BELGRADE, Maine — Representatives from Pan Am Railways, state officials and town residents will meet in North Belgrade Community Center on Tuesday evening to discuss a fee some residents knew nothing about.

In February, Dick Bickford received a letter in the mail from Pan Am, stating that he owed fees associated with the railroad crossing that stretches across the private road he lives on, Kayak Lane.

Many years ago, he said, railroad companies made agreements with homeowners on private roads to help pay for maintenance of the crossings. It was a $75 fee per year, plus the residents would be required to carry liability insurance for the crossing.

“They’re hauling out these old agreements and trying to make [residents on the road] pay $1,600 a year. That amounts to $400 apiece,” said Bickford, who then mentioned the liability insurance related to damage to the tracks that is not included with homeowners insurance. “So, you’re paying roughly $1,100 to $1,200 a year [total].”

When Bickford bought his home on Kayak Lane in 2000, there was no fee from the railroad attached to his deed, so he never paid it. He never knew it existed, he said.

“Property owners in Belgrade who had crossing agreements received the letter in February about crossing fees going up many times more than they were paying,” said Rep. Dennis Keschl, R-Belgrade. “Some weren’t paying the fees. It’s raised all kinds of property issues and right-of-way issues. When you start looking into it, it gets complicated.”

Complicating the rail crossing agreement with homeowners, Bickford said, commercial vehicles are not allowed across the tracks without the railroad’s permission.

“If I want oil delivered, I have to call [the railroad] three days prior and pay, by the hour, to have two flagmen stand there while he crosses,” said Bickford.

Bickford also owns a small electrical business on his Kayak Lane property. He isn’t allowed to cross with his commercial vehicle but does anyway.

Also at issue is a 1981 state law that says railroads may not charge a fee for private crossings if the railroad takes a sales tax exemption for iron, rock, rails, ties, switch plates and switches for improving rails.

“If they take that exemption, they can’t charge any fees to us,” said Bickford, who has retained a lawyer.

Pan Am Railways Executive Vice President Cynthia Scarano will attend Tuesday night’s meeting along with Keschl and Maine House Speaker Robert Nutting, R-Oakland. The meeting will start at 6 p.m.

“We’re going there to try to reach some agreement. The people requested we have a meeting and that’s what we’re doing,” said Scarano.

Bickford said 12 homeowners were notified by Pan Am, and will be at the meeting.

“This is a test case right here,” said Bickford. “Whatever they get out of us 12, they’ll march on everybody with it.”

Newport and Fairfield representatives recently expressed their displeasure with Pan Am regarding inaction from the company in fixing railroad crossings in their towns.

Join the Conversation

23 Comments

  1. I know of people that live on the defunct Brewer to Ellsworth  line with private driveway crossings and the state charges them $200 every year. Sort of extorsion, isnt it?

  2. Before any meeting takes place, I would make sure  Pan Am is not taking that exemption first. If they are, case closed.

  3. If I were at that meeting, I would want to video all the proceedings.  I guarantee Pan Am will object, but you should not trust this company.  Do not accept their word for any reason, and bring your lawyer(s).   

  4. Springfield Term. Rwy Co. [ST ] has all the crossings in Belgrade in the Federal data. Of course the yearly check by the state is 15 years old and the railroad 12 years old.

  5. I would have them remove the rail off my property….how can they place the rail there without land owner permission?

  6. Does this mean we will have to pay Canada to cross their 500 foot wide right of way that Republican  Paul Lepage plans to seize from American land owners?

  7. Almost all rail line’s are considered private property by the perspective owners. They were given or purchased the land to improve and maintain as a rail line.  So any property title/deed search should show this.

  8. Hmm, how many derailments have occured in the last couple of years on PanAm owned tracks?

    Where are all the rail road advocates?

  9. Really?  It takes not one but TWO flagmen to tell an oil truck driver that a train is not approaching? Why, because one of the guys might be deaf?

  10. The article title is a little misleading.  It seems to imply that Pan Am is coming up with some new plan to get money from landowners when they are really trying to enforce old agreements.

    I would like to know how long ago “many years ago” is.  And were these agreements with every land owner where there is a crossing?  Why wasn’t this enforced by Pan Am/Guilford/Springfield Terminal, etc., all these years?  Why are they doing this now?

    I would also like to know why Pan Am isn’t maintaining the rest of their tracks?  The trains have to go FIVE MPH in some locations because of the poor condition of the tracks.  What they heck are they doing with all their money?!??!

  11. just curious, do the homeowners have the option of not allowing the tracks on their road? If they don’t have a choice then the RR company should pay the upkeep…

  12. How about the Towns start charging the railroad for not keeping up their public crossings?  Pam Am crossing are not kept up at all.  Go to Pittsfield and see their main street and industrial road crossings, they are very bad and the Town has complained to them.  Let’s not hear you have no money to fix them.  Guess you should not run your trains in town.

  13. At one time that property that the railroad is on belonged to someone else.  I also thought that the right of way laws exempted this kind of fee other wise how would one go from one piece of public land to another.  This is utterly stupid.  Also i watch oil trucks cross tracks all day long and they stop look and listen before they do so why do you need a crossing gaurd?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *