Campaign clutter

Now that both the Republican and Democratic Party conventions are over, I am hopeful that American voters will have a good sense of where the presidential candidates stand on the issues they care about.

It can be difficult to wade through the enormous amount of information and advertisements coming our way. Cutting through the political campaign clutter can be quite a challenge.

With this in mind, the annual AARP Voters’ Guides can help. Our nonpartisan status enables us to offer specific information about congressional and presidential candidates’ positions on issues of concern to older voters. This year, our guides focus on Social Security, Medicare and financial security. With more than one-third of Mainers over 65 relying on their Social Security benefit for their entire income, we know this is a critical issue.

With almost 270,000 Medicare beneficiaries in our state, we understand that voters will want to know what the candidates plan to do to strengthen this vital program. With almost 7 percent of older Mainers going hungry every day, it’s time to find out how the candidates plan to address financial security problems.

If you would like to find out where the candidates stand on these matters, go to earnedasay.org and take a look at our voters’ guides. The candidates’ responses are culled from publicly available information and excerpts from their own campaign sources.

Please also join us on Election Day, when we all have the opportunity to make our voices heard on these critical issues.

John Hennessy

AARP Maine advocacy director

Portland

A stand-up guy

Sam Canders has and always will stand up for his fellow veterans of this country. When a man confronted my husband, a veteran, and told him he was wrong for holding a sign in support of his brothers and sisters in the military, Canders stood by my husband and defended him.

The only veteran that stood up and defended my husband when no one else did, Canders, a Republican from Bangor, is a candidate who would serve our people well. If only we could duplicate him 100 times over, we would. We need more people willing to speak up and stand up for what’s right, even if it means he stands alone.

He would be a great asset to House District 15. Canders never compromises his principles; he’s a stand-up guy, a man of his word. District 15 would be lucky to have him.

Jeanne Hoxie

Hallowell

Taxing comments

It is becoming most tedious to read letters accusing Mitt Romney of somehow failing to pay his “fair share” of federal income tax. The latest installment penned by Debbie Brooks suggests he should be considered a traitor for maintaining multiple offshore accounts, which deprive the Treasury of all his sheltered taxes.

She and others so inclined seem bemused that “rich” people use such a legal, Internal Revenue Services approved mechanism to their financial advantage. They perceive that offshore accounts disqualify only affluent Republicans from running for president.

Romney has reported paying a 13.9 percent tax rate on his considerable 2010 income. To my knowledge, that return is not being audited by the IRS. If this bona fide rate on his millions earns him condemnation as a traitor, how shall we characterize the 47 percent of Americans who pay no federal income tax?

Collectively, they wield millions of daggers capable of inflicting millions of stab wounds in the back of our country. So who is doing more damage to our nation? Brooks is, of course, entitled to her opinion and the BDN, which buys ink by the barrel, is entitled to publish such ad hominem attacks against President Barack Obama’s challenger.

However, as a conservative who believes Romney’s policies will relieve this country of its economic woes, I am convinced that letters which criticize him at the personal level are published merely to taint Romney’s character, to diminish him as a viable candidate and ultimately to serve as a whetstone upon which to hone the BDN’s liberal ax.

Ron Goldstone

Dexter

Harvesting concerns

As a native of Down East Maine, I can relate to George Seaver’s ( BDN, Sept. 9) concerns about rockweed harvesting. Like other old-timers, I’ve watched the steady disappearance of coastal resources and the resultant decline of Washington County’s economy. I’d like nothing better than to see a revival of the fisheries and jobs that would come from it. That will never happen by the grab-all-you-can method we’ve used in the past. It can only happen through realistic regulation based on good science.

What is known suggests that the seaweed is vital habitat and food supply for the whole inshore ecosystem, and the more we take away, the more harm it will do. Seaweed torn off by nature returns its nutrients to the water; not so what is hauled away. The amount harvested will become much greater as the global market expands.

Except for Cobscook Bay, Maine sets no limit on how much can be taken. Only honest science can tell us what the effects are and, so far, the necessary studies have not been done.

I joined the Rockweed Coalition because removal of the seaweed looked like more nails in the coffin of our coastal ecosystem. If studies prove that wrong, so be it. In the meantime, I say to the coastal fishers: Science and environmental protection are our friends, not our enemies.

Harvesting jobs, and tourism and wildlife as well, depend on a healthy ecosystem. Let’s work together to restore the coastal ecology, not fight over the last scraps.

Ken Ross

Robbinston

Health issues due to smart meters

My husband and I opted out of our smart meter after it was installed without our knowledge or permission. As you know, the opt-out fee is $40, plus an additional $12 tacked onto our monthly Central Maine Power bill.

To me this is nothing short of highway robbery. Even though we don’t have a smart meter directly on our house, we are surrounded by our neighbor’s smart meters. One of our neighbor’s smart meter is directly opposite our bedroom.

I’ve had health issues that showed up shortly after the installation of the smart meters. I’ve been plagued with tinnitus, heart palpitations and insomnia. The tinnitus has produced ticking in one ear and loud humming in the other ear. CMP seems not to care about its customers well-being. This is not the way Maine should be.

Susan Kanellakis

Camden

Join the Conversation

92 Comments

  1. Ron Goldstone–Mitt Romney was on the ‘A’ list four years ago to be McCains running mate.  During the vetting process, McCain’s gang reviewed many years of Romney’s taxes and opted to go with an airhead from Alaska instead.  We all know how that turned out.  
    Don’t you even wonder, just a little bit, what Mitt is hiding?  

      1. 7 years is the number of years you are legally required to keep by the IRS. This might be why.

        I still feel Romney is not telling us all there is to know concerning his taxes.

        1. There is no defined IRS requirement to keep your records for seven years.  Can be as little as three years.  Don’t report all income and income greater than 25% of gross income keep for six.  File a fraudulent return the IRS can go back indefinately.  You may need to keep assest records far longer than seven years. 

    1. Obama has spent(invested?) 1million dollars keeping school records sealed. What is he hiding? If one is a fair question so is the other.
      Let’s see who’s secret is worse.

        1. If it is a “Complete lie” why has no one been able to show those records?
          Our much vaunted journalists can not find even one copy of his application to any of the schools that HE has attended? can not find classmates that actually remember him in classes.
          Our Journalists are known to delve into files that are not open, but are unable to subborn even one person in a school office? In freaking credible. And there is no question by anyone.

          1. Because school records are protected under federal law. Same reason you couldn’t go out and get mine. There are no new laws here, just existing ones that protect everyone school records. School records are not public information.

          2. And Military records are not, or Tax records are not.
            Bush’s Military records were not sacrosant.
            The Press does not care about no stinkin law if they want something.

          3. Forgeries of what? You are complaining about a law that equally protects everyone. Columbia has even said that Obama was a student and he graduated. 

          4. They’re voluntarily released so the public can know more about the candidates. It’s precedent to release several years of tax returns. 

          5. Too bad that Obama won’t release his educational, Social security, Draft or actual Birth Certificate.
            All of the documents “released” have been shown to be forgeries by multiple document labs.
            I am not interested in arguing with you on this subject … you would not doubt HIM for all the money in the world and I already know that.

          6. It wouldn’t matter, you would still hate him. He released his birth certificate and still people scream that it’s a fake. Then some others just move the goal post and demand even more from him. And yet, those same people are perfectly fine with the lack of transparency from Mitt Romney. That’s called hypocrisy. You know what we call people who actively and comfortably engage in hypocrisy? We call them hypocrites. 

          7. Because they are not public records and cannot be released without permission, which costs nothing to either give or not give.

  2. Ron goldstone, I’ve been hearing the “it’s legal so there’s nothing wrong with it” meme a lot lately regarding Romney’s offshore accounts. I so just to be sure, if it’s legal but morally questionable, is that okay then? Is it Presidential or patriotic, or does that not matter as long as it’s legal? FYI, lying is legal, as is adultery and a host of other morally- questionable acts. Would you be okay with it if Mitt were a lying adulterer as well, or does your view only relate to tax-dodging schemes?

    1. What is wrong with having one’s money invested in mulitple areas?  Xenophobic?  Atleast he is paying taxes on those investments.  Unlike the former Chairman of the Taxation Committe who did not disclose his foreign investments and did not pay taxes on them.

          1. It’s ridiculous to say that people are troubled by tax havens because they dislike that which is foreign. 

          1. lol, except in the countries that don’t tax investments and incomes which is obviously where he keeps much of the money.

          2. Yes he pays it when it is brought back into the country and after they play the games (which are legal) it comes in to the country as capital gains taxed at 15%.   This is one of the reasons that the Republicans want to change the law and not tax capital gains, another thing they are trying to do is let corporations and individuals bring money. earned outside of the country, back to the US tax free.   You got to admit they are doing their best to not pay taxes on anything.

        1. A person is in violation of US tax law if they do not disclose their foreign accounts.  Having had an overseas account I’m a proud traitor

          1. I understand that they must report their foreign accounts but do they have to pay US income tax on the money earned?   Also I remember something about many people were not reporting the overseas accounts so the IRS said we won’t charge you criminally if you report the money before a certain date, I believe it was in 2009.  Maybe this is why (R)money doesn’t want to show his past returns as he may have taken the deal for some of the money he had tucked away and had not reported.   I have no proof but it smells funny.

          2. Romney wants us to cut his taxes, and raise mine — but he doesn’t want us to know what he’s paid in taxes.  He says, “trust me.”  He also said “trust me” when he ran for Senate in Massachusetts, and then admitted he hadn’t been entirely truthful.  But this time we should trust him.  Right.

    2. “lying adulterer”?
      I bet you were OK with Clinton wasn’t you?
      Romney paid $3 million in taxes. How much should one person be responsible for anyway?
      If the 47% who pay nothing, paid even $100 each to contribute to the infrastructure that they use, the people who defend this country, or even the people who make sure the drugs we buy for them are safe, we would probably have no deficit.
      Paying sales tax when you buy something with money that we gave you in the first place doesn’t really count either.

      1. The 47% that you and Mitt speak of pay no federal income taxes because they are either unemployed, under employed, on social security, or just won’t work. Mitt has a dream. He wants to lower his taxes and balance the budget by hammering the pathetic little paychecks of WalMart and McDonald’s workers. He is GOP, through and through. Mitt is un-electable anyway. There are not enough rich white people left in America to carry the day. He has zero appeal to people of color, veterans, working stiffs, or anyone else who has a distaste for spoiled frat boys.

      2. Personally, if I were in that income bracket that requires me to pay $3 million in taxes, I’d be doing pretty darned good. I’ll bet you a dollar to a dime that virtually everyone of the 47% would be doing pretty good if they were required to pay $3 million. Please save your sympathy for those who are in REAL hard situations.

      3. Yes, because the only tax that supports infrastructure in the USA is the income tax. Please, we only get 1/3 of our total tax revenue from income taxes. Gas tax supports infrastructural more then income tax. 

      4. Since Romney has not had a job since either 2002 or 1999 if you can retroactively retire, he is one of the 47% who paid no federal income tax.

    3. Please get the President to submit a bill to change those tax rules.  Get Pingree to sponsor it.  I will tell my Rs to support it.

    4. Upon what religion are you basing morals?
      I was under the impression that morals come from religious beliefs.
      Almost of all of the lefts favorite Presidents have been liars and or adulterors and I expect tax cheats.

        1. Morals are based on a system of absolutes, when was the last time you actually beleived in absolutes. any you will give, even I will come up with a reason that that “moral imperitive” has to be broken.

          1. Morals are not based on absolutes, there are grey areas in morality.  Is it always immoral to lie, for example?

          2. It is immoral to lie, always, but certainly there are times that it may be understandable, but it is still wrong.

  3. Ron Goldstone–you should consider becoming a standup comic with such amusing comments. Surely you’re not serious.

    1. Right on.  And, speaking of tainting a candidate’s character, what have the Rs/TPers been doing for 4 years (yes, even before the election)?

  4.   Mr. Goldstone, were Romney to show us as many years of tax returns as he insisted Paul Ryan show him (ten years) we would know whether, in some of those ten years, Romney joined the 46% who paid no federal income taxes.
      We do know that Romney paid almost no FICA taxes, which a majority of the 46% pay on every dollar of income they earn.  Romney’s income is called capital gains, even though he had no assets at risk and was earning these gains on other people’s money (This is known as the carried interest exception.)  Thus, he escaped paying the 14.3% in FICA taxes he would have had to pay on self-employment income and had those millions taxed at a rate less than half the income tax rate for the same amount of money earned as ordinary income.
      Senator Russ Feingold campaigned against the carried interest exception and was defeated in his re-election effort in 2010 because of huge campaign expenditures made by a hedge fund manager who benefited from this tax loophole.
      Since Romney wants to return us to the tax cuts of Bush II, why, beyond blind faith, do you think that will help the economy?  

    1. Romney hasn’t worked since 2002 so he has not paid any Federal Income taxes, he has only paid capital gains taxes

  5. Ron Goldstone, the “Internal Revenue Services approved mechanisms” aren’t exactly true. The IRS only follows laws written by Congress. Theirs is not the job to approve or disapprove of the laws as written.

    To my knowledge the 47% and in all likelyhood the 99% voices aren’t heard when tax laws are written. When these laws are written, money talks and BS walks.

  6. Susan if you tighten up your tin foil hat about two notches all of your issues should go away!!!!   You people crack me up!!!

    1. You are ill informed. FCC does not regulate radiofrequency emissions at at levels below microwave ovens despite thousands of studies showing biological damage. Smart meter radiofrequency/microwave pulses and bursts disrupt normal cellular functions and cause symptoms in some people. Everyone is exposed even if you don’t feel what it is doing to your body. Yet.

      Byt the way, overtaxed, nationwide people are fighting for smart meter opt outs. 14 states have some kind of opt out available. Nationwide people are reporting health symptoms and concerned about privacy and costs. Tea Party and the left are joining on this one. Wake up and do your research.

      1. Willing to bet all of these people are using cell phones too, how about that research all nonsense jsut like global warming and all other liberal supported crap

  7. I just love how these people do mental gymnastics. In the same breath, they applaud Romney for getting his effective rate low by using legal means, but then they demonizing other individuals for not paying more taxes than legally required. It’s nonsense. 

  8. John Hennessy – Sorry to inform you, but the AARP is not non-partisan. They are in Obama’s back pocket.

    Ron Goldstone – Home run. 

    1. Actually you would probably find their “guide” is just another instrument to sell insurance.  That is AARP’s primary goal, money from the kickbacks.

    2. Quite correct about AARP.  Soda shot out of my nose the first time I saw the Obama commercial that said “the non-partisan AARP.”  I see they quickly stopped saying that, too.

  9. Mr. Goldstone, it is Mr. Romney who has INVITED every bit of criticism he has received and you ain’t heard nothing yet now that this FOOL has definitively proven he is completely UNFIT to be president by showing us what he thinks of about HALF the nation with his outrageous, arrogant, and completely FALSE comments about the “47%” who he claims pay no taxes and just see themselves as “dependent victims.”  The MittTwit is, again, UNFIT for the presidency.  He is a silver-spooned corporatist inheritance baby who has never had to be concerned about finances because his daddy’s money would always take care of him.  For him to make such outrageous comments about working people and the elderly and the poor in this nation makes him UNFIT FOR THE PRESIDENCY.  As to his taxes, the MittTwit has the audacity to stand there and question others’ taxes when he hides his money in the Caymans and in Bermuda and in Switzerland to shelter it and get lower rates that most of the rest of us can’t get?  SHAME ON HIM !  Let me clue you in.  That 47% are hard workers and retirees.  They pay federal payroll taxes, state taxes, local taxes, sales taxes, and gas taxes.  And PLENTY of Obama supporters, like me, pay A LOT of federal INCOME taxes too.  Anyone exempt from the federal income tax are exempt in large part because they receive BUSH ERA deductions, or are retirees on fixed incomes who did pay them all their working lives, or work but don’t make enough to have to pay them.  But again, they DO pay payroll, state, local, gas, and sales taxes, not to mention all the fees for services we all have to pay.  The MittTwit WILL NOT BE PRESIDENT, and it is because he is completely unfit to be President.  He is nothing but a corporate toadie of the worst order who cares nothing about the middle class and only cares about his billionaire donors like the Koch Brothers, and he is an elitist out of touch boy of privilege who has no clue about the middle class, the working class, or the poor in this nation nor their values.  SHAME ON THE MittTwit ! PS: Why didn’t he run for re-election in Massachusetts? Because his poll numbers were in the TANK, and he’d have been run out of office on a rail. And he knew it.

  10. Ron Goldstone:   I agree completely.  The economy is a mess in the U.S.  Incomes are down, unemployment is up, disability claims are skyrocketing,  oil/gasoline are at crippling prices, and the Middle East is in total disarray.  All the Democrats have is to find something wrong with Romney or Ryan to get the public to ignore the failures of the Democrats, Obama/Biden and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.  Hillary’s responsibility is the safety and security of our diplomatic missions.  The death of our Ambassador in Libya is at her feet.   The media, including the BDN, do everything they can to ignore the shortcomings of the Democrats and vilify the Republicans.

    1. Okay, but what solutions are Romney and Ryan pushing? They won’t even tell us beyond vague bullet points. They refuse to get specific. 

      1.  The specifics are that they don’t intend to bankrupt the country like the current idiot(s) in the White House.

        1. That’s not specific. For example, they say they’re going to close tax loopholes, but then refuse to say which ones. Why? They say they can balance the budget. Well, if you can do that, then tell us specifically how. 

          I can promise you the moon, it doesn’t mean I can do it. 

      1.  It’s the responsibility of the Secretary of State to see to the safety and security of our diplomatic corps.  She effed up BIG TIME.   You can be sure if Condi did this, the Democrats would be calling for the impeachment of President Bush… add it to the list.

        1. Guess which party pushed for cuts to security for our embassies?

          “Democrats enacted $1.803 billion for embassy security, construction and maintenance for fiscal 2010, when they still controlled the Senate and House. After Republicans took control of the House and picked up six Senate seats, Congress reduced the enacted budget to $1.616 billion in fiscal 2011, and to $1.537 billion for 2012.

          The administration requested $1.801 billion for security, construction and maintenance for fiscal 2012; House Republicans countered with a proposal to cut spending to $1.425 billion. The House agreed to increase it to $1.537 billion after negotiations with the Senate. “

        2. Well, probably more the responsibility of our intelligence community for not finding this video and understanding how it might be used by those who wish to incite hatred of USA. There are many who hate us and why not…. we kill their neighbors, we torture their children, we sell arms to their enemies. Need I go on? And, it has been made pretty clear that the ‘defense’ of embassies is the responsibility of the host nation. An embassy is not a military base. This has happened before. It will happen again. The forces of hatred here at home and abroad will not go away. A sad human condition. 

  11. Susan, make sure you don’t use a cordless phone or your cell phone….
    Last time I checked the meter is on the outside of the building……
    Hillarious…

    1. The American Academy of Environmental Medicine says these exposures are cumulative.

      Cordless phones are like having a cell tower in your house, emitting levels as high as a cell tower even when you’re not using it.

      Cell phones? Look up the book online by Motorola insider and researcher, Cellular Telephone, Russian Roulette. You will learn why they are not safe and how the industry has hidden it.

      Smart meters are not harmless and may be that last straw of exposure in a microwave-crazed world.

  12. Mr. Hennessy:  I am sure that AARP looks forward to being an honest broker when the real conversation about Medicare finally starts.

  13. Susan Kanellakis – toads cause warts, moonbeams are dangerous and babies come from the cabbage patch.

    I thought our society rejected ignorance and superstition centuries ago.

    Apparently not.

    Yessah

    1. You are ill informed. FCC does not regulate radiofrequency emissions at at levels below microwave ovens despite thousands of studies showing biological damage. Smart meter radiofrequency/microwave pulses and bursts disrupt normal cellular functions and cause symptoms in some people. Everyone is exposed even if you don’t feel what it is doing to your body. Yet.

      Nationwide people are fighting for smart meter opt outs. 14 states have some kind of opt out available. Nationwide people are reporting health symptoms and concerned about privacy and costs. Tea Party and the left are joining on this one. Wake up and do your research.

  14. Mr. Goldstone,
    Romney’s policies are exactly the same as  George W Bush’s,  the policies that gave us the economic meltdown.
    Why you would be in support of these failed policies is a mystery and leaves you with no credibility.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *