As we consider this year’s election and are pulled this way and that by campaigns eager for our vote, we’re beset by increasingly rancorous debate that spans the national elections to local elections. What we hear on the airwaves seems to give license to us to be equally bitter with each other as we engage in debate. U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe’s exit is a tragic example of how we lose good leadership when we don’t enable our representatives to engage in good government. It was not always this way. Maine has always led the country with our pragmatic, reasonable approach toward politics. Compromise has been our way of life, not a dirty word. Despite our differences, neighbors help each other, whether it is with a casserole when someone is sick, wood to help heat when there is no money for oil or a fundraiser for a family whose child is sick. We have also always known that the land in our great state has multiple blessings, whether for recreation, logging, farming or hunting. Mainers are a people with differences of opinion, but we’ve always managed to meet in the middle.
Our national electorate is almost evenly divided between social conservatives and social liberals. Layered on that is a difference of opinion about how to get ourselves out of the fiscal mess we’re in. If the approach we get from our elected officials is not to represent and govern for both sides, there will only be winners and losers.
Both sides of the aisle, instead of moving toward each other, are moving further and further apart. The Republican party is unrecognizably to the right of the Republican party of Reagan. The Democratic party doesn’t understand their president, who has embraced drone warfare and social program cuts. The Republicans vilify the president for policies that are to the right of Nixon, saying that they don’t go far enough. The far left pressures ever harder for social changes that are anathema to the Christian Right. Personal vilification has replaced cogent argument.
It is an explosive mix, and nobody is keeping the matches away from the fuse. In fact, it feels like our representatives are the ones eager to blow up the powder keg rather than lead us through reasonable compromise. Whose interest does it serve to keep us divided? Certainly not mine, but maybe those who want to stay in power? The irony is that while they are in power, they are powerless to get anything done.
Maine’s tradition is to elect uniters, not dividers. The current situation in Congress presents a unique opportunity, because both sides of the debate will need to court representatives unchained by a strict pledge to outside interests or beholden to intemperate and uncompromising positions.
This philosophical divide is not going to change for a while — such demographics take generations to move. What can change, however, is how we choose to bridge that divide. Political discourse has become bitter and divided, and there is more focus on “winning” than governing. I remember the first time I was shocked to hear a U.S. Senate leader state that their party is the “ruling” party. Such sentiments are the stuff of Parliament, not Congress. Our system was designed to protect all Americans, weak and strong, not just the “winners.” Rule in America is about responsibility, about porch-step reasoning, about cordial difference of opinion that recognizes we are all patriots who love our country.
The American people deserve better than political parties that pursue power so that they can “rule.” We deserve better than politicians who coarsely bellow that their way is the only way. We deserve better than bellicose taunting on the airwaves. We need true leadership which seeks to win by coming to agreement, seeking common ground and finding solutions that, while not perfect for everyone, come close enough that we can all live with them and move forward.
We are all Americans and we all love our country. Vote for candidates for your town, for your state representatives, for your national representatives who express willingness to work with the other side for solutions, not candidates who take “pledges” or espouse uncompromising positions. Save our country by seeking common ground with your neighbors. Find things to agree on and agree to work on the things we don’t agree on. Embrace and listen to your opponents’ ideas, and give them credit for wanting to help America stay great.
Invite your neighbor up on your porch and find that common ground, and hopefully, as Maine goes, so will the nation once more.
Eric Treworgy is a software executive living in Surry.



run for public office why don’t ya
I wouldn’t advise until the snakes are trown out of the snakepit.
What a crock.After thirty years of democrat one sided control.Now that the democratic party is circling around the bowl on it’s way down.The media is asking for party’s to work together. right.
Another example of the problem.
Right on!
You mean a uniter like our community organizer?
What a great job he has done. Civility he called for
then in the next breath tries to lie about everything.
And the sheep keep bleating..more, more!
This a prime example of the malady.
Oh what nonsense. The President has bent over backwards to compromise with the other side and you darn well know it. However, since the stated mission of your radical corporate toadie buddies has been to simply obstruct, and to heck with the good of the nation, you can point at your own foolish party for the lack of compromise. Mr. Obama is arguably one of the fairest and most civil gentlemen we’ve had in that office, as compared to people like the fool Bush and his handler Cheney, or that ultra-goofball arrogant fool LeBUFFOON whom you voted for to disgrace the Blaine House. Gee, he’s a real “uniter” now isn’t he? And how about all your hate-mongers in your propaganda media like the drug addict and college dropout HeadRush Limpmind, or the delusional hate-weeper Glenn Beck, or that twisted sister devil’s bride Coulter, or the wolf-killer Failin’ Palin? Oh, such “uniters” aren’t they. PS: Your flip-flopper corrupt corporate toadie MittTwitt RobMe is a joke, and the Maine TeaRadicals are going to get a serious pounding come November.
You are clearly a believer! However, the members of the Jim Jones colony in Guiana were believers also – until they drank the coolaid!
Speaking of believers, for no good reason.
After rereading your ranting post I must ask – how do you like your room in the asylum?
Sick, sick, sick.
The village i***t has apparently been given a keyboard and Internet access.
Lot of that going around, especially from the conservative side.
Not nice, Mr. Rodent, not nice. It’s exactly that kind of alzheimeresque cheap shot that keeps the slings and arrows flying.
So are we to infer from your dispassionately presented observations that conservatives are poopy-heads?
It took a while to tease it out, but that seems to be the essence.
Now there’s someone that’s overdosed on MSNBC. What’s really a shame is that even the politically insane are able to vote.
You are a perfect example of what is wrong with
the democrat party today. You are a prime example
of how easily duped the sheep have been. You are
also a prime example of most liberals in this state
are so hateful and can’t stand the truth. You are a
prime example of how the sheep revel in the
hypocritic lies being bandied about by the community
organizer’s crew. Why has the democrat party become
socialists and cringe at the thought of anyone making
it on their own? Why are the likes of yourself so dependant
on the community organizer’s transformation to the
food stamp nation? Such enthusiasm for your vitriol would
be better used finding a job from one of those evil companies
who are stealing from YOU.
Great article. Sick of these disgusting candidates that run on platforms that involve solely finding a common enemy. We’re all Americans. Not just some of us. All of us.
So, I guess you’ll be voting with the Tea Party this year. Welcome aboard.
The Tea Party thrives on division and creating enemies out of our neighbors. I would never vote for a Tea Party candidate.
Great column. Expect it to attract extremists like flies.
The President has divided our country like none I can recall in 50 years.
Wrong!
A division subsequently in “reaction” to to him, not by “his” design!
The country is divided as a result of the elimination of the fairness doctrine in politics and the emergence of right wing propagandist and Radical Right Wing Ideology.
War had been declared long ago!
The Republican Corporate Party threw a hissy fit when he was elected !!!! Subsequently the Tea Party was originated as a grass roots campaign to equalize the offset of numbers of voters that plagued the corporatist, after all they have the money but not the numbers. They destroyed our Economy with Trickle down and Globalization and where poised to but the Final Death blow to the United States Government by their OWN admission.AKA —-Grover Norguist’s pledge to shrink the Government to the size where it could be drowned in a bathtub!That was no empty threat, that was real!The Very first thing out of their Propagandist Rush Limbaugh mouth in 2008 was his hope that the President would Fail!The Very First thing out of McConnels mouth was that his number one political goal was the defeat of Barack Obama! Make NO mistake about it! War has been Declared on the United States Government and the average American Citizen by the Republican Party!The Goal is to destroy the United States Government and Replace it with Corporate ( For Profit) Control!
It’s ALL about Money and Power!
I suppose the President is a uniting force?
How do you unite a Lynch Mob looking to hang you?
The best evidence I can show you is the fact that Norquist exists at all. Administrations that are capable of effectively communicating across the aisle are the ones where people like Norquist don’t exist. The Norquists of the world don’t come first but as a reaction to either the divisiveness or the weakness of a President. You decide which he is. Weak or divisive?
I’ll ignore your race-baiting crap.
Norguist started The Americans For Tax Reform during Ronald Reagan’s term!
I quess ignorance may be your only strength!
That proves my point. Norquist wouldn’t exist as the power he is without the President developing an opening for him. Either we have a weak ineffective President or he he intentionally divisive. He IS the President you know. The fact that you are blaming an unelected Norquist for Obama’s problems is further proof of my position.
Unfortunately, money can anything, especially in politics.
You deflected the point that he emerged under the Reagan adminsitration.
Money has always been part of the process. Always. If you believe it hasn’t been you are a denier.
As for Norquist It doesn’t matter how long he has been around the fact is his power has grown and is a perfect example of how the President is ineffective…. If we had an strong President Norquist would be a nobody. Obama’s inability to lead made Norquist the power he is.
That’s right. And the money of the likes of George Soros and the unions purchased the White House for the present occupant. But, the money isn’t flying in like it did in 08, so I’d dare say that Obama isn’t quite as successful with his own people. With over 200 fundraising events already, and a whole lot more in the works, and Romney beating him on donations, I’d say that Obama’s first term has been a failure.
And since you bring up Reagan, do you know how many fundraisers he had for his second term election? Try zero.
Obama is a failure. He has nothing to run on, so he’s doing his best to demonize Romney. It’s already been proven that he’s working with a Super PAC or two, which is against the law, but no one will bring it up because they don’t want to be called racist. And I’ll bet you right now that he won’t go on Fox for a Presidential debate for fear of being asked real questions that he won’t get on the other channels.
Democrats on campaign finance. “When Democrats outspend Republicans money it is a good thing. When Republicans outspend Democrats, it’s “buying” the election.” Hypocrites.
More Democratic hypocrisy. When Republicans ask for ID in order to vote it’s stealing an election. When Democrats decide to invalidate overseas military ballots because the Postmaster didn’t put a date on the packet that is following the law.
In Massachusetts when a person registers for food stamps they are given a voter registration form, but not so when they register for a gun permit.
Your thought process is illogical, Norquist came to be under the Republican Regime of Ronald Reagan who spent more than any president before him. He was there long before Obama.
Besides,Currently the amount of taxes under Obama is the least amount in Modern History,Norquist is an ideolog that transcends Presidencies, he in No way is the result of Barack Obama.This division is all about the propagandist assault on the feeble minded to gain political power to favor the wealthiest Americans and Corporations.Obama tried many times to compromise, it is not in the Tea Parties Vocabulary!You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink, if it only drinks tea.
Your point is illogical. There are always people in the opposition. There is nothing new about that. This President is ineffectual in his ability to deal with the opposition. That is the definition of a weak President.
I wouldn’t blame Norquist for any Presidents inefectiveness or success, unless they too were shown to have signed a pledge to Grover Norquist.
I do blame the inefectiveness of Congress on all those who have signed fielty to Grover Norquist. They are all IMO traitors to the offices they hold.
So far Maine hasn’t sent a representative to Washington who has signed a pledge to Grover Norquist or anyone else that I know of. I see no reason to change that trend.
Summers signed the pledge of his enternal “Soul” to Grover Babe!
I know. In fact he stated in one of the debates that he had signed it twice. I hope that we won’t be sending him to represent the citizens of Maine while he is under contract to Grover Norquist.
The point is the “pledge” would not exist if Obama knew how to compromise. It’s very existence is proof of Obama’s failure as a President.
If I’m not mistaken the pledge has been around prior to Obamas election.
The main point is that I don’t want any pledge to anyone but the people these politicians are supposed to be representing. Their constiuents. I don’t want Governor LePage having to consult with Grover Norquist. I don’t want the Secretary of State for Maine having to consult with Grover Norquist. Now you have a potential Vice President who is signed on as a Grover Norquist puppet. If you can’t see the conflict of interests here I have to wonder.
Too true.
I wouldn’t get into this discussion if I were you. You are unarmed.
Wow!
Thats why I gave up on YOU!
You really have proven to have NO critical thinking skills!!
Pretty smokey in the room you are operating from.
Well, I suppose he could take himself hostage!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upvZdVK913I
At least he tries, the TPers don’t.
And that is your defense of Obama’s leadership ability?…… “He tries.”
What more evidence do you need??
I had a son who tried to play baseball. He tried also but it was not his game. Had a lot of fun… but as a career path .. Its just not him.
No, you’re wrong. Obama has been a divider all of his political career. His first two years in office, he worked with the Dems and left the Republicans out of just about everything he did. It’s only been since the Republicans took the House that Obama has offered any compromise, and his offerings have only been for campaign fodder. If Obama was a uniter, he would tell Reid to release the 30+ bills that the House has sent to the Senate that would help small business and the middle class. But, he won’t, because these bills would make the Republicans look like they care and the Dems don’t want that getting out.
As for the Tea Party, it’s obvious from your comments that you know nothing about us except what you hear from the mainstream media. We are true Americans at heart and are working to bring this nation back to the greatness that it deserves. We have people from all walks of life and all parties in our ranks. And we are willing to give our all to ensure that the freedoms and liberties that so many have fought and died for remain in place. We cannot stand idly by and let the progressive radical push America into the abyss. Ain’t gonna’ happen on our watch.
Actually, Eric, people should vote for the one that is going to put America first, not themselves or their party.
Agreed. People should vote for Obama, somebody other than LePage, and not for Tea Party candidates.
I take it you don’t understand what it means to put America first.
Yes I do.
Work with the other side? Would be nice. However, as soon as President Obama was elected, the TeaPublicans immediately said that they woulld not work with him and that their only goal in life was to obstruct and see him defeated, the nation be damned. The TeaRadicals are off the beam. Today, Ronald Reagan would be a “liberal RINO” in their eyes. These radicals were willing to allow the nation to default rather than compromise. President and Obama and Democrats have bent over backwards to compromise to fair degrees with them. Nothing doing on their radical side. They are now agains things they used to support but now won’t because it would involve compromise. It is just disgusting. You can’t compromise with ultra-radicals, which is exactly what the TeaPublican Party is.
Great article Eric. The problem seems that we have a hard time finding any candidates that are willing to be flexible. I truely believe that there needs to be a third party.
More blather from the left. Anyone who views Obama other than a radical leftist socialist clearly has problems of political perception.
Leftists should not be accomodated; they must be defeated. Nearly everything they stand for and work towards is to the detriment of this great country. Open borders, gutted defense, debt holes deeper than the Mariana Trench, murder of the unborn. The list goes on.
Only if viewed with extremist blinders.
I thought this was a very well written piece. Thank you. I am especially sad to see Sen Snowe leaving Congress. For years, she has been a good representative of “the middle ground.” She uses compromise as a tool and I think it has benefited us all.
I have to disagree with this a bit: The Republican party is unrecognizably to the right of the Republican party of Reagan. The Democratic party doesn’t understand their president, who has embraced drone warfare and social program cuts. The Republicans vilify the president for policies that are to the right of Nixon, saying that they don’t go far enough. The far left pressures ever harder for social changes that are anathema to the Christian Right.
In the last sentence, if we’re talking about social changes as in gay marriage, then these aren’t really issues that we should be debating. These are civil rights.
Ever notice how the left ramps up its Kumbaya ratio whenever they smell defeat on the horizon?
Ever notice how conservatives and TPers ramp up their deflections when they’re getting desperate?
Please, amuse us with a list of the deflections the right has ramped up. Then make a list of actual issues that the Obama campaign is putting out there. You’ll find that both list are very, very short. Actually, the Obama campaign issue list will be blank, because they can’t run on his record.
Obama’s birth certificate.
Give us an example, then.
2 to begin with. Romney makes all these speeches about putting the American worker back on the job. Fine but someone please show me where he has this written down so we can all read it and understand it. So far all I’ve seen him do is make speech’s. He crys and whines about ACA but again, no where does he have an option for us all to study and make our own decision’s. He expects the GOP and the Independent’s to accept his positions all on blind faith like Bachmann’s allegations about Hillary’s Chief of Staff. The time has come for common sense and clear rational thought, not ‘Chicken Little’ screaming, to be used. To date, Maine has been seriously lacking in using rational thought given what LePage has provided us all with, which is one step short of a Saturday cartoon show. Now is the time for us to get back to a serious discussion and effort in making Maine what we all know it’s capable of being, not the laughing stock that the current political scene has dragged it down to…..
Too numerous to cite. Hit the archives. You may recognize a few.
86
I think you mean the 99, not the Tea Party. So many get the two of them mixed up. But, that’s the intent of the mainstream media. They rely on the uninformed to swallow their lies about the Tea Party, and according to several that comment in these threads, it’s working.
No way is the “99” equivalent to the TPs.