WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats narrowly approved a plan to preserve tax cuts for the middle class while letting them expire for the wealthy on Wednesday, giving Democrats a significant political victory on a measure that is fated to go no further in Congress.
Senators approved the bill by a near party-line 51-48 vote, with Vice President Joe Biden presiding over the chamber in case his vote was needed to break a tie. Minutes earlier, lawmakers voted 54-45 to kill a rival Republican package that would have included the best-off in the tax reductions.
The $250 billion Democratic measure would extend tax cuts in 2013 for millions of Americans that otherwise would expire in January. But it would deny those reductions to individuals making over $200,000 yearly and couples earning at least $250,000.
Passage of the Democratic measure put the Senate on record as backing a bill that closely follows the tax-cutting vision of President Barack Obama. It averted what would have been a significant embarrassment for Democrats and Obama, who has made tax fairness an overarching theme of his re-election campaign.
The vote also serves as a counterpoint to the GOP-run House, which next week will approve tax cuts nearly identical to the $405 billion Republican plan the Senate rejected Wednesday.
Sen. Susan Collins, who along with Sen. Olympia Snowe voted with their Republican colleagues against the plan, said she favored a complete overhaul of the tax system instead. She also said the Democratic plan did not do enough to protect small businesses.
“The Democrats’ proposal, which is backed by the administration, would not only raise taxes on hard-working families, but also allow the ‘death’ tax to rise to a confiscatory top rate of 55 percent on estates, with only $1 million exempted,” she said in a statement. “This would make it virtually impossible for far too many small, family-owned businesses and family farms to be passed on to the next generation.”
Snowe also favors comprehensive tax reform.
“I voted to extend tax relief for all Americans because, as the Congressional Budget Office recently reported, a failure to address impending policy decisions such as the sequester and expiration of the current tax rates could have a negative impact on GDP between 1.5 and 3.5 percent, potentially sending the economy back into a recession,” Snowe said.
“The question is, who are you fighting for,” Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said before the vote. “Are you fighting for the people who make a billion dollars a year? That’s who the Republicans are fighting for, and they get so emotional about it. Or are you fighting for the middle class, the heart and soul of America.”
Republicans said the measure was all about Democratic posturing for the upcoming elections and would hurt the economy because boosting taxes on the wealthy will hinder them from hiring workers for their companies.
“Thank goodness it’s not going anywhere because it would be bad for the economy, the single worst thing we could do to the country,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said.
With Senate control at stake in November’s elections, Republicans were hoping that several Democrats seeking re-election would hurt their candidacies by having backed the Democratic package. The bill would dramatically boost the estate tax, which would be widely unpopular in farming, ranching and high cost-of-living states, and increase levies on dividends and capital gains, which are relied on by many elderly people.
“That’s what today’s votes are all about,” McConnell said in a thinly veiled warning to Democrats. “Showing the people who sent us here where we stand.”
The White House chimed in by reiterating its support for the Democratic plan.
“All sides agree on the need to extend the tax cuts for the middle class,” the White House wrote in a statement. “This legislation reflects that consensus and should not be held hostage while debating the merits of another tax cut for the wealthy.”
Under the Democratic measure, individuals earning over $200,000 and couples making at least $250,000 would see their top rates rise from 33 percent and 35 percent today to 36 percent and 39.6 percent in January.
Democrats argue that the well-off should contribute to efforts to contain federal deficits, while Republicans say many of those affected own businesses and would have a harder time hiring workers. The increase would affect 2.5 million households, or 2 percent of all 140.5 million tax returns, according to 2009 Internal Revenue Service statistics.
The Democratic bill would also boost the top tax rate paid by people who inherit estates to 55 percent, exempting the first $1 million in an estate’s value. The GOP measure would maintain today’s 35 percent top rate and would not tax the first $5.12 million of an estate’s value.
In fresh figures released this week by Republicans, Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the Democratic provision would affect 55,200 estates next year, compared with 3,600 who would face estate taxes under the GOP plan.
Democrats would impose top tax rates next year of 20 percent on dividends and capital gains, two sources of income enjoyed disproportionately by the wealthy. The GOP top rate would be 15 percent.
The GOP bill ignores some tax credits for low- and middle-income families that Democrats want to extend for college costs; for some low-income couples and large working families; and for families with children.
All were part of Obama’s economic 2009 stimulus bill. Democrats say those tax breaks were meant to be permanent but Republicans say they were only a short-term response to the recession.
___
Associated Press writer Jim Kuhnhenn contributed to this report.



Great news.
Incredible!
The top 10% of income earners pay more than 70% of the country’s income taxes… and Democrats whine that it’s time these rich folks started paying their “Fair Share”?????
“…And Barack Obama so loved the Poor — he created millions more!”
You dont get it do ya!
If one kid has all the Marbles and he is forced to give a few to the others to get a game going so be it!
You can’t play with nothing in your pocket!
After all, it’s all about the Game —not Marveling over the hoard that you cheated from everyone else!
Joseph Goebbels would be proud of this headline. Actually, the Dems are not attempting to cut taxes for the middle class, their tax rates would stay the same. The Dems are trying to raise taxes during a down economy. However, as Obama has stated “his policies are working” and “the private sector is doing fine”. So if you agree with Obama, I guess it is OK to raise taxes now, even though he was the one who argued (based on the view of his economists) that is was not wise to raise taxes during a bad economy.
It is good to see that there are actually people who are educated on this issues out there, such as yourself. This isn’t an issue of whether you believe the rates should be higher or lower, but instead I find this to be a very serious issue of the media of not only being bias, but flat out lying and attempting to turn one group against the other.
So the bottom line, after all the partisan excuses and nonsense, is that Sen. Collins voted to raise the tax rate for just the working middle class but NOT the wealthiest American, right ?
In other words, she cast a vote to increase YOUR taxes, if you are an average Mainer.
With Collins here in Maine voting to keep screwing the Maine middle class, is it a wonder why Romney hasn’t come to Maine ? Even Ron Paul knew better than to go poke the doghouse when the occupant is home and ‘ticked’ off at constantly being beat over the head. November, folk’s, is coming. You want to see a serious change in Washington as far as your tax’s go, V-O-T-E ! Get out there and support your Candidate, whoever it is. You want change, work for it or get out of the way and settle for what you get, it’s that simple.
I think you are confused! How is Collins screwing the middle class?! In my mind, it’s Snowe who only cares about the wealthy…primarily because she is one! I’m so glad she has hose no step down…we need a person who cares about the majority of Maine people!
Wait, so how are they screwing the middle class?
That headline has quite the spin to it, actually, it is a flat out lie. Not raising taxes on a group of people is NOT the same as cutting their taxes.
The Democrats didn’t want to cut taxes for the middle class, they wanted to let the tax rates for the wealthy go to pre-Bush rates. Again, this is not the same as cutting taxes.
The Republicans didn’t want to cut tax rates for the wealthy, they simply want to extent the Bush tax cuts for all, not raising, or cutting anyones rates. Again, this is also not the same as cutting tax rates.
Whether you agree with the Democrats, or Republicans on this issue is not the point. The point is, this headline, like so many others, are misleading, incorrect, and appear to be nothing more than attempt to turn one group against the other.
Scrap the whole Tax Code . . . Repeal the 16th ammendment . . . and start over with Tarrifs and a national sales tax that excludes food, clothing and housing . . . . how is that for a start. This country needs to move away from the “Class wars”. We need to come together and become more productive as a nation . . . and the only way to do so is to eliminate taxes on Income and Savings.
“Republicans said the measure was all about Democratic posturing for the upcoming elections and would hurt the economy because boosting taxes on the wealthy will hinder them from hiring workers for their companies.”
Ain’t THAT aload of bull!
Taxes are at an all time low!!!! And
Last time I was at Lowes they had me self checking out with a computer and there was nobody around but a security gaurd!
The economy is in the toilet because “””consumers””” don’t have any money!
Not because “””Corporations””” don’t!