Gone are the days of the nameless, faceless “john.” Men who buy sex are now likely to end up with their faces splashed across the Internet or the morning newspaper.

A Maine tourist town shaken up by authorities’ promises to reveal the identities of dozens of clients of a fitness instructor accused of prostitution is just the latest place to enlist public shaming as a preventive measure.

Fresno, Calif., sponsors a website called “Operation Reveal” that features mug shots of suspected johns, while Oklahoma City has the vigilante-style “JohnTV.” In Arlington, Texas, a highway billboard declares “This could be you” under the picture of four suspects.

In Maine, the small-town scandal has literally put Kennebunk on the map — it’s now part of a database tracking more than 870 municipalities that have launched initiatives targeting men who hire prostitutes.

Interviews and surveys of officers at 200 police departments nationwide since 2008 found most consider targeting customers the best way to curb prostitution, because they fear publicity about the charges more than fines or even jail time. It continues a long-developing trend away from prosecuting the “supply” side — the prostitutes themselves — and targeting the demand.

“What they usually ask is, ‘Is my wife going to find out? Is my boss going to find out? Is my name going to be in the paper?”’ said Michael Shively, who conducted the study funded by the National Institute of Justice.

In the case that has embroiled Kennebunk, 29-year-old Alexis Wright is accused of operating a prostitution business out of her Zumba studio, secretly videotaping her encounters and keeping meticulous records of her clients.

Police plan to release more than 100 names little by little over the next several weeks. The warning has set off a flurry of rumors among residents who say they’ve heard the list might include lawyers, doctors, law enforcement officials and a television personality.

A lawyer for two men believed to be on the list asked a judge to prevent the release of the names. The judge declined, but the lawyer has appealed to the state’s top court, which won’t rule until at least Monday.

Law enforcers and other opponents of prostitution say that the practice endangers vulnerable girls who could fall prey to pimps, and that it breeds crime and drug use. While john-shaming is well known as a preventive tactic, it’s unclear how well it works.

“That’s the million-dollar question,” Shively said.

His three-year study found about 60 percent of police departments that arrest prostitution clients publicize their identity in some way, Shively said. An interactive U.S. map based on the study will be available next month that will allow users to click to see more about an area’s tactics.

Places including El Paso, Texas; Chicago; St. Paul, Minn.; and Chattanooga, Tenn., have been or are currently home to police- or community-sponsored shaming pages. In Baltimore, a community program has encouraged residents to attend court in prostitution cases to shame offenders and urged judges and prosecutors to follow through with charges and penalties.

Sometimes, police departments send so-called “Dear John” letters to the homes of owners of cars seen cruising for street walkers. Others require offenders to attend classes aimed at preventing recidivism by educating first-time offenders about the dangers of prostitution.

But the efforts face criticism, too.

The shaming techniques are particularly damaging because they publicly humiliate people prior to trial, for what remains a relatively minor offense, said Laurie Shanks, a professor at Albany Law School.

“The chance of a completely innocent person having their life destroyed was astronomical,” she said. “It was worse than the scarlet letter. At least the scarlet letter happened after the trial. It’s closer to branding, where you can’t take it off once the harm has been done.”

Collateral damage done to families by shaming is “a very legitimate concern,” Shively said.

“Imagine the 13-year-old girl who goes to school and her father’s name is in the paper,” he said.

In Kennebunk, the superintendent of schools has directed teachers and staff to be on the lookout for students who may be teased or have trouble coping because they have relatives on the list.

Eliot Spitzer resigned as governor of New York in 2008 after the father of three was accused of a rendezvous with a prostitute. He remains married and hosts a cable news show. Actor Hugh Grant emerged little worse for the wear after being arrested in the company of a prostitute in Los Angeles in 1995.

Historically, Shively said, police have arrested women and girls who provide sex for sale. But efforts to arrest customers can be traced to the 1960s and has gradually increased. In the intervening period, the percentage of women in sex arrests in the U.S. has fallen from 90 percent to 65 percent, Shively said.

In 1999, Sweden took the approach of decriminalizing the sale of sex but continuing to punish those who paid for it, prompting even more discussion about the best way to combat the sex trade.

A notable exception to targeting prostitution customers is in the federal system, where prosecutors say johns would have to cross state lines or take advantage of vulnerable victims such as children to justify the expense of a federal case.

Barbara McQuade, U.S. attorney in Detroit, said she does not believe her office prosecuted any of the 30,000 or so clients of a decade-long sex ring that made millions of dollars by dispatching prostitutes nationwide.

“We were looking for the organizers,” she said. “In the federal system, we exercise a lot of discretion because we have scarce resources. We can’t arrest and prosecute every john hiring a prostitute.”

The law enforcement community is starting to realize that the women in the sex trade are frequently victims of circumstances so cruel that their work is carried out under pressures more common in slavery, said Norma Ramos, executive director of the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women.

It’s all part of changing the public’s perception of prostitution, she said.

“The idea is to discourage men from the notion that they have the right to buy the bodies of lesser privileged women and children for sexual gratification,” Ramos said.

“We have to move away from the ‘Pretty Woman’ model and toward understanding that prostitution’s pretty ugly.”

Neumeister reported from New York. Associated Press writers Clarke Canfield and David Sharp in Portland, Maine, contributed to this report.

Join the Conversation

190 Comments

  1. Hypocrites and cheaters should not be effectively rewarded for seeking out prostitutes by shielding their identities.  We need to move forward as a society.

  2. Law enforcement had no qualms about revealing the names of the pimp and the hoe.

    What’s up with the delay in releasing the names of the other participants?

    The inevitable release of the names may answer this question.

    1. They released the pimp and ho’s names because they’d been criminally charged. Names aren’t public information until someone is charged.  A couple of the defendants who were john’s have filed a motion for an injunction to prevent their names from being released. Until that motion is finally resolved, police have to retain the information.

      1. It is my understanding that the KPD has been issuing summonses all week.
        Along with those summonses should be a police report that is public knowledge, same as the original inditement of the pimp and hoe (alleged).

        Someone or many someones are trying to use a get out of jail free card.

        I suspect it’s not really free though.

      2. They also list these Jon’s as victims because of the unlawful taping.  So it is just a loophole to jump through for the law, but my bet is that they will be released.

    2.  The scum that hired the prostitute may not be able to hide their faces, but the cops sure seem to be doing a good job of doing it for them by not releasing their names.

          1. So what does that make any woman that uses a man for money and uses her sexuality to get it?  This is just the way it is.

        1. If prostitution was legal would the johns be scum? Maybe it is time to legalize, tax and regulate prostitution.

          1. It really is a sticky issue even for an honest christian as myself. I mean a girl can go to a bar after work, meet a guy at happy hour she never met, go find a hotel and do the deed, then he can take her out for a $300 dinner, buy her a piece of jewelry and give her money for cab fare and no laws are broken. All legal.

            Or some young girl can date some fossil for his money alone, serve up her goodies till the old geezer dies, collect the life insurance policy then run off with her 22 year old high school sweetheart on the dead guys millions and no laws broken.

            There are many examples.

            It seems to me that the people that are involved in such trade are desperate adults. Although I wouldn’t support my daughter engaging in prostitution it seems like the only one that should really be judging anyone here is God. It seems man and woman have found many ways to get around the prostitution laws even though what many of them engage in borders the definition.

            Heck it is totally legal in Vegas and has been for a while.

          2. Sorry, I’m no expert. Solicitation for prostitution must be legal then in Vegas. I was there not long ago and I couldn’t walk 10 feet down the sidewalk without somebody, pimp, prostitute, paid solicitor or someone handing me their business card for sex with picture and phone #. Thanks though for clarification though. I am sure you know better then I.

          3. A friend of mine lived in LV for a number of years, and prostitution is not legal.  IIRC, it is somehow legal to hand you a card, but they can not say a word to you.  Did any of them actually talk to you; just out of curiosity? 

          4. Come to think of it I don’t think they did. I thought it must have been my old ugly looks or they didn’t like the fact I handed them a track with the 23rd Psalm on it. I don’t know. I kind of have always felt bad for the girl.

          5. Not the fault of anything or anyone.  The oldest profession has been around since the first man looked at the first woman’s legs and the woman caught that look and discovered she was in possession of something valuable.

            ALSO; many people here seem to assume the “pimps” are male.  In most places where prostitution is prevelant, most “solicitors” are female.

            The old stereotype of a black dude with”Tan shoes and pink shoelaces, a polka-dot vest and man-o-man a big Panama with a purple hat band.” is a obsolete memory from a distant past.  

      1. ok what about a  child that says this person raped me an there name gets put in the paper . Now come to find out that child made it up because the child could not get there way . For the rest of that person life they will always be know a the person that rapes that child even tho that person never did it .

          1. Rare but it dose happen an remember this is america YOU ARE INOSENT untill proven guilty in a court law so no names should be printed in the papers

          2. Hey wolly, I’m with you on this post trust me, but before you call someone’s post stupid, you better get spellcheck.  doSE should be doES; an should be anD, america should be America, INOSENT should be INNOCENT, untilL should be untiL, oh what’s the use.  Just sayin’ that maybe you should not use replies with words like stupid or dumb.

          3.  wollydevil,Im sorry that you got offended.I thought you were quoting an old movie line that I liked and remembered from ,the 80’s I think. Sorry ..

        1. Ah,but think of all of the child molesters that have gotten away with it.Id bet that the amount of those caught and convicted isnt even one tenth of the true amount.

    3.  as George Carlin always said:

      Selling is legal.
      F’ing is legal.

      Why isn’t selling f’ing legal!?

  3. Any man that loved his wife wouldn’t harm her by seeking sex outside of the marriage.  Any man with a brain would avoid seeking sex from a potentially STD ridden prostitute.  These “Johns” deserve to be exposed first to their wives, second to the public, and third to a really nasty STD.  Think they’ll learn their lesson then?  

    1.  any woman that loves her husband should provide him what he needs so he doesn’t have to seek outside sources. there’s a reason these guys went somewhere else to get what they need.

      1. If they aren’t satisfied in the relationship, they either need to try to fix it or end it, cheating is never the correct choice. It is neither the man or the woman’s sole responsibility to ensure the other ‘provided for.’ Relationships are a two-way street.

        1. Well we don’t all have the right answers for a relationship …..relationships are not easy it’s work ….when you have been with someone for a long time it’s hard to leave that person .. We are only human …..I think it’s wrong to cheat but if some one choices to do so they should not have there life ruined ….it’s because of this way of thinking we are in the situation we are in the united states ……WE NEED A REVISED CONSTITUITION ..we put to death more people then any where in the world and have the most incarserated people ..so that has got to tel you something America isn’t as cool as we think .. We are all sheep bahhhh bahhh it’s horrible ..people who get drunk beat there wife and kids and drive home drunk say pot should be illegal ..cops bust a marijuana grow operation then go have beer to celebrate ….we are so backwards ..we are now the backwards Canadians and the Chinese home run

      2. well these men usually are getting what they “need” at home but choose to go seek outside sources for their entertainment as well, maybe if they spent as much time on giving their wives what they “need” then they would have a better marriage.

        1. I dont know,but Im thinking that most women would not be into the heavy duty bondage and water sports involved in prostitution.But keep trying,there has got to be a way to absolve the men and blame the wives…mmmm
           

      3. I agree that there is a reason these guys hire prostitutes.  Such men clearly haven’t experienced love (perhaps because they have been judged as unworthy of loving?) and know nothing of commitment.  They seek sex for hire because they are lonely empty pigs. 

        1. Or, they subscribe to the prolific school of thought that says “if it makes you happy, do it”.  It’s an increasingly selfish world where items, people, and relationships are disposable.  After all, what’s the value of self control and doing the right thing when 5 minutes of “happiness” and gratification are at stake?

      4. That’s not true……and if you’re a man….you know it’s not true of a certain percntage of men. Too many men are thrilled by the excitement of a different and unfamiliar woman. It’s not that their wife is depriving them.  It’s like going to get your hair done….the cost is worth it, the stylists treats us like a queen, they aim to please and the conversation is “fun and pleasurable.” We keep making appointments for the next time.(Of course, getting our hair done is legal)
        If a man is thoughtless and negligent towards his wife, it interferes with how wonderful she thinks he is and makes it so he isn’t appealing enough for her to separate their sex life from how inconsiderate he is in their daily life. A prostitute doesn’t care how much of a jerk her Johns are. She just wnats him to pay the fee and she will treat him like he is the greatest thing since sliced bread. A certain percentage of married men get addicted to the adulation and the no strings attached set-up…..and they are willing to pay whatever the asking price is.

      5. Are you actually implying that if a married man cheats its his wife’s fault?  I agree both sides contribute to a bad situation most times, but man up and take responsibility.  If you cheat, its your choice and your fault. Not you personally, well maybe you, I don’t know you, but you catch my drift. 

      6. Boy, do you have the wrong name, Mr. Logical Thinking Guy!  Nothing logical about your your back-woods statement.  You’re making weak excuses for these men and you’re making yourself sound pathetic in the process.

      7. Well,of course its all the wifes fault.I mean,hey its their responsibility,right?..Um,seriously dude?

  4. These ladies of noon and night do a great business with local town officials, lawyers, and even members of the police department.  I suppose these guys are rarely home to please their wives so they resort to buying sex at their leisure.  Normally they get away with it, but this lady of the night was smart in IDing her clients for the sake of the poor unsuspecting wives who have cheating husbands.  Good for her!

  5. They should have thought about humiliating the family before they thought about a ZUMBA class! Bring on the list!

  6. Ahh, it is as they say the oldest profession. And, yes it is very repulsive to many people. It  is truly sad however, that in today’s economy otherwise good women have to resort to either selling drugs or themselves to even survive. I am as curious as the next person to know the names of those in a given comunity who pay for illicite sex. However, I’m really doubtful it’s going to change anything. I suspect the oldest profession is going to find ways to survive.  While our tax dollars are used to pay for assets with which to curb professional sex between two consenting adults, I’m thinking maybe they would be better spent apprehending drug-bent Rite-Aid robbers, rapists and drunk drivers. Perhaps I’m wrong.

    1. This was not a “good woman.”  She was collecting welfare benefits while she was filming her johns for the purpose of blackmail.

  7. They’re planning a 100% conviction rate of going for 150, out of 150. All Guilty. At least on paper. But how is the court system going to handle 150 pleas. Where does the law provide for any degree of innocence when “the list” of inquisition is published in newspapers prior to any trial, hearing, or, plea bargaining? So many are charged with the exact same count based upon a frequent list of names. Moreover, what are the fines going to be for those that are found guilty over the course of the entire investigation? A single fine of $200, is for the first offense.  Does law enforcement not have the obligation to arrest and stop criminal activity as soon as it is discovered?

      1. of course, i did not have sexual relations with that lady!  to quote a well know democrat president :)

  8. I might be the only one, but i don’t see the harm.  These are two consenting adults.  Who cares if she/he gets paid?  I think the police should spend more time fighting drugs, child abusers, murder, etc.  Again, these are two consenting adults!!!

    1.  exactly!!! how is it any different then buying a women dinner and a movie and then screwing her. same thing except one is legal the other is not. also one the movie gos to a third party and the other the women just gets straight up cash.

      1.  or picking a woman up in a bar, or looking on Craigslist for one night stands?   People in this country are too obsessed with what people are doing in their bedrooms….

        1.  Dear BDN and Disqus
                         how about sending a bleeping email letting us know when our comment has been flagged so we can either edit it or leave it. Just freaking common courtesy. God this company (disqus)s^(k$. And how you tell us who did the flagging so we can repay the favor.

      1. it’s a stupid law though….why should the state have control of what someone does with their body?  If they want to do it, and they are an adult, why not?

        1. control of body by the State…….it is now the responisbility of the government to protect us from ourselves. Don’t you listen to the news?

      2. Its against the law to speed to but nothing is done about it . its against the law to not stop  at stop signs  an nothing is done about it .

    2. I would love to see the prostitution charges be acquitted through jury nullification. For the woman and her clients. Jurors have the right to throw out any case if the jury finds the law unjust. It is not only the right of the jury, it is their responsibility, if they find any law ridiculous or unjust, to throw it out.

  9. Legalize it, tax it, require monthly med checkups. Take the criminals out of the picture. Hey, She’s not on welfare, she’s just pulling herself up by her bootstraps. Any good Republican should be proud.

    1. Actually, she WAS collecting welfare too.  Check the back stories.  I also encourage you to lead the way toward legalization of prostitution, the laws are made by we the people, you know.

      1. Actually, I’m a Christian, not a wife but in a relationship, and I vote (R) but lean more libertarian and I think if abortion is legal why isn’t prostitution?  If we’re really talking about the right to control a woman’s body, doesn’t that seem like a less extreme example of choice?  You’d need rules like med checks and things that hookers would need for safety, but why not.  People will cheat.  Women have sugar daddies, lets just call it all what it is and face it. I think it’s wrong, but there are a lot of things I think are wrong that shouldn’t be illegal.  But…we still look to gov’t to protect us from people being naughty.

    2. Monthly “med checkups”? Do you mean, monthly checkups to see if the prostitute has contracted and is passing on to her clientele, AIDS, syphillis, gonnorrhea, and the like?

      She could get a clean bill of health, return to her workplace, have unprotected sex, and pass something vile onto her second client of the day–and to every one of God knows how many until the next blood test one month later.

      1. Why do you assume that a prostitute would have unprotected sex? Do you assume that because she is a prostitute she is not smart enough to understand how STD’s are contracted? In my business, if you want to have a long career, you wear your PPE (personal protective equipment, ie. hardhat steel toe boots, safety glasses, etc.). I would think that a prostitute would be admant about her clients wearing PPE as well.

        1. You are assuming that all prostitutes are in the business after making a rational career choice, complete with risk-benefits analysis, and that all prostitutes have IQs that are at least average, perhaps high average or better. Also, that none of them have brains addled by drug addiction. That is not the case.

          Here’s one article to consider–“Imagine we pass laws making it legal to run a brothel and that, in order to keep a license, condom use is enforced and workers need to be regularly tested for STI’s. Presumably, this gets the workers off the streets and makes the selling of sex safer for everyone, including the spouses and partners of the clients. So far that sounds like it achieves some of society’s objectives, right?

          “Let me ask you this: what happens to the sex trade worker who can’t find a place in a brothel? Specifically, what about the worker who can’t work in a brothel because she has an STI? In this regulated utopia, do these would-be sex-trade workers shrug their shoulders and apply for a job at Tim Hortons instead? Of course not. These workers are still out on the street, as are the minors and other workers who don’t want to pay taxes.

          “And what happens to the client who doesn’t want to buy sex with a condom? Well those guys are not in the brothel either. They are out on the streets buying services from the most risky sellers, those who because of the regulations can’t work in a brothel. Add to this the fact that regulations drive up brothel prices. So now, the street sector is comparatively cheaper, and many men are buying there regardless. This isn’t just speculation on my part. Evidence from countries with a regulated brothel sector shows that more enforcement of licensing and STI testing actually increases the number of sex trade workers on the streets. In addition, it increases STI rates and makes working in the sex trades more dangerous, not less.” http://bigthink.com/dollars-and-sex/prostitution-paradox-regulating-brothels-can-spread-disease

          Also, for reasons of their own, some men pay a premium to have unprotected sex. A desperate woman might have no choice but to do this.

          1. You make some very good points. I think we can agree that the women in this case and in the Craigslist case in Brewer a few years back were all well educated women who choose to be prostitutes. All moral and societal anguish aside, my point is that they were not forced into prostitution by some nefarious 3rd party. I guess I look at it like prohibition or legalizing marijuana. There once was a huge illegal trade in bootleg alcohol, that resulted in gangland murders nationwide, and the rise of organized crime. Plent of people still make moonshine, but their is not much market for it now, certainly not enough to kill someone over. I think we all agree that marijuana is headed down the same path toward legalization.
            As far as the people who would seek a prostitute on the street, even if their are legal brothels, I would posit that they are going to seek out prostitutes regardless of how we try and “crack down” on the “crime”. Just look at where the “war on drugs” has got us, jails overflowing with drug users that did nothing to society but hurt themselves using drugs.

  10. You may rest assured that huge amounts of cash as well as commitments to future benefit are being tendered to prosecutors, judges, and other officials to keep names on this list from becoming public.

  11. These videos and the list could and most likely lead to extortion of the clients. That is why the names need to be released.. If someone has this type of dirt on a Police Chief and wants to start a drug dealing ring. The Chief of Police will have his hands tied and have to allow the drug trade in his area or face losing his jobs for buying sex.. That is why they whole list needs to be exposed to prevent politicans or judges from being extorted.. If the elite are on the list then their integrity is already compromised thus needing exposer.  This needs to be exposed for the protection of Maine people from extortion

  12. A Maine tourist town shaken up by authorities’ promises to reveal the identities of dozens of clients ..

    I think I could find something a little worse to worry about…

  13. remember, you can buy them drinks, or flowers, or diamonds to get what you need, you just can’t give them cash money , because then it’s illegal. 

  14. so i have decided I’m gonna set up a prostitution ring but I’m gonna do it legal.  1. first “date” no sex just talk and share info. 2.Second and subsequent dates….buy a gift of agreed upon value and present to hooker with receipt. 3. have sex. now she is your mistress and not a hooker. problem solved. No different than a regular mistress. and if she is a “mistress” to more than one man that is her business.

  15. So let me get this straight! There is a move to let Gay people get married! But we are going after hookers and johns?  Whats wrong with this picture??

    1. Are you serious?What is wrong with this picture is that you think you have a valid point when clearly you dont.  Prostitution is illegal! Look up the law. There is no law stating that when two people love each other what they do behind closed doors is none of anyones business. If two people want to get married because they love each other then so be it. 

    2. Yeah really. Hey,we better be careful,or the next thing you’ll know,they will be letting women vote and colored folk sit at OUR tables at restaurants!!!!

    3.  Maybe you should worry about whats going on in your bedroom (likely nothing) and worry less about what everyone else does behind closed doors.

  16. Release the names and stop the speculation. At this point, people who have no involvement at all are starting to look suspicious. Clean out the festering wound and expose it to daylight, the sooner the better.

    1.  People whose names are in the paper for committing crimes are those who have been CHARGED!    There is a difference. 

  17. So they dont hide the names of drug dealers,OUI,speeders,sex offenders or any business owners who committ crimes. No one really thinks they can pay for sex and some how no one will ever find out,drug dealers never thought they get caught. I say print the names and let the chips fall where they may,like my grandmother use to say  “lay down with dogs and you’ll get flees” sorry for all you fools who think your money can buy sex and power shame on you,not your familys,they had no idea you all were such dogs  

    1.  Exactly. How embarrassing do you think it’ll be to find out that everyone in town knew but you? Get it over with.

  18. I don’t see prostitution as something I’d be interested in and there are some serious consequences in some cases but so what. Everything has a consequence. Just legalize it and regulate it like Nevada does. As I’ve heard, if someone is going to engage in prostitution Nevada is the place to do it. Not only because it’s legal but because it is most safe as all “participants” are to be tested. Sex sells, why not tax for it? I do believe there needs to be some form of punishment as Wright ripped off the tax payers/DHHS. THAT should not be taken lightly.

    1. It’s time for the names to be released and show that afluent people cannot buy their way out of this one. All crimes should be publicized and their perpetrators regardless of position or status.  

    2. Just curious where you’d like your home town’s legal brothel to be located. Is there zoning? If not, it could be across the street from your house (handy in some ways, I suppose, but perhaps not a great idea if you have kids). It could be next door to any store on Main Street. You can’t be positive that a *legal* brothel owner would be discreet.

      1. Across the street is fine. I do believe it is a residential zone but no one has kids around this part of town, and it’s just trees there now. Wouldn’t hurt my feelings.

  19. If cities and towns in Nevada can legalize the operation of a brothel, and not prosecute the patrons, why is there no moral outcry there? People refer to homosexual encounters with general indifference now…it’s “…what goes on between two people in privacy.” Why should men be demonized in the press because they succombed to the marketing of a willing partner, with the exchange of cash for pleasure? Further, it would appear the Kennebunk Men were themselves victims of the brothel management since their names were secretly determined and secret filming was facilitated? Personally, I am beginning to think the brothel encounters were soon going to become a source of much more income for the owners…yes, in the form of blackmail. So these men are possible victims rather than offenders. Adding a list of men’s names to the front page of a newspaper not only destroys lives…but sells newspapers.

      1. You don’t understand. In fact, newspapers are often compared to prostitutes. Sensationalism sells, you know.

  20. How many idiots gave their real names anyway?   Good luck matching all the faces from out of state because nobody cares.  Put the whole list out there if that is the case.

    If my name comes up it’s because of my yearly Zumba membership fee of $439.   I knew I should have went with the premium membership. Damn!

  21. Until all those smiling faces are on the front page it all just a lot of malarkey — seeing is believing…  LOL

  22. There is an old saying, from long long ago…”You Play”, “You Pay”.  If you arent willing to take responsibility for your actions, then best not be doing those actions.  This should go for everyone, criminals, doctors, lawyers, politicians and the average worker.  It should not be sexist.  Women also hire escorts.  Until this country makes Prostitution legal, which only Nevada allows, then I say put their face and mugshot up there like all the rest of the criminals.

  23. “The list might include lawyers, doctors, law enforcement officials and a television personality” yes, men are men and they should all be treated equally and should pay the price for their indiscretions. Who cares what their title is..they CHOSE to make a bad decision led by a very small brain…shame on you all.  :/

    1. Small brain and small you know what. Thats why they need a hooker:)and little did they know their wife is out with a gig0lo.:(    

      Sorry Jean ……I  am tired .   I do not support prostitution.

      1. So….did you think Bill Clinton was a great President? Do you think his party enjoys his campaign endorsements? He was worse than a patron of a brothel, and he skated. Does that bother you?

        1. Hold on, you must not have done any research on the venom brothers as they were known, at Yale. Yes, I am speaking of the Bush Brothers. Yes, Bill Clinton left us with a big surplus and we watched it wash away with Bush. No doubt one of if not the dumbest presidents we have ever had. Just another wealthy guy who bought the white house. Hope it doesn’t happen again and I’m an independent and always vote for the person, not the stupid party stuff.

        2. I think you misunderstood me. Of course it bothers me. As I stated earlier its about time the names are published. Aside from all this……yes he was a great president.

    2. What a sexist statement.  Both by you and this article.  What about the WOMEN who are whoring themselves around.  You make it sound like this is only a men’s issue.  It is NOT.  Women are making the exact same bad choices.  It’s just not as politically correct to hold them as accountable.  

    3.  Those on the “list” have NOT been charged with any crime.  Therefore, there is no reason to publish their names, except to satisfy so many people with prurient interest!  Subscribe to The Globe …

  24. “The list might include lawyers, doctors, law enforcement officials and a television personality” yes, men are men and they should all be treated equally and should pay the price for their indiscretions. Who cares what their title is..they CHOSE to make a bad decision led by a very small brain…shame on you all.  :/

  25. This is a case when you find out if people are as righteous as they profess to be, don’t be disappointed, this sort of thing has been going on forever, why do you think they call this the oldest trade? Who we want to be and who we are is apparently in a permanent state of flux, for all of societies effort, tradition and ritual, history keeps repeating it’s self?  GO figure?

  26. It’s life we’re concerned about Sicko.  That of a child forced into prostitution.  Means nothing to you, right ?

    1. we are not talking about a child here.  These are ADULTS!!  If it was a child, i would say give them the death penalty, but it’s not.

    2. in most country s where it is legal there is LESS child molestation and child prostitution than here in the us. I whole heartily disagree with anything to do with child molestation and child prostitution. this has nothing to do with children. This is about 2 consenting adults. who cares where the money goes?

      1.  I’ll accept the term “most country s (sic) because I’ve been to Thailand where child prostitution is rampant to the point of being a tourist attraction (I wasn’t a tourist).  And I suspect that there were more than two consenting adults involved in the current Portland issue.  We’ll know soon.  The problem with prostitution is that it a prime example of uncontrolled capitalism.  And you know what happens with that – we’re living through it right now.  More than a few participants push limits to the extreme.   And here those limits are those of general public morality.     

  27. i dont like cheating husbands and boyfriends but think how it will disrupt families and creat potentially domestic situations . you know prostitution goes even online to wesites like imvu. this is actual prostitution that goes online . the prostitutes gets either gifted by the john or gets paid credits for sex. they should go after the online prostitutes. the have online stripclubs . they release names they will destroy families and create a possible domestic stuation 

    1. They distroyed their own families, They BROKE THE LAW. If they got caught speeding it would be OK to put their names in the paper wouldn’t it.. I am pretty sure if I were a john my name would be out there already. class warfare.

  28. This is seriously laughable. I think we have bigger problems as a society than wether or not someone wants to pay or be paid for sex. Try putting a little energy and money towards fixing a some of the real issues and not legislating morality. So far I haven’t seen any country where it is legal crumble to the ground BUT I am willing to bet  that the employment taxes generated by making it a legal profession not to mention the controls that could be put in place to address the”danger” points might be amore reasonable solution.

    1. Today were are talking about this issue.. This is part of the problem with society, the well to do can write laws to benifit themselves while the middleclass and the poor have to abide by the laws submitted by the upper class sex buyers.. you are treated differently because the people you are trying to protect are s–ewing you. 

  29. So all of you pro prostitution posters out there are voting Yes on Question 1 right? It seems that if you want to be progressive and legalize paid sex you would support same sex couples living a dignified life together.

  30. “Police plan to release more than 100 names little by little over the next several weeks.”
    .
    A tactic designed to maximize the bribes Police can collect for keeping a select few of the names secret.  Law enforcement has taken a prostitution ring and used it to start their own extortion business.

    1. absolutely a huge waste of $ and it is extortion. I see no value in their progressing with these charges. Its a waste of time and money. 

  31. Not sure which is more pathetic, the “men” who have to pay women for sex, or everyone who is salivating over the release of their names for public consumption and snickering.

    1. I’m salivating for the names.. Just for once I would like to see the elite take a hit.. expose them for them for who the really are. Pillars of Society my eye

  32. The Box Top’s had it right when they sang:
    Sweet cream ladies, forward march; 
    The world owes you a living 
    Sweet cream ladies, do your part, 
    Think of what you’re giving 
    To the lost and lonely people of the night 
    Out of need, they seek direction for their life 
    They will love you in the darkness, Take advantage of your starkness, And refuse to recognize you in the light 

    Well, the worm has turned, This madam
    is going to recognize these John’s 
    unless the Judge was a client also.

     

  33. Until we make it legal, it is illegal and everyone who breaks the law, deserves the same public notice.
    We do it with drunk driving, pot smoking etc. If someone does not like it, work the system to change the laws. Of course, considering you can get someone to sponsor the bill and actually do something for the people instead of themselves. If everyone hasn’t noticed, all these so called politicians are out for themselves and hardly represent, The People, anymore. We really need to limit terms, benefits and careers and opt for a draft of merit. This is 2012 not 1712 and things have changed,

  34. These are consulting adults. It should be legal. It is legal in Nevada and regulated. The same should occur in Maine. I think the police should focus on hate crimes, and crimes that do damage to people.
    This is a big waste of taxpayers assets.

  35. Does this affect you?  Then who really cares?  I could care less who is on that list, and anyone who does is nothing but a gossip hound anyway.

  36. if you live with and support your significant other,are not married and he or she does not work does that make he or she a prostitute and you a john? just tryin to get the big picture……………oh to live in these enlightened times pondering such world altering events

  37. Since she videotaped everything and kept records she must have been planning to pay taxes on it someday.  Collect the taxes and move on.

  38. I had to laugh at the story title. The Johns are hiding pretty well so far, aren’t they? And with each passing day of the coverup the odds get larger that not all of the names on “the list” will be made public. One has to wonder what’s happening behind the scenes….

  39. “…  residents … say they’’ve heard the list might include lawyers, doctors, law enforcement officials and a television personality.”

    Who else could afford to pay those prices?

    The humble Farmer

    P. S. I think that adding the television personality might be going a bit too far.

  40. “Collateral damage done to families by shaming is ‘a very legitimate concern,’ Shively said.
    “’Imagine the 13-year-old girl who goes to school and her father’s name is in the paper,’ he said.”

    Yeah. This is something that should be considered. Over 60 years later I can remember very clearly the exact words someone at school said about my father. 

    Every day we read of some kid who was pushed over the edge. There will be repercussions.

    The humble Farmer

  41. Now why are people still participating in prostitution when theres been a very public nation-wide crackdown? Lets move on and identify and attempt to help the underlying social problems that fuel prostitution. What are some of the root causes? Drugs? Addiction? Unemployment? Homelessness? Inability to secure a healthy relationship? Problems in your current relationship? Shame regarding taboo sexual practices? Power? Some of these ideas are geared to either the prostitute or john specifically as may be obvious. Its interesting to note that some of the potential causes for someone becoming a prostitute are also listed as consequences for prostitution…. addicition etc.

    I’m concerned about this case. It has the usual suspects. To me they seem more like caricatures or actors in a play. The prostitute, the pimp and a group of johns. She appears somewhat ethnic (stereotype) or she tans a lot and he’s an older businessman. In this case he’s an older white guy so that brings up all sorts of racial exploitation and slavery imagery. Is she down on her luck? Young and naive? A drug addict? Is she from another country and he’s stolen her passport? Has she been groomed in any way? Given her age of 29 and how she has presented herself in the media I don’t think shes young or an obvious addict. By that I mean a stereotypical idea of an addict. Her skin did look a bit rough under her makeup, but that could be nerves. At 29 I would think that she would have to have been involved in this for over a decade to fit the bill. The pimp in this case who has been acting as an insurance agent, erotic photographer (his water marks on her massage site), private investigator and oh yeah.. pimp has even been a star in one of the films.. if I recall correctly from a prior news story.  The speculated johns are cops, lawyers, doctors and media. What no Kennebunkport millionare types? Is this strictly middle class crime?

    This case seems to be more about shaking up things in the Kennebunk area. Is this a political move? Is it about real estate? Is it about redistribution of wealth? Even though it has all the usual suspects it seems like an unusual case.

  42. I feel sorry for the children who will be affected by this scandal.
    I am not sure if the shame list will serve as a deterrent but  being stoned  to death surely did.

    If other crimes (for example stealing) are made public then this needs to be public knowledge. Fair is fair.

    Who knows……. maybe a govenor,  perhaps a physician, or just your average blue collar worker will be on the list. Oh well a crime is a crime.

  43. Posting a COMPLETE list of names may save someone’s wife from contracting an unwanted invader in her body. Women have a right to know of that possibility. I fear some of the well-connected men will dodge a big bullet here which the women in their thoughtless lives will have to bare.

  44. There’s been an economic theory floating around since the begining of time, “supply & demand” Why is the world’s “oldest profession” still illeagl?    

  45. In this case the “prostitute” was not taken advantage of. She was paid, kept film (probably to sell on the internet or for some sort of ‘Insurance”? and she kept notes of transactions. It was apparently “business”.  No one was taken advantage of as  some suggest the act of prostitution is.  No one was forced to have sex. This is very different from the desperate drug addicted prostitute or the foreign born woman forced into prostitution.
     
    What came out of this all? The State makes a few bucks in fines, the taxpayers pay to house the Madame in prison/jail for a few months, the cops can claim they made the City a safer place, the lawyers get a few dollars. In these bleak economic times it is nice to see something contribute to the economy.  
     
    The men have to live with the choice they made. It is up to someone other then us to judge them. It isn’t up Society to humiliate them. Likely many lives will be disrupted from all of this as a result of the “offender’ names being dragged across the media outlets.  This issue should be handled privately between the men,  families and the court. It is not an issue of National Security or a threat to Society.  Not one person in this State needs to know the names and faces of the offenders.  

      1. I hope you aren’t suggesting that somehow Ms. Wright is some sort of victim. She likly needed the cash because of all the Big  Bad Corportions oppress the poor. Maybe it was Bain….if she had held out a little longer Obama Care would have paid her medical bills and she would not have needed to sell her sexuality….the poor woman. No, wait…I think Angus King somehow profited from her. Maybe she was paying his campaign because she actually has another business in wind power. She needed to “pimp” to pay for the candidate the supports wind power!

  46. After reading the many comments on this issue, I did not see much of anything that addressed the fallout.  Releasing names will surely bring much harm to families, parents, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, but most of all to children.  There will no doubt be divorces, separations, broken relationships, and most of all innocent children’s trust destroyed maybe for life.   Is this worth the destruction to have names become public?  “Comunnityeffort needed” has the right idea in my view. 

    1. As sad as it will be for parents to see their sons , wives to see their husbands, and kids to see their fathers (hopefully children don’t see) I know as a wife that if my spouse was seeking sex from a prostitute I would want to know. And there probably would be a divorce. I think it is worth the destruction to have the names become public. What they did was wrong and why should they be protected?

  47. Why should the names of the Johns be hidden from the public?  Prostitution is a crime, thus both the provider & user’s names should be made public.  It’s not much different than the police releasing the names of a drug dealer & his clients when caught.  Why should Johns be any different? 

  48. What we have here is class warfare, where elitism is being treated differently then the middle class or the poor.

    1. How do you reach that conclusion? This isnt the “haves” vs the “have nots”. Looks to me they all did business in the same place, and probably paid about the same price. Also, there is always press flexibility in reporting. Everyone who clamors for the names of these men would probably be peeking in the windows, too.

      1. Yeah, there’s that angle of “Methinks thou protest too much…”  or in this case WAAAY too much.  And the old saying:  “Those who yell the loudest usually have the most to hide.’  LOL   Almost like the Salem Witch trials…

  49. these “poor Johns” should think about the shame they are bringing onto their partners and children BEFORE they pay for sex. List the names like they do in the court news of anyone else committing a “minor offense.”

  50. We might as well paint a giant letter “A” across all of their chests and outcast them from the towns then.
     People are so caught up in drama that they don’t care who is going to be effected when these names come out. I’m sorry, but I sure do not care either way – it should be up to the men that went there to tell their significant others what they had done, it’s not up to the public to humiliate them and outcast them because of sexual relations with a prostitute. We are in the 21st century and why is it that everyone is so shocked by this???

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *