kidney disease.

The hospital has signed a letter of intent with Colorado-based DaVita Inc., one of the country’s largest for-profit dialysis chains, to transfer ownership of its kidney dialysis clinics in Bangor, Ellsworth and Lincoln, as well as its home dialysis program. The deal also calls for DaVita to take over management of inpatient acute dialysis services at the hospital.

Dialysis is a procedure that involves filtering toxins from the blood of patients who have diseased kidneys. Many dialysis patients are older and suffering the effects of years of diabetes.

At a sometimes heated public hearing on the sale at Spectacular Event Center, a nurse’s union and patient advocates spoke out against the deal, concerned that DaVita will put profits ahead of patients and highjack local doctors’ decisions about patient care.

Officials with DaVita and EMMC, as well as some dialysis nurses who contradicted the union, argued that the company beats EMMC on many quality measures and has the expertise to better manage the clinics.

No patients of EMMC’s dialysis clinics testified at the hearing.

“When you assign a dollar value to each dialysis patient, you start down a certain path,” said Carl Ginsburg, an attorney for the National Nurses United union who has represented DaVita patients in cases against the company. “How will you recoup that investment? That has been the central concern of DaVita management from its inception.”

DaVita officials said the company’s clinical outcomes are among the best in the industry, leading to fewer infections and lower mortality rates. The company serves about 142,000 patients nationwide.

David Roer, a DaVita nephrologist and group medical director, said patient safety is a top priority for the company. The ownership change will leave decisions about patients’ care in the hands of their doctors, he said.

“The final decision is with the patient’s physician, it’s not made by a suit in Denver,” Roer said.

Tuesday’s hearing on DaVita’s application to buy the clinics was held under a state review process for health care projects known as certificate of need. A unit of the Department of Health and Human Services will review the application and recommend to the commissioner that it either be approved or denied. A preliminary recommendation is expected in August.

Neither the company nor EMMC have disclosed a sale price. A document submitted under the state review process states that the capital expense totals more than $10 million.

DaVita would purchase the clinics and EMMC’s home dialysis program under a subsidiary called Total Renal Care, Inc. It would assume management of the acute inpatient dialysis program at the hospital under a subsidiary called DVA Renal Healthcare and Patient Pathways.

DaVita’s purchase of the clinics would mark the company’s first foray into Maine. DaVita and competitor Fresenius Medical Care, which operates 10 clinics in Maine, run two-thirds of all dialysis clinics in the country.

Kathy Day, a patient advocate and registered nurse who formerly worked at EMMC, has spoken out against the sale, saying the loss of local control could put patients’ lives at risk.

Day became concerned about the deal after learning that DaVita, operator of more than 1,800 clinics in 43 states, is facing legal challenges on several fronts. Last week, the company settled a whistle-blower lawsuit over the use of an anemia drug for $55 million.

Day said she fears that if DaVita takes over the clinics, dialysis patients in northern Maine could be discharged against their will for complaining about substandard care and left with no other treatment options.

She highlighted the case of Larry Hall, a former DaVita patient in Wilmington, N.C. Hall had been a patient for nine years when he received a letter in November 2007 informing him that the facility would no longer treat him, “effective immediately,” because he had placed “extensive limitations” on the clinic’s staff.

The letter, from a DaVita attorney, included a list of clinics run by other companies where Hall could get treatment. The closest was more than 50 miles away.

Hall had challenged the clinic’s management about his care, saying poorly trained DaVita staff used the wrong needles on him, causing scarring and other complications that have required multiple surgeries to correct.

“It was like people off the street, not trained properly,” Hall said recently of the clinic’s staff. “They wanted to get patients in and out as fast as they could.”

Hall had sued the company for negligence and eventually won a $10,000 jury award. Federal regulators also found the clinic violated Medicare rules by dismissing him without notice.

For the last several years, Hall has received his dialysis treatments at the emergency room of a local hospital.

A DaVita spokesman said recently that federal privacy laws prevent the company from commenting on individual cases, but involuntary discharges are undertaken only when patient or staff safety is at risk. Because such dismissals are rare, the company doesn’t specifically track them, but they represent far less than one percent of DaVita’s total patient population, spokesman Vince Hancock said in a May 23 email.

DaVita was chosen as the best operator for the clinics after a lengthy due-diligence process, according to EMMC’s chief medical officer, Dr. James Raczek. If the sale is approved, the same doctors will oversee patients’ treatment and most of the clinics’ nurses have accepted job offers with DaVita, he said. DaVita will also operate under the same state and federal regulations as EMMC, he said.

Strict regulations and the highly specialized nature of dialysis programs have led most hospitals across the country to sell their outpatient clinics.

More than 80 percent of the nation’s 5,000 dialysis clinics are now for-profit, according to an analysis of the industry by journalism nonprofit ProPublica. Financial incentives encouraged for-profit operators to get into the dialysis game. The shift dates back to 1972, when Congress voted to extend Medicare coverage to nearly anyone diagnosed with kidney failure, including full payment for dialysis and kidney transplants.

Some nurses are worried that staffing ratios will be slashed at the clinics. The national nurses union and the Maine State Nurses Association organized a press conference opposing the sale ahead of Tuesday’s hearing.

A DaVita official said the company may in fact add staff to meet rising demand for dialysis services.

The application documents state that DaVita is interested in exploring opening a new outpatient dialysis clinic in Dover-Foxcroft and shifting more clinic patients to the home-dialysis program.

Sandi Hennig, a registered nurse and union member who works at the acute dialysis unit in the hospital, said DaVita is bound to have some patient complaints as one of the nation’s largest dialysis companies.

“You can pick any Fortune 500 company and find people who are unhappy with it,” she said during a break at the hearing. “You can find people at Eastern Maine who aren’t happy with the care.”

Many nurses who treat dialysis patients support the deal, encouraged that DaVita’s expertise and corporate resources will mean EMMC can upgrade old dialysis equipment and improve care, she said.

Dr. Michael McGoldrick, a nephrologist who treats EMMC dialysis patients, denied claims at the meeting that local doctors are cashing in on the DaVita deal. He and his physician partners will be compensated by DaVita under the same agreement they have with EMMC, he said.

“I stand to make zero dollars on this deal. My partners stand to make zero dollars on this deal. We essentially, using the expression, have no skin in the game. We are merely looking at what’s best for patients,” McGoldrick said.

Portions of DaVita’s April 11 application related to the allocation of the sale money, the fee arrangement between DaVita and EMMC for the inpatient program, and agreements for physicians overseeing the clinics were blacked out.

DHHS is accepting further public comments on the sale over the next 30 days.

I'm the health editor for the Bangor Daily News, a Bangor native, a UMaine grad, and a weekend crossword warrior. I never get sick of writing about Maine people, geeking out over health care data, and...

Join the Conversation

32 Comments

  1. This is just the tip of the iceberg, with the Republican agenda of privatizing every entity it can.
    Stay tuned for Rent-a-Cop, Rent-a-Teacher, Rent-a-Corrections Officer, etc.  None of the aforementioned will have nearly the skills or experience of those currently holding those positions…but of course that is what will allow them to be paid very minimum wages, while their CEOs laugh all the way to the bank.
    Nice world this bunch is building.

    1. Just a minor point…Eastern Maine Health Care IS already a
      private, not a government, entity. I don’t have enough information to know if
      this sale of one private entity to another is a good idea (I certainly wonder
      if the for-profit company thinks it can make a profit with it, why can’t EMHC
      do the same to its own benefit?) I do have enough information from this post to
      see you are blinded by your hatred of Republicans and have no concept of how
      Capitalism works. And it has been proven to work quite well to the benefit for
      those willing to work. I fully realize that there are greedy and unethical
      Republicans, just as there are greedy, unethical Democrats and Independents in
      our midst. The overwhelming majority of people do not fit this mold. If we
      could have conversations without vitriolic fervor, it could indeed be a nice
      world we are building.

      1. I don’t want capitalism in my healthcare.  You people who argue for maintaining the current healthcare system take note:  Why is healthcare a marketable service?  Because there is profit to be made.    Want to save some money on your healthcare?  Support a universal healthcare plan in the US and eliminate the profit!

        1. There is no doubt that significant changes are needed in our
          system, but eliminate the profit? I don’t know what you do for a living but I
          have worked in healthcare for the past 30 years, and if my paycheck didn’t
          arrive every other week I would quickly find myself another occupation. I
          suspect the same could be said about any Allied Healthcare Worker, RN, PA, or
          Physician. I am sure you probably don’t provide whatever service you provide
          without compensation. In spite of the many shortcomings in our
          system, people still come here from all over the world (including from
          countries with nationalized healthcare) to receive advanced procedures or a
          higher quality of care.

        2. Then why don’t you work for free so that money is freed up for someone to be cared for….didn’t think you would.   Remember…Socialism is for the people….not the Socialist.

    2. Fine…then you put up YOUR money or gather investors and run it the way you see fit.   Liberals are always good at telling OTHERS what to do with THEIR money. 

  2.  None of the nurses or doctors who defended Davita today have worked for them long term. They have all had the sales pitch that Davita puts forth.  Although they are sincere in their desire to give high quality care, what happens when they are not meeting profit goals?  How will they cut back on care, cheapen supplies, staff, etc.  Those directives will come from Denver Colorado, and they will either abide by the directives..doctors and nurses alike,  or they will be done.  Also, a doctor today said they will never practice REUSE, which is a practice of Davita. Davita patients have been asked to sign waivers of liability so the clinics can practice REUSE. Reusing dialyizers, (personal “kidney” devices) puts patients at risk for infection, blood clots and sickness from chemicals used to flush them out.   Never is a long time.  Will the Denver CO headquarters tell the nephrologists that they will indeed practice reuse, because it will be cheaper care for the patient and there will be less need to keep new dialyzers in stock?
    There will be no local board of directors or local governance.  Patients have been harmed by Davita and many of them  have been dismissed simply because they were empowered and vocal patients and they spoke out. 
    Davita’s priority is profits, not patients.   A 6 billion a year gross business and a 22 million dollar CEO pretty much tells us that it is all about the money.

    1. I really don’t think you will be happy with anything.  First you and the nurses union talk about how unsafe the care at EMMC is and now they bring in a national company that specializes in dialysis and you are still appalled.  EMMC researched the company before they went ahead with this deal.  All major healthcare companies have complaints with people even bringing forth incredibly unwarranted litigation.  It is very common for healthcare organizations to settle these suits no matter where the fault lies.

        1.  I am a proud member of MSNA (as a retiree), and I am affiliated with the Consumers Union Safe Patient Project, NEVER(Northeast Voices for ERROR reduction), the consumer advisory council with Maine Quality Counts, and I have worked with the Maine Quality Forum, Consumers for Better Care, Critical Access Hospitals patient safety collaborative, the Maine Legislature, and many others.  Nurses (and the many other members of all the organizations I work with)  are most concerned when patients and their safety is threatened.  I sincerely believe that  Davita is a threat to patient safety. 

  3. just do a little research and find out who from the hospital is on the board of Davita or who are the major stockholders.
    No need to sell it unless someone is going to make a buck thats sitting on EMMC’s board

  4. Wasn’t there a time when EMHC EMMC was trying to buy up any healthcare organization in the north Maine area they could get their hands on? Now they have a profitable enterprise and they want to sell it? Why? Why does EMMC want to rid itself of a paying healthcare enterprise, one that the people of northern Maine depend on? What exactly that DaVita can do that EMMC can’t? Cut costs? EMMC supporter “livinginreality8″ says  ” EMMC researched the company before they went ahead with this deal”.  So what?  What is the purpose of the deal at all? Does EMMC have other plans for the money? How are they going to spend this money on something more important than giving dialysis to the people of northern Maine? It smells. The dangers of having one dominant healthcare organization in an area is obvious and will become more so.

  5. Shouldn’t the focus here be good quality of care for the patients  that will  be involved in this transition?  Shame on you Kathy Day for calling yourself an advocate. All you are trying to do is cause more stress in the lives of these patients.  Yes, problems do occur . It could be in the Dialysis setting or it could be ICU . If  you had really investigated as an advocate you would have found that other companies also have had problems. That is why there is CMS, The Network and policy and procedures for these patients that the staff are to follow. At any time CMS can make an unannounced visit. They have the power to keep you open or close you.  The  patients at the dialysis unit at EMMC are very fortunate to have had EMMC over the years. Changes do occur.  This change may be for the best.  You call yourself an advocate for dialysis patients. Well  you need to change your focus as an advocate. These are things  you should really be focusing on. Helping the patients find the money each money to pay for medicine , food or  fuel.  You try to live on the dialysis patients budget . You couldn’t do it.  Your true focus should be on the real everyday problems that dialysis patients face all over the world.   Why don’t you as an advocate for dialysis patients Kathy Day go to just one unit . Spend 3 or 4 hours sitting by this patients side and ask them how their lives have changed since starting dialysis. Ask them how you could make it better for them. Then lobby for this and every patient. That is a REAL ADVOCATE for all Dialysis patients.

    1.  I have spoken with many dialysis patients.  These patients were all Daviata dialysis patients who were first harmed by their clinics, and then after they complained about the harm, many were dismissed by Davita.  I have not claimed to be a dialysis patient advocate, I am a patient safety activist. If and when I see my neighbors and community threatened by the possibility or the reality of unsafe healthcare, I volunteer to help stop it.   I have spent hours and hours with a dedicated dialysis patient advocate who has worked with thousands of dialysis patients who have been both harmed and dismissed by Davita and other for profit dialysis corporations.  Her experience is that Davita is #1 for dismissals.  In many of those cases neither the ESRD network nor the CMS were responsive to the patient’s complaints.  Davita representatives are firmly entrenched in the ESRD network, so that explains part of their lack of response.
      If Davita buys EMMC dialysis for over 10 million dollars, the priority turns from patients first to profits first.  Kent Thiry, CEO of Davita amasses an annual compensation of 22,000,000 million.  Money intended for safe high quality dialysis care goes into his and Davita’s stockholders pockets.  Money intended for safe high quality ESRD care for Mainers will be siphoned out of our state and into stockholders pockets.  When the clinics are not profitable enough for Davita, cuts will be  made and care will be cheapened.  Who can say definitely that Davita would not close clinics if they are not profitable enough to suit them?  EMMC would never close clinics, because they are accountable to this community and region.  Their board of directors are local governance.  The governance of Davita is in Denver, CO.  The people who control the puppet strings will never been seen in Maine dialysis clinics.

      Ask yourself Ladypeach17, if money/profits were taken out of this conversation, would we even be having it?  Profiteering off patient suffering is a despicable thing.  It leads nowhere except to corruption. 

       None of this is good for patients or Mainers. 

      Dialysis patients must come first. 

      I am very proud of my work and the people I work for …that would be PATIENTS!

  6. You know if a company is for profit in the health care industry the patient is screwed. Their safety is now at risk and their costs skyrocket. The company got to make the almighty dollar for a profit no matter how many patients suffer and die. Well at least the CEO will be able to buy a new mansion and a new yacht to go with it.

  7. Dialysis clinics have been bought up across the country by Da Vita and Fresenius, a manufacturer of the dialysis machines. proving that there must be profits in some medical care that is largely paid for by Medicaid. 
    Fresenius seems to have a good model and, while experiencing growth/merger problems, is generally rated fairly well by most health care professionals in this area (Albany, NY). 

  8. My biggest issue with the article above is this blatent comment: “A DaVita spokesman said recently that federal privacy laws prevent the company from commenting on individual cases, but involuntary discharges are undertaken only when patient or staff safety is at risk.”

    Come on DaVita Spokesperson, YOU know the CMS Conditions for Coverage with regard to IVDs.  You left out a whopping big one:  IVD for non-payment. 

    The truth is that MANY Involuntary Discharges (IVDs) are for NON-PAYMENT.  Which means that if a person can’t afford the 20% that Medicare does not pay, they are at risk for IVD.  Also, I would wonder if DaVita will take ALL patients no matter what their insurance.  DaVita has a history of soliciting “HIPPERS’ (patients with really good insurance, in order to supplement (gouge) to compensate for the Medicare bundled rate.)  After 33 months,  as long as they have the work credits, people on dialysis are made Medicare Primary no matter what their working or insurance status. so the big profit for DaVita is the private insurance payments in the first 33 months of dialysis. (and you wonder why your premiums are so high.  In 2008, my insurance company was billed on average $36,000 a month for my dialysis) The average Medicare payment in the bundle is around $226.00 per treatment. (in-center treatments are usually scheduled 3x a week)

    It would be GREAT if the new EMMC DaVita clinics would PUBLISH their rates.  Let’s see some transparency here.  Capitalist or Communist, let’s have some transparency. For those people who are making “zero dollars” on this deal, well, too bad for you, because others have had profit participation, $$ incentives and all sorts of perks thrown in to their little hut in DaVita’s “Global Village”. There is some great video on line of your CEO Kent T. dressed as a swashbuckling Pirate at your Las Vegas Convention/party.

    This is about money people, not quality of care.  Medicare does set the minimum level of care for dialysis facilities, and the state enforces that.  What incentive does DaVita have to give you anything BUT the MINIMUM quality of care.  As long as they meet the MINIMUM requirements, everything else if profit.I would like to know that there are options for otherwise healthy people who can’t afford dialysis other than death.

    How many IVDS for non-payment did the DaVita Corporation have last year???  Where are those people getting their dialysis now? 

  9. Interesting. After years of reaching out octopus-like and gathering all the medical services under one roof because “We can do it better,” now they are selling off specialty care to gain some money. What goes next? What if our insurance won’t cover the treatments because there’s profit involved? I do not trust hospitals.

  10. After even more thought about  DaVita buying out EMMC ‘s Dialysis unit I have come to this conclusion. Kathy Day is NOT an advocate for the patients. SHE IS an advocate for the Union! Since the dialysis unit will no longer be part of EMMC the RN’S employeed by DaVita will no longer be union. 

    1. Very true, put your life in the hands of a Technician with a GED, minimal training, making minimum wage with a could give a crap attitude. If you have to go there for treatment I feel for you. No RN available to help. Very scary.

  11. As a former dialysis patient I can tell you first hand I received the best care possible from Dr. McGoldrick & staff at EMMC.   I am still under follow up care and continue to be treated with care, concern, respect & honesty.  I am lucky to still be around and often think of my friends that still need this life saving treatment.   Dr. McGoldrick is one of my favorite doctors, and I saw many through the course of my disease.  I believe he does, and will always have his patients as top priority, not the almighty dollar. 

  12. As a former dialysis patient I can tell you first hand I received the best care possible under Dr. McGoldrick and staff at EMMC.  I am still under follow up care and am always treated with respect, care, and honesty. Dr. McGoldrick is one of my favorite Dr’s, and I’ve seen many throughout the course of my disease. I’m lucky to be off dialysis, and I often think of my friends that still need this life saving treatment.  I believe they will all be Dr. McGoldrick’s top priority, and not the almighty dollar. 

  13. As a dialysis patient safety advocate, I encourage all to read the inspection reports of Davita at http://www.qualitysafepatientcare.com  Although these are for California, if such as the following is happening in California, then one can rest assured that it is happening in other states as well (1) lack of adequate education/training of staff, (2) lack of unit-level supervision due to untrained RNs (3) lack of adherence to facility policies and procedures as well as federal regulations —

    If EMMC now uses RNs for dialysis, Davita might change to using technicians as they do in their outpatient units – technicians, in order to administer a life sustaining treatment, only are required to have a high school GED and are cookie cutter trained by Davita —

    Although Davita professes to have the best outcomes related to infection control, etc, I would highly recommend, again, reading some of the Davita inspection reports to see where there are serious problems in the clinics – the inspection reports show the day to day care that patients receive —

    Retaliation is alive in many units and patients experience covert or overt retaliation from staff when they speak up to ensure they receive quality safe care —

    opinions of Roberta Mikles BA RN
    Dialysis Patient Safety Advocate
    Director, Advocates4QualitySafePatientCare
    http://www.qualitysafepatientcare.com

  14. Here we go with even less patient care from Eastern Maine Wealth Care. Next, you will hear a voice with an Indian accent answering your call button. “Hello, my name is Char-lee. How might I be of assistant this beautiful morning”. One moment please. ” Hello, Dell computers. How might I be of assistance this beautiful morning?” Bad patient care, the place is full of infections like MRSA. Money, money, money. The hell with patient care.

  15. I Thank God for having around Patient Advocates like Arlene Mullins and Kathy Day who looks out and listen to me and other patient. We patients have enough problems with dealing with day to day medical problems. I have been harass daily by some of  Davita staff because i complain about being injured not properly train TECH’S using wrong needles , giving wrong meds and not giving me meds for over three months that my doctor had order for. Because I complain they place in my Medical records that i had a Behavioral problem. There is a lot MORE I can tell , no one should never have to go threw this as a dialysis patient or person.

  16. Davita is the devil.   They hire empty suits from the corporate world to be VPs and ignore dialysis-specific needs.  I recommend that patients dialysis at an independent unit owned by a caring nephrologist.

  17. Peach — First, Kathy Day is one of the most concerned advocates for patient
    safety and second, for your information (1) CMS does not protect patients as
    they should be — for example, for years they have never initiated effective
    consequences for negative outcomes that are preventable, even in spite of the
    OIG reports — (2) The Networks often do not help patients and patients
    complain of such — further, the Networks have NO authority to site a facility
    for anything — and, lastly, the money that goes to the Networks should be going
    to patients — Do we really need the Networks If you think the three
    aforementioned areas are effective than shame on you — Oh, the clincher is that
    CMS, who approved the new federal regulations allowed dialysis technicians for
    ONLY have a high school GED – shocking and scarey — our group opposed this —
    keep in mind that Davita uses mostly technicians for care and only has a few RNs
    in their units – CMS also initiated minimal experience for RNs in charge of a
    unit– now, if you are aware, a life – sustaining treatment can turn to a deadly
    one in a matter of seconds and it takes experienced people to intervene

    I sat with my father for six years, three times a week — I know about
    dialysis –

    Oldfishergeek — all the providers have problems just take a look at the
    California inspection reports at http://www.qualiatysafepatientcare.com
    – if this is happening in CA then likely happening in other states —

    ALthough Davita (and, other providers) profess excellent care,  I beg to differ – the daily care that patients receive can be seen in the inspection reports at the above site —

    Over and over I hear from staff that they are told get patients in and out .. things are not going to get better as long as the large providers have so much control…
    THANK YOU KATHY DAY FOR WHAT YOU HAVE AND ARE DOING __
    opinions of Roberta Mikles – Dialysis Patient Safety Advocate

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *