If you’re like most Maine voters, you’ve probably never heard of Gary Johnson.
If you have, you’re likely a die-hard Libertarian, a political reporter and/or under the age of 40.
But the former two-term governor of New Mexico and Libertarian Party candidate for president may play a bigger role in Maine’s 2012 election cycle than many could have guessed when Johnson entered the race as a Republican in April 2011.
Johnson provides a segment of Maine’s young Republicans with an option to Mitt Romney after their efforts to boost the presidential campaign of Texas Rep. Ron Paul were thwarted by several controversial decisions, first by the Maine GOP and then by the Republican National Committee.
Johnson also holds appeal for a sizable segment of Maine voters who are more left-leaning than the Democratic candidate on the ballot. His support of medical marijuana, his message on peace and his support of ending U.S. military involvement abroad resonates with many.
While it’s not the first time Maine has had a Libertarian Party candidate on the ballot, it may be the first time that candidate draws enough votes to officially establish the party in Maine. Typically, a Libertarian Party candidate for president will pick up between 0.25 and 0.5 percent of the vote.
“Gary Johnson will significantly outpace that,” Jim Melcher, a political science professor at the University of Maine at Farmington predicted in an email message Friday. Melcher wrote that one recent poll that suggested Johnson would pull between 2 and 3 percent of the vote.
“He has tuned his appeal to sound very much like Ron Paul, with calls to audit the Federal Reserve, and I think a lot of Paul’s backers are listening to him,” Melcher said. “Many seem to still be bitter about their battles with Romney’s forces.”
A recent YouTube promotional video, narrated by Johnson, features images of Paul and touts Johnson’s endorsement of Paul in 2008. And during one of two nationally televised pre-primary Republican Party debates, Johnson said if he were the GOP nominee, he would select Paul as his running mate.
“(Paul’s) efforts have changed America; they’ve changed me,” Johnson says in the video. “The revolution he ignited in the hearts and minds of millions of Americans will not fade away.”
Melcher said Maine voters have a track record of voting, in fairly sizable numbers, for candidates outside the mainstream parties, such as when Ross Perot, running as a Reform Party candidate, was able to pick up significant numbers in both 1992 and 1996.
Johnson, wildly popular in New Mexico and touted as being “fiscally conservative” and “socially cool,” will likely become an option for a small segment of Maine’s “undecided” voters, which recent polls showed at about 8 percent of the electorate.
“He has more charisma than most other Libertarian candidates, and younger Paul supporters will find his stance on marijuana appealing,” Melcher said.
But whether that appeal will translate into any kind of coattail effect for other third-party candidates on the ballot, such as those seeking the seat of retiring U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, remains to be seen.
One of those U.S. Senate candidates, Andrew Ian Dodge, a tea party-leaning Libertarian from Brunswick, said he thinks Johnson will help him and believes Johnson’s appeal to younger voters should not be underestimated.
Dodge pointed out that many younger voters are not being accounted for in most telephone polls, which depend heavily on land-line connections. Most young voters use cellphones only.
He said many Ron Paul supporters in Maine were so angered by the National Republican Party’s efforts to keep their delegates subjugated during the party’s national convention that they are turning to the Libertarian Party.
“We’ve been told to (expletive) off, and so we are,” Dodge said. “Johnson will get over 5 percent in Maine, partly because Romney is tanking but partly because a lot of Paul’s backers are listening to him.”
If Johnson’s appeal does trickle down the ballot, pulling Dodge along, that could spell trouble for Charlie Summers, the Republican Party candidate for U.S. Senate.
Polling second and 12 to 15 points behind the front-runner, former two-term Maine governor, independent Angus King, Summers will need every Republican vote he can muster if he hopes to win.
And while a lot of focus has been placed on whether the Democrat in the race, Cynthia Dill, a state senator from Cape Elizabeth, will be the spoiler for King, a number of pundits are suggesting it could be the Libertarian offerings on the ballot that spoil it for Summers.
But Melcher, the UMF political scientist, said he didn’t see it quite that way.
Dodge doesn’t have nearly the popular appeal that Johnson does and neither of the two have much of a campaign infrastructure in place in Maine, Melcher said. Also, both are fighting an uphill battle financially.
“Dodge may get a little help from Johnson’s strength, but I do not think Dodge will be a substantial factor in the race,” Melcher said. “He’s not universally liked or even universally taken seriously among Maine tea party activists who would seem to be his base, and I don’t think he’s got the money to build his name recognition.”
While political action committees, presumably supporting Summers, have spent nearly $2 million in Maine on television attack ads against King — Dodge is happy to have people in Freeport willing to put up his lawn signs.
It was also announced Friday that the Democratic Senatorial Campiagn Committee would spend $410,000 on attack ads against Summers in Maine, set to air at the beginning of October.
Johnson’s national campaign is struggling to raise $1 million to get his campaign videos running on television and not only on the Internet.
David Sorenson, spokesman for the Maine GOP, said third-party candidates have always been a factor in Maine elections.
“And those candidates attract votes from both the left and the right,” Sorenson wrote in a message Friday. “We are focused on helping Republican candidates win support from the broadest possible swath of Maine voters, because our message of fiscal conservatism, pro-growth economic policies and government accountability resonates with everybody who gets a chance to hear it.”
But Sorenson had a slightly different message for Dodge during an exchange on the social media site Facebook on Sept. 20. Dodge was lamenting that he and the two other independent candidates were being excluded from some of the U.S. Senate debates in Maine.
“Andrew: Do you think you have a chance of winning? If not, would you prefer Summers to King? If so, why don’t you drop out?” Sorenson wrote. Dodge shot back, rehashing the grievances of Maine’s Paul supporters.
Dodge later said Sorenson was calling for him to drop out of the race because the Maine GOP was worried about him peeling off some who would otherwise support Summers.
Melcher said Dodge’s view might be off and Summers’ support with the most conservative elements of the GOP is stronger than Dodge presumes.
“There isn’t the antipathy toward Charlie Summers among tea party backers that there is toward Mitt Romney, and Summers has looked more and more conservative over the past several months, particularly in his comments on global warming,” Melcher said.
Young voters will be a factor, and like the biggest portion of Maine voters — those not enrolled in either major party — they are not particularly loyal to one party or the other.
Nicola Wells, a Lewiston resident and state director of the Maine League of Young Voters, said it’s not easy to characterize young voters here and in general, they have a dynamic range of political views.
Wells said one thing is clear: Young voters are skeptical and discerning, which may propel more to seek a candidate outside the mainstream.
“I do think there is this desire to change the status quo,” Wells said Friday.
The strategies for doing that range from supporting third-party candidates to working to change the mainstream parties from the inside out.
The league, which has contact with about 6,500 young voters in Maine, is typically more left-leaning. They voted to endorse President Barack Obama’s re-election but chose to offer no endorsement in Maine’s U.S. Senate race.
“There was no candidate (in that race) that passed our threshold for professionalism, experience and well-defined policy views,” Wells said. “In other words, they had no ideas for actual policy to back up their positions.”
Wells agreed with Dodge that young voters are undervalued and often the source of misconceptions.
“Our membership really cares about voting, and there’s this strong misconception out there that young people don’t care about their state or local elections,” Wells said. “But we are all defined by a different context than the generation before us, and we struggle to speak to each other (politically) across generations and to understand each other.”
How much of a factor Johnson’s presidential campaign will be in Maine could also depend on how big of a lead or perceived lead any of the other candidates in the race emerge with, Melcher said.
“If voters on the fence between Johnson and either major-party candidate … conclude that Obama has all four Maine (Electoral College) votes in the bag, they may feel freer to vote for Johnson,” Melcher said. “The bigger the Obama-Romney margin, the better it is for Johnson and Jill Stein (the Green Party candidate for president), too.”



WoW!!! The BDN actually mentions someone other than Obama or Romney who is running for president. The national media will not be impressed. I will be “wasting” my vote for Gary Johnson.
Courtesy of the Lewiston Sun Journal, however..
That’s after we were treated to endless drivel about Ron Paul.Johnson has advertised on Maddow last week.I don’t agree with all of his positions but he’s worth a look at least.
Why would anyone vote for a Librarian?
LOL
Because we are getting sick of the same old mule and elephant? lol.
I am proudly voting for Gary Johnson in November.
Many Maine republicans are voting for Gary Johnson. He is picking up momentum from republicans all over the state.
Voted Obama 2008, Voting Johnson 2012…
Yes, Johnson may take more votes away from Obama than from Romney. For those on the left who are unhappy with Obama, Johnson is the non-Romney alternative; and the Right is going to vote ‘against Obama’ regardless of Romney’s shortcomings.
Actually … that is wishful thinking . Nationally and even more so in Maine, Romney and the R’s in general will be impacted by more voter loss compared to D voter abdication to Libertarians by those who can’t stomach either Willard or POTUS.
Speculation, not wishful thinking. I’m inclined to agree with you about fewer Democratic defections because Democrats seem to me to be less given to independent thinking than Republicans: they’re like teens who ‘rebel’ by all wearing the same different clothing.
I will be voting for Johnson as well, people need to educate themselves. Look up the NDAA bill that Obama signed and Romney supports, See that Romney supported the TARP bailout. Look into both Obama and Romneys largest $$ supporters are {they are the same companys}.
Obama ran on ending the wars, we are still in Iraq and Afgnanistan, We were helping Libya and now he wants to give 450mill to Egypt and 45mill to Syria while were broke
Romney owns ObamaCare as he helped get the law passes n Mass. , he raised fees on gun owners in Mass twice as Gov. and Mass was 47th under Mitt in jobs.
Johnson as Gov. of New Mexico Left office with New Mexico as one of the only four states in the country with a balanced budget,Vetoed 750 bills during his time in office; more than all other governors combined,Cut over 1,200 government jobs without firing anyone,First New Mexico Governor to challenge education status quo and propose statewide voucher program, Limited annual state budget growth to 5.0% during eight years in office, Cut taxes 14 times while never raising them—a first for New Mexico, Vetoed 32% of the total number of bills submitted for his signature
Very little difference between Romney and Obama, but try to telling that to the dyed-in-the-wools on either side and you might as well be talking to the wall. As you pointed out, both parties support essentially the same things and have the same big supporters. And, no matter who becomes the new Bomber-In-Chief, we will be bombing more brown people (credit to George Carlin). It appears that nothing is going to stop the metamorphosis from a federal government to an all-knowing, all-seeing, meet-every-one-of-our-needs national government.
There are actually six candidates that Mainers will be able to vote for in November.
BDN–you have your work cut out for you–inform us please!
BTW, see this real alternative: jillstein.org
I wish Ron Paul would have run as an Independent. But I will be voting for Gary Johnson!
” I got OBAMA PHONE”
HA, HA, HA! I saw that too! But I think it’s just ‘bamaphone’ and one word isn’t it?? Still funny!
AND you probably get WELFARE too. That I have to pay for AND if you are poor how the HE** do you PAY for computer access!!!!!! oR ARE YOU JUST joshin ME? :)
“You on food stamp, you minority, you low income, you disable you get OBAMA PHONE!”
ROMNEY Sucks! He sucks BAd. I got OBAMA PHONE!
Although I agree with Gary Johnson on many of his positions, he simply doesn’t have a chance to get elected. The two party system, as much as it is destroying politics in this nation, is what is in power – like it or not. So it will be either Obama or Romney and a vote for Johnson, while a vote of conscience, will be a wasted vote as the majority of Electoral College votes (another dinosaur that has outlived it’s time) will be split between those two candidates. And there lies the destruction of our nation. The politicians in office won’t change what benefits them and the American People are powerless to restore true democracy.
Since when is a vote for conscience EVER a “wasted vote”? It’s called conviction. It’s about sending a message. It’s about taking a stand for what is right for this nation. If a candidate stands for what one believes in, leads a commendable life, has an untarnished and honorable reputation and leads by example, how could a vote for them be “wasted”? This overstated fear of wasting a vote is what has caused us to elect increasingly more mediocre , talentless, puppets of special interest and stooges for foreign governments.
Agree 100%. Whenever people make the wasted vote argument, say, “I’m going to hold my nose and vote for _____”, or tell me they’re not really voting for _____ but rather voting against _____, I have to ask them at what point are they really going to vote for somebody or something.
A vote for whoever this guy is truly is a wasted vote. Four more years of obama & gas will be $7+/’gal, the debt will be $28Trillion, U3 unemployment will be 11%, U6 will be 20% & everyone will owe $80K instead of $51K. The best message we all can send is to vote Romney/Ryan to get obama out of office.
If people think they have it hard now. Wait till the debt crushes our government. No safety net, no jobs, no food and no where to turn for help. I’m old enough so I most likely will miss it. But my children and or grandchildren face that reality. Government can not keep spending what they don’t have and trying to be everything to everyone. Use your vote to end Obama reign. This is not the time for a protest vote.
I wish I could share your naivete optimism, but the only difference between Romney and Obama is that Mitt is driving the bus at 120 mph towards a bridge abutment and Barry is driving the bus at the same speed off a cliff. What can I say, pick your poison. Under Ryan’s spending plan, the budget continues to grow, just not as quickly as under Obama. In fact it will grow the deficit by 4.5 trillion over the next ten years. The Department of Offensive Imperialism Defense budget grows. Romney wants to repeal Obamacare, but then he wants to replace it with a Republican version. If he gets elected, just like the line from The Who song, “meet the new boss, same as the old boss”. Thanks, but no thanks. I refuse to play the voting charade game.
Voting for someone who will garner 1% of the vote makes less of a statement than does voting out socialism & tyranny.
I understand what your saying, but the reality is that Romney is not going to change anything. A politician can tell you everything you want to hear, but you need to look at how they govern and their voting record. The Romney governorship laid the ground work for Obamacare. Ryan voted for the No Child Left Behind Act, the prescription drug benefit known as Medicare Part D, the new Department of Homeland Security, including the TSA, the PATRIOT Act, TARP, and he backed the auto bailout. Can you just ignore all of that?
obamacare is a monstrosity destined to cripple the healthcare industry & drain taxpayer wallets. Something like obamacare won’t happen w/Romney.
Growing the public sector is absolutely essential, bigger bloated inefficient government is not the answer.
No politician is as manipulative as obama. Voting him out is this country’s highest priority & is the 1st step towards recovery. Mr. Johnson has far less chance to turn things around than Romney does.
The system’s busted, politicians are game playing, power mongering liars & thieves but the priority is to vote obama out.
romney passed something of the same scope just smaller scale in Massachusetts! what is so hard to handle about that? what really makes you think he is going to repeal it.
collectivist liberalism = socialism collectivist conservatism = fascism you are trading one rabid dog for another and we won’t see any positive changes.
The idea that Romney/Ryan and their Stepford Wives will be in or a heartbeat away from the presidency is one of the most frightening things this senior voter could contemplate. If you vote R/R Republican, be sure and invite them into your bodies and your bedrooms, because they intend to be there and make rules governing them!
But it doesn’t scare you that Obamacare cuts 500 billion from Medicare? You’re worried about intrusion into your body and bedroom (and rightfully so) but you’re not worried about the bureaucrats who will decide that you’re not eligible for an angioplasty because you’re too old? Interesting. Beyond comprehension, but interesting.
Gas may just be $7+/ gallon under Obama, but under Romney/Ryan I see gas shortages after the Iranians shut off the Strait of Hormuz. Romney will surely be Israels dog. A vote for Romney/Ryan means a THIRD war, more spending and more tax cuts. I see US bankruptcy by the end of 2016 under Romney. We are facing the same fate as the USSR during the Reagan presidency. Our military spending is unsustainable.
Israel’s dog? Do you prefer letting Iran nuke Israel off the map as they themselves have said? obama seems ready to let it happen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgvMGLdc908
Your other arguments don’t hold water either. obama’s record of failure is undeniable but you refuse to see the facts. One needn’t look any further than Europe. It has collapsed. Just as collapse in Europe has happened, obama’s euro-style government will collapse the U.S. as well.
Well first, Iran is NOT going to wipe Israel off the map even with a nuclear arsenal which may be years away. There is this thing called “mutually assured destruction”. We didn’t fire on the USSR and they didn’t fire on us for obvious reasons. While I don’t like any country having a nuclear arsenal; I don’t blame Iran for wanting to acquire nukes to protect their nation and resources. Furthermore, it is time we stopped playing the world policeman. This idiocy with constant drone strikes within sovereign nations is only stoking the fires of anti-American sentiment.
To your second argument, our economy would likely be OK without the past decade of war and tax cuts. Our current level of military spending continues to expand. The “cuts” so often parroted by the right wing types are not actually cuts to existing spending but cuts to the GROWTH of spending (i.e.we are only giving you a 5% raise this year instead of 15%). We cannot afford to keep increasing spending on the military. When we talk about cuts, we should mean REAL cuts. Simply look what happened to the USSR. This is a better comparison than the current troubles in PARTS of Europe. Some of Europe (Germany, Scandanavian and former eastern bloc countries) are economically doing better than we are.The reforms needed in this country are not going to happen given the political stranglehold of the current two party system. This is why I am voting Libertarian.
Johnson 2012
The company I work for is headquartered in Germany. They a requiring every European employee to take 11 days off before the end of the year due to the collapse over there. Germany is not immune from the collapse & if they keep caving in to bailing out the rest of Europe, they’ll crash & burn, too. Unsustainable debt, socialism, labor unions – the same hallmarks of obama – have had a disasterous affect over there & those hallmarks will cause the same collapse here. That is one reason why I’m voting for Romney/Ryan. Of course, protecting the 1st & 2nd amendments, pro-American principles, an upbringing not connected to communism & private sector experience are some other reasons as well.
Yeah, you see what making a stand got for you in the Maine governor’s race… The guy that more people voted against won….
Those who voted for Nader literally handed the Presidency to Bush.
I’m voting for Johnson. Nowadays the Republicans are nothing more than the socially conservative branch of the Democratic party. Their economic policies have been nearly identical to those put forth by Democrats, protecting the corporations while refusing to make necessary spending cuts. They have strayed too far from their root ideology in an attempt to attract moderates and therefore have absolutely nothing for me.
Since when is a vote for conscience EVER a “wasted vote”? It’s called conviction. It’s about sending a message. It’s about taking a stand for what is right for this nation. If a candidate stands for what one believes in, leads a commendable life, has an untarnished and honorable reputation and leads by example, how could a vote for them be “wasted”? This overstated fear of wasting a vote is what has caused us to elect increasingly more mediocre , talentless, puppets of special interest and stooges for foreign governments.
no.. not in this election.. the downside is that Obama will get another 4 years to destroy your country… you decide what it’s worth
Well, if you cast a vote for a candidate that can’t win, and it helps the greater of two evils win, you’ve wasted your vote. I’ve I went with my convictions, I’d probably have to write myself into the ballot! Votes for Perot helped Clinton. Votes for Nader helped Bush. Simple, really.
Nader did NOT help Bush, that is just a myth, go back and look at all the other electoral votes.
Gore lost that one all on his own…
did not even win his own home state of TN..and strangely, did not fight the Florida theft very hard…
that was the boys protecting “The System,” I suspect.
ROMNEY / RYAN 2012 !!!!!
Forget it. They are not going to win. Unfortunately neither is Johnson, but I’d rather my vote go to someone who deserves it.
Johnson 2012!
““He has more charisma than most other Libertarian candidates, and
younger Paul supporters will find his stance on marijuana appealing,”
Melcher said.”
Why tie young voter’s possible appeal to a candidate’s opinions on marijuana?
i’m pretty sure that would still be on the low end of the totem pole.
You can’t easily get any if you can’t find a job out of college.
Dont waste your vote…
Gary Johnson’s ceiling in Maine is 15,000 votes or 2%; he won’t be a factor.
Johnson also holds appeal for a sizable segment of Maine voters who are more left-leaning than the Democratic candidate on the ballot.
I can assure you, a more left-leaning candidte is not being supported by the tea partiers. That does not make any sense at all.
in one of the most important election in the history of the United States of America.. a peeler is running with no chance of a win, but will or at least could be the one thing that loses the election for one party or the other… you pick it… if we had a good strong congress, which we don’t , if we has two candidates that were constitutionalists, which we don’t, or even two that were US citizens, which we don’t, then it wouldn’t matter ,, would it………………
I can’t be the only one banging my head against a wall when someone uses the “well if you vote for Johnson you’re giving your vote to such and such”. Every time I hear it I wonder what would happen if all the voters who listen and heed the argument actually voted for the candidate they like rather than the lesser of two evils…