Memphis police detectives with the Organized Crime Unit vice team worked into the early morning hours on Thursday, posing as “johns” in a sting that netted at least 17 women arrested and charged with committing prostitution near a church or a school.

Hours later, real “johns,” men charged with patronizing prostitution, attended a $75 “At Risk Behavior Class” at the Criminal Justice Center in Downtown Memphis.
Completing the four-hour class — with speakers from the Health Department, Memphis Police Department, University of Memphis and the Ryan White Program on HIV/AIDS — and paying court costs usually will allow the men to have the charge dismissed, said Patrick Stegall, a Memphis attorney.
The slow release of the identities of alleged “johns” in a sensational prostitution investigation in Maine last week has raised the issue of whether publicly spotlighting the customers of prostitution can help combat the crime. In the Kennebunk, Maine, case, police have accused a dance instructor with running a prostitution business at her Zumba dance studio.
A study released in April, ” A National Overview of Prostitution and Sex Trafficking Demand Reduction Efforts,” found that more than 800 cities and counties nationwide address the demand side of prostitution — rather than the supply side fueled by prostitutes and pimps — by targeting sex customers.
“Shaming” arrested johns by publicizing their identities through the media, police websites, billboards and other means is one of a dozen tactics that the report found and is chronicling on a website, DemandForum.net.
For a few months in 2002, the Shelby County District Attorney General’s Office partnered with WMC-TV Channel 5 to broadcast identities of people convicted of prostitution and patronizing prostitution as part of an anti-crime marketing campaign. The joint venture ended when the money ran out, said Shelby County Dist. Atty. Amy Weirich.
“On a general principle, it certainly can’t hurt anything,” she said. “It’s public record when somebody is arrested.”
For a five-year period dating back from Wednesday, patronizing prostitution charges made up about one in four of all Memphis police prostitution-related charges, according to department statistics. Prostitutes faced charges in three out of four arrests.
The Memphis department does not spotlight patronizing prostitution arrests.
“We do not publicize ‘johns’ names, although they are public record if someone would like to obtain the information,” Sgt. Karen Rudolph, a spokeswoman for the department, said by email.
The Shelby County Sheriff’s Office in September highlighted about 90 men wanted for patronizing prostitution, dating back to 2007, on its Facebook page, facebook.com/ShelbyTNSheriff, according to Det. Mickey Keaton.
But the media, including The Commercial Appeal, don’t routinely identify johns.
“The newspaper certainly doesn’t condone prostitution,” said Chris Peck, Commercial Appeal editor.
“We also don’t condone illegal drug consumption, drunken outbursts at bars, road rage, or being a bad neighbor. But we simply don’t have the space or manpower to cover every bad decision or bad act in our community. We have to pick and choose. And that’s the bottom line, honestly, of why we don’t routinely publicize arrests and convictions for men who patronize prostitutes.
“At the same time, if a particularly newsworthy event occurs that involves a prostitute and a john, we can and will cover the event,” he said. “And, we know that those arrested for patronizing prostitutes do have their names and often their photos listed on law enforcement websites, so we can, and do, routinely check those records to make sure we are aware of those who are engaged in this activity.”
Deborah Clubb, executive director of the Memphis Area Women’s Council and a former reporter for The Commercial Appeal, said that the marketplace for prostitution would not be there if men weren’t out there buying it.
As long as those who are innocent of the charge are protected, Clubb said she favors a multilayered approach, including publicity for johns to attack the prostitution.
“I would love to do anything more than we’re doing now to get at the marketplace,” she said.
Prostitution-related arrests
For the five years stretching back from Wednesday to Oct. 17, 2007, Memphis police made about 5,760 prostitution-related arrests, an average of 1,150 a year, according to statistics provided by the department. Of that five-year total:

  • About 45 percent were charged with prostitution, a Class B misdemeanor that could bring up to six months behind bars.
  • Nearly 30 percent were charged with prostitution within 100 feet of a church or within 1 1/2 miles of a school, a Class A misdemeanor that could bring up to 11 months and 29 days. The penalty near schools includes a mandatory minimum seven days in jail and a $1,000 fine.
  • About 24 percent were charged with patronizing prostitution, a Class B misdemeanor.
  • About two-tenths of 1 percent, a total of about 10 charges, were for patronizing prostitution near a church or school, the Class A misdemeanor with the mandatory minimums.
  • About 1.5 percent were promoting prostitution charges, which usually apply to alleged pimps, and is a Class E felony carrying a penalty of one to two years.

___
(c)2012
The Commercial Appeal (Memphis, Tenn.)
Distributed by MCT Information Services

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

  1. Shame is a learned behavior.  As such I’m not too sure these “Johns” are capable of learning with their big heads.  Just saying…they seem to be overly fixated on the “littler” things in their lives.

  2. Why are we so concerned about these men’s families but don’t even pause to think of the children and families of shoplifters, minor traffic offenders, etc?

    The social profiling, and inequality before the law, especially relative to her investors,  between this “victimless” crime and pot is what keeps jumping  out to me in all of these discussions.

    It cuts both ways on almost all points.
    If the johns, businessmen,  mayors, and hockey coaches, and their families are being treated too harshly, then so are people arrested for pot procession, surely.

    If you think throw book at them, granted more to the professionals than the common johns, good, but don’t you think their property should be seized like in the Washington County pot operation, too  ? Why not ?

    Then  relative to the johns,…. except class biases based on their economic class and social profiles, …if one faces jail time for procession of pot, why shouldn’t the johns face the same level of jail time for their illegal procession of … errr… you KNOW.

  3. You might think they deserve protection from shame, after all most of our sexual abusers are. Consider, more then 85% of all sexual crimes against children is committed by the husband, current boyfriend, or other family member, but when the child reports this, it is covered up, and the abuser protected by the very person who is supposed to protect the child.  This fact has been known for years, but nothing is ever done about it. Why???  Just think of how many shamed family’s their would be. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *