When he ran for president in 2008, Mike Huckabee spoke about the good eating habits that led to his 105-pound weight loss, and he often touted his book “Quit Digging Your Grave With a Knife and Fork.”
Now Huckabee has found some of those pounds he lost, and he has a new message: He wants Americans to eat more fast food.
“The goal is simple,” he announced this week, calling on Americans to help those who honor “the Godly values we espouse by simply showing up and eating at Chick-fil-A on Wednesday, August 1.”
As of lunchtime Tuesday, Huckabee’s Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day already had 100,000 RSVPs. If each of those people buys the Deluxe Chicken Sandwich meal (1,080 calories) and tops that off with a brownie sundae (590 calories), the weight gain associated with Huckabee’s effort could be about 50,000 pounds.
Well done, governor. An obese nation thanks you.
Huckabee is starting this food fight for the spirit, not the body. Unfortunately, he is doing violence to both. His defense of the fast-food restaurant will make Chick-fil-A a fat target in the culture wars and will further divide Americans. Apparently, it isn’t enough to be split on matters of politics; now we must choose sides between red and blue eateries, retail stores and consumer products.
The trouble began last week, when the Biblical Recorder published an interview with Chick-fil-A’s president, Dan Cathy. Cathy defended his closed-on-Sunday policy and his contributions through a foundation to conservative causes. Cathy, though attesting that his wasn’t a “Christian business,” said he was “guilty as charged” when asked about opposition to gay marriage: “We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives.”
This implied that gay people (not to mention divorced people) had no business eating at Chick-fil-A. The reaction was furious: Boston’s mayor said he would block the company from the city, and the Jim Henson Co. stopped developing children’s meals for the restaurant. Chick-fil-A quickly retreated, saying in a statement that “Going forward, our intent is to leave the policy debate over same-sex marriage to the government and political arena.”
The controversy might have wasted away, but Huckabee fed it with a call to defend Chick-fil-A against “vicious hate speech and intolerant bigotry from the left.” He protested: “If Christians affirm traditional values, we’re considered homophobic, fundamentalists, hate-mongers, and intolerant.”
Huckabee is thus forcing Americans to take a stand: If they eat at Chick-fil-A, they are affirming Christian principles and opposing gay marriage. But what about millions of people who don’t wish to make such a statement and merely like chicken nuggets (preferably with ranch or honey-mustard sauce) and waffle fries?
I asked T.J. Parker, the owner of the Chick-fil-A franchise in Silver Spring, what he thought about Huckabee. He looked stricken, as he should: He operates in a blue part of a blue state, across the street from Ben & Jerry’s and down the block from Whole Foods. “For any comments involving anything, you have to contact public relations,” he pleaded.
If only Cathy, and Huckabee, had shown such restraint. They didn’t, and now Chick-fil-A seems destined to climb to the top of the left’s boycott list, already crowded by, among others, Wal-Mart, Target, Bayer, ExxonMobil, Koch Industries, Peabody Energy and United Parcel Service. Conservatives “buy-cott” such enterprises to counteract the boycotts, while observing their own long boycott list, including: AOL, Planet Hollywood, Nike, Southwest Airlines, General Mills, JCPenney, Starwood and Whole Foods.
Boycotts are most effective when highly targeted, such as efforts to get advertisers to shun Glenn Beck’s Fox News show (now canceled) because of his outrageous accusations, or to get companies to defund the American Legislative Exchange Council over its conservative ballot initiatives. But when they are vague statements of consumer disapproval — the left doesn’t like Coors and Domino’s, while the right dislikes Starbucks and Ben & Jerry’s — they serve little purpose. If you boycott all the targeted companies, you’d be wearing no clothing, eating compost and living in a tent made of hemp you planted yourself.
There’s a difference between shunning a company simply because you don’t like the management’s politics and punishing a company for a specific misdeed. Chick-fil-A changed categories last week, and Cathy, realizing his mistake, is trying to retreat.
Huck should let him go — and stop turning people into Christian warriors simply because they want to Eat Mor Chikin.
Dana Milbank is a columnist for The Washington Post. His email address is danamilbank@washpost.com.



I am not a Christian but will stop by Chick-fil-a for:
Chick-fil-A® Chargrilled Chicken Sandwich – 290 Calories
Side Salad – 70
CaloriesDASANI® Bottled Water – 0
CaloriesTotal Calories: 360
I will stay trim and fight for first amendment rights at the same time.
50% of the country agrees with Dan Cathy as a little googling would have shown.
Seems like you are just a typical lazy liberal reporter.
Huckabee screeches about the first Amendment, claiming that gay people and their allies are bullying Chick Fil A for having an opinion and for being Christian. Does the pendulum not swing both ways? Can only Chick Fil A voice their opinion and gay people have to be forced to eat their fried garbage? Or do they too have the right to voice their opinion and speak with their wallets?
For the record, it’s not because Chick Fil A is Christian run that the boycott is happening. It’s their anti-gay policies, donations, activism, etc. that is causing the stir. There are many gay Christians out there.
What in the world are you talking about – “gay people have to be forced to eat their fried garbage…” If gays want to speak with their wallets, more power to them. Who’s forcing anyone to eat at Chick-Fil-A? Talk about a straw man. Wow!!
I very specifically referenced an instance in which those on the right screeched that gays were wrong and bullies for speaking with their wallets.
Talk about strawman? And what exactly are you doing? You ignore half my comment so you can get in a dig — keep your wow to yourself.
Let the libs boycott Chick-fil-A. They won’t be missed.
Target wouldn’t agree with that thinking. One thing you can count with any business, negatively effect their bottom line you’ll get their attention.
Ignoring the unfortunate political brouhaha, I have mixed feelings about Chick-fil-A. On a couple of trips below the Mason-Dixon line, I’ve eaten there twice (would have been more but didn’t know they’re closed Sunday’s). I found them to be somewhat overpriced, one restaurant was well managed, better than most. The other was sub-par on all counts. Since that was the last one I went to, I probably won’t return to any Chik-fil-A.
Disclaimer; I’m not a lib. I do think that Hucakabee and Cathy are overreacting. It seems as though conservatives, Christian or not, need to fell at least a little persecuted.
Persecution is part of being on the right side of an issue.
And that is why people against same sex marriage demonize gays and lesbians.
The opposition is simply standing on moral grounds. We don’t demonize.
Is that why Chick Fil A’s CEO donated to a company that seeks to paint gay and lesbian americans as child molesters? If that is not demonizing a group of people, then I don’t know what is.
I thought it was the left that always states that what a person does with his or her money is his or her business. Oh, I forgot, that rule only applies to their side.
The CEO of Chick Fil A has the right to spend his money as he wishes. I’m not denying him that right. If he wants to donate to homophobic organizations, he can, but I am going to make sure that none of my money goes to his “cause”.
Who knew there was a list of businesses I was supposed to boycott. Although I did have a relative who refused to buy Heinz ketchup in 2004, because it somehow supported John Kerry.
Well done, Mr. Milbank. Your focus is on the words of two unelected, private individuals who spoke as such. It’s called free speech, even though it’s not politically correct, sensitive to so-called “diversity” and LEED-certified. People have the right to say what they want to say in this country…at least for now…
…which is why it’s such a crock that you and others continue to focus on the non-story and ignore the real story – government officials threatening to ban a private company from doing business in their jurisdiction because a corporation takes a particular stand on an issue (file under corporate freedom of speech and thank the Supreme Court for rightly ruling on Citizen’s United).
Side note – the First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees freedom of speech not only for private individuals, but for collectives of individuals, ergo not only corporations, but entire industries. It’s called Freedom of the Press – if you disagree, I suggest that you talk to your representative about submitting legislation to prevent newspapers from endorsing political candidates. As memory serves, the NYT, the Wa Post and the Chicago Trib are all publicly traded companies, are they not? How about slapping a gag order on them come October and let’s see who’s screaming about corporate free speech. Just sayin’.
But I digress…where’s the outrage over the comments made by Mayors Tom “Mumbles” Menino and Rahm “Chicago Values = 250+ murders” Emanuel? These tolerant blowhards are leaders of two of the biggest cities in America and yet nothing about them threatening Dan Cathy and Chick-Fil-A with a blatant violation of the First Amendment? All this while Emanuel cozies up to Louis Farrakhan and his anti-Semitism and while Menino attends mass at the local Catholic church.
At least there’s a silver lining to the story. Apparently Menino and Emanuel got the memos from the law guys, who informed them that they just opened the door to a bazillion dollar lawsuit and have been backing away from their tolerant intolerance faster than Joe Biden can spell that three-letter word, “J-O-B-S”…
You silly man. Don’t you know liberal rules only apply to those who are in agreement with them. If you think they only target businesses, think again… http://www.citizenlink.com/2012/06/21/why-is-glsen-bullying-my-community/