Our 41st Dinner with the Smileys guest, former Maine governor and current candidate for Sen. Olympia Snowe’s Senate seat, Angus King, lives in Brunswick, Maine. At dinner, between answering Ford’s tough questions (“Why do people call Maine a liberal state when we always have Republican senators?”), King shared with us how much the Department of Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission’s decision to shut down Naval Air Station Brunswick has affected the community. In particular, King and his wife, Mary, spoke about feeling the loss of the positive cultural effect a military community brings to a region.

We military families usually focus on how our move-every-three-years lifestyle positively influences our own lives. We acquire new tastes and interests. Our eyes are opened to different socioeconomic problems and conditions. Our children are exposed to different ways of living and seeing the world. We are introduced to different politics and regional concerns — what’s politically critical in, say, San Diego, isn’t necessarily critical in Omaha.

Too often, however, military families neglect to appreciate how much of an asset we are to the communities in which we live. Our experiences abroad become part of our identity, creating new demands for culturally diverse foods and experiences wherever we go. (You haven’t seen a wide variety of ethnic food selections until you’ve been to a military commissary.) In schools, our military dependent children share stories from their travels throughout the country and world. And in regions where many parents work in the same fields of business — or even for the same company, factory or mill — military children bring new perspective about the working- and middle-class and what it means to be a family.

The flip-side to all of this, of course, is that military families don’t stay in one place long enough to really make a lasting difference.

Or so we think.

Angus King’s comments about what military families bring to a community came, coincidentally, on the heels of my decision to run for the school committee in Bangor. At first, I was hesitant about putting my name on the ballot. Bangor is a small town. Many people involved in the local government have been in the area their whole lives. I don’t know the complete history of the school department, and my kids have only been in the district for four years. What could I possibly have to offer besides my bachelor’s degree in elementary education? I’m just a military wife who moved here. Never a Mainer; always “from away.”

But King’s comments sparked in me a new way of thinking: I actually have quite a bit to offer because I’m a military wife. I have seen schools in California, Florida, Virginia and Alabama. I’ve witnessed good districts and bad districts. In college, I worked in an inner-city school; in Florida, my son’s school was rural. I’ve volunteered in countless classrooms and tutored at-risk students in Alabama.

In other words, I have a wide perspective.

And what I’ve always said, even before deciding to run for school committee, is that the difference between the good schools and the bad ones is people. Specifically teachers. I’ve seen state-of-the-art school buildings filled with lousy teachers. I’ve seen schools made up almost entirely of rundown portable buildings and filled with excellent teachers. My son went to a school with 14 — yes, 14 — kindergarten classrooms. Then he went to a school — in Bangor — with only two classrooms each for grades K-2.

In all of these cases — big, little, rich, poor, well-funded and not — the difference is teachers. They are a school’s best, most important resource. Teachers set the tone for the school. They bring culture, variety, perspective and influence. Schools — and parents — want to hang on to the good teachers. They’ll fight to keep them happy and well-funded. They’ll jockey to make sure their children are in that teacher’s class.

Because a good teacher, like a positive military influence, is an asset. A good teacher’s retirement is a devastating loss for the school district. It vibrates throughout the schools. Just as the King mourns the void that a military community once filled in Brunswick, the absence of a good teacher does not go unnoticed.

It all came together for me at our dinner with Angus and Mary. If elected, I’ll fight for excellent teachers, who, I believe, are as important to a school district as military families are to a community.

I hope other military spouses will get involved in their communities as well. For too long we’ve second-guessed our ability and our “right” to be involved in local politics. We’ve neglected all that we can give back and the chance to share our wealth of experiences and perspective.

As always, you can see pictures from our dinner with Angus King by going to www.Facebook.com/DinnerWithTheSmileys.

Maine author and columnist Sarah Smiley’s writing is syndicated weekly to publications across the country. She and her husband, Dustin, live with their three sons in Bangor. She may be reached at www.Facebook.com/Sarah.is.Smiley.

Join the Conversation

26 Comments

  1. This is simply the best yet – Angus King is a really wonderful person, I have admired him for years and hopefully if he gets elected to the Senate for Maine I KNOW he will do a good job. Look how he influenced your decision to run for School Board – this is how he is able to get things done!! Thank you again for another really good one and please give my regards to Mary, his wife, who will be a strong factor in his term!!!  

  2. I do hope that military veteran Charlie Summers gets to have dinner with the Smileys.  Angus King is no veteran, came from out of state, and left our  state with a billion dollar deficit when he left the governor’s position, including the ridiculous, taxpayer funded laptop computer scheme.

    Do hope veteran and District 15 candidate for the Maine House of Representatives, Major Sam Canders,  will also be invited.  He is a 747 pilot with 13 years of  service to our country and a member of the Air Guard.

  3. I’d love for this country, after 11 years of war, to move away from all of this military waste and concentrate on making things better at home.  Let’s drop our focus on the military for a few years. For all you folks who are going to respond to me with comments about fighting for freedom, etc. I would simply refer you to the pointless war that was Iraq.

    1. We don’t often agree, Bangorian, but on this I agree with you.  Not so much on the idea of eliminating military waste but rather on the idea that the mood in the US should not be as isolationist as it was just prior to Pearl Harbor but the idea that if we were more isolationist than we now are 9/11 might not have happened.  I think that the days of the US being a policeman to the world for the sole reason of ‘protecting our national interests’ should end.  Like Russia when the USSR broke up, we just can’t afford it anymore.

      1. We spend far less on the military than we do entitlement spending.  The military budget is being cut…entitlement spending keeps increasing.  

  4. *** How Angus King Ended Up In Maine ***

    How about how he doesn’t tell us his arrival in Maine allowed him to beat the draft?

    Both Angus King and Charlie Summers have stated they wish to get on the Armed Services Committee if elected.

    Summers served, King didn’t.

    Where is the part of King’s biography about how King took a legal aid job after law school in Virginia and with it got a near impossible occupational deferment so he wouldn’t be drafted like the less fortunate sons who were dying in Vietnam?

    Where does he discuss that the members of his family were Democrats in elected office in Alexandria, Va., a suburb of Washington,D.C.

    Where does he state that his uncle Jack (Jack Ticer) of Alexandria went to work at the Armed Service Committee during the Vietnam war? Where does he therefore tell us his connections may have pulled strings for him so he could avoid military service?

    This is very important as Mr. King wants to get on Armed Services, now that the coast is clear and he can go to war from his armchair.

    King was born March 31, 1944 and graduated from law school in Virginia in 1969. This was the middle of the Vietnam War and there was a selective service lottery. The lottery drawing held December 1, 1969,determined the order in which men, born from 1944 through 1950, were called to report for induction into the military. The highest lottery number called for this group was 195; all men assigned that lottery number or any lower number,and who were classified 1-A or 1-A-O (available for military service), were called to report for possible induction.

    Angus King’s birthday drew a low lottery number of 30.The lottery numbers pulled for each birthday on December 1,1969 can be seen by googling:

    RESULTS FROM LOTTERY DRAWING – Vietnam Era 1970

    Occupational deferments were NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE TO GET. But voila, Angus King got one by taking a job at Pinetree Legal Assistance in Maine where he primarily worked on divorce cases. After his commitment there ran out,he was over 26 and no longer eligible for the draft. He also never did that kind of work again.

    FACT: That’s how he beat the draft and that’s how he ended up in Maine. With his uncle so close to the powers that be in Washington,D.C. and then his uncle working on the Armed Services Committee, it is basic common sense that this be pursued by the Maine media. How did Angus King get a next to impossible to get deferment from military service? 

    Again, he wants to play general from the safety of an armchair. So this is most relevant.

    1. We are going to have to start calling you Patten_Re_Pete.  
      Stop cutting and pasting the same comment ad nauseam.  
      It’s boring and tiring.

  5. VOTE SMILEY FOR BANGOR SCHOOL COMMITTEE——-VOTE KING FOR US SENATE——————–VOTE SMILEY FOR BANGOR SCHOOL COMMITTEE——————–VOTE KING FOR US  SENATE———————–VOTE SMILEY FOR BANGOR SCHOOL COMMITTEE————————–VOTE KING FOR US SENATE

  6. King talking about military matters (he never served) is like the president’s supposed support of Israel. Lots of noise for political convenience, yet little substance or follow-through. Sarah should have dinner with candidates who are real veterans.

      1. It’s nice to see that you admit King is a Democrat. Too bad he chose not to compete for the Democratic nomination against Dill.

        1.  for the most part I don’t vote along party lines, so it wouldn’t matter me if he was running as a republican.  My point as you well know was the, it’s okay if I didn’t, but not okay if you didn’t.

  7. And do we think that the timing of Smileys’ 41st dinner guest just 4 weeks before the election was just coincidence?  I think not.

  8. Does anyone actually read her column. It’s always about her and her kids. I don’t care what your kids are doing. 

    1. Well then, don’t read her column.  I can’t imagine that anyone is forcing you to read it.  But from the rest of us, thank you for writing Sarah, we do enjoy reading about the family life.

  9. My question would be will the BDN allow the other school board candidates equal time and space to outline their qualifications for office.  Otherwise this is a BDN paid advertisement for Ms Smiley’s candidacy for the school board.  And, so much for fair and equal treatment of candidates for office.   

  10. What a sneaky underhanded way to get a free campaign  commercial. Is Sarah going to have Cynthia and Charlie over for dinner and do columns on them sometime before the election?

  11. Awkward!  The fact that you are running for a seat on the school committee should never have been included in your column.  Talk about campaigning!  The fact that you did, and failed at delivering a smooth message just leaves me thinking…..Awkward!

  12. Sarah, why do you seem to only invite people with prestige to your dinners? Why don’t you invite an inlisted military family for a change.  After all, aren’t you suppose to be representative of a military wife?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *