PORTLAND, Maine — A Westbrook man was charged with possession of child pornography Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Portland after a special agent with the Department of Homeland Security discovered him downloading and sharing videos using file-sharing software, according to court documents.
Joel Dudley, 28, said after he was arrested on Monday that he had downloaded an estimated 500 to 600 videos of child pornography “out of curiosity,” according to an affidavit supporting a criminal complaint filed with the court. The Westbrook man said he would delete the videos after viewing them, and he periodically erased his storage drive using “Department of Defense-grade” wiping software, the document said.
Dudley is the father of three girls between the ages of 3 and 8, who were in his custody, according to an application for a search and seizure warrant of the Westbrook man’s apartment.
Investigators frequently inform the Department of Health and Human Services when children live with an individual charged with possession of pornography, according to Stephen McCausland, spokesman for the Maine State Police. Whether the children have been removed from Dudley’s home could not be determined due to privacy laws that seal DHHS cases concerning children from the public.
Homeland Security agent Martin Conley found that Dudley allegedly downloaded three videos of child pornography between May 8 and July 4 using a file-sharing computer program called Ares. One of the videos showed an 8-year-old girl being sexual molested by a woman in her 20s, and the two others portrayed preteen girls engaging in sexual acts, according to court documents.
During the investigation, Saco police Detective Fred Williams reportedly found videos on a DVD of children engaging in sexual acts. The DVD was located on a desk in the office next to Dudley’s bedroom, according to the criminal complaint.
Conley was able to track Dudley using a modified version of the peer-to-peer software that allowed the agent to see an individual computer downloading the videos, according to the application for a search warrant. A grand jury subpoena was submitted to Dudley’s Internet service provider, which confirmed he was one of its users.
The Westbrook man said he ran a computer salvage and repair business called D & W Services out of his apartment — and sometimes from an office in Gray — which accounts for the large amount of computer equipment found on the premises by investigators, according to the complaint. Dudley said that “several other individuals had access to the entire apartment and the computer equipment inside the apartment.”
U.S. Magistrate Judge John Rich III on Tuesday ordered that Dudley temporarily be held without bail. The defendant is scheduled to appear in federal court in Portland on Aug. 27 for a bail hearing.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office has asked that Dudley be held without bail pending the outcome of his case.
If convicted, Dudley faces up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.



500-600 isn’t curiosity, that’s full blown pedo activity.
I have heard people caught with child pornography use the “I was curious” excuse. What is there to be curious about? That there are warped individuals who are sexually attracted to children and act it out for the world to see? I do not believe that anyone downloads such material unless they are interested in child molestation, or are already molesting children. Besides, by now people must know that possessing such materials is against the law. Do they really think they won’t be caught, when law enforcement has people working full-time to find and track down people who traffic in child pornography?
Agreed. Trying a new food or drink is curiosity. Listening to a new band is curiosity. Downloading and sharing 500-600 videos that show people forever damaging children is not curiosity. It’s sick, twisted and illegal.
“Investigators frequently inform the Department of Health and Human Services when children live with an individual charged with possession of pornography” Frequently???? This should be 100% of the time.
HDRoadQueen I totally concur. I’m sooo sick of these pervs.
Isn’t anyone else the least bit concerned that the government seems to be spying on citizens 24/7?
NO! Not at all. They specifically target child porn sites looking for offenders. You got a problem with that? I’m not saying that’s all they’re looking at but , no,I’m not concerned. You are under surveillance from security cameras everywhere you go.
no, i don’t believe it for a minute. they spy on who they want to whenever they want to.
I’m not! Child pornography is not a victimless crime. I want them to do whatever it takes to catch these “people”!
I think that child molesters are the lowest form of life and do permanent damage to children. Is there any penalty severe enough for what amounts to emotional and psychological maiming? I have no problem with tracking them down and I am not concerned about their civil liberties. I know some people may take issue with that. So be it.
they use issues like this to justify it. because they don’t believe people would find it intrusive. They compromise politicans all the time, now they are spying on the general public. and as you can see people have already excepted it. On the triple murder article I’m 100% sure they the comments are going to them or the police first, That is why peoples post are rerouted before being posted if ever.
got any evidence? my posts aren’t “rerouted” and I have yet to have a post not show up.
I now believe your one
This is a monster and an atrocity. Any father who puts their so-called desired “needs” before their children doesn’t deserve them. Good for you DHHS for stepping in and doing the right thing. I will sleep better knowing his girls won’t be with him.
His hair must grow inside out and tickle his brain! I said it befor and I’ll say it again, “A fair trial then a fair hanging!!!”
We know that is a crime and he will be punished for it..
What is just a shocking is everyone excepts the Idea that homeland security has their nose in everyones computers. “Homeland” and you think they are protecting you from the boogie man. they are spying on you… 1984
baloney. he was using peer-to-peer file sharing software which means that he was pulling the video files down to his computer and then his computer was serving the files out to others on the Internet. Anyone could have connected to that file-sharing network and seen the files and the IP addresses of the computers sharing them. The only special access the police needed was a court order to find out who was using that IP address. This is no different than any other investigation after criminal activity is observed IN PUBLIC, that is, on the public Internet.
I don’t believe HOMELAND needs a warrent, HOMELAND??
I don’t undertand why if “Homeland Security” has the ability to monitor these despicable websites that have child pornography available for download, why don’t they have the ability to just shut those sites down?
Heck they probably created the site.