Recently, a 60-year-old friend, who treasures her right to vote, became afraid that she suddenly wouldn’t be able to. She had heard bits and pieces of radio show talk about having to show identification even for those long-registered. She heard about grandmothers struggling to locate their birth certificates.
My friend was relieved to hear that these stories simply don’t apply to Maine. Here, if you’re already a registered voter, you do not need to produce ID. If you haven’t yet registered, you may do so on Election Day with proof of ID, age and residence — whether you’re a snowbird or a student residing in a dorm room.
If you don’t have a document with you, you may sign an affidavit or, in some cases, vote a “challenged” ballot. Challenged ballots count. They’re not tested unless they’d make a difference in a close election. You may never be turned away from your polling place (the one in your district) as long as you’re in line by closing time.
No special barriers for new voters, the elderly, students, the military or anyone else are permitted. You don’t automatically lose your status as a dependent on a tax return or your scholarships because of where you vote. Police are not waiting at the polls to collect on outstanding parking tickets.
Don’t trust last-minute robocalls or fliers that change your polling place or the date of the election. Call your town office to verify. Even if someone exercises his or her right to raise voter eligibility questions at the polls — which happens occasionally — don’t be intimidated. Challengers must swear to their reasoning under penalty of perjury. Voting is a fundamental right, to be used without fear.
The U.S. Constitution gives all citizens the right to vote. They can register to vote in Maine if: they are a United States citizen; live in a town or city in Maine; and will be 18 years old by Election Day.
If you are registered to vote in Maine, you can vote. You do not need to show ID to get a ballot. You may see a sample ballot and get help on how to mark your ballot before you vote. You also may ask for help to read or mark your ballot.
If you make a mistake, you can get a new ballot. You have the right to use Maine’s Accessible Voting System at your voting place. You may not be harassed when voting or be pressured about how to vote.
If you have any problems, or if you are not allowed to vote, you should call the Elections Division at 888-868-3763 or the Disability Rights Center at 800-452-1948. For information, contact the deputy secretary of state at 624-7736.
The election is important. Vote.
Stephanie Cotsirilos is a consultant and attorney living in Orono. This opinion piece does not constitute legal advice.



“The U.S. Constitution gives all citizens the right to vote.”
This from an attorney? The Constitution forbids government from keeping specific classes of citizens from voting, but it nowhere grants a universal franchise.
The key word is “citizens”
Nope. Citizen-felons can’t vote in most states, for instance. Neither can citizen-children, citizen-lunatics and so on. All the Constitution says is that no citizen can be denied the vote because of age if they’re eighteen or older, or because of gender or race and a couple of other things. But states can still deny the vote – even in federal elections – to someone who, for instance, has not established residency. There is no blanket ‘right to vote’ in the Constitution, or anywhere else.
Amazing how we always hear of the poor person who has no ID. I guess I wonder how this SIXTY year old person cashes checks or has any proof to purchase certain things? I am sure there will be 100 reasons why so many people don’t have an ID. I am sure there also exceptions as to why…but not as many that the crusaders want you to believe, If one of these people were asked to show an ID to use an EBT card or cash a welfare check or to buy a big screen tv or ipad…they would be quicker than a magician to make one materialize.
Amazing how we always hear about voter fraud, but when pressed, there never seems to be any real evidence of it.
You never heard of Democrat legislator for life John Martin’s two top lackeys being caught altering boxes of uncounted ballots and going to jail for it? I’m sure that was the last time the Maine Dems ever cheated in an election…or maybe they just got better at it.
So an example from 20 years ago?
“You never heard of Democrat legislator for life John Martin’s two top lackeys being caught altering boxes of uncounted ballots and going to jail for it? ”
Ballot box stuffing is “election fraud” not “vote fraud”. Vote fraud is an individual claiming to be someone else when he votes. James O’Keefe and his crew of “citizen journalists” are the only ones engaged in organized vote fraud.
If you actually read or listened to any real news you would have
already heard about this and wouldn’t have to ask others for sources.
MSNBC and moveon.org just don’t cut it.
But here you are. Just a small sample.
http://www.examiner.com/article/north-carolina-democrats-admit-voting-twice-for-barack-obama-2008-election
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/video-captures-dem-campaign-chief-plotting-vote-fraud/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57539706/congressmans-son-resigns-after-voter-fraud-video/
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-pn-va-undercover-video-20121024,0,2265110.story
Amazing how the state gives those ID’s away for free… oh wait, they don’t. So that means people have to pay for them. So if a person has to buy something in order to vote, then that means it is a poll tax. Poll tax… didn’t the Supreme Court say something about poll taxes?
Actually, several of the states that have enacted voter id requirements (Pennsylvania comes to mind) are giving the ids away for free.
Because they have to, since making people pay for them is a poll tax, that was kind of my point… Maine does not, and has not considered giving ID’s away for free.
It doesn’t personally affect me but I’ve always wondered how someone can cash their paycheck, get a job, or even get any type of benefits (medical or welfare or whatever) without a picture id.
Usually its through a check cashing service. Also its mostly older and poorer people that do not have them.
What a silly argument for not having a form of ID. The point is who the heck do you know who DOESN’T have some form of ID? Granny? There will be some exceptions of course and granny sure isn’t a concern, she would probably be more honest than many. To ask someone to show who they are isn’t charging them a thing to vote. If they don’t have a ID of some kind, it is pretty hard for someone to do a number of things other than vote. Matter of fact, how does anyone know YOU are even legal to vote…cause you say so?
Yea, upholding Constitutional rights, what a silly argument…
How about the right to vote without fear of one’s ballot being compromised through fraud? Supporting efforts to avoid/deny valid voter identification is akin to condoning the misuse of the ballot. How is that in any way reasonable or just?
How about pointing to actual fraud first before getting paranoid about your ballot being compromised?
If you actually read or listened to any real news you would have
already heard about this and wouldn’t have to ask others for sources.
MSNBC and moveon.org just don’t cut it.
But here you are. Just a small sample.
http://www.examiner.com/article/north-carolina-democrats-admit-voting-twice-for-barack-obama-2008-election
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/video-captures-dem-campaign-chief-plotting-vote-fraud/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57539706/congressmans-son-resigns-after-voter-fraud-video/
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-pn-va-undercover-video-20121024,0,2265110.story
Okay, so that’s only two examples and they’re not even affirmed examples. And they would never be enough to sway an election. Next?
You actually admit that voter fraud may exist! I know it was hard, but that really was a big step on the path to reality and objectivity.
These were just the tip of the iceberg that exists.
You might want to look into John Martin.
http://articles.latimes.com/1993-03-04/news/mn-310_1_legislative-aide
And then there is this:
http://pinetreepolitics.bangordailynews.com/2011/10/26/for-voter-fraud-look-to-the-canadian-border/
And remember how Al Franken stole his election?
http://washingtonexaminer.com/york-when-1099-felons-vote-in-race-won-by-312-ballots/article/2504163#.UIkqsqPorug
http://www.forbes.com/sites/billfrezza/2012/08/08/sen-al-franken-voter-fraud-revelations-call-for-ways-to-reduce-it/
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/yes_vote_fraud_real_B5KsHFqcgUjYJCivnI6IuN
LOL, I love how you think citing examples of ways to commit fraud are the same thing. I can tell you how to rob a bank, but it doesn’t mean you’ve done it.
There has to be a proportion between the solution and the problem. You don’t install a new kitchen simply because your faucet is leaking. You disenfranchise many more voters than even close to what there is for fraud. That’s not right.
Oh dear. Back to denial… And you were making progress!
What I’m denying is this assertion that voter fraud is this rampant problem. It’s not.
I asked you for examples and you didn’t provide me with anything real. You demonstrated that voter fraud is possible — well duh, so is murder and robbing a bank.
And even if you do provide an example or two — are the solutions proportional to the problem? Can you answer that question for me? It’d be like banning guns entirely because of the crimes people commit. You don’t punish legal voters for the rare instances of crime elsewhere.
Guns are a bad example since we make people jump through hoops to buy one. And do we even need to start on the laws in many states limiting the right to bear arms.
In what way does it punish legal voters to have to provide ID? How about if voters have to dip their finger in that purple ink to prevent voting more than once?
Because not everyone has an ID.
ID’s are easy to get and all states with voter ID laws have made provision for free voter ID’s.
It doesn’t matter how easy they are to get. Many legal voters don’t have them. Period.
Based on your logic people shouldn’t have to register to vote either. After all, that is a “requirement”. Just show up anywhere and demand a ballot.
Dipping your finger would be the most effective then using ID.
Key word, “may”. We never said it didn’t, to a microscopic extent.
If
that were the real reason, I’d agree with you. The republicans are just looking
to keep as many people who normally vote democratic from the polls. They’d
rather disenfranchise thousands to prevent one case of voter fraud.We,as a
country, monitor elections all around the world to try and prevent what the
republican party is doing here, preventing people from voting by making the
rules so difficult they may not be able too
If that were the real reason, I’d agree with you. The republicans are just looking
to keep as many people who normally vote democratic from the polls. They’d
rather disenfranchise thousands to prevent one case of voter fraud.We,as a
country, monitor elections all around the world to try and prevent what the
republican party is doing here, preventing people from voting by making the
rules so difficult they may not be able too
How about the fact that Romney’s son has a connection to the voting machines in Ohio. If you are a McDonald’s employee, you can’t play the Monopoly game, but if you are the son of a presidential candidate, it is no problem owning the voting machines. Yikes…..
How about the voting machines in North Carolina that keep changing votes for Romney to Obama?
Data please.
If you actually read or listened to any real news you would have already heard about this and wouldn’t have to ask others for sources. MSNBC and moveon.org just don’t cut it.
But here you are. Just a small sample of the hits when you google “north carolina voting machine”
examiner.com/article/north-carolina-voters-say-ballots-cast-for-romney-being-registered-for-obama
http://www2.wbtw.com/news/2012/oct/24/2/nc-voters-select-romney-voting-machines-choice-dis-ar-4822118/
http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/10/24/north-carolina-voting-machines-obama-romney/
And here is another one for you.
http://www.examiner.com/article/north-carolina-democrats-admit-voting-twice-for-barack-obama-2008-election
http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/video-captures-dem-campaign-chief-plotting-vote-fraud/
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57539706/congressmans-son-resigns-after-voter-fraud-video/
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-pn-va-undercover-video-20121024,0,2265110.story
I got a kick out of this line from the first article:
“If you intend to vote for Romney as President, you can not choose the ‘straight Republican ticket’ option that displays on the voting equipment panel. You have to select the option that allows you to vote for the candidates at each level of the state election in order for your vote for a Republican as President to be confirmed,” Redstate diarist “lineholder” wrote.
They seriously have a voting for dummies option? Is this for the automatons that can’t be bothered to search out their precious D’s and R’s?
The dumbing down of America never ceases to amaze.
Straight ticket voting on paper ballots used to be very common. There would even be a single box to mark for it.
History 101….
Really? I did not know that! Though I don’t think it was in the 101 class.
You screech about people using biased sources, but I don’t see you citing the very recent examples of Republicans engaging in questionable activity regarding voting. It appears as if what you’re accusing others of is actually what you’re guilty of yourself.
Explain why republicans propose changes to eliminate voting fraud and democrats fight it tooth and nail?
Because it disenfranchises legal voters.
Give a valid example of how any legal voter would be disenfranchised?
Even better, provide the same level of proof you have demanded of me. Actual, proven examples of it ever happening. In fact lets use your own standard where a couple of examples are not good enough. I want to see proven widespread disenfranchisement in a recent election.
It’s estimated that 10% don’t have a government issue ID.
Take off your partisan blinders for a second. The logic you’re using is the same that you would denounced if it was used in regards to gun control. Banning guns or making them much harder to get only impacts legal gun owners — it does nothing to stop actual criminals.
I think it’s laughable that you say “widespread”. Is that the standard? Because I haven’t seen your evidence of widespread fraud.
“estimated” I know hundreds of people and have worked retail before. In all that time I have met only 1 legal citizen who did not have an ID. Or are you counting illegals in your 10%?
I’m saying that’s what experts estimate. I don’t care one bit what your personal experience because that’s not fact based.
How many people do you know who do not have an ID?
It doesn’t matter. Asking someone a question about who they
know isn’t a scientific method. I only know one woman who is a little person,
that doesn’t mean that more little people don’t exist.
I’m not going to play this game with you where you pick and
choose which facts you want to believe it. The estimated number by experts is
10% of legal voters don’t have a photo ID. Period. If you don’t want to believe
that? Fine. But just because someone believes the world is flat, that doesn’t
make it so. Keep ignoring reality, I don’t care. But I’m also not going to have
a discussion with someone like that.
Until you or your experts provide a rigorous study substantiating that 10% I will continue to consider it just another of the lefts inflated “facts” used to promote their agenda.
“I’m not going to play this game with you where you pick and
choose which facts you want to believe it.” LMAO, you do thid all the time.
Their study is more rigorous than anything you’ve provided. More rigorous than your bigotry about “illegals” too. So ignorant. Go spew your stupidity elsewhere.
You haven’t even supplied a link to any of these studies.
Of course, you did stoop to the usual lefty tactic of calling me a bigot because I pointed out that illegals could not have a valid ID anyway and many do not even try to get one.
Or is the real reason you don’t want to require ID is that you want all these illegals to vote?
Really cause I worked retail and ran into atleast once a day.
Working retail there is really only one reason to ask for ID and that is when presented with a check. Since they would have been asked for ID every time they try to use a check either they get one or they stop using checks.
So i find your claim suspicious at best….
Thank you for this piece.
Yet the Black Panthers can stand outside of polling places with billy clubs and intimidate voters and it is not even INVESTIGATED by the racist Holder and the Obama administration.
When was the Black Panthers here in Maine? When was the last time you even heard of the Black Panthers involved in natinal elections? How about the KKK striking fear into the voters in the deep south?
I was just demonstrating some REAL voter intimidation, and it didn’t come from any voter ID rule. Not surprisingly Holder and Obama were uninterested in it.
Funny you should mention the KKK. That was the organization of the DEMS in the south. Robert Byrd the Democrat Legiscritter for life from West Virginia was a high ranking clan official.
And the Dixiecrats morphed into Southern Republicans. Tell all the history.
What’s your point though? We shouldn’t feel intimidated when we go out to vote. That goes for bullies at the polling place and for politicians insinuated that student voters (for example) are breaking the law just the same.
What? Where? When? Oh come on! And surely you are not suggesting that the Obama adminstration would stand back and let this happen. Could we please see your back up for these comments. And please make sure this is after 1960.
How uninformed can you be???
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Black_Panther_Party_voter_intimidation_case
No complaints were filed by voters about the incident, although poll
watchers witnessed some voters approach the polls and then turn away,
apparently in response to the New Black Panther Party members.[9]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574361071968458430.html
The episode—which Bartle Bull, a former civil rights lawyer and publisher
of the left-wing Village Voice, calls “the most blatant form of voter
intimidation I’ve ever seen”—began on Election Day 2008. Mr. Bull and
others witnessed two Black Panthers in paramilitary garb at a polling
place near downtown Philadelphia. (Some of this behavior is on YouTube.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU
Honestly I wouldn’t have started off with Wikipedia as I can go and fix it for you if it would make you feel better. I did read the Wall Street Journal article and also watched the youtube video. Thank you for that. I was uninformed, however, I do want to point out this was one incident and I think we can all agree that the New Black Panther’s are just a little too intense. I also want to point out that charges were dismissed against the Black Panther Party and although it doesn’t go into detail it was based on law…not color.
That instance of “intimidation” consisted of a couple of members of the New Black Panthers standing outside a polling place.
If Holder tried charging them with anything, the charges wouldn’t stick for a second and the Justice Department would have wasted its time and made a fool of itself. But leave it to wingnuts to think that not arresting two black men for standing somewhere is somehow “racist” against white people.
deleted
A “NATIONAL VOTER IDENTIFICATION CARD” is the way ta go!
No thank you!
More government spending! lol
Back on to topic…I put this “article” on the same level as yesterday’s “Chat with a Friend”, regarding same sex marriage. Its use is to start a conversation. So IMHO why are we talking about voter intimidation? Fraud is much more on subject and voter fraud has probably been around since the first election was held. I don’t have time to do all the research but I can say that where mankind is good, mankind can find a way to louse it up