If Ben Franklin were alive today, he might be inclined to observe that in this world nothing can be certain except death, taxes and that message at the bottom of your television screen warning that this channel is about to go away because of a financial dispute with the cable operator.
Among the top three most annoying television-viewing experiences (right behind PAC-funded political attack ads and anything starring Snooki) is the seemingly monthly warning of a blackout of your favorite channel.
Recently, the CBS/CW affiliate in Bangor and the ABC affiliate in Portland have pulled their signal from, respectively, DirecTV and Time Warner cable because of disputes over retransmission fees. The disputes revolve around these local TV stations wanting to be compensated by the satellite and cable systems that carry (retransmit) their signals.
The argument is that for decades cable and satellite operators have paid ESPN, CNN, Fox Sports, TNT, TBS and the Knitting Channel (we can only wish) monthly per-subscriber fees that now range from an average of 1 cent per subscriber to ESPN’s industry-leading $4.69 per subscriber.
ESPN alone represents more than 26 percent of all cable fees.
In other words, whether or not you watch ESPN’s SportsCenter at noon or its Chia Pet infomercial at three in the morning, 26 percent of your cable or satellite bill is dedicated to ESPN.
Given that ESPN is available in approximately 100,000,000 television households, it pockets $469,000,000 every month, which translates to an annual total take that would make even Donald Trump blush: $5,628,000,000.
Granted, some of that money is used to pay for the ever-escalating fees for marquee sports events, but consider that ESPN also sells commercial time, so its annual gross is, well, gross.
For years, local television stations such as WMTW in Portland and WABI in Bangor made do by charging only for commercials, but in recent years they have coveted a piece of that tasty subscriber-fee pie that ESPN is hungrily devouring.
So the dances begin as the retransmission agreements expire.
WABI pulls its programming from DirecTV, WMTW (via its parent company, Hearst) yanks its signal from Time Warner, and the messages at the bottom of your TV screen commence.
For me it’s a wearying experience because I know that the impasse will be temporary.
I also know that the local broadcast stations have a more legitimate claim to cable subscriber fees than do, say, TLC, MTV, OWN, or the Disney Channel because WABI, WCSH, WGME, WLBZ, WMTW, and WVII not only carry a full array of network and syndicated entertainment, news, and sports programs, they also produce local newscasts, promote local events and charities, and employ local people.
Something else I know: my cable bill is no longer a good value.
I pay approximately $103 each month, which serves up a basic cable package, a measured-speed Internet connection and a DVR function.
The only channels I watch (the only channels I receive with this package, really) are the local affiliates and whatever else is thrown in to make it appear that I get more than I can from an antenna on my roof (but, truly, how many times can one watch Top Gear on BBC America?).
Sure, there’s a movie-rental feature, but the titles are limited and seem more expensive than what my Netflix subscription or Redbox can provide.
And while I, in effect, pay for ESPN, I can’t watch it because it’s not part of my selected tier of channels.
I once had the entire array of cable offerings: HBO, Cinemax, Comedy Central, TCM, Food Network, and Kardashian Klassic (or so I imagined), but I don’t miss any of them.
Primarily that’s because I can access much of that content online or via Netflix, but it’s also because I have come to realize that self-limiting my television options has allowed me more time to consume news from around the world via that World Wide Web contraption, read an actual book, read a virtual book, page through the latest issue of Cat Fancy, fill out the BDN’s crossword puzzle, paint a bedroom wall and learn the intricacies of microwave cooking.
Satellite providers and cable systems need to (as ESPN might term it) man-up and pay the local broadcasters for the value they deliver, and the local broadcasters need to stop crying wolf every time a re-transmission agreement hits the (temporary) skids.
Because, to paraphrase Ben Franklin, fish, visitors and that message at the bottom of your television screen warning that this channel is about to go away all stink after three days.
Towle Tompkins, director of sales and marketing for Bangor Daily News, has held management positions at the Outside Television network, WGME in Portland and WABI in Bangor.



Illuminating and disturbing but note that often dish netwroks do not provide truly local channels. it came out with resolution of the WABI dispute that an ABC channel from Florida was also reinstated. Hardly a local channel, at least WABI is. If one has a choice between cable and satellite, guess which one provides better service.
DirectTV added Bangor as a designated DMA(FCC mandated viewing area)AFTER the 2006 rulings that NAB fought bitterly.Even then I couldn’t get Bangor locals.Six years later my “locals” are NY.Previously they had been from Atlanta and San Diego.Please explain THAT.And over the air is not an option.I had a tech come out and look into installing a good antenna and he said it would pull in one station,possibly two.Not worth it.
Consumers have asked for years to be unbundled but NAB will do anything to keep its extra channels on.Viacom’s ratings are way down,especially Nick but we will still pay for that and subsidize others.
If you are a Direct TV subscriber, all local channels can be had directly from Direct TV instead of the NY channels – call them and ask, I did.
Not in my area.I did ask and was told “they’re working on it”3.5% of their subscribers cannot get true locals.I’m working on winning Powerball- same odds.
Wait a minute. Something is radically wrong with this picture. Networks with their excessive, obnoxious commercials should be PAYING the cable and satellite providers to make their message available into viewers homes, Not vise versa. Since this digital age was mandated. Unless you are in a perfect signal area you get NOTHING. Seems like these greedy networks, just like Viacom did last night to DirecTV for 3 billion squabble should be heavily investigated by the FCC, are double dipping and end up right into the CEO’s pocket and laughing all the way to the bank. But obviously the FCC could care less about consumers. Their interest seems to be keeping the big boys happy. If they ever make a change, would our rates go down, I doubt it.
That is actually how it USED to work.Guess who started the extortion?Right-FOX in 1996.
Thank the right wing for screwing the consumer again.
worst thing about fox network… they cancelled firefly.
This cannot be repeated enough. I just finished the series and I feel so cheated now. That show deserved 6 more seasons.
watch serenity it provides some closure.
What is firefly?
$103/month and you’re not getting ESPN in your tier? You need to change your package
I thought everyone got ESPN no matter what else you get.
But your $103 would be considered a better value if your cable provider ponied up The Knitting Channel.
I find it more amazing people have so little to do but watch 100’s of channels of tv? This is Maine there are so many better thing to be doing.
and most of them involve pissin’ off whinny liberals!
whiny*
haha thanks dictionary troll
Anytime! :)
What really stinks about blacking out the channels is that our “local” affiliates punish us, the viewers, knowing full well that when the contract is signed everything is retroactive and they’ll be paid even for the time they pulled their channel. They use us as pawns in negotiations. If I had a choice I’d watch national feeds of the major networks and drop the locals entirely, but can’t because I’m in the “Bangor viewing area”, even though I can’t receive their signal with an antenna.
I sympathize, Veazie is definitely in the Bangor Viewing Area, but on a good day i get channel 7, and only channel 7
Then your antenna is pointed in the wrong direction. I have an antenna in Milford and get all local channels.
We are looking at a different way, we do not watch sports, religion, shopping, soap operas, commercials, cooking, fishing etc. So we need only a few channels. There must be a better and cheaper way. CNN is a must.
“CNN is a must”—I almost spewed coffee all over my computer
I would’ve “Liked” this fifty times if I could’ve!
The average household receives 50+ channels(often far more)but watches 12-15 tops.
a must…. ur funny
CNN… Really? No, I’m not kidding… REALLY???????
At least ESPN provides something you can’t get in most other venues(live sports)The real problem is that I have to pay for right wing religious crap that is offensive and works against me and most other civilized human beings. Yet because this is on the “family”tier and then incorporated into all subsequent tiers,I’m forced to subsidize non taxpaying filth like Pat Robertson and Hagee.If you want that,you should have to pay extra for it and keep it away from decent people.
Take it easy on that leftist koolaid buddy, your going to stress yourself out maaaaaannnnn!
funny.. I didn’t see anything about politics in the article…..
Not the venue for this type of discussion.
First of all,the article writer obviously has a bias against ESPN. And it’s my money being allocated for things that hurt me and other Mainers.
neither of those things has to do with politics either… my point stands.
I’m not sure if you are saying you’re “hurt” by this article or paying for cable… in either case, if you really don’t like it, then stop paying for it. Also in either case, the same material is available online for free.. unless, of course, you want to watch ESPN :P
I have family members who are elderly and TV is their enjoyment-the computer is not an option. I’d be perfectly happy to spend less on cable as I watch very little-but if it keeps them happy,so be it.
As my earlier post stated,I’m hurt by the racist,sexist filth spewed by Hagee,Robertson and Fox which my cable bill supports.I shouldn’t have to pay for religious channels.
That’s exactly how many people feel about tax dollars going to NPR/PBS.
As if such tax dollars DID go there.They don’t because that would educate people.The R’s don’t want that.PBS/NPR is barely political.
u mad bro?
At least ESPN provides something you can’t get in most other venues(live
sports)The real problem is that I have to pay for left wing holier than thou/hippy
crap that is offensive and works against me and most other civilized
human beings. Yet because this is on the “family” tier and then
incorporated into all subsequent tiers,I’m forced to subsidize non
taxpaying filth like PBS. If you want that,you should
have to pay extra for it and keep it away from decent people.
“filth like PBS”You mean like scientific programs such as NOVA?Nice plagarism.No originality from the right.
I’m not sure you know what plagiarism means… nor do you know how to spell it.
Spelling error duly noted.My statement still stands.
Tv should be free for putting up with the crapola.
Couple yrs ago I discontinued our satellite service package and installed a HD local antennae on my house–I pick up 9 channels which includes all the local news and PBS and Fox–the antennae was like 100 bucks or so. We have plenty to watch when the mood strikes us and what we cant get on TV we can check out on our computer. So now we don’t pay anything for TV viewing. We were paying like 69 per month for Sat –we took it 1 step further and had our landline disconnected for our phone -as we all have trac- phones anyways–another 35 bucks a month saved–We don’t miss all those crappy shows that your forced to pay for and def don’t miss all the sales pitches on the land phone –And were saving 1200.00 a year..and off the couch a heck of a lot more ! See there are options folks.
Back in the third grade I was smarter than the person who wrote this headline.
I knew how to spell the word “cable”.
I read “cabal” in the headline and went looking for the conspiracy.
Hmm. I thought he meant “cabal”. Could fit the theme.
It’s a play on words.
Hmmm, a play on words maybe….The use of this term usually carries strong connotations of shadowy corners, back rooms and insidious influence; a cabal is more evil and selective than, say, a faction, which is simply selfish; because of this negative connotation, few organizations use the term to refer to themselves or their internal subdivisions.
I think the original title was “Gestapo TV”
Cabal T.V. Is this something new? I’ve heard of Cable T.V.
It’s a play on words. Look up cabal.
Cable tv should be based on personal choice not what they think i want to watch. We as individuals should be able to design our programming around our likes and pay for the service we want not what someone else thinks i want. Who can watch all that is offered and who would want to watch all of that stuff?
I’d like to believe that it would be cheaper to just pay for the channels you watch and not have to buy the rest. Only the FCC pushed by politicians can make that happen , since all politicians are in the pockets of big business we’ll never see that happen. Imagine all the screaming if we were to go in to a book store for a few magazines and were charged for them all ! Dosen’t make sense , does it ? Who are those who were elected as public servants actually serving ?
You have the choice to NOT pay. And when enough people do this, they will start coming out with packages like you describe.
Puzzles me why anyone would pay to watch hours of commercial advertising.
If all you see is commercial advertising… your getting up and leaving the room at the wrong time! :) There is still a lot of worthwhile content. Granted a fair share of crap too.
We use an antenna and get 2.1, 2.2, 5.1, 5.2 and 12(x3); we could get 7.1 & 7.2 if we moved the antenna but then we’d lose the others. Since we’re so far out of town we don’t have the option of cable and I don’t miss it at all. Can get news on the internet and find plenty of other things to do with our time with the tv off.
Lets see. You own a business and you make money … Puzzling…
All the whinners that thought it was OK for people without cable to lose the stations to digital transmission.
You need to pay for your product or don’t get it.
The local stations have no rights to these products for free..
Huh?
CABAL TV…………..Learn how to spell BDN
learn how to look up words on the internet:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cabal
This is clearly a play on words.