PORTLAND, Maine — A long envisioned passenger rail service connecting Portland with Auburn took another important step forward Thursday as a national Realtors group announced it has awarded a grant to study, in part, new ways to fund the 29-mile public transit line.

The promise of a Portland-to-Auburn line has been quietly evaluated in recent years, but has been largely overshadowed in the media by the extension of Amtrak’s popular Boston-bound Downeaster train from Portland up the coast to Brunswick.

Tony Donovan, founder and president of the Maine Rail Transit Coalition, said the newly announced $15,000 National Association of Realtors grant will build off of a federally funded study of public transportation options north of Portland completed in 2011. It also will be used as seed money to leverage an additional $60,000 to $70,000 to explore the proposed rail line, he said.

Donovan described the $15,000 grant, despite being small in size, as a “game changer,” as it provides the push necessary for the Portland-to-Auburn rail plan to build momentum. Previously, he said, it remained a long analyzed, but otherwise stagnant, proposal.

Among the focuses of the newly funded research work will be a look into utilizing so-called “value capture” methods of funding the transit expansion in Maine. The model involves recouping investment into the rail infrastructure by capturing additional tax revenues generated by raising property values along the rail corridor.

The plan essentially would be a transportation-focused tax increment financing program. Municipalities and private developers commonly use TIFs to shelter property tax increases — spurred by new development — from being collected by the state government, instead protecting the extra taxes for local reinvestment of some kind.

Donovan — who is also a board member of the Maine Commercial Association of Realtors, the local administrator of the national association grant — said property values increase along rail corridors as residents have easy access to transportation and businesses get easier access to potential train-riding customers.

Another potential strategy included in the value capture model involves approaching businesses benefitting from the customers or employees being delivered by the rail to help cover the costs of the service, Donovan said.

The state of Maine owns the railroad currently in place connecting Portland with Auburn.

“We’re saying maybe there’s a way to generate funds for transportation at the local level, and not only could we change the way we fund transportation, but change the way we make decisions about transportation,” Donovan told the Bangor Daily News. “We believe that if an alternative [to highway travel] is available, there are a lot of people who will want to use it and who will pay to use it, and who will find that their cost of transportation is less than that of owning a car.”

Portland City Councilor David Marshall serves on the Greater Portland Transit District board and is chairman of the city’s Transportation, Sustainability and Energy Committee.

“I think it’s important for us to look at transportation choices for people, and this particular rail line serves as a connection between the two largest metropolitan areas in the state, being Portland and Lewiston-Auburn,” Marshall said. “Our roads get a heavy amount of use. Every passenger car and truck we can take off the roads means less pressure on them, and they’ll last longer as a result. But there also are increasing numbers of families living without cars, so the timing is good to look at other commuter options throughout the region and see what the viability is.”

Donovan said the initial study will consider potential funding for, as well as the economic and environmental impacts of, a commuter rail service featuring 22 round trips daily between the two cities using smaller diesel rail cars with capacities of approximately 100 passengers each. The Diesel Multiple Units, or DMUs, would travel between 60 and 80 miles per hour through the corridor, Donovan said, although they could have a much higher maximum speed.

Long-term, he said, connecting Portland with Auburn would set the stage for future northwestern expansion to the fledgling Oxford Casino, ski resorts like Mt. Abram and Sunday River, and even perhaps all the way to Montreal, Canada.

The Maine Rail Transit Coalition president acknowledged that project skeptics may be quick to point out the estimated $60 million-$70 million cost of establishing the Portland-Auburn line — a sum that would cover, among other things, the reconstruction of the railroad, acquisition of the DMUs and building of the platforms along the way.

But he said Maine is well-positioned to access as much as $75 million in U.S. Transit Authority funding for the project from the same New Starts/Small Starts grant program that funded the aforementioned study into public transportation options north of Portland.

A federal program like that, Donovan said, could require a 50 percent match from the state or local governments. But he said when the costs of the proposed Auburn-to-Portland line is compared to the costs associated with maintaining roads and bridges, Mainers might be convinced to support the investment.

“Relatively speaking, the cost that we’re talking about investing in this type of transportation is less than what we’re talking about spending on roads and bridges, and we believe the numbers indicate a better return on investment than spending on roads and bridges,” Donovan said. “Even 50-50 is a manageable bond. People say, ‘Oh, $60 million,’ but you’re paying more than $20 million to replace the Martin’s Point Bridge [between Portland and Falmouth] and that’s only a third of a mile.

“We believe this will be the basis for a transportation system that will attract jobs, attract new wealth and new economic development,” he continued.

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

Join the Conversation

29 Comments

  1. This makes sense….the LA area has seen significant economic growth in spite of the recession.  Train service between the area and the economic engine of Portland can lead to more development like the recent Carbonite move to Lewiston.

  2. Long considered obsolete in the U.S., the fabled BUDD RDC self-propelled commuter rail cars have been reconditioned by the VIA RAIL(Canada) for use in British Canada and Vancouver. They once serviced much of New England from Boston’s N. end Station.

    Similar cars made by VOLVO do commuter runs in Sweden; but with an interesting twist….the engines have been modified to be powered by Compressed Natural Gas made in local anaerobic digesters fed with organic wastes. 

    So perhaps Maine can re-invent commuter rail and have cars sustain ably powered with locally produced natural gas. 

    1. I also would suggest http://www.usrailcar.com as those DMUs are made in the USA and are quite nice.  You don’t really need a traditional engine and passenger cars.  The DMUs use half the fuel, are very fast and flexible and comfortable.

      BTW, I used to ride the Budd cars in Boston when I was in college in the 1970’s.

      Good idea on the NG. Perhaps, these could be converted?

      1. Industrial Rail has RDC’s for sale starting at $140,000 reconditioned w/choice of power trains…see 
        http://www.industrialrail.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4:home&catid=1&Itemid=1#   RDC just sued VIA RAIL over some contract breaches, so they may be looking for new customers. I’ve seen used ones in VT. yards and short lines, but you really want a reconditioned unit. 

        I’m guessing both the DMU’s, and BOMBARDIER self-propelled cars cost considerably more. The USRAILCAR operation in Colorado went bust, despite considerable support from DOT and interest from Baldacci.  New name, same product? 

        Line speeds are high up to 90mph….but the track isn’t and used for heavy freight, so you have signalization synch., expensive crossing gates, etc.  May have to replace the rails with heavy gauge, and ties. 

        It’s fun to dream, as long as someone else is picking up the tab, like AMTRAK

        1. No disagreements.  USRailcar has a great product but what a tough market, especially back then when they folded.  The whole inter-urban idea makes sense but as under-funded as rail is (vs. airports and roadways), it’s always a tough sell.

          The new stuff from Nippon, Bombardier, and USRailcar are all in the millions, I imagine.  I want to say $7M/car but I don’t know for certain. 

          I agree on the line speeds.  I think, though, if they started out at reasonable speeds and the service caught on, there would be demand to upgrade the rails, crossings, signals, etc.  To me, Maine is perfect for this – kind of far for cars and too short for airplanes.  DMUs running up/down the core from Ft. Kent (?) Caribou (?) down to Boston seems reasonable to me.

          If you really want to dream, think maglev – Bangor could be a bedroom community for Boston!

          Aside from the cost, I hear all the complaints about maglev and rights-of-way, but I would argue one could use the airport model – at those speeds (351 mph average), you could have the elevated rail well outside of the usual rights-of-way issues area and just have stations somewhat in the outskirts of Bangor/Portland.  Some kind of shuttle in would be good – perhaps, an aerial tramway?  (You can tell I REALLY like to dream!)

          1. My fav. is a high speed automated–see http://www.bombardier.com/en/transportation/products-services/transportation-systems/driverless-systems/automated-monorails?docID=0901260d8000a7e4 monorail well above the weather and grade crossings and using the I95/295 corridor. A long pre-stressed concrete bridge with local shunts and stations, minimal weight and much better fuel efficiency; low insurance and maintenance. With local casting of sections, it could go up very quickly like the Bath and Wiscasset bridges. No freight train interference, and an incredible scenic tourist ride!  Nice thing is it’s a construction project that uses mostly local raw material..sand, gravel, concrete and labor, so most of the money would be spend in State. 

            How slick is this monorail built by Bombardier for Sao Paulo, Brazil? http://www.bombardier.com/en/transportation/products-services/projects/details?docID=0901260d80142cb7

            Found used German DMU’s for 1.5m. and some classic C.P. cars….Budd  made dome cars which are  available from the 50’s w/bar & snack bar. 

            MAGLEV along a HVDC energy pipeline from Hydro Quebec?

          2. Very neat!  Well, of course, maglev generally is kind of monorail and always elevated.  There are several YouTube videos on the Pudong Airport maglev.  That’s the German system, of course.  The speed is 500 kph (351 mph) average with a much higher theoretical speed.

            I agree.  So much of this is pre-fab cookie-cutter if people would just buy into it.  Maine has such an advantage be being able to have rights-of-way and still be scenic (drawing the tourists) and if they went with a number of smaller cars, you could have the bypass-station model to go direct to other stations (express mode).

            There is some talk about going smaller and thus reducing the costs and just running more trains.  It’s an interesting theory.  Have you ever seen the “people mover” in Morgantown, VW?  It was started in the 1970’s as a prototype and still runs today – much like a horizontal elevator, it has the pass-station feature.  It works great.  But, of course, getting people to accept “change,” well, you know what that is like.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgantown_Personal_Rapid_Transit

    1.  There is a lot more to be considered than gas and toll. Annual ownership of a car is estimated to exceed $3K or an estimated $1+ per mile (acquisition, lease, maintenance, wear and tear, insurance, etc.), factor in the cost of maintaining roads and highways, cost of injuries and fatalities due to higher level of accidents. A transit system entirely focused on road and air is probably the most expensive model. Rail provides an economical diversification in spite of the apparent initial investment.

      1. Your comment, while valid, only applies to a busy urban area that can support a car-less lifestyle. In Maine you need a car due to the vast rural areas.

        1. Exactly…which is why your question is so important.  People may make different car choices if they take the train, but they won’t live without one.  This is Maine…not New York.

          1. True, but depending upon what you are doing, you can save on parking and hassle taking the train.  If the stations are located where you want to go, it usually is a good deal.

          2. Agreed.  I am a big fan of commuter and light rail.  They allow for smarter cities *with* suburban and rural living.

          3.  All good points, but driving to a station and riding a majority of your commute on a train still makes sense.  Also, transportation drives development–so if you want denser communities, the transit must come first.  Not the density.  Maine has as many people in it as Philly, maybe more.  The difference obviously is how widely spread out they are.  Imagine if they were twice, three times, four times as dense.  Our cities would be bigger, more synergistic, more exciting, more profitable.  Our cultural amenities would be great.  Our natural resources would be cleaner, our outdoor activities more inviting and plentiful, our rural and agrarian areas more preserved/conserved.  All with the same population, in a different arrangement.  That arrangement is facilitated in part by transportation choices.  Transit is an important component of the available menu of choices that can support great efficiency in land development.

        2. I hear you, but you would be surprised how quickly one adapts to using the train.  First off, I don’t have to drive!  I can rest, read, and relax.  Now, this assumes the stations are where I need to go, of course.  While it is not for everyone, it certainly is for a lot of people.

          I actually drive to the end of the line, get on, and ride downtown, saving wear-and-tear on both the car and me.  And, in two-years, I have only once had to use a ZipCar because I had to get somewhere during the day by car once I was downtown.

          1. I don’t disagree. If I could ride a train everyday I would. But since I live in a highly rural area and work in a slightly less rural area public transport is not viable.

          2. I know what you mean.  The family farm is in Troy.  No trains there.

            But, for LA-Portland, I’d bet there’d be enough traffic to support it.  Especially, since the DMU’s are quite economical.

          3. Rode Swiss rail for several weeks….WOW….one station must have had a thousand bikes parked around it; everything ‘kissed’ the train station…buses, cog rails, high speed trains to Italy and the rest of Europe, and a schedule than was accurate to the minute!

            Car ownership costs are a lot more than fuel; and there are some moves toward neighborhood vehicle pools … a pickup truck, please!    

            With monorail you could assembly a van bus system. 

    1. I agree.  But, I think the line is owned by PanAm.  The DMU concept is what I have been touting for years.  Much less expensive – kind of a sports-car of trains.  With the new traffic-control software, single-tracking is much easier to do.  I think a DMU from Bangor to Portland with both locals and expresses would be the way to go.

    2. The LA/Portland train will be a success due to the existing commuter traffic between LA and southern Maine cities;  there is no commuting between Bangor and cities of the size of Portland, Lewiston/Auburn, Biddeford/Saco, Brunswick/Bath…..this equals a ‘no go’ for commuter trains north.

  3. Good for the National Association of Realtors! I would bet this would make home values rise in Androscoggin County. Portland also has issues with freeway overcrowding and hopefully this would help. 

    1. No-one made money operating a railroad; but fortunes were made developing the land along the stops. Remember, without realtors and banks who owned the land along the PAN AM tracks in S. Maine there would be no Wayne Davis and no AMTRAK.   Always follow the money to learn the truth!

  4. In reply to the Cars/Train Maglev and super cool Bio/Energy Trains, I think the other important  issue is , how far how fast, and where do they go. Why not keep going? What is holding Maine back( some powers that be might just try and derail the whole thing before it has a chance) 

  5. whats to study? spend millions for something allready known! and not a teaspoon of earth moved. It is a no brainer. but some group of do gooders will pitch a fit about it just to hear them self bi—h

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *