When the first man on the moon died on Saturday, President Barack Obama tweeted: “Neil Armstrong was a hero not just of his time, but of all time.” Armstrong’s final comment on Obama, on the other hand, was that the president’s policy on manned space flight was “devastating,” and condemned the United States to “a long downhill slide to mediocrity.”
That was two years ago, when three Americans who had walked on the moon, Armstrong, James Lovell, commander of Apollo 13, and Eugene Cernan, commander of Apollo 17, published an open letter to Obama pointing out that his new space policy effectively ended American participation in the human exploration of deep space.
Armstrong was famously reluctant to give media interviews. It took something as hugely short-sighted as Obama’s cancellation of the Constellation program in 2010 to make him speak out in public. But when he did, he certainly did not mince his words.
“We will have wasted our current $10-billion-plus investment in Constellation,” he said, “and equally importantly, we will have lost the many years required to recreate the equivalent of what we will have discarded. For the United States … to be without carriage to low Earth orbit and with no human exploration capability to go beyond Earth orbit … destines our nation to become one of second or even third rate stature.”
Obama was never a politician with a big international vision. He has experts to do that stuff for him, and of course they are all part of the “Washington consensus,” which is just as parochial as he is. So he canceled the big Ares rockets that would have taken American astronauts back to the moon and onwards to Mars and the asteroids. Some other spending program just yelled louder. Maybe the Navy wanted another aircraft carrier.
If NASA (the National Aviation and Space Administration) wants to put an American into space now, it has to buy passage on a Russian rocket, which is currently over $50 million per seat. By 2015 the Chinese will probably be offering an alternative service (which may bring the price down), and before long India may be in the business as well. But the United States won’t.
There is likely to be a gap of between five and ten years between the retirement of the Space Shuttle fleet last year and the first new American vehicles capable of putting a human being into space. Even then it will only be into low Earth orbit: none of the commercial vehicles now being developed will be able to do what the Saturn rockets did 41 years ago when they sent Neil Armstrong and his colleagues to the moon.
Armstrong was a former military officer who would never directly call the president of the United States a liar or a fool, but his words left little doubt of what he really thought: “The availability of a commercial transport to orbit as envisioned in the president’s proposal cannot be predicted with any certainty, but is likely to take substantially longer and be more expensive than we would hope.” In other words, don’t hold your breath.
He was equally blunt about Obama’s assurances that the United States was not really giving up on deep space: “While the president’s plan envisages humans traveling away from Earth and perhaps toward Mars at some time in the future, the lack of developed rockets and spacecraft will assure that ability will not be available for many years.” Not the return to the moon by 2020 planned by the Constellation program, but pie in the sky when you die.
This is not a global defeat for manned exploration of the solar system. The Russians are talking seriously about building a permanent base on the moon, and all the major Asian contenders are working on heavy-lift rockets that would enable them to go beyond Earth orbit. It’s just an American loss of will, shared equally by Obama and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.
“I know China is headed to the moon,” Romney told a town hall audience in Michigan in February. “They’re planning on going to the moon, and some people say, oh, we’ve got to get to the moon, we’ve got to get there in a hurry to prove we can get there before China. It’s like, guys, we were there a long time ago, all right? And when you get there would you bring back some of the stuff we left?” Arrogant, complacent, and wrong.
Americans went to the moon a long time ago, but the point is that they can’t get there now, and won’t be able to for a long time to come. Which is why, in an interview fifteen years ago, Neil Armstrong told BBC science correspondent Pallab Ghosh: “The dream remains. The reality has faded a bit, but it will come back, in time.” It will, but probably not in the United States.
Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose commentary is published in 45 countries.



There is a lot to do in space and with current technology, it’s easier and safer to do it unmanned. Obama isn’t to blame here. He’s not the one demanding billions in thoughtless cuts to science and research — he’s not part of the party that is demonizing education and science left and right. The thesis of this essay is so flimsy — it’s laughable.
Feel free to laugh. I’m not laughing, however. I feel she is right (except for a detail: Lovell went to the moon twice, but never walked on it).
A good analogy: what if Spain sent Columbus, and then said, “Ah, who cares? We beat Britain and France. Maybe they can bring back a piece of a wrecked galleon.”
Tell me what walking on the moon over and over will accomplish — tell me what that will accomplish over what we’re currently doing when we send unmanned crafts to mars and beyond.
What did Seward expect to accomplish when he bought Alaska from the Russians? I doubt if he really knew.
I don’t know, either. I do know that sending humans pushes the technology envelope further than sending a machine, out of necessity. I also know that pushing that technology envelope will spin off benefits, just as the 1960s manned program did. I also know that sending people is more exciting than sending a robot. No one watches Star Trek to see how the radio-controlled rover will get out of its next predicament……
You’re entitled to your opinion, and I don’t want to belittle it, but I think America is better when it has a vision. Not when it retrenches.
We have a vision! We can keep sending people to the moon, but the kind of information that is gathered in that way pales in comparison to what we can do with crafts and probes. For example compare the photographs of the planets we had prior to sending out Cassini to photograph them. It’s remarkable. We now know that some of the outer planets have moons with sub-surface oceans. There is talk about sending a craft to those moons and exploring those oceans. A person would not be able to do that – a robot could though. We just landed a craft on Mars! Say that that isn’t as exciting or visionary, but I think it is.
You will say anything to deny the truth and excuse Obama. If George W had killed the space program, you would be all over his case.
The Republicans truly have been pioneers of Outer Space!
Rush Limbaugh takes trips to Mars, with all his followers, ” Daily” !
At least we’re not stuck in permanent orbit around Uranus. hahaha
“stuck in permanent orbit around Uranus”
That’s actually a pretty perfect description of Limbaugh and his followers.
Obama didn’t kill the space program.
Obama killed the space shuttle program and put most of the other NASA programs on ice until the next administration takes over. As Neil Armstrong said, “we will have lost the many years required to recreate the equivalent of what we will have discarded.” Well, we have.
He hasn’t gutted the NASA programs. Stop lying. He’s advocated shifting courses, instead of repeating the same ones — like landing on an asteroid by 2025 and sending out more unmanned space crafts. Of course these things take time — it’s immensely complicated. NASA doesn’t do things in just a couple of years, they’ve always taken years and years to plan missions.
And please, I find it disgusting how you and this author are politicizing this death. Any way to get in a jab at the President. You talked about the low road the other day and here you are. And further, you spend half your time denouncing science and discrediting it — now suddenly you’re all for it? More hypocrisy.
Tell that to the 8,000 former NASA employees in the state of Florida alone.
I thought all government jobs were bad, and we needed to vasty reduce the public sector? Also, aren’t all government workers lazy and entitled? I’m confused now.
NASA has serious need of new technology, thus the loss of jobs in Fl. That never seems to make the News. But that solar deal that Barry fell for sure made headlines. Give credit to the Bush administration for saying NO to the big solar rip off that Barry approved. That money should have gone to NASA.
8,000 jobs were lost when the Shuttle program ended. Others have lost their jobs due to the lack of funding that was slated to support new technologies.
The money that was spent on the solar flop could and should have gone to NASA. Ask the President why he fell for the solar falsehood. Give Bush credit, as his administration saw through that solar scam and said No.
I don’t care who is in the White House or what party is in charge, we need to get the space program up and running once more. The space program united this nation around a dream of getting to the moon and beyond. We could once more live that dream if only the politicians would resume the funding and get out of the way.
No President, Obama or otherwise, had the right to kill this program. His actions put thousands of people out of work, and wasted untold millions of dollars. Now we have to pay 50 million per seat to hitch a ride with a country that loses supply ships and has a pitiful space record. But, there is great news…..when China gets their program up and running, we might be able to hitch a ride for less. Pitiful. Just pitiful.
Agree.
The Airforce has been running their own shuttle for quite a while, and they have done this at 1/3 the cost. But since it is military, it’s secert…. As for Obama, his intent is to distroy the country, his policies are working for him, just not for America.
It’s 1/3 the cost because it’s robotic.
Here it is the Airforce shuttle http://www.spaceflightnow.com/atlas/av026/landing/
I fixed the link
Oh please E.J. if Obama had a manned Space program, you would be all over him for spending money needlessly.
My conservativism leads me to believe that the manned space program is a tremendous waste of money. Unmanned (and cheaper) missions have given us far more knowledge than the manned program ever did.
In my opinion, we need to get stuff in order here on earth before we go offl “star trekking.”
You’re wrong. I’m fully behind a manned space program. I have no problem with robotics and space probes, but anyone can do that.
And so tell us how exactly a human could do what we have the robots and probes doing. You made a joke about Uranus — but we’ve actually been there with a space probe and learned quite a bit — could a human do that? Any one could do that? Then how come we’re the only country that has?
It’s pathetic the levels you’ll stoop to to get a dig in on your political oponents. If they spend too much, they’re awful wasteful and special interests — greedy union thugs, etc. If we don’t spend enough, we’re trying to destory the country and kill the jobs.
If the President says green, you’ll scream yellow. If he says yellow, you’ll scream green. It’s so transparent and obvious what you do.
But, you’re wrong once more. Obama has done several things that I’ve given him credit for.
1. Obama continued the Bush tax cuts.
2. Obama continued with the Bush plan and got bin Laden.
3. Obama left Guantanamo open.
4. Obama is allowing the military to handle the terrorists cases.
5. Obama shifted the emphasis on deportations to look at criminal illegals first.
6. Obama stuck with the Bush plan to pull out of Iraq.
That’s all I can really think of right now. But, if more come to mind, I’ll list them for you.
I notice how you always convenient gloss over the parts where you were either missinformed, lying, or making things up.
Not everyone can do what NASA has been doing with its robotics and space probes. We’re the only ones doing it.
Not believing what you said about Romney at town hall in Michigan. Doesn’t sound like him at all—-produce an unedited video. Then MAYBE I will think about believing it.
It sounds exactly like him.
There’s no choom on the moon. Barry and the Choom Gang know it. How can you expect a person who spent his formative years who knows where smoking who knows what to aspire to get to deep space? All you need is some good weed and you are there every time right? Neil Armstrong. Genuine American Hero. Obama? Well. You decide.
Obama’s drug of choice was cocaine. At least that’s what he wrote in his book.
I stand corrected…..and Neil Armstrong is still a Genuine American Hero.
People assume that Obamas policies are failing, what they don’t know is it is his intent to distroy everything that has made america great. so what may be failure to you is succeding to Obama…
You’re exactly right. I’ve been saying that for a long time, but the libs can’t handle the truth.
Yes, Obama is TRYING TO DESTROY AMERICA. Uh-huh. Whatever you say, random crazy person on the internet.
I don’t disagree totally with wolfndeer – the unmanned program has really opened doors and yes, wolfndeer, I agree the Mars landing is exciting. I don’t see it as either/or when it comes to manned/unmanned. I see both needed. I think we are taking a step back.
Anyone else out there having trouble with Disqus?
Sometimes..Last night it seemed to hang with a “Please Wait” when I tried to comment…Working now though..