AUGUSTA, Maine — Teenage drivers are likely to feel the most direct impact of new Maine laws that will take effect Thursday.
A wide-ranging law extends restrictions under the intermediate license from six to nine months. Those restrictions include no passengers except family members and no driving between midnight and 5 a.m.
During the first two years a young driver has a license, any violation will result in a 30-day license suspension for the first offense and longer suspensions for subsequent offenses. Major violations, such as driving under the influence, will bring suspensions, a driver improvement course, community service and $200 reinstatement fees.
And for all drivers, the minimum fine for texting and driving increases from $100 to $250.
State police Col. Robert Williams calls texting a leading contributor to highway crashes and sees the increased fine as a needed deterrent.
“If the fine will prevent one crash or death, then the law has accomplished what it was meant to,” Williams said.
And he suggests youths take the law extending driving restrictions seriously.
“Once you obtain your license, to lose that privilege is to lose your independence,” he said.
The new law targeting youths gained momentum after a spike in highway deaths of young Mainers in early 2012. In one accident, police say an 18-year-old who had been drinking alcohol and texting friends crashed her car into trees in January, killing two passengers who were 16 and 19 years old.
That law is among the scores that take effect 90 days after the close of the 2012 legislative session, addressing topics from tax and welfare cheating to union rights. They do not include “emergency” measures that took effect immediately upon Gov. Paul LePage’s approval, or those with specific dates spelled out in the legislation.
New laws will give state government a new face. The agency that regulates development in Maine’s 10-million acre Unorganized Territory gets a new name. The seven-member Land Use Regulation Commission becomes the nine-member Land Use Planning Commission, with heavier representation from the counties in its jurisdiction.
Two state departments — Agriculture and Conservation — are consolidated into one, to be known as the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry.
Welfare cheaters will face penalties of up to $2,000 for spending benefits on booze, gambling and strip joints. The Maine law is prompted by federal legislation that’s also had an effect in other states.
Sales tax cheaters who use software programs known as “tax zappers” are also targeted by a new law. The tax-evading programs, which can be installed through flash drives, falsify electronic sales records so cash-heavy businesses can underreport the totals and lower their sales tax bills.
The commissioner of education must develop a model policy to prevent bullying and cyberbullying — bullying and harassment by email, text message and social networking sites. The policy must be distributed to school administrative units by Jan. 1, 2013.
An existing Maine law targeting the hallucinogenic drug known as bath salts is now broadened to ban five more similar designer drugs, which have appeared since an earlier law was passed in 2011.
In the workplace, collective bargaining rights are abolished for workers at a Turner-based egg farm, formerly known as DeCoster’s, and for private child care providers who receive state subsidies.
Another new law bars the state from prohibiting its employees from having concealed weapons in their locked cars. That law already applies to private employers.
Consumers may benefit from a law submitted by LePage that will require the Public Utilities Commission and the Office of the Public Advocate to post on their websites the annual costs of state policies that increase the price of electricity.
A couple of new laws that fall under the heading of red tape-snipping will limit the liability of farmers who play host to agricultural-tourism activities, and remove $100 minimum fees for fertilizer and agricultural liming materials.
As of Aug. 30, the Crossroads Landfill in Norridgewock may pursue expanding onto 175 to 200 acres contiguous to the landfill site. The facility accepts waste from about 80 communities.
It now becomes illegal to claim falsely to be a member of the Aroostook Band of Micmacs, the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, the Passamaquoddy Tribe or the Penobscot Nation. Making such false claims, which could lead to undeserved privileges or other gains, can result in fines up to $2,500.
Starting Thursday, U.S. Route 1A between Brewer and Ellsworth is renamed the Korean War Veterans Memorial Highway.



One can only hope the texting while driving laws are REALLY enforced. Watching cars cross the center line coming toward me and seeing the drivers looking down into their laps is getting more and more scary!
They probably won’t. It’s out of control in Mass. All the little hoodzies think they can handle it and they’re running red lights and not even paying attention.
OtherMainah, hopefully with this new add on “texting while driving law” will also get the troopers out there enforcing the speeders as well it goes hand in hand or will it turn into just another unenforced law :-/
While renaming 1A are they going to now put some speeding enforcement out there?
When I first got my license I acquired a job shortly after. I would occasionally give rides to friends to work/school and the other way around. There were some days that without these rides I never would have made it to work. Are any of you lawmakers going to give the responsible kids rides to work and/or school that may be depending on friends already going that way? Of course not. The problem isn’t necessarily having friends in the car. The problem is people driving under the influence and people who text while driving. I bet if you took care of those problems you would see a reduction in accidents.
It’s 9 months of family members only – up from 6 months. The two years rule applies to any traffic violation. Read the article more carefully.
It’s 9 months of family only allowed in the car.
A wide-ranging law extends restrictions under the intermediate license from six to nine months. Those restrictions include no passengers except family members and no driving between midnight and 5 a.m.
9 months and its a good idea.
Re-read it Jessica. I believe this is saying that the new law merely extends the intermediate license timeframe from 6 months to 9 months – in effect adding 3 more months to the already in place “family member only” rule. The 2 year language is regarding a 30 day loss of license for ANY rules broken during a drivers first 2 yrs on the road.
Either way, restricting the ability to drive for all teens limited to family members only, is not a good idea. I would have missed a lot of work if I wasn’t able to ride with friends at that age.
Ah but you are passing the blame onto the wrong thing here. I hope you took at least one thing from your driving classes–driving is a privilege not a right. With that privilege comes some restrictions, especially as you are very inexperienced within the first year or so on the road and need that time to really learn the dangers of driving. With these laws in place, had you missed a lot of work, whose fault is that really? You were the one who picked up the job, right? You were the one who agreed with your employer that you would be on time when your shift started–correct? So how is this government’s fault when you have the privilege to drive, knowing the restrictions in place, and then willingly pick up a job–something the government has no hand in whatsoever–and then are unable to get to work because you cannot line up reliable transportation?
You need to assume responsibility for your actions. Its nobody’s fault but your own if you fail at ensuring that–not the government.
You assume they didn’t already have a late night job before these new restrictions were placed. As for the case with my sons, they did. This interferes with their ability to get to work on their own in the morning. Mind you, my husband or I will drive them now, but it is a huge inconvenience to put all of these kids into one category. I parent my children and teach them to be self sufficient and responsible, which includes getting themselves to their job on time.
School is starting. I don’t mean to judge, but what job would your children, who presumably are going back to high school, be required to get up and drive before 5am? Is that really smart, having them wake up in the middle of the night to work some third shift job and then go to school all day? Something doesn’t quite add up here. Also, there are probably work permits attainable or they may even be grandfathered since they got their license before the new laws are in place.
Are you familiar with the family farm, Fennis? My boys DO in fact milk, when they don’t have school the next day. MANY of the teenagers in our area do. It is a summer job for the youths that the adult co-workers don’t want (working late night, when they can work the day shift). Cows aren’t on a 9 – 5 schedule. And my younger son does not have his license yet.
And I find it hard to believe you know no teenager who either works past midnight in the summer (waitressing or babysitting) or has to leave before 5 am (pumping gas, convenience stores, farming of all sorts).
Are you from Maine? We teach our youths the value of a dollar. It is also a great way to get them to go to college.
Sure, I am from Maine. In fact, I started working when I was 15, and I guess as you seem to put it in your previous post, that first year I was a burden on my parents because it was so inconvenient for them to get me to and from work, but as you said it was an important part in my growing up and learning the value of a dollar.
The new laws are a burden to those teens just looking to get to and from work, but thanks to their peers and their inability to handle driving safely, everyone must pay. I don’t agree with more nanny government policies, but what else can we do besides ban cell phones completely? Driver tests are significantly more difficult than they used to be, require much more practice/logged hours, and yet there is still a problem. Granted, I swerve out of the way of plenty of incapable adult drivers too, but the majority of those near accident causing drivers are teenagers fiddling around with their cellphones or paying more attention to their friends in the back seat over what is on the road.
The law is a burden, not my children. Yet one we will deal with. Inconvenient? Absolutely. As you or your children (which I assume you have) have never had to work at 3 or 4 am as a teen you wouldn’t be able to empathize.
Allowing a waiver for employment with demonstrated need that you must apply for is a step in the right direction. But there currently is not one.
I don’t disagree with the remainder of the law, by the way. I agree, putting a car full of teens on the road with an inexperienced driver is crazy. But that has absolutely nothing to do with one teen driving either late at night or early in the morning.
Yea that makes a lot of sense… So teen drivers are bad, they can’t be trusted to drive with their friends in the car. So instead of 1 teen driver, who the state fears are bad, having their 2 or 3 friends with them in 1 car, you have 3 or 4 teen drivers all by themselves in separate cars. These laws, on any given Friday or Saturday night, triple the number of teen drivers on the road. As for the enforcement of text and driving, well you have to get the cops to stop texting and using their laptops as they drive first.
I agree with you Dane. Not sure why that was to me?
From the article: “During the first two years a young driver has a license, any violation will result in a 30-day license suspension”
That is taking it a bit too far. If some poor kid is caught driving 5 mph over the posted limit they should not have their license suspended for 30 days.
It happened to me. 10 days before my 2 years were up my license was suspend. It was taken away on Christmas day.
So, court was in session on Christmas?
Didn’t have to go to court. I had to mail it in.
LoL If you think they have to take you to court for you to lose your license, you obviously don’t know laws at all.
Boo……hoo…..hoo.
Your contribution to the thread is greatly appreciated.
Awwww, Man! That sucks!
I agree. Heck I have seen peeps in their 30s and 40s that still dont know how to drive.
Yes, you SHOULD get a suspension for 30 days!
Young/new drivers need to learn what that “feels” like to be suspended (30 days is not that great a hardship) before they learn what killing two of your passengers “feels” like.
The only real value in a law like this is if it is enforced, to the letter. Otherwise, it should not even be on the books.
Speed limits are determined by careful engineering protocols–the road width, slant, condition, nearby obstructions, likelihood to be a problem in bad weather, etc.
And yes, you can probably safely drive “ten above” the limits until the day, the time, the weather, the traffic conditions where you should not have driven ANYTHING above the limit–and then it will be too late to learn that lesson!
You are missing the point. I highly doubt you always drive exactly the speed limit. I don’t know of many people that can do such a thing. Gravity will cause your vehicle to speed up even on the slightest of hills and you cannot expect drivers to ride their brakes all the way down a hill.
Slapping a teenager with a 30 day suspension for a minor traffic violation is stupid.
Of course, I exceed the limit every day, and I would bet most of us do, but I am also aware that I could be pulled over, and I have been.
A few miles per hour over I get a lecture, and I deserve it. A significant amount (ten over?) I might get a ticket, which I deserve and will pay.
But I am an experienced driver, with a clean record for 35+ years (except for that one time…).
It did not take more than one time to remind me to not mess–too much–with the speed limit. If you do not learn that at a young age, you may not get to experience an old age. That is my point.
Laws are there as deterrent. If they are not being used to deter, they are a waste of the paper printed on. We need enforcement to make them work. Speed limits are REALLY important in those bad situations: icy, night, fog, etc. I do not go a mile over the limit then, and often a good ten mph below the limit.
There is no minimum speed limit except on Turnpike (40 MPH), and in bad weather that too is reduced, and in really bad weather, I know to sit still, park or find an all-night diner, or at least a well-lighted place to park while the snow or icy rain, etc. comes down.
So far, it has gotten me to a ripe middle-age…
(Oh, yes and they need to learn to brake BEFORE they crest the hill, or head into that sharp curve.)
And you still don’t get it.
Hey, Kevin of B, I do agree with a lot of what you write on these comments sections, but when it comes to driving safety, I am for strict enforcement of the rules: people who operate big motorized machines on the same roads as me better do it carefully!
A 30 days suspension will greatly inconvenience a few young drivers, others not very much–they were walking or getting driven around just before their license, were they not?— and yet others will drive any way, anywhere, anytime they want, even with a suspended license. Only a jail cell or a hospital bed, or a coffin will stop them. We cannot help them.
I am interested in that great middle, the 90% who will get “scared” by a suspension and straighten up and “drive right” afterwards. Once is enough for most people, thankfully.
So, we agree to disagree, OK? — Smarten Up
I respect your opinion but yes, you and I will have to agree to disagree on this one.
“I am interested in that great middle, the 90% who will get “scared” by a
suspension and straighten up and “drive right” afterwards.”
90%??? You’re delusional.
There is a minimum speed limit even on back country roads. I have known people that have gotten tickets for driving too slow. They are just as dangerous as speeders.
“Speed limits are determined by careful engineering protocols–the road
width, slant, condition, nearby obstructions, likelihood to be a problem
in bad weather, etc.”
Bullcrap.
Setting speed limits based on worst case conditions, (likelihood to be a problem
in bad weather), is illogical and foolish. No matter what weather conditions you ASSUME to be worst case there will always be times when things are even worse. Based on that logic speed limits everywhere at all times should be 5MPH. You are limiting speeds and traffic capacity during the majority of the time where those limits have no purpose.
The road where i live was totally reconstructed several years ago. Speed limits are the same now as when the road was a narrow, twisty, and full of hills and valleys. So much for “Speed limits are determined by careful engineering protocols–the road
width, slant, condition, nearby obstructions”. I can show you multiple places where speed limits are set at 40 0r 45 MPH where the road is reconstructed, wide, has no obstructions, etc.
I was driving through a section of Pennsylvania a few years ago. 4 lane highway built up on both sides. Street lights at most cross roads, usually about every quarter to half mile. Reminded me of Broadway out by the interstate or actually Hogan Road would be an even better comparison. And what were the speed limits you ask? Well they were 45 MPH and in places 50 MPH. Not the ridiculous 25 MPH here in Maine in similar locations. I was amazed at the time. When i drove into the area it was late in the evening and I was able to make good time and guess what. I had NO problem stopping for street lights at that speed. Anyone paying attention would have no trouble either. And during the day, when traffic was heavier, actual speed was closer to 30 to 35 MPH because that was what traffic conditions allowed.
The law is the law. The kids need to understand that they must adhere to the laws OR pay the consequences if caught. If a kid does not want to risk losing his/her license, they need to make sure they are not speeding.
I’d had my license for 2 weeks when I took the little Honda bike down an empty road for a mile and was heading back when I got busted. No bike license, registration or helmet.
3 charges, 90 day suspension. This was in 1971 , so it wasn’t too different 40 years ago.
It should be 60 days.
It’s easy to see why so many people refer to you as “out of touch.” I don’t believe for one minute that police officers waste their time and resources pulling people over for driving five miles over the limit. They would probably be pulling over 95% of the driving population. Your lack of common sense is really something.
When I got my license in the 70’s any offense in the first year of driving resulted in a 30 day suspension. And I seem to remember that a second offense in the first year resulted in a 90 day suspension.
didn’t go deep enough, they should of raised the driving age to 18 as well, the fine for texting should be $500.
I would like to see it if your caught texting license suspended. People pay fine maybe not being able to drive would knock some sense in them before they kill someone, but then again it doesnt work for drinking does it?
You do realize Maine is a very large state and has a serious lack of public transportation. When I was 16 I was able to walk to my first job but in Maine walking to work is not an option for a lot of kids.
My thoughts exactly. We are not like other states.
ummm,, i grew up in aroostook, please don’t try and tell me how big the state is. it’s not my fault that the kids today are less mature and less parented. the amount of 16 yr olds that have a job is so minimal it doesn’t even qualify to be a topic.. and don’t try and get me to feel bad for someone having to walk to work for doing something wrong and losing a license.
All 3 of my teens have jobs. Handle the car quite well. Must be an anomaly? My 16 yr old daughter gave me a hard time when i thought she needed to practice parallel parking before her driving test. “Dad i can parallel park the tractor with the bush hog on it”. ’nuff said. BUT, As well as my kids can handle a car, I still worry alot.
Drive big truck for a living, i can see down onto cars very easily…………there are alot of “adults” out there texting and driving.
wow good for you,, hat’s off to you being what a real parent should be.. your an exception and you should be proud.. nice job.
So you have scientific data that proves kids today are less mature and less parented or is that simply your opinion?
get a grip kevin,, read the paper, look around, open your eyes. if you think today’s society of young adults are prime citizens then your as big a fool as you sound. if your kids are good kids then i salute you as anyone else would, and i commend you on your actions, but don’t try pizzing down my neck and telling me its raining out. fact is, most of today’s youth are druggies and total useless lazy criminals.
You are so out of touch with reality it is not funny. I’m just going to shake my head now and walk away.
Good day!
There is no question that there are some irresponsible young people out there, but to say “most” of them, I believe, is a mistake. As a parent of of two, I can say mine are not only responsible, but do not use drugs or drink. None of their friends are users either. There are a lot of really decent kids poised to take over our world.
Raysgirl you are correct but he is so out of touch with reality he will not see your point.
Looks like we got another victim of the social/mainstream media! I bet those 50 year olds now were 100x more mature considering you didn’t read every little thought going through their mind on a computer screen like you must now, Lol.
Anyhow maturity is subjective to opinion, you can quote it as “facts” with no sources other then your own eyes, but thats really only relevant to your perspective. I don’t know what factual data you have to prove “kids are druggies” comparable to the 60-70s, rofl. Might want to withdraw from BDN and any social media site, go back to a state of playing in the dirt all day or hanging out at a campfire if you want to go back to everyone being mature in your perspective. Its highly bias, yes I agree the 20 bath salt stories I’ve read about on BDN were so tragic and horribad I almost got scared and couldn’t sleep, o wait. Its the internet. A good dose of real uncensored media is what you need to wake up to reality. We have it like PARADISE compared to most places in the world, quit complaining; you sound worse then the self-entitlement kids your trying to criticize.
When I was a kid huge crowds of people hung out in our local park – openly drinking and smoking pot. They had drag races up and down Main street and had fist fights just about everyday. Don’t pretend that this sort of stuff you speak of didn’t happen “back in the day” because we all know it did – We just didn’t have police forces in place to round them up back then.
Ouch, MOST?? I’m thinking Givrsum needs to cultivate better friends.
Having spent well over a decade working in education in the state, there is ZERO doubt in my mind that kids are, as a whole, less mature and less parented.
Parenting as a whole is dropping rapidly (“gee, I don’t know what to do….little Johnny just won’t get up for school in the morning. All he does is play his video games all night.” Any idea how many times I have heard that very line?….too many to count.
Some parents take care of nothing while other “helicopter” parents need to take care of EVERYTHING…even things their high school aged children should be dealing with at school, etc. Some kids won’t decide what to eat for lunch without consulting without their parents. Kid doesn’t like the grade they got on a test, “go to the bathroom” and then call/text mommy so she can call the school and complain.
There is zero doubt in my mind that 20-30 years ago, kids (as a whole) had more responsibility and were easily more mature.
But that is your opinion and your opinion only. You like Givrsum are lumping all children together because of a few that do stupid stuff.
You also might want to correct this sentence: Some kids won’t decide what to eat for lunch without consulting without their parents.
Edit: I just read that sentence to my 13 year old daughter and she said: I’m glad he was never my teacher.
We’re from Aroostook also. When my teenage drivers misbehaved withdrawing their driving privileges was a first line of defense. Driving is a privilege, NOT a right.
Here’s something interesting (from GOMaine):
A new report by the European Cyclists’
Federation titled Safety In Numbers demonstrates that higher rates of bicycle
use result in lower numbers of casualties. The reason is that cycling is safer
for each cyclist when more people do it.
They
cite two examples:
The Netherlands has witnessed a 45% increase
in cycling and a 58% decrease in fatalities between 1980 and
2005
London has seen a 91% increase in cycling since 1990 and a 33% decrease in
cycling casualties between 1994 and 1998.
The report also shows that increased
numbers of pedestrians crossing at intersections lead to large reductions in
relative risk of pedestrian injuries. That is,
where there were greater numbers of pedestrians, fewer pedestrians were involved
in crashes.
deleted
As cell phones are upgraded the need to type will disappear. My wife recently upgraded me to an I phone with Siri. Much safer to use.
SOMEWHAT safer to use, but still not safe. It is not only the distraction of texting, or dialing, or even holding your cell.
It is that the part of your brain that abstracts the conversation, the text reply, the speaking to Siri, is the very same part of the brain that you need to focus on ALL that you need to be aware of when driving–the road immediately in front of you as well as the road a block (in city) or a quarter mile (in country); the traffic signs and signals: lights, limits, cautions, road markings; the activity on the sides of roads (is that a mailbox or a dog–or worse, a kid–about to dart across the road?); the road conditions; humps, black ice, standing water, etc, etc..
And don’t forget, there are the other vehicles to watch out for!
Maybe you should just drive and do nothing else?
You are right. At least if someone dictates a message they can keep their eyes on the road. Just driving is the best plan. Thanks
as someone with 3 teenagers in the house I am happy to see these new rules, and wish they’d get stricter even! I’d be happy with age 18 to drive. Kids at 16 are to immature. Anyone disagreeing with me doesn’t have teenagers.
So don’t allow your children to drive until they turn 18. You do have that power as a parent.
I’m glad the state is doing your job for you, even if it means restricting responsible drivers.
one could read this comment two ways. if you are texting whether you are a teenager or responsible driver then you are in violation of the law. teens and or responsible drivers should not be texting and driving as a matter of fact you should not even be on the phone while drivng. pull over take your call or text and then procede.
WhenI took drivers Ed you could get a 15. If you are teaching your teens responsibility there shouldn’t be so much trouble.
They can be as strict as you want when you do something called parenting! I don’t disagree with you one bit, but instead of allowing nanny government to do the work for you, get off the couch and parent your children! If you don’t want them on the roads until they are 18, here is a thought, you don’t let them drive until they are 18! Wow, its called parenting. I’ve used the term a few times here…if you don’t know what that is, look it up.
wow what an a** you are.
Sorry, I have an opinion too. People rely too much on nanny government to do their jobs form them and actually expect government to do more when they could just simply tell their little spoiled devils no. If you truly feel that your teenager is not responsible enough to drive, then tell them they aren’t ready and will have to wait until they are 18. I don’t see how that is being mean, its just parenting.
I don’t have teenagers, but I DO agree. 15-16 and soemtimes even 17 is too young to drive!
It seems only right that they are most affected by the new laws in re to driving. They have an inordinate effect on the rest of us when they drive and text. And they text constantly, even when driving. It remains to be seen how well this law will be enforced.
Taking away ones drivers license does not stop a person from driving.
So don’t bother trying stop bad drivers, they may do it anyway????
How about fines for welfare recipients who waste money on buying fireworks?
So much for the GOP promise of less government interference. I guess when laws make sense and might save lives, they’re willing to vote “yea”.
The texting while driving fine is way too small, still. At least $500 if you want it to have any impact. It is such a stupid thing to do that making it a $1000 fine would not be out of order.
I know I wish it was all so simple, but not just teens that are doing it.
It would be a good law EXCEPT… The cell phone lobby had the state put in the law that you have to be SEEN by the officer in order for him to stop you. If you have your cell phone in your lap where it cannot be seen, they have NO cause to stop you. I watched a cop in Bangor sitting next to a car full of teens and the driver was looking down at his lap. The officer couldn’t do anything about it even after cars started blowing their horns because the light was green and the kid was still texting.
Be glad when the legislature gets back in session so we can get some more laws from big brother.
-edited- #request delete, posted in wrong reply.
Thank god I got my Drivers License before this law went into effect, doesn’t apply to me(:
Connecticut passed many of these driving laws several years before Maine. Among them was the hands free phone law. As it turns out, many drivers still violate this law despite increased fines, among them the police, who should be setting the example for everyone. But, alas, they ignore many of the laws that they are sworn to uphold, as evidenced by the many reports of police officers being charged.
yakkin’ and texin’…. simple solution!!!!!…. after you start the vehicle the phone and whatever goes dead>>> too hard to figure out?
“The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for
authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place
of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their
households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They
contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties
at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.
ATTRIBUTION: Attributed to SOCRATES by Plato
SOCRATES was a pedophile, so I don’t put much stock in his opinions about children.
When the Athenians accused Socrates of “corrupting the youth”, they where not accusing him of pedophilia . Rather, they were accusing him of stirring up young
men to rebel against the Athenian rulers who had lost the war with Sparta.
YES!!!!!
What I really want to know is, who was still using a RAZR flip phone in 2011?
Millenials are certainly less equipped for the real world, but going all nanny state and changing the driving age to 18, etc doesn’t fix it. Better parenting does.
Plenty of people got their license at 16 and were responsible. If you can’t teach give a sh*t at 16, it wont matter at 18.
As near as I can tell, the taxpayers got ripped off for any cost this legislature incurred. There is not one item mentioned here which will help ordinary citizens
“State police Col. Robert Williams calls texting a leading contributor to
highway crashes and sees the increased fine as a needed deterrent.”
“And for all drivers, the minimum fine for texting and driving increases from $100 to $250.”
Gov. LaPage has been talking about convening a session of the ME Legislature to push his as yet secret agenda through. While you are at it Mr. LaPage, how about doing something that will benefit ALL Mainers: SUBSTANTIALLY increase the fine and other penalties for texting while operating a motor vehicle. Although the new penalty is better than the former, $100.00 fine, given the seriousness of the offense–which is akin to driving while impaired by drugs or alcohol–it still amounts to a light slap on the hand that texts. Not a strong enough deterrent for those who make it a habit to divide their attention between phone screen and the road. Certainly, with the number of highway fatalities this year, as well as the numerous crashes resulting in all manner of injuries and property damage, this could be considered an emergency need to be revisited when you call the Legislature back.
crank yankin and texting ….. stupid stupid stupid ….. take a good look around ….. “i hear ya knockin’, but ya can’t come in”
We were waiting at a stop light in Bangor with someone in front of me as I watched in my mirror a car coming behind me and I couldn’t move, a youth hit us at 40 mph. knocked us both out, hurt us both. he was texting. amazing!!! must of been important, totaled his car, I had a reciever hitch.
should be a 500.00 dollar fine
Yet the REAL problem on Maine’s roads and everywhere else goes unfixed due to chicken heart legislators.I refer of course to old people who are dangerous and have no business on the roads.It’s just cheaper and easier to pickpocket the young who aren’t politically organized.
Wow, so a new driver can’t drive someone to an early flight, or pick someone up from a late flight? :(
So much for car pooling and saving gas and parking spaces, and parental hassle, now they all have to have their own cars or parents have to pick the kids up from school or after practice still. So much for being environmental. Or for that matter, how about getting back to school after a late night track meet at one of the universities. They can no longer drive themselves home, if the meet gets out too late and the travel back to school is too long, let alone to a late night dinner with the team.
I think I was more dangerous driving alone than with people. I knew I was responsible for those lives, just me, myself, and I no biggie, it’s only my life.
I think this is another law that goes to far.
deleted