We all have a right to expect that we and our families can live our lives in relative safety. We have a related responsibility to work together as the community we are to help provide that safety to each other. Lately it seems like we’re witnessing threats to our sense of peace as we watch and read about an apparent increase in the number of media stories concerning local crime in general and drugs and violence in particular. Some of us have not only read these articles but have experienced direct threats to our personal safety.
As director of the Bangor Area Homeless Shelter, I’ve known a number of the individuals connected with recent stories of crime on the streets and in local neighborhoods. Some of these people committed crimes, while others were victims. For many who live lives of poverty and with disabilities, including mental illness and chronic addictions, depression and desperation can lead to a lifestyle that includes criminal activity and self-destructive behaviors.
For some of us who have our lives more put together, when we read about people being arrested, and the identifier in the story is that the individual is a “transient,” many of us think thoughts like, “That idiot!” or, “Throw away the keys!” Our world is relatively simple when the bad guy isn’t someone we identify as a community member.
But it gets more complicated when the offender is someone we know (think of all the head-shaking about Bob Carlson) or a family member. How would we want the residents of Missoula, Mont., or Corpus Christi, Texas, to react to a native son or daughter from Bangor who had lost his or her way and was in the end stages of addiction and/or congestive heart failure?
“Transient” dehumanizes the person. The process helps us defend our judgment and to avoid having to think about what may have led the person to commit the crime(s). The use of dehumanizing semantics isn’t new and has sometimes been the result of conscious policy. Think about wars and the use of words like “Jap” and “Kraut” and, in my lifetime, “Gook.” We put soldiers in impossible situations and then give them labels that deny the individual identity of the enemy soldier to try to help them justify and minimize the consequences of carrying out orders. Imagine having another human being in your sights and then having thoughts about the things you have in common — and that the person is also a human being.
The label “transient” is becoming code for “from away,” “not one of us” and “not deserving of anything from us.” I do not think we gain anything when we think of people this way. We can denounce the behaviors without dismissing the person. We can hold people accountable, and we can ensure that consequences are delivered.
But if we only punish, despise and abandon people — many of whom live in poverty with untreated illnesses — there is a cost to us, in addition to the lousy quality of life experienced by those individuals. It costs money to provide law enforcement response, to conduct legal proceedings and to pay for expensive medical care provided by way of emergency rooms because we have denied health care coverage to many of these people.
We really need to find ways in which to maximize our connections to each other in this community, while we work to identify more efficient and less costly interventions. It may be tempting to try to dismiss some people by using language that demeans them and keeps us separate from them, but in the end we are diminished by doing so. The maintenance of a large segment of people living in poverty is a sea anchor on our attempts to strengthen the economy.
If we want Greater Bangor to be as healthy a community as possible, we need to find effective ways to support people in need and work with them to reconnect with the rest of us. Not every effort will work, but each success will support and improve this city we call home.
Dennis Marble is executive director of the Bangor Area Homeless Shelter.



Excellent points Mr. Marble. Thank you.
Someone, I can’t remember who, said “A society is judged by how it treats its less fortunate members”.
For those who consider themselves Christians, remember that Jesus said “Whatever you have done for the least of my brothers, you have done for me.” I understand the frustrations people have with the homeless and the fears associated with them due to some of the behavior some display at times. But we should not just write them off. We are a throwaway culture, but that should not include human beings in my humble opinion. “There but for the Grace of God”, it could happen to any one of us. Bill Clinton addressed this in his speech last night, when he said that the election is about whether we are all in this together or whether we prefer to say “You’re on your own.”
Oh I have no problem with PEOPLE helping PEOPLE.
I do have a problem with being everyone’s keeper and having
my money confiscated to take care of people capable of taking
care of themself. I have a problem with the govt telling
me WHO I have to take care and how much they
are going to charge me to do this.
I have a hard enough time being my FAMILY’S keeper…not anyone elses.
Reread the Bible passages referred to and get back to us.
Thanks, I agree. What I just love is these people telling us what WE ought to do. I assume they think we are sitting around with time on our hands, looking for a hobby.
If EVERYONE took care of their own family members we would have zero homeless folks.
Nice thoughts but when you want to use a ATM late at night and you find some one sleeping in it, or you enter the steps in front of your apartment and found someone has deficated on them, Or when you head out to work in the morning and find someone has smashed the window on your car and taken nothing, you get to wondering if maybe we would be far better off WITHOUT these particular “community members.”
Did it ever occur to you that if these people had a safe place to sleep and their own, clean bathroom to use and a job and a secure, stable life, they wouldn’t be doing the things you just described?
These people aren’t vermin, they’re our fellow human beings.
I would guess that your opinion is not the majority view. Did it ever occur to me? Yes, back when I was an idealistic youth, and didn’t know better. My eyes have been open wide for many years now, and the scenerio you outline simply is not true.
Now you can get all politically correct with me and tell me how these people are the productive members of our society who just didn’t have a chance. As I said my experience shows me that is untrue. You can also bring up the fact that many homeless are women with children fleeing abuse. That is a fact, but those are not the people who are sleeping in ATM’s and deficating on the sidewalk.
Oh, and Yeah, when I travel to Bangor, I do not bring my bathroom with me, and lo&behold I never considered relieving myself in the gutter. Bangor is a city blessed with many bathrooms. I have never been challenged when using one of them.
Finally if you want to limit the number of homeless people by a large precentage, You should start lobbying the State to dismantle its foster care programs which contributes greatly to the adult homeless population.
Where would you like them to go? Do you honestly believe that they WANT to have to sleep there or to go to the bathroom on stairs? Some humanity….please. Instead of complaining, help them for god’s sakes.
Well said Dennis.
Instead of transient lets use a more accurate word.
“Scum”
Dennis Marble banging the drum for “the homeless” is akin to the PSAs with an armed police officer telling us lower orders that we don’t need our 2nd Amendment rights or the usual DEA guy writing an oped on why this drug or that drug is the most potent thing ever and must be banned.
“Homelessness” is Marble’s rice bowl (job- three letters Mr. Biden) and he will defend it no matter how many “transients” show up in the BDN’s crime reports.