ELLSWORTH, Maine — After just 20 minutes of deliberation, a jury on Wednesday found a Franklin man not guilty of robbery and other crimes following a three-day trial in Hancock County Superior Court.

On Feb. 9, a man broke into a Stonington Manor apartment and beat the woman who lived there in an attempt to steal prescription drugs. The man punched the woman in the face four times before she handed over her medication — fish oil pills and blood pressure medicine. When the man saw the name on the bottle, he realized he had broken into the wrong home and ran away.

The state said that man was Morris G. Young, 26, of Franklin. Young and his alleged accomplice, Catherine Carton, 33, of Sedgwick, were each arrested in March on charges of robbery, burglary, assault, aggravated criminal trespass and theft by unauthorized taking.

During the trial, the state relied heavily on the testimony of another Stonington woman, Jennifer Seile. Seile, an admitted drug addict, told police and the jury that Young and Carton had been staying with her when the robbery took place.

She said that on Feb. 8 the trio had discussed places they might obtain prescription Percocet, including from a woman in Stonington Manor. In testimony Monday, Seile said she tried to dissuade Young and Carton from robbery and promised to buy them pills later if they just stayed home.

The next morning, Seile said she was woken up by Young and Carton arguing. She said Young admitted to breaking into the wrong house and punching the woman in the face. She later provided police with a mask she claimed Young had worn to the robbery, which was later confirmed to contain Young’s DNA.

Young’s attorney, Robert Van Horn, pounced on the credibility of Seile as a witness in his closing arguments.

“The state’s case rests entirely on the testimony of Jen Seile,” he told jurors Wednesday. “The evidence has shown that Jen Seile’s testimony is unreliable.”

Van Horn said Seile made up the evidence because she was upset with Carton for a relationship she had with Seile’s ex boyfriend. He also insinuated that Seile and her boyfriend may have been the true culprits, as Seile had had a fallen out with the intended victim of the robbery.

The attorney pointed to discrepancies between Seiles version of the robbery, as she claimed was recounted to her by Young, and the testimony of the victim and other witnesses. For example, Seile claimed Young returned from the robbery with three prescription pill bottles, when only two bottles were stolen.

Van Horn also provided evidence that before the home invasion, Seile had unsuccessfully tried to convince Young and Carton to break into her father’s Stonington market, which Young and Carton refused.

The attorney didn’t deny that Young’s DNA appeared on the mask, but took issue with the fact that other DNA also was found but never identified.

The strongest piece of evidence casting doubt on Young’s alleged guilt, Van Horn said, was the discrepancy between the description of the assailant given by the victim and a witness, and the description of Young on the morning of the robbery provided by Seile.

The victim and a witness said the attacker was wearing a gray sweatshirt and sweatpants, which she said definitely were “not denim.” Seile said Young had been wearing a green sweatshirt and jeans.

“There has got to be reasonable doubt when two witnesses say the attacker wore one thing, and the woman pointing the finger said he wore another,” Van Horn said. “… The reason [Seile] didn’t have any firsthand knowledge of this robbery is because she made it up.”

Though Young was found not guilty of all the charges stemming from the Stonington robbery, he still may return to jail. He faces three charges of violation of his probation. The state alleges, and Young admits, that he has not completed a batterer’s intervention program and he has not paid 21 months worth of supervision fees.

Those conditions of parole were given after a 2009 conviction of domestic-violence assault. Justice Ann Murray, who presided over the robbery trial, will hear the probation revocation hearing at a later date.

After the trial, Young declined comment. His attorney said only that he was happy with the jury’s verdict. Carton will face trial in the Stonington robbery on Nov. 15.

Follow Mario Moretto on Twitter at @riocarmine.

Mario Moretto has been a Maine journalist, in print and online publications, since 2009. He joined the Bangor Daily News in 2012, first as a general assignment reporter in his native Hancock County and,...

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. You have got to be kidding me,all three of these clowns are useless!!!These so-called ladies would rather be involved in drugs than provide for their own children.We’ll find out in Nov. if Kates family will  buy her out of another mess?Jen Seile thats another story

    1. I disagree, if it was Joey he would have got the right apartment. What I see here is a good defense attorney casting reasonable doubt.

  2. I should have continued……How may deaths and robberies on that Rock have Joe as the common denominator?  The natives know who I mean.

  3. Like I said before, Jen Seile is the true crimnal in this case. She was the master mind behind everything- like a little puppeteer. Probably if they took a DNA sample from her, they would solve their unidentified DNA puzzle. 

  4. This is an outrage!!! Who was the man that beat that poor woman up then?! She needs to see justice here and I can’t get over the fact that the state is so incompetent!!!

  5. Seems like a lot of the discrepancies are from Seile, maybe they should think about that…. Don’t suppose she is deliberately doing this to make sure no one is found guilty.  If they are found guilty who will she get to do the next job for her?  Who’s house will be next for drugs they don’t have?

  6. Seile was awoken by them arguing after the attack, which means she didn’t see or hear them leave? How come no one raised the question about what he was wearing when he left to do the crime, he could have changed his clothes!!! Talk about raising reasonable doubt…..

    1. It’s disgusting that he got away with this – shows that Kate will not be charged either because of Jen’s testimony with Young’s case. What an outrage!

  7. Since Jen is the one who turned in these clowns maybe she is scared she will be charged and is lying to get them off. I think the police should look this case and the pharmacy breakins over again and charge the ones who everyone knows did it. Why would the woman who was attacked lie about the man who beat and robbed her? I would think this should have been a wake up call for the woman down the hall who was the intended victim. Double lock your doors or better yet keep our drugs to yourself, Jen would not know who to rob if you were not out peddling your drugs!!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *