BANGOR, Maine — A former Maine police officer is criticizing the heavily redacted Maine State Police report issued last week that determined the Rev. Robert Carlson was a serial child sex abuser who went undetected for decades.
“Too much is inarguably being covered up,” Westbrook native Brian Gagan, who worked as a patrol officer in Westbrook and Scarborough and now lives in Arizona, said in a telephone interview Monday. “Secrecy is only necessary in law enforcement when a prosecution or prosecutorial investigation is under way.”
Lt. Christopher Coleman, commander of the Maine State Police’s Major Crimes Unit for the northern part of the state, on Monday was sent several of Gagan’s criticisms about the 104-page Carlson investigative report released last week.
“We are not going to dignify that accusation with a comment,” the lieutenant said in an email. “Many state police reports are redacted pursuant to the appropriate laws. These laws afford protections to the privacy of victims and witnesses, among others.”
Title 16 of the Maine Revised Statutes says that law enforcement and other agencies may not release to the public investigative records that contain the names of witnesses, victims, confidential sources and techniques and procedures used by police not generally known by the public.
Carlson jumped to his death from the Penobscot Narrows Bridge on Nov. 13, 2011, three days after state police began their investigation into allegations that he sexually abused a boy, and just a dozen hours after Penobscot County Sheriff Glenn Ross, his longtime friend, informed him about the criminal probe.
“It’s impossible to check the accuracy and veracity of the report because of the redaction,” Gagan said. “My reaction is: This thing was ignored for far too long. It sends alarming signals to me.”
Gagan was one of four former police officers who conducted a “psychological autopsy” of the domestic violence homicides that occurred in Dexter on June 13, 2011. Their report, released in November 2011, evaluated the murders of Amy Lake and her two children by her estranged husband, who also killed himself. The report states the family might be alive today if law enforcement and court officials had handled the case differently and taken his guns away.
In the Carlson investigation, “there was a significant amount of material gathered which contained personal information and is protected from disclosure,” Coleman said, explaining the redactions. “We are not going to get into the number of pages.”
Gagan said that in his opinion, “when the state police don’t disclose stuff it means there is stuff they don’t want disclosed. … It’s a coverup.”
“Their unwillingness to be fully disclosing on the Carlson case [is] unconscionable and wrong for Maine’s taxpayers,” the former police officer said.
State police investigators went to the home of Carlson’s widow on Monday, Aug. 6, to inform her about the findings of the eight-month investigation.
They also stopped by to see Sheriff Ross.
“We gave Mrs. Carlson a heads up that the report was being released because she was Mr. Carlson’s wife, and to Sheriff Ross, as a professional courtesy,” Coleman said.
Elaine Carlson left the state the following day, the Rev. Carl Schreiber, pastor of the East Orrington Congregational Church, where Carlson was a senior pastor for 25 years, said last week, and Ross also is now on vacation.



Unredact this report, at least to a degree. The public deserves to know what kind of a beast Carlson was.
Probably this kind of beast. See post below.
What does this have to do with anything?
Answer – Absolutely Nothing!
You nuts or what? Too much talk radio in your life I’d say.
Sorry, wrong link. Try this one. http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2012/08/06/news/major-porn-network-may-include-cannibalism/
That link has no connection whatsoever to Carlson’s despicable behavior. Whether HeadStart is a money pit and a waste of taxpayer dollars is irrelevant to this discussion.
You must have missed the whole part of the article explaining how the law restricts what can be released…..
It’s an opinion, but he has some validity to his, the question now is what is best for the victims, instead of whats best for Carlsons family which seems to include Mr.Ross.
Keep in mind that Carlson was closely tied to law enforcement for many years. There are lots of cops and legal types out there that have a vested interest in keeping things on the down low.
PS – BDN – stop calling him Reverend! The guy lied about his credentials. He was a con-artist and a child molester, not an educated, ordained Minister.
I know…that is an insult to “reverends” everywhere..he was a pig…even that is too good for him..
The fox said the chicken committed susicide and thats why the fox was cleaning up the mess.
Redact the names of his victims to keep them out of the public eye, but unredact the stuff he has done, where he has done them and when he has done them. I knew Rev. Bob personally and I would like to know what kind of man I came to “respect”. I deserve to know the truth, as does the other 10’s of thousands of others that knew him and “respected” him.
I also “knew” Carlson. At this point in time I know all I need to know about him. He was a liar, a con man, a fake, a pedophile.
IMHO what we now need to do is investigate why several people (a therapist, two Bangor police officers, a Penobscot County Deputy Sheriff, a university president at a minimum) failed to do what they are required to do by law. If any of them had made the call and reported their suspicions, how many children would we have prevented Carlson from abusing?
I know this makes you uncomfortable but he was also a homosexual. We live in day and time that we dare not even begin to question that a homosexual we like might also may be a pedophile. This has a lot to do with why this monster was not stopped. We dare not offend the homosexual crowd. Yes, there are pedophiles among homosexuals just as there are among heterosexuals. Bob Carlton for the most part went after young boys, he knew where to find them. He was a creepy sick man that was “married” to a weak woman that too covered for him.
“I know this makes you uncomfortable but he was also a homosexual.”
Doesn’t make me the least bit “uncomfortable”. He was a pedophile. A person that has sex with a child. That is the attraction…the age of his victims.
~~~~~
“We live in day and time that we dare not even begin to question that a homosexual we like might also may be a pedophile.”
For discussion sake let’s say he was a homosexual. How do you question ones sexual orientation when that person lived as a heterosexual married male?
~~~~~
“This has a lot to do with why this monster was not stopped.”
The monster was not stopped because a therapist failed to report that they knew of a half dozen victims.
The monster was not stopped because two Bangor police officers did not report or open an investigation into seeing Carlson leaving a dark parking lot at night in the company of a young boy that was not his son. Those officers considered placing surveillance cameras which tells me they considered the behavior to be suspicious.
The monster was not stopped because a Penobscot County Deputy Sheriff did not report seeing Carlson in the company of young boys at 1 to 2 in the morning in the control room of the jail.
The monster was not stopped because a university president did not report not one but two phone calls concerning Carlson.
~~~~~
“We dare not offend the homosexual crowd.”
You offend the homosexual “crowd” when you say a pedophile is not a pedophile but a homosexual pedophile. A pedophile is attracted to by the age of the victim, not the gender.
~~~~~
“Yes, there are pedophiles among homosexuals just as there are among heterosexuals.”
A pedophile is a pedophile is a pedophile.
~~~~~
“Bob Carlton for the most part went after young boys, he knew where to find them.”
Correct and that is what made him a pedophile.
~~~~~
“He was a creepy sick man that was “married” to a weak woman that too covered for him.”
Well now you are entering an area that you have no idea about. You don’t know Elaine Carlson from a hole in the wall. You don’t know what, if anything she knew. You don’t know if she was “weak” or strong. Spouses (male and female) are often times the last to know about the secrets and worse, evil dark secrets their spouses carry around with them.
you said it much better than I……
For discussion sake let’s say he was a homosexual. How do you question ones sexual orientation when that person lived as a heterosexual married male?How do you know he lived as a heterosexual married male? You and I weren’t in his bedroom, plus he and his wife never had any children.I stand by my statement that Elaine Carlton was a weak woman. She had to know her “husband ” was not an ordained minister, yet she went along with the sham. She was with him the night he received the award from the scouts and she basked in the glory of the night. She enabled her husband’s dysfunctional behavior.For the most part homosexuals don’t even like to acknowledge that there are creepy people among them. Bob Carlton was a homosexual who was also a pedophile, liar and fraud.
There are creepy people among us heterosexuals too.
Nothing you have said here makes any sense and it is plain to see that you are just trying to erroneously tie pedophilia to homosexuality. Nice little dog whistle there, trying to call in the gay bashers.
Life isn’t as black and white as you would want to believe. Each individual has his or her own motivations, and even when they live to tell the tale, you never know if you are getting the real story, or just another facade. People lie, people cheat, people hurt other people for reasons we cannot even begin to fathom. There are varying shades of grey in this world, and to sit on the internet and pretend to have all of the answers is extremely naive.
What we do know is this. Carlson preyed on innocent children. Gender is irrelevant, because even if he did identify as a homosexual deep down inside, his personal motives cannot be ascribed to any other individual. The reason we are discussing Carlson is because he was a pedophile. To try to distort that fact to make a political point is cheap and underhanded.
It’s 2012, time to evolve.
Don’t go twisting what I am saying. I know it’s 2012 and it’s time for you to stop thinking that only heterosexuals are creepy. And by the way what was political in what I was saying? He was a homosexual that was a pedophile. I’m sure if he was a priest you would identify him as a Catholic priest who was a pedophile. What’s wrong with pointing out he was a homosexual?
Because we don’t identify a pedophile that abuse young children of the opposite sex as a heterosexual “that was a pedophile”. We simple call them what they are….a pedophile.
Nor do we spend endless time pointing out a pedophile that enjoys opposite sex children as a heterosexual “that was a pedophile”. We simple call them what the are…a pedophile.
So why do you and others spend endless time attempting to link a pedophile like Carlson to the homosexual community? Why not classify him like we do “heterosexual” pedophile and simple call him a pedophile? Why do you feel the need to sub-classify Carlson?
Last week there was an article in the BDN concerning an adult male that sexual abused a female infant and recorded the sexual assault on his cell phone. I don’t recall one post that went out of their way to identify this monster as a heterosexual “that was a pedophile”. Why?
Pedophiles are pedophiles. Wrong is wrong.
This guy gets it.
How many of his victims were female? Like Sandusky, Carlson was a homosexual.There is a good argument to be made that Carlson was covered because anyone saying anything would be chastised like Chick-fil-a. It is all about love unless of course you happen to have a different opinion.Then watch the hate spread.
“For discussion sake let’s say he was a homosexual. How do you question ones sexual orientation when that person lived as a heterosexual married male?How do you know he lived as a heterosexual married male?”
Ah he lived as a heterosexual male because he brought his wife to private and public events. He was seen in the community as a heterosexual male. He was not “seen” by the community at large as a homosexual.
~~~~~
You and I weren’t in his bedroom, plus he and his wife never had any children.”
I know several couples that do not have children. Does that make the male a “homosexual”?
~~~~~
“I stand by my statement that Elaine Carlton was a weak woman.”
And I stand by my statement.
~~~~~
“She had to know her “husband ” was not an ordained minister, yet she went along with the sham.”
You have no idea what she did or didn’t know. You have no idea what he told her about his background. By your logic any spouse should be held criminally responsible for all criminal acts of their spouse because they “had to know”.
~~~~~
“She was with him the night he received the award from the scouts and she basked in the glory of the night.”
Yes she did. As any loving spouse would that had no idea about the dark secrets of their spouse.
~~~~~
“She enabled her husband’s dysfunctional behavior.”
Self serving statement.
~~~~~
“For the most part homosexuals don’t even like to acknowledge that there are creepy people among them.”
Self serving statement.
~~~~~
“Bob Carlton was a homosexual who was also a pedophile, liar and fraud.”
Carlson was a liar, a fraud, a con man and worse of all a pedophile.
Bob Carlton became an ordained minister after he came to Bangor, ME and after he was “married” to Elaine Carlton. She had to have known he never attended theology school in NYC as he claimed.
Why do you insist on being self serving by not acknowledging that Bob Carlton was a homosexual. If it came out that a popular minister that was truly good and doing wonderful things was a homosexual I bet you would seize upon identifying him as a homosexual. You have an issue with the fact that a homosexual did horrible things. Remember it’s your crowd that likes to “out” people whether they want to be or not.
When a man molests little girls, we never blame it on the fact that he was heterosexual. Molesting children is not about sexual orientation. Wrong is wrong, molesting is molesting, and pedophiles are pedophiles. There is no evidence that suggests that it is better to be molested by a person of the opposite sex than to be molested by a person of the same sex. Wrong is wrong.
“Bob Carlton became an ordained minister after he came to Bangor, ME and after he was “married” to Elaine Carlton. She had to have known he never attended theology school in NYC as he claimed.”
I don’t know when Carlson was “ordained”. So I will just have to take your word that he was ordained after he moved to Bangor.
The MSP report has a copy of a degree from the New York Theology School or some such name and another poster linked to the schools site that the program was only available to inmates of Sing Sing. The schools website also stated that the program takes inmates to preachers. Was this “degree” the basis for his ordination? If you were his spouse would you have questioned the degree?
~~~~~
“Why do you insist on being self serving by not acknowledging that Bob Carlton was a homosexual.”
Because we don’t identify a pedophile that abuse young children of the opposite sex as a heterosexual “that was a pedophile”. We simple call them what they are….a pedophile. Nor do we spend endless time pointing out a pedophile that enjoys opposite sex children as a heterosexual “that was a pedophile”. We simple call them what the are…a pedophile.
~~~~~
“If it came out that a popular minister that was truly good and doing wonderful things was a homosexual I bet you
would seize upon identifying him as a homosexual.”
You assume to much. There are already ordained homosexual ministers and I haven’t “seized” upon anything they have or haven’t not have I made an issue about their stated sexual preference. You and a few others do that and quite well too I might add.
~~~~~
“You have an issue with the fact that a homosexual did horrible things.”
No, I have a problem when PEOPLE do horrible things. I really don’t care if they are homosexual, heterosexual bisexual or asexual. When a PERSON does a horrible thing WE should ALL have a problem with THEM doing that.
~~~~~
“Remember it’s your crowd that likes to “out” people whether they want to be or not.”
Do you assume that I am a homosexual? Because if you are or do you would be very far off the mark. I have been married for 25+ years to my wife so please, in the future before you assume anything please ask.
~~~~~
So in closing I will ask you to answer the following questions
1) Why do you and others spend endless time attempting to link a pedophile like Carlson to the homosexual community?
2)Why not classify him like we do “heterosexual” pedophile and simple call him a pedophile?
3) Why do you feel the need to sub-classify Carlson?
4) Last week there was an article in the BDN concerning an adult male that sexual abused a female infant and recorded the sexual assault on his cell phone. I don’t recall one post that went out of their way to identify this monster as a heterosexual “that was a pedophile”. Why?
Thanks for that…I find it curious that one had to have been an inmate at Sing Sing in order to have studied for the Masters in Professional Studies that Carlson received….A copy of the diploma is in the state police report….What was Carlson in jail for that gave him access that masters course………………Also there are plenty of very good pastors and ministers who we never went to a seminary or were ordained by a bishop…
Is it possible that he “photo shopped” or otherwise “created” the diploma? It would be way to easy to determine if he was an inmate in NY. It would be a matter of public record.
I was involved fifteen or twenty years ago in a church in Maine where we had a creepy heterosexual guy who always wanted to be with the children, and he taught Sunday school for a while. In a game of “Red Rover” he called out, “Red Rover, Red Rover, let girls with no underwear come over.” That creeped out a lot of people. Because of that, and other creepy things he did, church leaders asked him to not work with the children, and to not go into the Religious Education wing of the church unless he was accompanied by a member of the Religious Education Committee.
We asked the police to run a background check on the man, and the police helped, but they said he had changed his name and moved from out-of-state, and at that time they didn’t have any way to find out if he had a record under a different name in another state.
He and his wife (she defended his behavior) left the church when we put restrictions on his behavior. We had no evidence that he had molested any children, but we didn’t want to take any chances, either.
A small percentage of people, some straight and some gay, molest children. But it doesn’t have anything to do with sexual orientation. Pedophiles are pedophiles. And there is no evidence that suggests that it is somehow better to be molested by someone of the opposite sex than to be molested by someone of the same sex. Both are horrible, and both are completely wrong.
You stated pedophiles are attracted to a victim on account of his youth. It would be hard to make a case against this assertion since in order for a person to be the legal victim of a pedophile, the person would have to be under 18. But Carlson had sex with males over 18. That without any doubt makes him a homosexual as well, doesn’t it? Also, I’m not aware of any minor female victims of his.
The term “pedophilia” means one thing legally and something else in the social sciences. The term in some contexts is reserved for prepubescent victims only. It’s questionable if any of Carlson’s victims were prepubescents. I heard one victim was merely 11 years old. Some boys reach prepubescence before 12. There we can’t tell if this 11 year old was prepubescent or not.
“You stated pedophiles are attracted to a victim on account of his youth.”
Yes I did.
~~~~~
“It would be hard to make a case against this assertion since in order for a person to be the legal victim of a pedophile, the person would have to be under 18.”
Here is the legal definition for Maine:
ME. REV. STAT. tit. 17-A, § 253 Gross sexual assault Class A crime if offender engages in a sexual act with victim and the victim:
• Submits as a result of compulsion or
• Is under 14 years
• Is under 12 years
Class B crime if offender engages in a sexual act with victim and:
• Offender has substantially impaired victim’s power to appraise or control victim’s sexual acts by administering or employing drugs,
• Offender compels or induces victim to engage in the sexual act by threat,
• Victim suffers from mental disability that is reasonably apparent or known to offender, and which in fact renders victim substantially incapable of appraising the nature of the contact involved or of understanding that victim has the right to deny or withdraw consent,
• Victim is unconscious or otherwise physically incapable of resisting and has not consented to the sexual act,
• Victim is in official custody as a probationer or a parolee, or is detained in a hospital,
and the medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally those under the age of 14, though onset of puberty varies). The prepubescent child must be at least five years younger than the
adolescent before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.
~~~~~
“But Carlson had sex with males over 18. That without any doubt makes him a homosexual as well, doesn’t it?”
From what little WE know about the abuse he continued a sexual relationship with one of his victims past the age of 18. I am not a psychiatrist and I don’t believe you are either so I think I will leave the determination if an illicit relationship that began as sexual abuse of a child that continues beyond the age of 18 becomes a “homosexual” relationship or the continuation of the sexual abuse that began during childhood. Since the victim has become dependent and remains dependent on the actor I would wager that it would be considered a continuation of the sexual abuse that began as a minor.
~~~~~
“Also, I’m not aware of any minor female victims of his.”
Here is a reading assignment for you, “Facts About Homosexuality and Child Molestation” ( http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_molestation.html ) but here is the conclusion:
“The empirical research does not show that gay or bisexual men are any more likely than heterosexual men to molest children. This is not to argue that homosexual and bisexual men never molest children. But there is no scientific basis for asserting that they are more likely than heterosexual men to do so. And, as explained above, many child molesters cannot be characterized as having an adult sexual orientation at all; they are fixated on children.”
~~~~~
“The term “pedophilia” means one thing legally and something else in the social sciences. The term in some contexts is reserved for prepubescent victims only.”
Asked and answered above.
~~~~~
“It’s questionable if any of Carlson’s victims were prepubescents. I heard one victim was merely 11 years old. Some boys reach prepubescence before 12. There we can’t tell if this 11 year old was prepubescent or not.”
And you know the age of Carlson’s victims how?
My first statement, “It would be hard to make a case…”, was intended to illustrate your statement was not entirely accurate. Pedophiles are not just attracted to a victim only on account of their youth. Some pedophiles, for instance, are attracted to young males only. Carlson may well have been one of those. When it comes to sex attraction, there are all sorts of combinations.
Concerning my second statement, that is, “But Carlson had sex with males over 18…”, I still maintain that his relationships with minor males past the age of 18 was homosexual in nature. The fact he was attracted or still attracted to someone of the same sex he engaged with is by definition homosexuality.
My last statement, “Also, I’m not aware of any minor female victims of his”, was intended to suggest Carlson may have been primarily attracted to males as opposed to females. Nowhere did I say or mean to indicate that pedophilia is more common among homosexuals. I steered away from making such a comment because I knew it’s a controversial one. In spite of what your source indicates (I read that source on at least 5 occasions prior to this thread), the jury is still out on this issue.
“My first statement, “It would be hard to make a case…”, was intended to illustrate your statement was not entirely accurate. Pedophiles are not just attracted to a victim only on account of their youth. Some pedophiles, for instance, are attracted to young males only. Carlson may well have been one of those. When it comes to sex attraction, there are all sorts of combinations.”
Ah Yes whawell they ARE attracted based on the age. Here is the medical definition (again) – the medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a PRIMARY OR EXCLUSIVE SEXUAL INTEREST IN PREPUBESCENT CHILDREN (emphasie mine) (generally those under the age of 14, though onset of puberty varies). The prepubescent child must be at least five years younger than the adolescent before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.
~~~~~
“Concerning my second statement, that is, “But Carlson had sex with males over 18…”, I still maintain that his relationships with minor males past the age of 18 was homosexual in nature. The fact he was attracted or still attracted to someone of the same sex he engaged with is by definition homosexuality.”
I disagree. One of us is right and one of us is wrong. I am not going to change your mind so fine, believe what you want.
~~~~~
“My last statement, “Also, I’m not aware of any minor female victims of his”, was intended to suggest Carlson may have been primarily attracted to males as opposed to females. Nowhere did I say or mean to indicate that pedophilia is more common among homosexuals. I steered away from making such a comment because I knew it’s a controversial one. In spite of what your source indicates (I read that source on at least 5 occasions prior to this thread), the jury is still out on this issue.”
The medical definition of pedophilia is – the medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a PRIMARY OR EXCLUSIVE SEXUAL INTEREST IN PREPUBESCENT CHILDREN (emphasie mine) (generally those under the age of 14, though onset
of puberty varies). The prepubescent child must be at least five years younger than the adolescent before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia.
Please note the medical definition (and for that matter the legal one) focus is solely on the AGE of the victim, not the gender.
I said 18 and I should have said 16 but my point in my original comment was that many pedophiles are selective about the sex of the child.
As to the definition of pedophilia, researchers are not all in agreement concerning what the medical definition should be as the understanding of child sexual molestation broadens and evolves. Some researchers would not even assign a minimal age. And my dictionary defines pedophilia simply as “sexual feelings directed toward children.” I like this last definition because it doesn’t send the wrong message to a parent of a 16 year child that their child could not fall prey to a child predictor.
That said, I’m not in disagreement with you, I was just trying to make the point some pedophiles are homosexuals, a point some posters were missing. In other words, some pedophiles have no sexual interest in girls.
I will agree with you on this one because it makes sense…..there are homosexual pedophiles…..but not all homosexuals are pedophiles…..and I believe that normal homosexuals are just as outraged when they hear of an incidence of pedophilia as you are…..pedophiles are sociopaths and Bob Carlson obviously embodied one with his lies to the community and his wife……she may have been weak but I don’t believe she knew what her husband was doing for a minute….
There is no evidence that being molested by someone of the opposite sex is better than being molested by someone of the same sex.
Pedophiles are pedophiles.
Exactly, and some pedophiles like both sexes to abuse along with multiple heterosexual affairs while being married. It is far more complicated than people just blah, blah, blahing here. Far more sexual child abusers are identified as heterosexual is what the data shows.
Yes.
Research shows that most pedophiles are heterosexuals…Seriously..
well said
I think you and 10,00o others might want to seek a deep spiritual awaking and seek humility as a way to learn the true meaning of a good human. How many other judgements have you made that now needs to be questioned
I don’t think I need a deep spiritual awakening or whatever, I would just like to know the true nature of what this man did. As a member of this community, I feel I deserve to know that. So go push your red button.
Here is the answer. you have a poor judgement of people
Please tell me you are not actually defending that monster.
Where did you get that from. of course not.
He is asking and trying to understand, just like we all are while given minimal information.
I find it ironic that the Police are giving ‘professional courtesy’ to Sheriff Ross, given that the report reveals that he abused that type of courtesy when he tipped off his friend Carlson. If Carlson were still alive, then we’d be having a trial and some of the people who helped him do this, by virtue of looking the other way and remaining silent, would be under oath on a witness stand. But Ross prevented that by giving away privileged information.
I really believe that Sheriff Ross needs to step down and I believe that the State Police owe us the whole story, not some hand-picked version of it. It’s time for the secrets to end. Our community deserves to see the whole picture and the State Police have it.
This story is not just about a child-molesting con-man, it’s also a story about community leaders and people in positions of authority looking the other way while children got hurt. I want to see some of those people in handcuffs for their failure to do the right thing in the interest of self-preservation.
Anybody who chooses child endangerment over career advancement deserves a trial.
Believe whatever you want…he aint stepping down.
I find it amazing how a former cop that moved west is now the go to expert on all the ills in Maine. Seems like he plans on writing a book or two. The law protects the victims name and address for a reason. They did nothing wrong and don’t need everyone to now what happened to them. If it was your family member that was a victim you wouldn’t want their private information given out. What people did or didn’t do seems to be morally wrong but don’t seem to be criminal.
*******************************************************************************
The reports that go to the DA’s Office or others officially involved in the case would not be blacked out. Agencies can share that information. It is blacked out in reports that are released to the public to protect the victims. The DA got all the information and made the decision from everything that was collected to charge someone or not. A former cop in another state would not have access to the full reports so would not have all the information.
*********************************************************************************
As below Bustd, the Sheriff’s Assn. as well as the AG’s Office have looked into Ross’s involvement and said it didn’t rise to a criminal act.
Cappy 12 said that the Reynolds case was being run fine by Waterville PD and they were removed from the case. Waterville asked for help on the case because like most departments in Maine they are not big enough to dedicate several officers to a case that will require months maybe years of work. By having the State Police and the FBI involvcd many more resources and experts are made available that Waterville PD could never supply.
I too went to school with a lot of cops and know a few. I have never seen them confide in me the inner workings of an on going criminal investigation. I also know some doctors but I really haven’t master surgery yet either.
Actually, I think Ross’ behavior rises to the level of criminal.
Sorry to disagree, but this (former cop who MOVED WEST ) was, I assume a fellow Mainer, whom, in my eyes, through his job in Maine law enforcement, was afforded a bird’s eye view of the inner workings of the (secretive and clandestine) opperations of general Maine law enforcement on a day-to-day basis for years…..after reading your post, I got the subtle feeling that EXPERT is now a dirty word…..Listen, I am stating my opinion , too, as you……and it is my gut feeling that this former cop ( Mainer…never mind he moved WEST ) is nothing more than a BRAVE WHISTLEBLOWER…..sorry that tweaks your shorts…..it is also my belief that we Mainers would have the Ayla Reynolds case SOLVED, if not for the (FEDS ) being called in to (help ? )…….I also think it stinks to high heaven that Waterville P.D. was (removed) from a case in their own jurisdiction when they were doing a fine job from day one……Lastly, if you think for one moment that there is never corruption, nor cover-up within the police community, and that anyone who (blows the whistle) is full of it (or shifty cause they “move west ” ) , then I got a nice piece of acreage in a swamp I would love to sell to you……I am no (expert) myself, only a former military veteran and criminal justice major……I served and went to school with lots of cops…….What do you think (they) were “fielding incoming clues” in the Reynolds case for ? Why they (invited) the public to call in with (leads / tips ) ?? Ever hear of (vetting) in order to ascertain just exactly how much someone does indeed know ?? It’s a great tactic…..
Since I’ve not followed this closely, my question with ref to the redacted report is this: Was this report released to the public or to other legal agents? If to the public, yes, a heavily redacted report is in order. If to other legal agents: why would a redacted report be necessary if it is only provided to ‘in house’ channels?
According to a news report I heard earlier today the MSP turned over the complete report to DA Almay today.
I wonder if some of those who are covering/being covered may have been involved in the same type of behavior. Could it be we had our very own pedophile ring right here in Maine? Perhaps it was part of the same international child porn ring we read about in the global news. If they don’t tell us the truth, our imaginations can go anywhere.
Let’s not go jumping to conclusions about a “pedophile ring.” 1 + 1 does not equal 17.
I think Ross did the wrong thing in telling Carlson about the investigation — Ross’s behavior was at least stupid.
But it is easy for us now for us to see most of the pieces of the puzzle. We knlw Carlson committed suicide. We know now, because of police investigation and newspaper reporting, that Carlson abused a number of young people (I say “young people” because I don’t know the ages). We know that Carlson misrepresented his credentials. We have many pieces of the puzzle now.
But people like Sheriff Ross didn’t have all of the pieces of the puzzle at that time. At the time, Pastor Carlson was respected for the many good things he had done. It is only in hindsight that we realize that there were warning signs. Hindsight is 20-20.
I think Ross made the wrong judgment call, and possibly his action was illegal. But we should be careful not to jump to conclusions, and not be too quick to accuse.
Oh please. Go out and talk to people around town. Do you honestly think information only comes from a redacted police report published in the BDN? Carlson didn’t behave like he di, for as long as he did, in isolation. So all his friends and associates are under suspicion in the public’s mind. That needs to be addressed and soon.
Because what they do is both wrong and illegal, pedophiles become skillful liars, and skillful deceivers. They lie to themselves (in order to justify their behavior to themselves), and they lie to everyone around them. They put a lot of effort into covering up their immoral and illegal behavior.
It’s easy for us to look backwards now and say, “Someone should have done something.” And yes, some people did do some things, although not enough. Carlson was forced out of his position at Husson University, for instance. We know now that wasn’t enough, but we have 20-20 hindsight, like Monday morning quarterbacks.
It’s easy for us to judge others. But we know a lot more now than they knew then. We have most of the pieces of the puzzle now, but back then they didn’t have as much information as we have now. When you only have one clue, and don’t know the rest of the story, it’s harder to make a judgment based on that one clue.
penzance, the flaw I see in this argument is that we do know they are “protecting” a lot of information, what many think is a simple cover up. The fact that they are doing so produces the suspicion that they have reason to do so, IE, their own guilt.
I appreciate what you are saying, and I agree that all of the pertinent facts should be released (if they have not been), but not to the extent that it harms innocent people, such as those who were abused.
Since Carlson committed suicide, he escaped prosecution. The kind of an investigation that is done when there is no prosecution may be different than the kind of investigation you do when you are seeking a prosecution. By and large, our police officers do a great job.
I’ve not been following this closely, however, my understanding is that there were report ref to Carlson actions years ago that were not investigated. (Please correct me if I’m wrong.) If that IS the case, our lack of knowledge in this case is the result of not only information that is now being covered up, but information that should have been acted upon years ago when there was suspicion of Carlson’s abuses. If there was information that was placed on the back burner by Carlson’s friends, those who did not act upon allegations are equally as guilty as Carlson. Even a clergyman is required by law to report the confession of a murder. Why should law officers be held unaccountable for having information with reference to child abuse and not acting upon it? The suspicion of Carlson being an abuser has been out there in the wind for many years; I recall hearing ‘scuttlebutt’ at least 20 years ago. And, before someone jumps all over that, I do NOT believe that an investigation is in order based on rumor. However, if the rumors are supported by legal accusations, an investigation IS in order, especially with ref to child abuse. It takes only one accusation to force an investigation in this area. Why was Carlson not investigated if those accusations were in the hands of legal agents?
I totally agree with you. But at this time the man is dead. he can’t be found guilty of anything. He can not legally defend himself.
BS! Prominent people were effusive and kissing the “reverend’s” butt up to and after his last gasp.
or last “grasp”
wonder where the doctor came from who decided the “suicides” over the past years at Penobscot County Jail were suicides? In one that I can think of in 2008 the inmate supposedly took a sheet from his cell into the common bathroom (while accompanied by guards) and hung himself from a waist high handrail……made me wonder four years ago and I wonder now if ole’ Bob helped cover up this supposed suicide by having one of his friends pronounce him……
Suicides are handled by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner not local primary care physicians.
yeah well….I am guessing that they all work together dear…..a cover-up needs many players and having been the victim of one I can tell you that the perpetrators of the cover-up came from many branches of government both state and federal….not to mention the hospitals and medical personnel involved….they all work together to keep things clean on their side….of course it’s not really clean….just swept under the rug…….part of the cover-up I experienced was the changing of my healthcare provider from EMMC’s health clinic to PCHC where the husband of my primary abuser was working. I was so sick when they were through with me I didn’t know whether to “scratch my watch or wind my butt”….but they counted on that. Makes me sick that they all got away with treating me (and God knows how many others) like a piece of meat and spreading lies about me amongst their colleagues so they wouldn’t get found out. Doctor/patient confidentiality and right to privacy be damned if you are making sure your abuses don’t get out…
You lost me at “dear”.
I really wanted to call you something else darling but I was being polite…..
So you cannot disagree without making it personal? I stated a simple fact. The MEs office are the folks that rule on cause and manner of death.
I have no doubt that Carlson committed suicide. At first glance when it happened, I did wonder if one of his victims had assisted him, but in retrospect, I tossed that out. Pedophiles are, by their very nature, cowards who choose their victims because they can control them. Once that control is gone, my observation is that their either deny vehemently, cave in and fall back on “I was abused when I was a child, so I’m really the victim here”, or (in the case of a higher profile individual) make the choice that Carlson made rather than face all the people who have been victimized.
I have to agree with you. I also had my thoughts about what happened around noon on that Sunday morning and I am more than willing to admit that not one of the three scenarios running through my mind included Carlson jumping to his death because of accusations (now shown to be true) pedophilia.
“1 + 1 does not equal 17.”
CRAP I have to redo all my math on this rocket now. I’m never going to get to Mars at this rate.
crap crap crap
As far as Im concerned these people in law enforcement are just as guilty as Carson. They knew what was going on. Bringing young boys to the jail at night? Parking next to a Bangor PD officers dimlight home? Asking for tapes of child porn? Give me a break. And Almy doesnt have the ba**ls to hold them accountable?
This Carlson monster is gonna bring’em all down, and rightly so. These good ‘ol boys not only look alike … shaved heads and all … but, they also hide under the same unethical rock, respectfully speaking. But, this is good. The revulsion the public is expressing should result in a proper inquiry into not only Sherriff Ross’s back room behavior, but into the many ethical and legal boundaries being violated as events are now unfolding since Carlson’s tragic suicide last November. Public scrutiny and outcry will continue until the right thing happens, or until the public press and commentary being generated therefrom is gagged by certain government officers, agencies or corporate interests that do not have the public interest in mind. … only their own self preservation and interest, as in today’s decision to exhonerate Ross of any unethical conduct in his devulging of confidential police investigation information to a serial child abuse suspect. Where has their sense of honor, service to community and ethics gone …. and where is Al Pacino when you need him?
Judging by the tone of your rant, someone should be keeping an eye on you….
I am trying not to be too encouraged by the increasing number of people who like my posts in responding to you, Mr. Batsu, but I am not saying anything people don’t already know or suspect… that this “coverup” conspiracy is unfolding before our very eyes … the Emporer (DA, Sherrifs, Bangor Police Officers, doctors, healthcare professionals, who all know or knew the facts of suspected, ongoing child abuse by the Sherriff’s chaplain) isn’t wearing any clothes and is going to be told … loudly until immediate and lasting changes occur. All of them should resign or be fired to ensure community safety, first, and proper, loyal and competent service to the public, second. Every paycheck they collect in the meantime, in my view, is dishonest and a form of theft of public property for impersonation of the above mentioned proper, loyal and competent officers and professionals. And, incidentally, it is obvious, by the increasing number of positive hits my comments seem to be creating that …. “someone” IS “keeping an eye” on me, and I welcome it, as should everyone who is willing to take time to enter this important debate about why our system of protecting our weakest citizens totally failed the victims here and how, subsequent to uncovering this failure, those who should know better are perpetuating this failure in their efforts to minimize, by way of delay and outright cover-up, the extant of this, apparently, systemic problem. Where are our protectors? Our heros? Who will dare to confront and stop these enablers? Again, metaphorically speaking, where is Al Pacino (Scent of a woman) and his flame thrower metaphor, when you need him?
So him killing himself was tragic……..for who ? He got off easy if you ask me !
What do they call it, “The Blue Wall?” Or do we call it what it is, complicity.
and that blue wall called it susicide.
I believe the Medical Examiner ruled it a suicide.
Did you ever stop to think that if it was really a cover up, they just would not have released anything at all? Life is not a TV show, where everything is a conspiracy .
“We gave Mrs. Carlson a heads up that the report was being released
because she was Mr. Carlson’s wife, and to Sheriff Ross, as a
professional courtesy,” Coleman said.
professional courtesy? look into forced retirement, and I hope for Mrs. Carlson she can come to terms with what her husband did.
How many pedophiles wives get a heads up that police are going to release a report? As for Ross he will not resign, but he can certainly be voted out if he chooses to run again.
Ross probably feels bad enough..don’t you think? he is not a bad man. And has been a good sheriff. I think he might have been trying to scare Carlson..which he succeeded. And if that was the reason Carlson jumped..GOOD…saves the state tons of money prosecuting . Just another way of looking at it. Carlson was a coward!
He protected a pedophile, he is not a good man. As for saving money on Carlson’s prosecution, sure that’s great, but I hope they spend the money prosecuting his accomplices like the “good” sheriff. This stinks of Boss Hogg and Sheriff Roscoe type good ol’ boys protecting each other.
I do not happen to think he protected Carlson. From what I understand he did not like Carlson. You cannot blame others for what Carlson did. He was doing these thing long before Sheriff Ross was even heard of. Husson dumped him and never said a thing and they knew..so there is a lot to this whole thing. I believe these people who are being accused of covering up was really not, but was probably thinking nobody would believe such a thing of one of Bangor most outstanding citizens. They just avoided the bad publicity. Its tough to come forward when you do not have solid evidence. If there was a victim there, it was that person who should have come forward..NONE of them did…
That is exactly what they are doing …..giving him enough time to retire so he won’t lose his pension….even if you are convicted of a crime or wrongdoing as a police officer you won’t lose your pension and benefits if you retire before you are indicted….think of that cop Peterson who killed two wives that is in the news again…..
I am sure she will never come to terms with that. She was a quiet gracious woman who was also a victim of Carlson. Not sure why she ever stayed with him. That is a question only she can answer. I think I would run and hide too. At her age this must be horrific.
How is anyone going to know what was said behind closed doors between Ross and a dead man.
“We gave Mrs. Carlson a heads up that the report was being released
because she was Mr. Carlson’s wife, and to Sheriff Ross, as a
professional courtesy,” Coleman said.
Perhaps Lt. Coleman would be kind enough to let us all know how often the Maine State Police visits the spouse of the subject of a criminal investigation to inform them that the police report is about to be released. Why was it necessary to give Ross a heads up. Secrets, Secrets and more Secrets. Who is the Maine State Police covering for? This thing is starting to stink of a cover up more and more every day.
Because they still believe in the carlson legacy! That is why they gave his wife a heads up, if it was anyone else’s wife they would say tough luck, you should’nt have stayed married to the scumbag
Police often meet with families in cases like this where the suspect died so they can hear from them what they uncovered.
It is unbelieveable how the MSP are STILL kowtowing to this family. They just don’t see anything wrong with it at all. They are still treating them as the victims. It really makes me sick.
Maine State Police need an investigation into this investigation from the top down. Otherwise their credibility will be lost in the eyes of the people. Yes, protect those who were abused. Otherwise, we want and deserve the information from the mandated reporters of what happened so children can be protected. We want the truth MSP. There are more Carlsons walking across our state who are serial sexual abusers. We need to take greater action and stop the silence including the MSP.
I think they feel sorry for the wife. I still say…she had to suspect something over all those year…but yet again..he was good at what he did. LIED~over and over and over.
I am still wondering where the “son” came from? He did not live with the Carlsons all those years..and Carlson was married to his wife when the kids was born and she is not the mother…so there was more that just child molesting going on.
I have the same questions – kind of like Jerry Sandusky’s wife and all of his adopted kids. Very
disturbing, in my opinion.
Carlson had one son according to his obituary. I believe he was adopted.
http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2011/11/14/obituaries/rev-robert-t-carlson/
All I can tell you is he never grew up living with the Carlsons…I lived close enough to tell you this for very very sure…nor did any or the towns people know of this till recently..talk about strange~
OK, no argument from me. I never met his son and I was never inside his home.
…put on your tin hats…another conspiracy theory…
when all of the facts aren’t out there for the public to see, it’s human nature to fill in the gaps.
I was impressed by your post….why the edit ? I bet you rescinded all of the (good) stuff…..haha just kidding….Seriously, I totally agree with you….I wonder if the lower-level staties even (know) who they are covering up for, as the (order) just comes down the chain of command, possibly….It is perhaps those higher-ups who have that info….but, I have been getting a funny (odor) for a long time from 4343….yeah, that’s a 4-digit number….happens to be the 1st 4 digits of a longitude…..coincidentally, 4343 was the (pick 4) in the Maine Lotto on 16 October 2011….that was the evening prior to when 257 Sabbatus was raided…(Lewiston)……and, just for your added info, on that same day the pick 3 was 291……(as in 29 Violette +1 )……..I do not normally “look” at these things (lotto) but somebody told me that 666 was the pick 3 in the Illinois lotto the day that (___) won the Chicago primary….and the 666 drawing can still be seen on YouTube I believe……..and so I may be a believer, myself……**** The Maine Lotto has since (re-vamped) it’s web page so it is harder to now view prior drawings, more difficult……I really have great respect for people who are not afraid to tell it like it is……I am like you in a way…what you see is what you get……no masks…..
So kids now will not trust going to police because if they are being abused by an elitest for fear they will be brushed off and accused of making up stories..
Kids normally aren’t the ones that go to the police and report abuse. That’s is why Maine has a mandatory reporting law and 32 professions are listed in that law. In this case three different professions failed to report what they knew about Carlson.
Pedophile is a crime of power and control. The perpetrator has both the power and the control and the abused child has neither.
It has always been that way in Bangor for anyone at a disadvantage…..if you are poor you don’t count…..unless of course they are trying to get federal funds to build a health center or buy a helicopter…..
What was Ross doing in hancock country? after the death of Carlson.
Everyone is calling this a susicide..
Where are the computers, cell phones note books of Carlson. If he had dirt on the elite people in the area and theatened to reveal everyones secerts if he went down.
It’s possibile it was a murder.. Since the investigators seem to be hiding stuff why not rule it a susicide and everyone sleeps well.
Years ago a State trooper picked up an accountant named Rod Hotham that had the goods on doctors and lawyers in the Bangor area and was going to prove money laundering and other issues. The State police picked him and his documents up and were going to protect him until they were brought to justice. Thats the last Rod was ever heard from. over 20 years no charges..
Are you trying to say that Glen Ross was somehow involved in Carlson’s death?
Nope. I just asked what was he doing in Hancock county when he is the Penobscot county Sherriff. It’s not his jurisdiction.
Most likely the last person to talk to him alive and one of the first to see him dead.
I was just putting curiosities out there that I found to be odd.
I’m sure Carlson had dirt on many people. Why would he let them get away with dirty deeds when he had to face up to them.
The answers to your questions are contained in the MSP report.
“suicide” is something that happens in every level of politics. from the Executive branch right down to our local level. nothing new.
This story makes no sense, “State police investigators went to the home of Carlson’s widow on Monday, Aug. 6, to inform her about the findings of the eight-month investigation.”
“Elaine Carlson left the state the following day, the Rev. Carl Schreiber, pastor of the East Orrington Congregational Church, where Carlson was a senior pastor for 25 years, said last week, ”
Today is Aug. 6, how does the pastor know she left town the next day? The next day hasn’t come yet.
Stop messing up the story-telling lol!!!
Good catch!
That looks like a Nok-Noi goof up since she was the one writing that article on August 6th.
They have no sense of honor, service to community or ethics…..they all have secrets that would be revealed if anyone investigates further…..what most people don’t get is that the whole system is corrupt and that our esteemed community leaders have all been working together to cover up their crimes for years….their crimes cover a myriad of issues and the only goal any of them have is self preservation….that is why Bob Carlson got away with what he did; because he had something on every one of them and they on he. Like I have said many times before anything done for “the good of the community” is only done if there is going to be financial gain. If there is a chance that something done by one of our esteemed leaders will cause problems for the flow of funds a cover-up occurs. The victims don’t matter at all…..
Thank you officer for standing up to this troubling situation. How deplorable his wife and Ross are on vacation. Talk about trying to dodge the bullet.
And you would expect the wife of a pedophile to do what exactly?
Maybe she went to visit Jerry Sanduski”s wife! ! !! For all we know, maybe there is a super secret wife’s group( pedophile anonomous) that teaches woman of husbands like this how to be totally nonplused when questions about thier partners arise. How is that for a conspiracy theory?
Put up or shut up.
Another one for diversity. Oh ya, only if it is your diversity. Another cloying leftest.
Why do you keep defending his “wife”? She had to know somethings regarding what a fraud he was. You mentioned in an earlier post that you’ve been married 25+ years, what dark side do you have? I have been married 35+ plus years, sorry but my family will be disappointed on what a boring person I was.
Pedophiles are skilled liars. They carefully craft a facade and story for people to see and hear.
To maintain that story they have to remain in “character” 24/7 unless they are with their victims and even then they use the power and control the facade gives them to harm their victims.
He fooled his congregation. He fooled co-workers. He fooled people in power and those that had no power. He fooled politicians. He fooled the BSA. He fooled people on the street and newspaper reporters. Why do you believe that he didn’t fool his wife too?
And if there is evidence that she knew and didn’t do anything about it, then charge her as an accomplice and let the chips fall they land.
Glenn Ross’ mom recently died, obit in the paper today so I would hardly calling losing one’s mom a vacation
Child molesters, pedophiles–marry weak women whom they can cotrol and who like the lifestyle established for them. But, if she had just been told today, August 6, then how did she leave for out of state the next day?
After the last report she was probably getting ready to go..this should not surprise anyone..
Does anyone remember how it came to light that Ross had tipped Carlson off? If I read that I don’t remember it. Ross wouldn’t tell; Carlson couldn’t tell; then who?
Ross told on himself when he mentioned to BDN while being interviewed that he had spoken with Bob Carlson the day of or the day before his suicide…..I think that whomever was investigating probably deduced that it had to be Ross as he was the only one that knew of the investigation……
Brian Gagan casts shame and discredit to the uniform he once wore. He has no right to it now, and never will again. The man has absolutely no idea what he’s talking about, yet he feels compelled to interject his very public, judgmental and uninformed opinion upon us all. He’s not even a Maine resident anymore! Why, I ask, is the BDN giving him the bully pulpit? Gagan’s paltry professional accomplishments certainly don’t merit the honor!
If data was redacted from the official State Police report, it was done for very good reason. No amount of hogwash spewed forth by a former, now non resident Police Officer will change this.
Information regarding witnesses and victims must be redacted in order to conform with State and in some cases, constitutional law.
Information that may contain actionable criminal data must also be redacted to preserve the integrity of ongoing investigations.
Information regarding certain specifics about crimes committed must be redacted to protect victims and/or witnesses, who do not want to be identified, and HAVE EVERY RIGHT NOT TO BE IDENTIFIED.
The man is dead. He’s burning in hell as we speak and breathe. His victims would like to live again, LET THEM! People who violated the law, who still live today, will be brought to justice. That justice will take form in our criminal courts, NOT THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION!
Its the court of Public Opinion that gets these issues out to be addressed and that is the way it should be. To save lives, we need to be able to change and change the laws when needed.
Lots of children have most likely lost their innocent’s because of this tragic event and many should be in counselling but as it appears,may be scratched out as not that important to the case. Brian Gagan is far away now so no one can try to destroy him and his family for breaking that blue line and its obvious you are in law enforcement.
No, vigilante justice went out with the old west and the Indian wars. The court of public opinion is just that, vigilante, or mob justice. I swore an oath, to uphold all of our rights. No just mob rule will prevail on my watch, not while I still draw breath… Right now in Syria, i here that mob rule is alive and well, perhaps you’d be happier in a place like that?
No…… Vigilante/Mob justice went out with the old west and the Indian wars. The court of public opinion is just that, vigilante, or mob justice. I swore an oath, to uphold all of our rights. No such mob rule will prevail on my watch, not while I still draw breath… Right now, in Syria, I here that mob rule is alive and well, perhaps you’d be happier in a place like that?
Xerxies, as in the God-King? Well, like Leonidas said, “Even God-Kings can bleed.” I don’t mean it literally, I mean it figuratively replace “bleed” with “be wrong” The victims obviously should not have their names made public, I don’t think anyone is arguing for that. What is irritating people is the “witnesses” who are being protected that are much more than witnesses, they are accomplices. The Sheriff, the therapist, and any other mandatory reporter that did not report Carlson’s crimes are not “Witnesses” and should not get the protection of anonymity. They too are criminals, and as the State Police have put a huge “Case Closed” stamp on it, the truth will never be revealed unless the Court of Public Opinion demands it.
P.S. I know it makes people feel better to think that Carlson is burning in hell, but there is not such thing. His fate is the same as Mother Theresa’s, basically just worm food.
what goes around, comes around, Karma, whatever you want to call it is real. It is a Natural Law. The most well known Natural Law is gravity, which states everything is pulled to the center of the earth to prevent chaos. If you doubt life after death, go to http://www.NSAC.org. Good luck to you
Lol yea ok… so um… I can tell you love the Kool-aid, but if a guy named Jim Jones is offering it, no matter how much of a sheep you are, please pass on it.
I’ll assume you are referring to Xerxes I, the king of Persia, who was crowned and succeeded his father, who’d considered himself the King of Babylon, in 486 BC when he was about 36 years old. He was never considered to be a god, although it’s written he may have toyed with the idea…
My first name is Xerxies, note the spelling difference…
No, I do not consider myself some sort of deity. I am a simple Catholic, by birth, man who happens to have the privilege of serving my fellow citizens as a law enforcement officer in Maine.
Witness identities must be protected to preserve the investigative integrity in any criminal investigation, at least until said investigation has been terminated. Even after this, witnesses do have privacy rights. Just because you or even dozens of citizens may have ignorantly assumed that all the witnesses are guilty of something means nothing. No amount of public pressure will change this.
Details of allegations or the identity of witnesses can, in many cases reveal the identity of associated victims through circumstance. If such if such details are contained in a police report, they must be redacted to protect said victim’s identities.
I don’t understand how people like you think? I’ve met many just like you, who assume that the Police are bad, that we’re always covering something up, that it’s a big conspiracy or that we always cover up terrible criminal deeds for each other. For the most part it has seemed to stem from a simple lack of intellect, but I don’t know, it feels willful.
I have a suggestion, since you seem to question all the decisions surrounding this case, and likely others, then perhaps you should don the uniform and help Police your fellow citizens… I mean it’s easy right? All we are, are a bunch of low brow Kevlar coated doughnut swallowers, right? All we ever do is sit around, commit crimes, and create and manage vast criminal conspiracies, right?
You have absolutely zero understanding of the concepts surrounding complex criminal investigations. But, rather than simply, and privately admitting this to yourself, and perhaps accepting the publicly known details of this case at face value, you hang your posterior out so everyone can witness your ignorance. Why?
What you do not seem to understand is mandatory reporting. confidentiality goes right out the window in this case, unless law enforcement covers for those guilty of the crime of failure to report. The counselor who failed to report, the officers who failed to report or investigate, and anyone else who is required by law to breach confidentiality and report this slimeballs crimes and didn’t are not witnesses they are criminals, and as such do not have the protections of witnesses. Unless of course the “good ol boy” network is at it again.
The only “complexity” to this investigation is the protection of high placed people who are nothing more than accomplices to a pedophile. This stinks to high heaven. If you could get past your cop arrogance for a moment you would see things stink, but no we can’t go after the good sheriff because of the “Brotherhood.” A minor intellect, a gun, and a badge does not give you power. You seem to have gotten rather drunk on it like most of your breed however. It’s this type of power seeking that causes situations like this. Many people, police included, gained power my riding Carlson’s coat tails and now he has been brought to light for the sick criminal he is, they fear they will lose their power and are banding together to protect each other from the fallout. “All those that gain power fear to lose it.”
You obviously have a chip on your shoulder regarding law enforcement and authority figures…I cannot help you with this. I’m sorry.
what ongoing investigations? they’ve buried the whole matter and don’t want to discuss it.
There is a reason why good cops refer to these types as “eaglephiles”.
This situation is similar to one in Augusta in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Two priests molested several boys in the St. Mary’s Parish and School in Augusta. This was well known to Augusta Police and the Kennebec County District Attorney’s Office. They worked hard to cover the whole matter up and protect the priests and Diocese of Portland. Only after several lawsuits, the resignation of priests, and a trial by the Vatican, is the whole truth now beginning to see the light of day. The harm done to the victims will be a continuing tragedy for many years to come.
Sheriff Ross was wrong for informing Carlson of the investigation and should resign. We people often think we know someone until something like this comes up. I will not judge others, but I do think the people that kept there mouth shut about Carlson, have a lot to think about. This is a hard situation and will bother many for a long time.
It SHOULD bother many for a long time. But, will it?
We are not going to get into the number of pages …….When Law Enforcement start with these type of statement it is a cover-up. Transparent to the tax payers who you are to protect and are paid for, not to fester your ego. Providing a number of pages would allow the public to know the range of effort , time or statements that were obtained. There is always a way to disclose without names. Being non transparent fester’s a private agenda, heighten ego problems and a complete separation from the public that you are sworn to serve. People have a right to know and Thank you to this officer, for breaking the barrier and bring up the on-going problems as it is the only way the it will be addressed, hopefully. Our town commissioners need to weigh in on this at their next meeting with the Police Chief, departing one or the new one. The only way the public can be served, is to know.
i don’t think we’re going to find beardsley’s response unique among administrators of other organizations. assuming more questions are asked. lieutenant coleman’s responses, however, are remarkably consistant.
http://www.kjonline.com/news/beardsley-didnt-totally-ban-accused-abuser_2012-08-06.html
I first met the The Rev(Perve) carlson while I was a cadet at the MCJA…..how ironic, he was teaching a class on ethics???? I pegged him right off as a pedophile perve…I went on into my career to investigfate perves just like him for many years…always remembering him,…knowing he was a no good POS perve hurting kids…how this was covered up…I am a cop, saying that ALL cops, and others that covered his perve’s behavior up need to be tried and convicted…..however,…. this is Manie…..Good luck with that….may you rot in you now where POS
Did you file a report of your “findings” about Carlson at the time, or are we simply reporting from the Cheap Seats of hindsight?
Did you know something and not say anything? This so-called man was everywhere and we all talk about it now. Little pieces that now make sense. Either help us in cleaning up this festering blight on our community or please stop talking.
And you choose not to investigate him why?
Hmmmm. I wonder just how long we’ll kick this dead horse before moving on?
Mr. Sawyer the system failed the victims…I personally will kick this “dead horse” until they system is either changed or corrected by adding a penalty for failure to report.
A therapist knew of a “half dozen victims” but did NOTHING.
Two Bangor police officers were very suspicious but did NOTHING. If you were still on the City Council would you being asking why or would you say what you just posted?
A Penobscot County Deputy Sheriff witnessed “odd” behavior but did NOTHING.
A university president received two phone calls and confronted Carlson which lead to his resignation at Husson but did NOTHING.
And you say we are kicking a “dead horse”?
Who knew?
Who knew about the Reverend?Why an’ what’s the reason for? “Not I,” says the deputy sheriff,
“Don’t point your finger at me.
I saw him fondling little kids in the jail
At two o’clock in the morning.
It’s too bad he had to jump,
But I have a job to do, you know.
It wasn’t me that made him fall.
No, you can’t blame me at all.” Who enabled the child abuse?,Why an’ what’s the reason for?
“Not us,” says the cops.”We saw him parked down on the Valley Road.Thought maybe we would put up camerasBut it’s dark there.Don’t say ‘abuse,’ say ‘what’s the use?’
Who ignored stories of abuse?Why an’ what’s the reason for? “Not me,” says the college president,
Smiling at the reporter on Channel Six,
Sayin’, “I wasn’t to blame
I had a college to run.”
It wasn’t me that made him fall.
No, you can’t blame me at all.”
Who knew about the priest from Weston and Jamaica Plain?
Why an’ what’s the reason for? “Not us,” says the angry monsignors and bishops,
Whose screams filled the sacristy loud.
“It’s too bad he was killed in jail that night
It wasn’t us that made him fall.
No, you can’t blame us at all.” Who let the little children suffer?,
Why an’ what’s the reason for? “Not me,” says Bernard Cardinal Law,
Puffing on a big cigar.
“It’s hard to say, it’s hard to tell,
I always thought everything was ok..
It’s too bad he’s brought this on the Church
But if he was sick, he should’ve said. And I’ve got a plane to catch to Rome.
It wasn’t me that made him fall.
No, you can’t blame me at all.” Who drove the teen-ager to suicide?
Why an’ what’s the reason for?
“Not me,” says the Pope,
With his golden shepherd’s staff in his hand.
I’ve got sheep to fleece
“I knew nothing of this,
My hands never touched him none.
I didn’t commit an ugly sin,
So long as the money’s coming in.
The moral issue of our time is abortion.
It wasn’t me that made him fall.
No, you can’t blame me at all.” Don’t say ‘rape,’ don’t say ‘evil.’It was destiny, it was God’s will.”
Hmmmm, I wonder wtsawyer, just how long before we are moving on to where exactly?
Just a thought,, can these kids sue his estate?
All they need do is make a movie out of this.Then the State police can leak the info to the film makers.
Why all the redaction – they want it to quietly go away – just like those who were perhaps aware of his pedophelia wanted it to quietly go away, rather than do anything about it.
Why are they giving any credence to this Brian Gagan character? He obviously is oblivious to the law that restricts what can be released in the report. You know, the law that is linked in the article itself (Title 16 section 614). That clearly explains what can and can’t be released in the report. It’s kind of sad that he is a former Maine officer and doesn’t have a clue about that statue…I wonder what he released over the years that he was not supposed to by law…It is pretty obvious the Freedom of Access act is to reveal the actions of public officials, not to reveal the statements and actions of private citizens, so it makes sense that the report is redacted to show what the police did, whiole not revealing the identity of private citizens. Imagine how much most people would whine if someone asked to see any and all information about you, and posted it for the world to see.
It seems a lot of people who say that they are “owed the whole story” (by the way, why are you owed anything unless you are involved with the case somehow?) want to overlook the fact that the police can’t release parts of it, by laws that our legislature passed years ago. If they did release it, they would be giving out personal and private statements that others may not want you to know about. Are you so selfish that you want to ignore other peoples’ right to privacy just so you can stick your nose into their business?
Maybe he (Gagan) learned it from the sherriff (name now escapes me) that tipped the Carlson off that he was going to be arrested?
if the criminal justice system continues to stonewall this thing. a civil suit might be the way to go. if only to shine a light on some people.
good, I hope it does. I want to know who the therapist is.
Carlson like many Sadistic pedophiles are able to continue to physically and verbally abuse children because otherwise good people put the interests of their organizations first.
http://www.pressherald.com/news/LePage-defends-DHHS-cuts-in-Lewiston.html
I just dont understand how these people thought that something was going on and didnt even anonymously report suspicions. Or the therapist for not saying anything. Just shocks me that some people just turn their heads.
it’d called looking out for yourself
Pedophile predators are masters of disquise. They can be your best friend or trusted cop. And, anyone who thinks that they can spot one is not being forthright. Having been a lawman and having taught deviant behavior to law enforcement and college students for over thirty years I speak from experience. People who are intelligent and have an agenda are brilliantly devious. There’s the former Lewiston high school law enforcement teacher who for years convinced his students and the public that he was a combat Marine Corps hero (he never served in the military). Then, there was the high ranking police officer in one of Maine’s largest cities who was a long time pedophile (now deceased). Again, they are very good at what they do and what they do is prey on innocent victims and fool those around him. That Said, I think it’s in poor form that the former police officer from Arizona comments off the cuff on something he knows nothing about. The investigation continues and those persons who have had a role in Carlson’s crimes will answer to the law or thier own moral concience.
You start putting words like “redacted” in these articles who’s going to read them? By the time you look up all the words you don’t know you forget what you were reading.
The humble Farmer
I was stopped by the headline. But I got my laugh in the second paragraph when I read that the officer who is raising the fuss now lives in — Arizona. Thanks, BDN, for making these goodies available.
so what if he now lives in AZ? He made a good point about the Lake case, that is, the guns should not have been where they were available to Mr Lake. I read on this post that Mrs Lake’s parents had the guns and gave them to Mr Lake’s ‘ parents because they didn’t feel comfortable having the guns at their house. Could they have made it easier for their daughter and grandkids to be killed?
This is a big reason why stories like this are covered up for years. The police know how the media operates, and now everyone and his brother is coming out of the woodwork trying to look like some kind of hero. “Oh I saw him doing this,” or “I thought he was wierd,” or “so-and-so needs to pay.” The media, and all of you people, are making a bigger name out of the perps than the vicitms. Which is almost always the case in any major crime. Ever watch the show Criminal Minds? They have a great saying, “Everyone remembers the name of bad guy, but no one remembers the names of the vicitims.” Think about it.
Gagan sounds qualified but I would like to know more about his creds, such as how and why he was appointed to dissect the Dexter murders.
Either/or, BDN, would you please remove the fake alias “The Rev. Bob Carlson” from his photo?
It’s too bad that the DA’s office can’t file charges against those that failed to report what was going on with Bob Carlson. The law states that these people were duty bound to report what they felt was happening, but provides no penalty for not doing so. Perhaps the only justice Carlson’s victims will receive against those that failed to take the required action to stop this pediphile will be to file civil suits against these people who not only failed to adhere to the law, but also failed to do what was morally right. If ever there was a case for being sued, this is it.
Maybe add the estate of Carlson to the law suit?
Deleted by the author.
Drowning from a bridge that high. I had a friend who jumped from the old bridge which is much lower and he died on impact.
Is it possible that he never fell from the bridge and was meeting someone underneath and was tazered near the water and thrown in?
Yes and it’s possible that the Tin Man, the Cowardly Lion, the Scarecrow, Dorothy and Toto were there too.
He jumped, he died, he committed suicide.
Can we now focus on the VICTIMS and those that allowed this monster to continue his abuse unchecked?
As this thing unfolds, why do I keep thinking about “The Emperor’s New Clothes”?
You know you are trashing the name of this Rev. and he is not alive to defend himself. He died an innocent man period. You can not convict someone that is dead. So why not stop trashing his name??
If it was so much going on the police should not have given him the heads up and just flat arrested him on the spot. Anyone can say anything once the person can NOT defend themself.
Let him rest in peace and let his family be able to walk around with there heads up high.
He took the cowards way out, he deserves to be trashed and btw the Reverend thing was a lie too he never attended the college he said he did. OK so he was a complete fraud and other than molesting children by all accounts a nice guy!!!!
Sorry Tom but the only person that “trashed” Carlson’s name was Carlson himself. He did it all by himself.
Sheriff Donnie Smith wouldn’t stand for this type of behavior! Thank the good Lord that we have him for our Sheriff.
sheriff ross is just as guilty as carlson he knew what was going on just didnt want to believe it
There is so much secretive crap going on with this entire situation that unless they bring in an outside source such as what Penn State did, we will never truly know the answers. My fear, is that with a governor such as Lepage, who doesnt believe in transparency, how likely is this ever to happen? I would guess not very likely. A lot of people failed these children. A lot of people failed the system they work for and a lot of people should be having sleepless nights over it as well. Our current DA doesnt want any part of this, as mentioned in news report after news report, he cites the law and how there is NOTHING he can do, almost like the little kid that says, “Don’t blame me”. Why isnt he looking for answers from people like Ross? Why hasnt someone asked for Ross to step down? Why is it that these Sheriffs of Penobscot County seem to hold the position forever with very little challenge come election time? Why hasnt the Attorney General weighed in on this yet? There is so many questions, very few answers and seems to me that this investigation would be better served if it went national much the way of the Sanduskey case but like so many details about the Ayla Reynolds case, those are not shared with the public. Our justice system in this state is broken and it will take a Huge person to right the ship, and a whole lot of time…Unfortunately for the victims of Carlson, that will never come soon enough..My prayers once again are with them.