ORONO, Maine — In April 1993, the University of Maine men’s ice hockey team jubilantly hoisted the NCAA Division I national championship trophy at the Bradley Center in Milwaukee.
For most Black Bear fans, it is the apex of UMaine athletics history.
Along with a second national title in 1999, it remains one of few such highlights for the state’s only Division I college athletics program. While UMaine teams have achieved some big-picture successes since then, most have languished in mediocrity in recent years.
UMaine spent an estimated $16.6 million on athletics during the fiscal year that ended June 30. Despite a sagging state economy, the department managed by athletics director Steve Abbott balances its budget with the aid of more than $10 million annually from state funding and UMaine students.
Only two of 17 sports, men’s ice hockey and men’s basketball, bring in more money than they spend.
With the fall sports season at hand, the BDN asked UMaine officials how they measure the cost effectiveness of the athletics department and what those metrics show. They were asked how they justify the expense of competing at the NCAA Division I level.
UMaine officials say the role athletics plays can’t be measured simply in dollars and cents.
President Paul Ferguson, who began his term on July 1, 2011, called athletics “a beautiful front porch to the university.” Black Bear teams are among UMaine’s most visible and scrutinized entities, and athletic events often serve as people’s first exposure to the campus.
“It really does provide a venue for our students to develop leadership skills and team-building skills and offers the University of Maine a great opportunity to engage across the country with our peers in a very different venue and a different environment that really promotes quality development of the individual,” he said.
Athletics employs 90 administrators, coaches and staff members who serve more than 400 student-athletes. The department expenditures for the 2010-2011 academic year, used as the baseline here because that year is the most recent for which complete figures are available, were $16,347,073.
That represents 5.6 percent of the total $373.8 million budget for the Orono campus, according to Janet Waldron, UMaine vice president for administration and finance.
In 2010-11, athletics received more than $10 million, or almost 62 percent of its budget, from state appropriations and student tuition and fee payments. It considers this money revenue.
Some question how much is spent on athletics, given a state economy that has led to significant cuts in other areas of the university.
“It’s embittering to see all that goes on on one part of the campus [athletics] and how so much of the rest of the campus is neglected, to a certain degree,” said Howard Segal, UMaine’s Bird and Bird professor of history. “When you see, year after year, insufficient number of faculty, insufficient number of courses, deteriorating buildings, what are you supposed to think?”
Measuring athletics’ value
UMaine officials measure the value of athletics with data and subjective observations. They look at the academic performance and graduation rate of student-athletes, wins and losses, donor contributions, game attendance, community involvement, perceived impact on the local economy and athletics website hits .
Athletic performance has been unspectacular in recent years. From 2005-06 through 2010-11, UMaine’s eight most financially significant teams — football, men’s ice hockey, women’s basketball, men’s basketball, women’s ice hockey, baseball, women’s soccer and softball — posted a combined record of 714 wins, 774 losses and 46 ties, a .480 winning percentage.
On a national scale, men’s hockey made NCAA Frozen Four appearances in 2006 and 2007, football reached the the NCAA Football Championship Subdivision playoffs in 2008 and baseball captured America East titles and played at NCAA Regionals in 2006 and 2011.
Football and men’s hockey competed in NCAA postseason play during 2011-12, with football advancing to the national quarterfinals.
Officials boast about the student-athletes’ academic achievements. Last year, athletes earned a 3.04 cumulative grade point average, which is higher than that of the overall student body.
The most recent NCAA data show UMaine student-athletes who enrolled from 2001 through 2004 had a federal graduation rate (within six years) of 67 percent compared with 58 percent for the overall UMaine student body and 64 percent for Division I student-athletes nationally.
Segal considers himself a Black Bears fan and said athletics play a valuable role on campus. He is nonetheless critical of the special treatment student-athletes receive. He said athletes routinely are given first choice over most other students when registering for classes.
Segal lauded the academic support program for student-athletes run by Ann Maxim as having been instrumental in the strong numbers.
“The question is one of fairness. I come down on the side that every student, all other things apart, should be treated equally,” said Segal, who scoffed at the notion student-athletes might somehow be under more pressure because of their sports pursuits and visibility.
Athletics increase UMaine’s visibility
Ferguson’s interactions with a wide spectrum of UMaine constituents have given him a broader view of the value of athletics in promoting the university.
For example, last fall, Chris Treister dove into the end zone for a dramatic, game-winning conversion in overtime in a football victory at James Madison. It was ranked No. 2 on ESPN’s “Plays of the Day,” which meant a nationwide audience of millions saw it.
“How many times was that played, that the University of Maine got tremendous visibility?” Ferguson said.
UMaine has several former student-athletes playing professional sports. The National Football League representatives are Lofa Tatupu, Montell Owens, Mike DeVito, Javon Belcher, Matt Mulligan, Trevor Coston, Jerron McMillian and Derek Session.
Former Black Bears Dustin Penner, Brett Clark, Jimmy Howard, Mike Lundin, Ben Bishop and Teddy Purcell, along with coaches John Tortorella and Jack Capuano, are in the National Hockey League.
Athletics have generated millions of dollars for renovations to Alfond Arena, Morse Field, Mahaney Diamond, Kessock Field and the field hockey complex. UMaine also has raised most of the estimated $15 million toward an overhaul of Memorial Gym and the field house, including a $7 million state bond.
Segal has simpler concerns at Stevens Hall, which houses classrooms and his office. He said plaster has been falling from the ceilings in the historic building.
“This building, ironically, is pictured more than any other building on campus, but is not important enough to justify fixing up,” he said. “That’s a question of symbolism but it’s also a question of substance and it would not be allowed to happen in athletics.”
The cost of athletics
UMaine sponsors 17 sports, three more than the NCAA Division I minimum and fewer than the offerings at many schools of similar size. Athletic student aid accounts for the largest portion of UMaine’s athletics expenses and in 2010-11, the department awarded $5.7 million in scholarships. UMaine awards the maximum number of allowed scholarships in most sports, so when tuition is raised, so is the cost of scholarships.
Coaching salaries were next at $3.13 million, followed by support staff and administrative salaries, benefits and bonuses ($2.69 million) and team travel ($1.51 million). The other 20 percent of athletic spending includes areas such as facilities maintenance and rentals, equipment, uniforms and supplies, recruiting and game expenses.
The salaries of UMaine’s head coaches and administrators often draw the ire of those who question the value of athletics.
UMaine athletics employ five people who earn a total of $718,000 per year in base salaries. They include men’s ice hockey coach Tim Whitehead ($190,000), Cosgrove ($175,000), Abbott ($140,000), women’s basketball coach Richard Barron ($113,000) and men’s basketball coach Ted Woodward ($100,000).
In 2011-12, all employees of the University of Maine System received a UMaine benefits package that represented another 49.5 percent on top of their wages. It includes items such as medical and dental coverage and contributions to retirement health and savings accounts.
Abbott points out UMaine’s coaching salaries are modest compared to those of their counterparts in America East, Hockey East and the Colonial Athletic Association.
“Our coaches are very well-paid for the region that we’re in, but when you consider nationally what other coaches make, our salaries are low,” Abbott said. “We have to pay enough competitively to attract the higher-caliber people that we want representing our institution and educating our students.”
UMaine coaches always are replaced when they leave their jobs, usually at a higher cost. Segal said the history department has gone from 23 or 24 full-time faculty in 1986 to 14 or 15 today.
“When people die, retire or leave, they’re not replaced,” Segal said, explaining some professors don’t retire for fear their position, and the specialized courses they teach, will be eliminated for good.
“The diminution of faculty and courses is horrible,” he added.
UMaine also is in the process of hiring a senior associate athletic director, who will earn approximately $100,000 per year. Ferguson said the position exists at most Division I schools and is necessary to provide critical department support as the No. 2 administrator.
Where the money goes
Football is the most expensive sport and during 2010-11 cost the department $3.5 million. Almost $2 million of that went to scholarships, while coaches’ salaries and benefits accounted for $791,784 and team travel totaled $323,566.
Football recouped $250,000 for its guarantee game at Syracuse in 2010, but Abbott said that money goes toward the general athletic fund. Football also had the largest amount of contributions ($375,640) but operated at a deficit of $870,238.
Men’s hockey had expenses of $3.5 million the same year, but brought in $1.1 million in ticket sales and had a positive bottom line of $708,093. The university also counts as revenue institutional support ($1,076,994), contributions ($193,601), sports camps ($76,181) and $21,358 in game guarantees, among other sources.
Women’s basketball spent $1.1 million and the men accounted for $1.07 million in expenses. However, men’s basketball netted a $78,444 profit thanks to $326,670 in guarantee money for playing high-profile teams.
“Athletics has been very active in finding ways to increase its own operational efficiencies in order to save money toward budget reduction strategies,” Waldron said.
UM budget compares to peers
UMaine’s athletic spending and expenses are lower on average than similar universities, according to numbers compiled by USA Today in its online college athletics department finances database.
UMaine numbers are comparable to New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, and to America East public schools Albany, Binghamton, Stony Brook and Maryland Baltimore County.
UMaine ranked fifth compared to those eight schools in expenses, revenue and state subsidies.
In that group, UMaine had the third most revenue (7.8 percent) from contributions and ranked No. 3 by securing 10.3 percent of its revenue from rights fees and licensing. UMaine spent less than 32 percent of its budget on coaches salaries, slightly below the average of its peers.
Generating revenue challenging
While much of its money comes from state subsidies and student tuition, UMaine athletics is challenged to generate enough income from other sources to remain viable and competitive.
The other primary revenue streams are donations ($1.45 million in 2010-11), ticket sales ($1.34 million), NCAA and conference distributions ($912,000), game guarantees ($648,000), royalties, advertisements and sponsorships ($630,000), sports camp revenue ($495,000), and program sales, concessions, novelty sales and parking ($369,000).
UMaine brought in $465,000 in 2010-11 from “other” areas, including facility rentals.
All UMaine students contribute to athletics through a portion of the university’s unified fee, which is assessed as a percentage of credit hours taken. Waldron said athletics receives $1.26 million per year from the fee, a fixed amount that has not changed since 2002.
That results in an approximate annual charge of $138 per student per academic year. She noted students may attend UMaine home games at no cost.
Ferguson has challenged departments campuswide to become more entrepreneurial. His Athletics Engagement Initiative is part of his Blue Sky Project, through which UMaine “aspires to be the most distinctively student-centered and community-engaged of the American Research Universities.”
As UMaine tries to boost marketing, increase ticket sales and solicit new donors, it is attempting to recruit more fans.
One area of emphasis is promoting a better game-day atmosphere. At football games, for example, tailgate areas will open earlier and outside vendors with different food offerings may be brought in to foster a more welcoming family atmosphere.
Attendance at UMaine athletic events has fluctuated in the last several years. Men’s hockey attendance dropped 10 percent during 2010-11 compared to 2006-07 but was up significantly last winter over the previous season.
Football improved 22 percent to 5,980 per game from 2008 to 2010. Men’s basketball has hovered near 1,400 fans, including a 10 percent boost from 2008-09 to 2010-11. Women’s basketball was down 38 percent between 2007-08 and 2010-11, but increased 7 percent last season to 1,353.
Officials admit empty seats mean untapped revenue.
Focused on the future
The financial challenges are likely to continue for UMaine athletics. Even with an economic upturn, the department will have to cultivate more donors, widen its fan base in a small market and find ways to keep costs in check to deal with growing expenses.
Officials were asked whether it would make financial sense to move to Division III, where scholarships are not awarded and coaching salaries are lower. That four-year reclassification process has been undertaken only twice in the last 25 years — by Birmingham Southern (in 2006) and Centenary (2010).
UMaine officials said they have no intention of making such a move which, among other things, likely would result in a decrease in the university’s perceived prestige.
UMaine officials are confident athletics will continue to serve students, entertain fans, re-engage alumni and expose people around the state, the region and the country to what UMaine has to offer.
“Part of a university’s livelihood is the connection with alums and their constituencies,” Ferguson. “To keep that and their pride is a huge return on investment.”



If you try and place monetary value on college and high school sports you will more often then not, lose out. That does not mean they are not otherwise “worthwhile”. College sports and the study of Birds are both important. Try and find common ground.
Hockey would bring in more money with a head coaching change. Many donors and season ticket holders have cut back on donations and purchasing season tickets. I agree it builds character(in some cases characters) and helps with leadership skills and it’s fun to watch. You’re going to have people on both sides of the debate provide arguments one way or another but at the end of the day it’s not like they’re going to cut athletics and leave facilities empty.
Hockey as now played is a violent sport, where concussive injuries are taken for granted and player assaults allowed to happen. Were the Ref’s police, they’d be arrested.
Can you play clean, respectful hockey and win; or is this type of sportsmanship better than winning at all costs?
You must not watch a lot of hockey…
just the Zamboni operator take out the blood spills and pick up teeth.
Concussions are not increasing, monitoring and diagnoses are increasing.
Got a study cite to go with that? Monitoring, diagnoses and rehab. costs are mounting. Women’s sports seem to have a lot of them limping around. I’ve read some reports on the cost of health insurance for women’s sports and it’s skyrocketing, as are orthopedic practices; and may be exceeding those of men’s sports. Women’s boxing, hockey, etc.
You certainly are a fool.
That the best you can do?…just sit on the bench, that’s where you belong and fill up the water cooler.
No thanks I’d rather be on the ice playing the so called “violent” sport.
You know Penn State had added M/W hockey for this year, right?
With a coaching change? I’m sorry but that makes no sense.
Makes perfect sense. The current coach is an utter failure, and the attendance and season ticket sales continue to plummet.
Football is worth the money. Yes, it loses $870K but your giving kids who may not goto college without football a chance for post-secondary education. Besides, UMaine football is competitive. What other program brings in $2.6 million?
“May not go to college without football?” How many kids make it to college based solely on their football skills? If that is what they are depending on to make it into college they are in for a big surprise. And they should also have a talk with their parents after they start working at McDonalds about never instilling reality in them.
Very good, in-depth article, and an eye-opener to boot! Consider these points:
“Athletics employs 90 administrators, coaches and staff members who
serve more than 400 student-athletes.”
This translates to a staff to athletes ratio of about 1:4!!! What is the average staff to general student population ratio?! It cannot be anything close!!
“UMaine spent an estimated $16.6 million on athletics during the fiscal year that ended June 30.”
That translates to about $40,000 per student athlete per year–or a total of $160,000 in four years–that the University of Maine invests in each student athlete. Think of it!! Arguments were put forth that these athletes develop excellent leadership skills among other benefits of the investment. Well, wouldn’t just about ANY student be able to develop leadership skills if they had that kind of financial backing? Now track those athletes over time after they graduate. How many of them go on to shine in an extraordinary way or do extraordinary things with this advantage? How many stay in Maine and give back? How many who have gone on to professional careers after U.Maine become benefactors of the athletic program themselves?
Most importantly, though is this question: under what other circumstance would the University pour that much money into just 400 of its students?! It’s time to make some cuts to the athletic budget. If the programs were self-sustaining, that would be one thing, but while other departments have to rely on raising their own budgets through grants, etc., no matter what the performance of the athletic department, they keep getting disproportionately well-financed!
To imply that the athletic staff serves only the student athletes is a pretty narrow view. In reality they serve the UMaine Sports fans all over the state and beyond. Personally I’ve enjoyed countless hours of entertainment following UMaine over the years- much of it for Free over TV or the Internet. Due to distance I’m not able to attend many games in person and that’s why I feel an obligation to make modest donations to the athletic department- to partially cover my use of the product.
Such accounting needs to made in comparison with other schools, especially Division I schools in the Northeast.
If all the other Division 1 schools jumped off a bridge, should UMaine?
Not the point most other schools waste money or even more on sports dose that make it right. Now you can say it good advertising to recruit students. Wait a second if they need to spend money on advertising then they must be a for profit bus. Maybe UMaine should not get tax dollar and have to pay taxes. Sorry it is not just a UMaine issue. It is an issue for cost.
Approximately $25,000 of that $40,000 per athlete is for scholarships. You also have to remember that scholarships are earned on a year-by-year basis. It’s like having any other skill. If your good at something, athletics, math, music, etc., you’ll be noticed and get a scholarship.
The UM athletic department gets about 2.5% of the TOTAL UM BUDGET. Half of their budget they get on their own, just like other programs.
Many athletes do give back to UM. The Mahaneys, Morses, Collins, and Alfonds aren’t just nobodies. The hockey, football, and baseball programs that have had players go professional usually receive contributions from those same players.
If UM were serious about education and we are so successful with our athletes, why not have them pay back their scholarships when they sign professional contracts and award those funds to needy students.
400 student athletes out of 10,000—4% of the total student body gain “leadership and team building skills”–what about the other 96%. Several New England schools have closed sports programs and have not suffered from that decision.
Name one university of Maine’s size that has done so… Yeah, I thought so.
BU, UVM, several California state universities, NYU, Northeastern, and more have all closed football and are doing fine and play Div. 1 sports.
BU- Private
UVM- Dropped football in 1974
Northeastern- Private
NYU- Private/Non-DI
Yes and all those kids from the poor families you speak of would not have been able to pay for college without a sports scholarship .
Imagine if the scholarships were pumped into helping smart but economically challenged students who lacked the ability to land a sports scholarship!
My point exactly. Maybe I can not spell , but I graduated in the top the top 10 of my High School class . I can tell you poor kids are at a big disadvantage . Not to bad for a kid who had an IQ in the low 70s . It is total BS. Just saying . Some thinking patterns like abstract reasoning and questioning authority are not good things in education. I would love to have a math test with those same teachers no calculator pencil and paper and see if they have an IQ in the low 60s lol. Maybe some things have change since the 70s but not much.
As an educator, my student load is often over 200 students. I can only imagine what the results would be with a 1:4 ratio.
These are not investments in individual student-athletes. They are investments in The University of Maine. Student-athletes are the benefactors of a lot of University resources because they invest so much into being a representative of UMaine. The time that a Div. I athlete puts into training in the off-season as well as practices, games, and all the travel that is required in-season goes beyond a full-time job. And they have to do this while still earning a college education.
One of the things I learned in the Maine Business School was that there is a solution other than making cuts that can improve profitability- improve the quality. The University is making strides through the attempt to better engage students, as well as in the hiring of a few of the coaches listed above. These improvements will make the University more attractive to incoming students, recruits, and all supporters of UMaine.
On a side note, the article compares the records of the “most expensive” sports over 6 years, but bases expense off the most recent year. This matters because a coach like Richard Barron of the Women’s Basketball team who was hired that year is more expensive than Cindy Blodgett, who coached the team through most of those losses (and recruited the team that Coach Barron lost with this past season)
GO BLUE!!!
As a graduate of Penn State, I know full well the costs of having a big bucks football program crash and burn as a result of one coaches indiscretions….one guy and thousands are affected!
So think about UMaine and the potential harm hidden out there on lawyer’s desks being written into briefs to be presented on behalf of long gone students….ready to assume the risk?
The other view is that I’d prefer to subsidize an athletic program which reflects Maine athletic talents; and not the result of an expensive recruiting program that now reaches around the world to snag athletes. Where are the champion sailors, Xcountry skiers, etc.? How many of them are recruited out of State? What would it take for them to compete for U.Maine? Is this really a “Maine” product or just a logo stamped on a recruit? I wonder how many of these imports stay in or return to make a contribution?
I realize I’m suggesting both the risk potential and potential loss of many teams and league involvement. For the first time, the PSU alumni magazine featured the accomplishments of other parts of the university….Amazing!
Having played IM’s at PSU and enjoyed the game for what it is; this isn’t the worse outcome since I think it’s better and healthier to be a lifetime player than a fan.
Start by restricting scholarships to Mainers and set a quota on imports.
Then subject each ‘losing’ sport to an annual financial review to see whether it’s worth subsidizing them.
Would you restrict PSU athletic scholarships to only PA residents? Hardly fair considering the population of PA in comparison. Would you also recommend this for other state universities? Depending on the sport, watch the non-state schools clean up.
I’m also an advocate of intramural sports and general particpationin fitness and athletics by all students. Guess what helps pay for those opportunities and facilities? Check out the utilization of UMaine facilities by non-varsity athletes of all ages beginning with the swimming pool.
Restrict the scholarships…Penna. is rich in athletic talent….Recruiting is now a commercial biz.
No way can Umaine compete with PSU in team sports; in fact it has enough trouble competing with the 3rd tier teams it plays now. Playing with the big dogs has gotten pricey.
Other state universities should do the same…Calif., Florida, Michigan, New York, Virginia, etc. all can hold their own with native talent.
Non-state schools ‘clean up’? hahahahah. Other than Stanford, there are few that are competitive, but I really don’t follow college sports…def. a non-fan….or do you mean that Bowdoin’s hockey team will ‘clean up’ UMe’s?
Student activity fees usually keep pools open as do fees charged community members like me. Prefer the Y in Freeport anyway.
Oh yeah, Maine beat Penn State by 15 in men’s basketball in 2010-11. I believe they also beat PSU in field hockey as well.
And where did those basketball players come from and at what cost, just so you can gloat and beat your chest?
This year PSU is ranked 6th in the nation in Women’s soccer; and 9th in Field Hockey…don’t know about that loss; but perhaps you could tell us what Maine’s national ranking is?
You’re proving my point that by concentrating football resources into sports like women’s field hockey and soccer, UMaine might be able to compete at a national level. Bowdoin women now outshine the Men in many areas, and having watched their soccer teams are actually exciting to watch…they’re really good!
It doesn’t matter where they came from, they chose to come to UM.
Maine is ranked 22nd in the NFHCA Preseason Poll. They’ve competed on a national level the past few years. The Black Bears even cracked the top ten last year.
The reason why sports like women’s soccer and field hockey exist is because of football. Ever heard of Title IX? They are the sports that comp the football scholarships.
janitors make less than movie stars. bird boy should have played a few sports in school and maybe he would have had an outlet for some of his anger.
If they started serving BEER at games, I think more revenue would come in! LOL
Haven’t some schools or was it the Pat’s who charge for tailgate parties and camping out now?
You raise a valid point. Most division 1 schools serve alcohol at games. I know for a fact that you can buy beer at Michigan State football games. 50,ooo people at a football game drink beer.
Maine does, in the luxury box level.
Waste of money…
UNH spends $27 million on an athletic program very similar to UM. They also have worse facilities (excluding the Whittemore Center) and equal-to-less caliber programs.
I would have went to UM but they didn’t have marble tossing scholarships at the time. They didn’t even have a team. I was forced to take a scholarship at Yale where they have a great team..
but back to Maine. I love Maine Hockey.. Maine sports with the new AD given a chance will be the top in their division. then the money will flow. Everyone loves a winner… Hear that Tim
Get more in state athletes on the teams! Maine tries so hard to be competitive in sports and they go to all these city areas in NY, NJ, PA, etc only to bring second tier players up north. Often these guys find themselves in trouble (numerous arrests from a number of the sports teams over the years). Get the best players from Maine to commit here…people will actually drive to see their high school’s superstar play in D-1 games
You don’t understand the level of competition. Most of the time even the very best Maine high school football players don’t make the cut, and when they do can they stick with it and actually earn a spot? See a few examples:
http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2012/08/17/sports/mainers-hope-to-do-state-proud-on-umaine-football-team/http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2012/07/19/sports/former-bangor-high-standout-josiah-hartley-decides-to-leave-university-of-maine-football-program/
UMaine has always tried to have in-state athletes, but these days most Mainers just can’t compete.
Depends on the sport…baseball flounders against teams that play year round, but look at the success in the Red Sox field teams. Women’s soccer and field hockey are two others. Nothing wrong with being number 2 or #3 or going to the Olympics in women’s rowing.
Big ticket sports like football and basketball are def. not UMaine’s forte….but even losers get to watch future superstars show off, so if you love the game there is an advantage here.
Football isn’t UM’s forte? You want to tell that to a team that finished top 8 year?
Take away Men’s hoops guarantee money that they receieved for playing Notre Dame & UCONN last season & suddenly that 78K profit turns into a 200K deficit!!!!!!
Mr. March should scheule all games againts high profile teams to justify why he still is HC and his horrible record –especially in MARCH -)
This is a very unnecessary article…bottom line is that UMaine athletics do a lot more for the school than one may think. They play an absolute huge role in getting the school publicity and getting potential future enrollment and add so much to student life. Lots of information in this article but very unnecessary.
Is there absolutely any DATA to support this assertion?
Not to mention the role they play for the fans in the community to have family entertainment at a very reasonable price.
This one is actually really simple to answer…NO FREAKEN WAY!!!!…Back when UMaine sports were making national tournaments and putting Maine on the map, it might have, but certainly not now. The football team is about the best we have for us right now and the only thing that truly brings in money with the likes of games against Boston College coming up and Nebraska in recent memory…those are Big money game and pays not only for the sports staff for football, but also for many other sports at Umaine that are basically money Loozers…Even baseball is nothing ever since Winkin left. Cut the other programs, cut those that dont make money and reduce the TUITION, so that normal people can actually help out with their kids going to college for an EDUCATION, and not have to deal with such high student loans.
College athletics provide the opportunity for a lot of “normal” people’s kids to get a college education.And have you heard about Title 9? You can’t cut the programs that don’t make money without eliminating athletics.
Yes all the hockey player grew up on welfare and could not have gone to college ……………Less than 1 % for sudendent play sports but it is 5% of budget so we could send 5 times as many kids to school if we gave scholarships based on grade not sports. and adjust for family income.
I don’t think college athletics should be eliminated, but I do think their profile ought to be significantly lowered. Universities should take only an indirect role. That is, if a group of students want to play (for example) football, let them start a club for it, just like the students who are interested in stamp collecting or model airplanes or whatever. They get a bit of the Student Activities budget, and if they want/need more money than that, they can figure out how to raise it themselves. No scholarships, no TV deals, no huge corrupting sponsorships, no student-athlete shenanigans, no free farm system for the pros… all of that bull is off the board.
With the exception of hockey, no students attend other sports in great numbers–come to a football game on any Saturday, you and 1,000 of your friends could get into the stadium with ease. Why are sports so sacred? UM is in the process of adding a new senior athletic director at $100K + benefits–where is the HARD DATA to support the assertions made by UM leadership here?
More students attend football than hockey.
The students aren’t lined up 5 hours before a football game to get in.
They aren’t lined up for hockey either. There’s more available student tickets for football as well.
They are lined up outside at pretty much every game. The non students are the ones who don’t show up at hockey games anymore.
No, they aren’t. The balcony isn’t as full as it used to be.
To be fair, why didn’t they list ALL of the professoer’s individual salaries as well as the coaches and AD? I’m sure that would have gone over well with the Thurston Howell III liberal crowd.
The haters of Ahteletics here are the ones who weren’t good enough or were overlooked by their peers when they were kids. To continually blame athletics for all of the failures of the institution is both gutless and painfully self-serving!
Btw, will SOMEBODY fix effing Stevens Hall! I am so tired of hearing this crap!
Anyway they get state money and everyone is forced to pay for it. I do not hate sports. I hate being made to pay for it when the waste so much money.
UMaine gets the state funding and decides to allocate $10 million to the athletic department. Doesn’t matter what it’s spent on, it still gets spent. Better to spend it on a program that also brings in money.
My point exactly they get my money and chose to spend it on programs that lose money. I say it is time to stop funding them with my money if they have that much to spend…..
First off, just because you paid taxes doesn’t mean it’s your money.
Second, what I meant was that athletics brings in revenue that many programs on campus do not. Does it always profit? No, but the revenue stream still exists.
If you want a list of salaries for every UMaine employee, that knowledge is public information and can be found online at maineopengov.org.
“The haters of Athletics” are people who are tired of funding crap. I played sports all the way to college. I didn’t bother trying in college because I was there to GO TO SCHOOL. Out of the several years I went to college I attended 2 hockey games. Yet every semester I had money siphoned out of my tuition to fund sports. I couldn’t care less about sports, had no desire to participate, and no desire to watch yet I am going to be spending many years paying off student loans that are collecting interest that helped fund them. As are thousands and thousands of other students who don’t care about sports. What I did care about were the classes I was able to get into and there were some years that was impossible. Either the classes weren’t being offered because there was no one available to teach them or the they were overflowing for the same reason. Sports are not necessary for a college education. We need to spend less time and money screwing around on something that isn’t going to help the population get a job.
The U of M, is over-rated, over priced and over managed.
Both college and secondary education need to take a real look at the sport situation, tax payers and tuition payers cannot really afford to support this luxury any longer.
Wow I had no idea there was so much scholarship money out there for athletes! I’ve been scouring the internet for months looking for scholarships to help pay for college. I’ve been lucky and received my first one for $1000 last month. Unfortunately several scholarships are disappearing due to budget cuts especially those funded by the US Dept of Education and the US State Dept (George Mitchell Peace Scholarship). It makes my blood boil to think that athletes get a free ride from the UM system. Seriously, $2,000,000 in football scholarships! No other department gives away a fraction of that amount to students in the form of scholarships. Spread the wealth please! I work just as hard as those athletes, but I don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of getting a full scholarship.
What does the State of Maine need more, 400 professional jocks or 400 engineers? Think about it. (That’s not to say jocks can’t be engineers too, but I hope you get my point.)
All this talk about how athletics boosts enrollment is BS. UMO has never had a problem with attracting new students. I didn’t choose UM because it has a strong athletics program. Most people go there for a couple reasons – number one, the in-state tuition is “affordable” and number two, it’s close to home.
It was a shock to hear of Mike Reid give up pro ball to become a pianist…I knew a number of ball players at PSU who graduated with engineering or technical degrees. Bob Mittenger, an all American linebacker and I took a lot of classes together and he went on to a pro career.
Anyway, PSU is in a different league with a full featured program and competitive in every damn sport…and the cash cow that funds them is football. The cow is seriously wounded, esp. bowl game revenue, so I guess they like Ohio State and others are undergoing the same kind of soul searching on what to keep and what to cut back on.
It’s a national problem, and I’m glad the BDN has focused on it.
The elephant in the room is football. Follow the lead of Vermont, BU and Hofstra (all superior academically to Maine)……dump the program!
Don’t dump it. A lot of people enjoy getting out in the fall weather and watching football. I think we could have just as much fun if the university stopped trying to play above its level and played the Maine college circuit. Coaching, recruiting and travel costs would drop precipitously. There would be more interest in the opposition because it was local which would mean more people buying tickets. Bigger crowds mean more enthusiasm, means more fun and we might even win a few games.
It’s a flagship state school, like New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Delaware. May I remind you that Maine Football was a top 8 program last year and was the most successful CAA team in the playoffs last year.
Good quality football = more fans
Students and fans do not attend games.. please go any Saturday and see for yourselves. If student, fan and alumni attendance is the criteria, football fails.
It needs to be marketed better.
Season ticket holder the past 10 years. My seats are behind the students. Attendance has gone up since 2007. Football averages more than hockey the past two years. No doubt it could still improve.
Were you stuffed in a locker by a football player when you were a kid bustah? Football is what drives all of the other sports at UMaine and every other D1 school. Football is the # 1 sport in the country.
Played football at Cheverus; too small to play at UMaine but attended every home game while a student. Football may be the sport of the country but based on the number of players “from away” that UMaine needs to recruit to be competitive, I dare say it is not the “the sport” in Maine .
There are several division 1 schools without football and numerous varsity sports. A deeper investigation as to how sports are funded, where the $$$ comes from and who gets what. The university is looking for a new senior assistant AD T $100k + benefit a year while student cannot get courses they need
I think that the answer is in in the first couple of paragraphs. If only 2 of 17 sports bring in more money than they spend, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to determine that something either needs to be done to showcase those other sports better or eliminate them. Unfortunately, jobs in the football field or basketball court are so few and far between, it might be better to focus our monies on jobs more graduates are likely to get…like perhaps medical, or accounting or what have you.
If anyone out there has ever watched a Maine men hockey game on TV or live it’s worth it! Something that is not worth paying money for is Algebra and the teachers that teach it. In a normal day, how often do you say, “Man, I wish there was a Polynomial for this situation!”
I have watched hockey I like it but who is paying for it???????? Just because I like something dose not mean others should have to pay for it. Very selfish point of view . That is the problem with people in this society . They think if they like something others should have to pay for it.
“In a normal day,” how many times have you ever heard of someone getting a well paying job because they watched a stupid hockey game live or on TV? Oh, that’s right. None.
I think that fraternities are the “most scrutinized entities ” I realize that this was not the point of the article but you don’t see athletic teams kicked off campus when 1 member does something wrong. I never really saw any athletic scrutiny….or anything that led to any changes.
Knowledge, research, education and self-discovery not expensive athletic teams should be the focus of a university. That being said, American universities gain prestige and attract students because of the fame of their athletic teams. And I do love our Black Bears hockey team. LOL
So 5% of your cost of tuition is for sports . Yet less than 1% of kids get to play . Those who do get special treatment. Do you think many of the hockey player are poor kids? At last check Jack Cosgrove made $260k a year with benefits . Great money for a part time job. They are not even allowed to train kids in the off season. Hockey and football might make them some money on some years. No one funds the sport for a kids who get out of Highschool and finds a job. Why should I be having to pay for the special kids????? Let not worry about that. Bangor High Just hired Bob lucey As assistant supper Intendent A Football coach from Orono. No wonder Dr. Web want a new $7million Football field . My issue is Bangor High has a hirer drop out rate than even central In corinth. They do not even have football so stop all the BS. About how Football helps these kids so much when we have so many social problems like drugs welfare crime Mostly caused by drop outs. Put more focus in helping at risk kids.
I would encourage the BDN to continue this dialogue since it reveals a sea change going on in Higher Education over ‘big name’ sports and the growth of ones like woman’s soccer, etc. Striking a balance and offsetting costs with revenue is going to be a challenge for the A.D.
…..UMaine football team scores more than $500,000 for two FBS games in 2013….By comparison, UMaine will receive $350,000 for its 2012 season opener Sept. 8 at Boston College of the Atlantic Coast Conference………..
http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2012/07/31/sports/university-of-maine-football-team-scores-more-than-500000-for-two-bcs-games-in-2013/
Ask questions before you think you know all the answers?
The FB team doesn’t get all this for their own programs, it sponsors/pays for the entire athletic program. In some cases may be the only reason their is a band/girls sports/facilities to work out in or play recreational sports as a direct result of athletics.
Larry Mahaney, Harold Alfond, giving was not just in sports,? Not all academic programs bring in research money either. It’s a mixed bag of all exposure working to create a place where kids will go to school, faculty will come to teach, and alumni and benefactors will donate money, at a minimum.
And it encourages others?
Faces of Philanthropy – $6 Million Gift For Arts & Athletics
Campaign Maine has taken a huge leap forward thanks to alumni Richard and Anne Collins ’59 and ’61 of Key Largo, Fla., who have provided $6 million to support improvements at the Maine Center for the Arts and the Memorial Gym.
http://umaine.edu/development/faces-of-philanthropy/6-million-gift-for-arts-athletics/
$5.5M Alfond donation boosts UMaine athletic facilities projects……
http://bangor-launch.newspackstaging.com/2010/10/15/sports/5-5m-alfond-donation-boosts-umaine-athletic-facilities-projects/
ALSO I ENCOURAGE THE BDN to a COMPLETE article that tells the ENTIRE story? This article seems slanted to create an agenda or find an agenda?
If there were no sports at Purdue, there would have been no marching band, and maybe Neil Armstrong wouldn’t have played in the marching band and maybe never walked on the moon?
Excellent reporting. The answer derives from one fact: Maine football averages 6,000 paid fans. That’s why student fees — which are just picking the pockets of mostly struggling middle class Maine kids — will always fund Maine athletics. (There are Texas high schools which average 60,000 fans.) But Maine’s Athletics and top Administration wants to play pretend, as if they have a legitimate, real football program. They don’t. There is effectively no fan base. Maine should drop football, just as UVM did, and everyone would enjoy soccer.
Texas high schools do not average 60K for football and Vermont dropped football almost 40 years ago. If Maine Football had no fanbase, there wouldn’t be 6000 fans each week. They average more than Maine Hockey. Does that mean Maine Hockey has no fanbase? Of course not. Maine has too much history with football to ever drop it. It would be bad business to do so.
The questiion is: is football worth the cost at UMaine? The answer is clearly no. The reasons are even more clear: atrocious student attendance, no existent fan base outside of the Bangor region, no media interest outside of Bangor (because there is no interest), outside of a few deep pocket alumni, UMaine alumni provide, at best, marginal support and lastly, given the condition of the Maine economy, the state needs to place every cent it has allocated for education towards academics.
Best photo ever, as the the field and the drain showing how UMO sports and the money it costs for mediocrity going down the drain is priceless
UMO doesn’t exist, and they replaced that field four years ago. Get a new hobby…
Anyone ever seen how Howard Segal acts I public…. An absolute embarrassment to the University. I’ll invest in student-athletes anyday over him.
Why don’t we see Segal’s salary?