PORTLAND, Maine — While drought cripples agriculture in the American Midwest, New England has seen an 85 percent increase in extreme downpours over the past six decades — and both troubling weather patterns can be blamed on global warming, a group of scientists, environmental advocates and politicians said Tuesday.

Democratic Rep. Chellie Pingree joined state Sen. Justin Alfond, D-Portland, and John Jemison of the University of Maine Cooperative Extension for the unveiling of Environment Maine’s latest report. The environmental advocacy group released a study following the increases in frequency and intensity of rain and snowstorms from 1948 through 2011.

“Extreme” precipitation events were defined in the study as “those expected to occur no more than once per year on average at a particular location based on the historical record.”

According to the report, severe rain and snowstorms have skyrocketed in frequency in New England over the study period, far outpacing increases in downpours seen in other parts of the country. The mid-Atlantic states saw a 55 percent uptick in the storms over the 64-year stretch and the five regions outlined between Ohio and Nevada saw increases between 26 percent and 36 percent.

The South Atlantic states saw a 17 percent jump in severe rainstorms while the three Pacific Coast states crept up by only 6 percent over that time period.

Ben Seel, Environment Maine clean energy coordinator, told reporters Tuesday that Maine has seen a 74 percent climb in the frequency of extreme rain or snowstorms from 1948 through 2011.

“In other words, severe rainstorms that used to hit Maine once every 12 months now hit Maine once every 6.9 months on average,” he said. “And scientists tell us that that trend toward heavy rainstorms is clearly linked to global warming. We need to heed scientists’ warning that these more frequent heavy rainstorms are linked to global warming and do everything we can to reduce carbon emissions.”

Seel evoked the recent storms and resultant flooding in Brownville, which initial estimates said caused as much as $1.2 million in damage, to illustrate his point. The damage to Brownville and neighboring communities fell short of the required $1.8 million in public infrastructure damage to qualify for federal assistance.

“In the 20th century, flooding caused more property damage and loss of life than any other type of natural disaster,” he said.

Pingree, who owns a farm on North Haven, and Jemison told the assembled media Tuesday the change in weather over New England is problematic for farms and agricultural operations, although in a much different way than the droughts afflicting the midwestern states.

Jemison said warmer winters — the Environment Maine report noted that nine of the 10 warmest years on record have occurred since 2000 — have led to increases in the number and variety of insects farmers must defend against. He said muddier springs make it difficult for farmers to plant or access their crops, while inconsistencies in the summer rains alternate between drowning and drying them out.

“We don’t need rapid rainstorms that come out of nowhere, we need gentle soaking rains that come at routine moments throughout the summer,” Pingree said.

The Environment Maine report attributes the changes in precipitation to global warming, saying that warmer temperatures increase evaporation and allow the air to hold more water. The study states that the water content of the atmosphere is increasing at a rate of about 1.3 percent per decade, sapping the soil of the moisture it needs for crops and building up humidity until extreme storms become unavoidable.

“Given the severe droughts in the Midwest, it’s important to understand that bigger rainstorms or snowstorms do not mean more water will be available for us,” Seel said. “Scientists actually predict that as global warming intensifies, longer periods of relative dryness will be between the extreme rainstorms, increasing the risk of drought. The same increase in evaporation that leads to more water in the air also leads to drier soils.”

Added Pingree: “Scientists tell us — and I’m actually one of those people who believe them — that global warming causes increased evaporations that cause drought conditions in the middle of the country, and all of that evaporation gets dumped into a downpour that just becomes runoff. That’s not a successful way to run an agricultural system, and it’s not a good sign for any of us.”

Also on hand Tuesday was Dr. Johan Erikson, professor of environmental science at Saint Joseph’s College in Standish. Erikson said he did not contribute to the study but was asked to review it for scientific merit. He said Environment Maine’s “research methodology … was excellent.”

Erikson said that while the degree to which humans have contributed to global warming remains ripe for political debate, the data on temperature increases as well as the frequency of rain and snowstorms are “really straightforward science.”

“The public should have no problem accepting the significance of this study,” he said.

Those who spoke at the news conference Tuesday said the report reinforces the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in vehicles and power plants, as well as fund research into renewable energy sources.

The report calls for federal and state governments to adopt limits on global warming pollution that would reduce emissions to at least 35 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and by at least 85 percent by 2050.

Pingree touted recent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rules capping carbon dioxide emissions at new power plants at 1,000 pounds per megawatt produced — down from an average of 1,800 pounds currently — and reducing the plants’ sulfur dioxide emissions by 74 percent by 2014.

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

Join the Conversation

42 Comments

  1. What mechanism was used 65 years ago to measure “Extreme downpours?”  Would they have known it if they saw it?

        1. The questions were so ridiculous they hardly merit answers, but here you go:

          Rain Gauges — which have been in use since the 1400’s and are still used today.

          Yes, of course they would. Why on earth wouldn’t they recognize trends and anomalies in a very well understood and thoroughly studied topic? Maine and much of the US was largely farm country back then and rainfall was an extremely critical measure.

        2. And you do?  I’ve lived longer than 65 years and am well aware of the capabilities of weather data over that period.

          1. While I was quite aware of the aware of the fact that we have kept fairly detailed statics temperature highs and lows, rain fall totals etc., I was not aware that anyone 65 years ago knew what a “extreme downpour” was.  To answer your question, “No.”  That’s why I asked. If, in fact, we had people who knew what an “Extreme Downpour” was AND sat around with a rain gauge and a stop watch (As some have suggested) measuring intense rainfall, I was not aware of that.  Hence the questions.

    1. 65 years ago we had already set off several A-bombs and were working on the H-Bomb. (1947)

      The instruments may not have been “digital,” or as precise to the hundredth on an inch, but good science is more than having a fancy tool, but knowing how to use the tools you have!

      Observation, rain gauges, stopwatches, that is how one measures extreme downpours.  Good records have been kept for over a century.

  2. All the alleged effect on global cooling of the 1,800 wind turbines envisioned by NRCM and Angus King for Maine are equal to that accomplished annually by a mere 1% of the Maine Woods. A nightmarish tradeoff for the wholesale destruction of 360 miles of our tourist state’s ridgelines.  

    Google:
    NRCM’s CO2 – Analysis

    PEOPLE ARE ON THE TAKE.

    By the way, the U.S. is leading the world in CO2 reduction. It is due to the increased use of clean natural gas. This happened in spite of organizations like NRCM, not because of them. FACT.

    1. Rubbish. Fracking contributes methane into the atmosphere and methane is 100 times more heat absorbent than CO2. So while we reduce our CO2 emissions we replace it with methane. Our contribution to global warming continues to grow.
       By the way if you want model movement away from fossil fuels, Norway is WAY ahead of us in renewables, generating all of its electricity from renewables, and Germany generates a significant amount from solar.
        

      1. “Although Germany’s promotion of renewable energies is commonly portrayed in the media as setting a “shining example in providing a harvest for the world” (The Guardian 2007), we would instead regard the country’s experience as a cautionary tale of massively expensive environmental and energy policy that is devoid of economic and environmental benefits.”http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/germany/Germany_Study_-_FINAL.pdf 

        Last month, unnoticed in the UK, Denmark’s giant state-owned power company, Dong Energy, announced that it would abandon future onshore wind farms in the country. “Every time we were building onshore, the public reacts in a negative way and we had a lot of criticism from neighbours,” said a spokesman for the company. “Now we are putting all our efforts into offshore windfarms.”
        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/denmark/7996606/An-ill-wind-blows-for-Denmarks-green-energy-revolution.html

        In early 2009 the Socialist government of Spain reduced alternative energy subsidies by 30%. Calzada continues: “At that point the whole pyramid collapsed. They are firing thousands of people. BP closed down the two largest solar production plants in Europe. They are firing between 25,000 and 40,000 people….” “What do we do with all this industry that we have been creating with subsidies that now is collapsing? The bubble is too big. We cannot continue pumping enough money. …The President of the Renewable Industry in Spain (wrote a column arguing that) …the only way is finding other countries that will give taxpayers’ money away to our industry to take it and continue maintaining these jobs.” That “other country” is the United States of America.
        http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/wind_energys_ghosts_1.html

    2. Wholesale destruction my butt. Wind projects build a few little roads and clearings. Have you ever seen what a large-scale forestry operation looks like? The amount of woods lost to a wind farm is miniscule in comparison.

  3. Let us all “hope” for “change”.  Now go, Chellie, create a congressional delegation to write a bill requiring the weather to gently soak at routine moments.  Hire a government contractor to enforce the changes made by the legislation and be sure to make the fine (not a tax) high enough so the weather may qualify for a federal “green” loan which will then create jobs.

  4. These George Soros funded yokels hold a press conference and the BDN regurgitates their press release. But yesterday Mitt Romney announces he wants to end subsidies for wind power (and rightfully so) and the Bangor Daily News issues not a peep. Say goodbye to this industry of charlatans come 2013.

    1. So is he going to end oil subsidies too? Oil gets many many times as much money from the government than wind does.

  5. well, you had better advance your solar  energy agenda if all we are likely to see is quick and short lived storms.

  6. They come out with this announcement following a rainless July and a winter in which I ran my snowblower exactly once.

    1. Yes, of course you are right. Global climate issues are completely controlled and measured by what goes on in your back yard over the course of one year.

    2. Extreme weather right?  A winter drought in Maine.  Then again, we broke records on the plus side the year before.  Extreme?  You bet.

  7. Vote for pingree. She will bring gentle soaking rains to Maine whenever we ask her to. Thanks chel!

    1. There is an element in the environmental left that wants to undermine the U.S. and topple it from it’s # 1 position of greatness. One way to do this is to try and strangle our energy supply. These enemies of America clamp down on nuclear, discredit new versions of nuclear such as thorium reactors, rip out our hydro, fight importation of inexpensive hydro from Canada, attempt to cease oil drilling everywhere, fight pipelines, turn natural gas drilling into a dirty word, oppose clean coal technologies and as stick the propagandistic label “dirty oil” on tar sands, to the detriment of the U.S.The reality is the U.S. has more recoverable coal than any nation on earth. The country though that produces the most coal is China, producing perhaps three times as much as the U.S. Yet we seldom hear the environmental left attack China. No, for them the root of all evil is the good old USA. Obama himself trumpeted to his lefty friends that he planned to bankrupt coal plants.

      Then, the energy sources that these enemies of America prescribe for us are the totally weak and useless grid-scale wind and solar.  They also help drain the treasury and often transfer U.S. taxpayer funds to places like China who manufacture much of this mature but rotten technology.
      While many in the environmental left are simply true believers and products of the pervasive anti-American indoctrinations within our public school systems and universities, there are also more hard core elements who coopt the dogma drunk into unwitting foot soldiers with the express purpose of weakening this country. 

      What better way than to choke off our energy supply? 

      1. Note that one alleviation method cited was to reduce CO2 emissions at power plants.  Guess who’s fighting that one.  The power industry has been running cheap with underpriced  coal power generation for decades.  The time of reckoning has come.

  8. ” We need to heed scientists’ warning that these more frequent heavy rainstorms are linked to global warming and do everything we can to reduce carbon emissions.”

    Good idea, here are some suggestions: 1. Ground Air Force 1   2. Make it a law that OUR Politicians can only speak when they are proposing something that will actually benefit the AMERICIAN PUBLIC  (That would really cut down on global warming).   3. ALL elected Officials must buy & use (at their expense) hybrid vehicles.   4. No Politicians can start running for office any sooner then one year before election …………….. these ideas would at least be a start.

    1. The vast majority of our electricity comes from coal and the resulting byproduct is CO2.  We’ve know that CO2 is a greenhouse gas for well over a century.  Anything we can do to be less dependent on coal would be a good start in my book.

  9. Make it a law that it will only rain between midnight and 4 am and most everyone would be happy, no matter where you live. If we only lived in a perfect world.

  10. In addition to ” gentle soaking rains that come at routine moments throughout the summer”  we need honest, intelligent representation in both Augusta and Washington who actually perform the job they were hired to do.  My bet is on the gentle rain…

  11. I think we should build many huge desalination plants and flood the deserts to cool the earth from the rising ocean waters….
    My morning coffee thought !

  12. Still trying to sell that old “global warming” scam, necessary to allow government that Mrs Sussman is a big part of, to be able to control us “peons” and “dorks” not smart enough to control our own lives.

    I could smell this rat when I read the headline above the story.

    Chicken Little still lives!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *