Let’s have a respectful conversation, for a moment, about breasts.

When a photographer goes to extraordinary lengths to photograph Kate Middleton without a top at a private villa in southern France, there is something to be said about the culture that responds with such giddiness to the thought of a woman with nothing on from the belly button up.

We’d like to say: Get over it. Women have breasts. But the issue is, well, bigger than you might think. People shouldn’t care so much, but they do. Caught up in notions that breasts are signs of fertility, we have a hunch people’s obsession has a lot to do with the unreachable. They want to see what they can’t see.

Across the world, women go topless, and no one cares. It happens in some countries in Africa, for instance.

In fact, when Middleton and her husband Prince William traveled to the Solomon Islands in the South Pacific recently, they were greeted by women who weren’t wearing much on top. The irony couldn’t have been more perfectly timed.

We’re not suggesting trying to force the normalization of barechestedness. But can we at least be mature about exposed breasts? They have been sexualized, yes, but they are also utilitarian. They can get cancer. Not to mention that it’s legal to go topless in Maine and other states.

Consider the historical perspective: Women have endured finger-pointing for a variety of other clothing choices throughout time. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, for example, was ridiculed as one of the first women to forgo floor-length skirts and corsets in order to wear bloomers — made popular by her friend Amelia Bloomer in 1851.

Studies have shown what many women already know: They are more likely than men to be objectified. On June 29, the European Journal of Social Psychology published a study by psychologist Dr. Sarah Gervais, who researched how people in Western cultures remember images of both men and women. While men were more likely to be seen as a whole, women were more often “reduced to their sexual body parts.”

Some might argue that going topless will only reinforce the objectification of women. But the fault of objectification lies with the objectifier, not the women.

Topless marches have been held in Farmington and Portland in the past to protest the double-standard that makes it socially acceptable for men to go shirtless on a hot day and not women. While some men joined the women in support, many other men (and women) gawked on the sidelines and snapped pictures — perhaps driven by the same desire as the photographer who took photos of Middleton and the people who constitute the market for those photos.

To those and other like-minded people, we say: Be respectful. Have you really never seen breasts before?

Join the Conversation

24 Comments

  1. I thought a woman showing her breast in Maine was not considered a crime. Wasn’t this the ruling when the woman in Newport was mowing her lawn topless? Viva la breast……….

    1. A women cannot legally be charged with nudity in Maine because a woman’s genitals are located inside her body and the law states that you must cover your genitals. 

      I remember a case a couple years back of two women in Orono beating a public nudity charge because of this.

  2. Fair enough, but in this case the photographer was no more than a Peeping Tom.  Anyone taking pics of half-dressed women in the privacy of their home would be subject to arrest. 

    1. I’m no friend of paparazzi but in this case she was not in her home (or any other domicle) and she was visible from the street.

      1. No, she wasn’t visible from the street unless you had a telescope, or an extremely expensive camera with a telescopic lens.  The photographer was a peeping tom — for money.

  3. Only in America.  We were founded by puritans and still are.  Most any beach in Europe will have many women with no tops on and no one gives a hoot.  European newspapers and magazines often have pictures of topless women and it’s no big deal.  Americans are seen, in many parts of the world, as puritanical conservatives. 

    1. When people were leaving England, Australia got the criminals and America got the Puritans.  Australia got the better deal.

  4. Kate is a big girl. She should be making good decisions. In this day and age of camera phones and telephoto lenses people in the public eye have to be careful of what they do. If you don’t want people to see you sunbathing topless….Don’t take off your top!

      1. My grandmother was a wise old woman and she used to say” If you don’t want people to talk about what goes on in your house, close your curtains and close your mouth. She also was a big proponant of watering your own backyard. I really miss her.

  5. Slow news day.  

    Or is this an example of what BDN editors think is really important?

    Ever wonder why your readership continues to decline?  (We didn’t bother to renew our subscription either.  Just not worth it.  Thinking of the WSJ….)

  6. As long as there are people who will pay photographers lots of money to photograph the “rich and famous”, whom so many of us stupidly idolize, there will always be people willing to take the pictures.

    If half the world wasn’t totally “infatuated” with the royals, what Lindsay Lohan is doing now, or is Randy Travis drunk again, none of this would take place.

    Some of us need a life!

  7. In her day, Katharine Hepburn faced a fair amount of criticism simply for wearing pants. As society becomes less patriarchal, I think that attitudes toward dress will continue to change.

  8. Visible to the road? Hardly. Kate and William were on a private second-floor balcony. The road was more than a half-mile away (one kilometer) and the photographer used an extra-long lens with a double magnifier/extender. According to one report, the equipment cost $24,000 or more. This is a clear invasion of privacy.

    1. I didn’t know these fine details.  I stand corrected.  And I do severely dislike paparazzi.
      OK, on to the broader issues discussed.  Any opinions other than just condemning the paparazzi?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *