CARIBOU, Maine — A former New Hampshire stockbroker who was convicted in September for bilking a St. Agatha couple out of more than $195,000 will spend the next three years in prison for his crimes.

James A. Philbrook, 63, also will be required to repay the money that he stole from the retirement-age couple, one of whom called him a “thief, a crook and a rat.”

Because of the money that Philbrook stole, the male victim said he will have to work well past retirement age to support himself and his wife, who cannot work due to health problems.

A jury in Aroostook County Superior Court found the defendant guilty of two felony charges of theft by unauthorized taking and securities fraud stemming from investment schemes carried out 2005-06.

Superior Court Justice E. Allen Hunter on Friday sentenced Philbrook to eight years in prison with all but three years suspended. He also ordered him to pay $195,000 in restitution and to serve three years of probation with a number of conditions, including that he not have contact with the couple.

Philbrook, who was represented by Jeff Pickering, a Houlton attorney, had been the couple’s financial adviser for more than a decade, Maine Assistant Attorney General Michael Colleran said during the more than two-hour sentencing hearing Friday in Aroostook County Superior Court in Caribou. Colleran said that Philbrook approached them with a scheme for developing a pay-per-view cable TV production featuring the entertainer Carmen Electra.

The couple initially invested $145,000 based on their longstanding relationship with Philbrook and his claim that their investment in the production would make a substantial return, Colleran said in court. In reality, the prosecutor contended, Philbrook used nearly half of the investment to pay back money that his son had embezzled from an employer. Philbrook used the rest for his own investments or expenses.

The state also presented evidence that Philbrook subsequently solicited another $50,000 investment from the couple for an education fund, but then spent the investors’ funds on his personal expenses.

Pickering on Friday continued to dispute that Philbrook stole any money, telling Hunter that his client had also invested and lost his own money in the Electra scheme.

He said that Philbrook believed that the funds provided by the St. Agatha couple were merely personal loans and that he could use the funds however he wished.

Pickering said that Philbrook thought he had done due diligence by investigating the Electra proposal. He denied that Philbrook had used the money for personal gain. He noted that it was going to be hard for his client to pay restitution, as he now receives social security disability payments and his health and a felony conviction will likely prohibit him from finding gainful employment when he is released from jail. Philbrook testified in court that he has suffered from Type I diabetes for approximately 40 years, has had a stroke and suffers from heart problems.
Pickering pushed for his client to serve nine months in jail plus probation, so that he could begin paying restitution as soon as possible.

Colleran said that nine months was not nearly harsh enough to punish Philbrook or to deter such crimes in the future.

The female crime victim told Hunter that Philbrook had stolen the couple’s money and future sense of security. She said that she and her husband trusted Philbrook and felt that he understood their desire to provide comfort for themselves and a legacy for their children and grandchildren.

The male victim was much angrier, telling Philbrook that he was the one who had worked hard for the money that they had saved all those years.

Philbrook apologized to the couple before he was sentenced, but he insisted that he thought they understood that the investment carried a risk.

He took the stand briefly Friday to testify about his assets. He said he gives his wife $1,800 a month from his $2,000 social security allotment for living expenses. There are two houses, one valued at approximately $300,000 for tax purposes, in a revocable trust in his wife’s name that he set up years before his crime against the couple, he testified. He is not the trustee or the beneficiary. One of the homes produces rental income.

He also testified that he did not know the amount of his mortgage payments, details about various insurance policies or how much money his wife earns in salary.

Colleran determined that Philbrook and his wife, who is a teacher, live on an estimated $80,000 a year income. They also enjoy luxuries such as cable TV and Internet service and own vehicles.

In imposing sentencing, Hunter characterized Philbrook’s actions as an incredible breach of trust against a couple who had worked hard to save money and plan for their retirement. He noted that Philbrook went back to the couple three times for money that he said was for investments. Hunter added that he did not find it credible that Philbrook, who worked for decades in the insurance industry, did not know financial details surrounding his own household.

Hunter pointed out that if someone takes money from someone else for a stated purpose and does not use that money as stated, it is a crime, even if the money is paid back. The justice said he found it “ironic” that Philbrook had taken $50,000 to help mitigate his son’s criminal actions, which in turn resulted in the 63-year-old becoming a criminal.

He said he feels that Philbrook has, and can attain, the assets to pay restitution to the couple.

Philbrook will report to jail on Nov. 12, a stay of sentence requested by Pickering at the suggestion of a Maine Department of Corrections nurse, who needs time to prepare for Philbrook’s medical care and needs.

The case was investigated by Christian Caruso and Jacqueline Drouin of the state office of securities and prosecuted by Colleran.

“Today’s sentencing sends a clear message to those who would commit securities fraud,” said said Maine Securities Administrator Judith M. Shaw. “Maine officials are working hard to protect investors and are taking strong action whenever advantage is taken of individuals, families or businesses in our state. Maine won’t tolerate investment scams and outright fraud.”

Pickering said his client will appeal.

Join the Conversation

17 Comments

  1. I am glad to see that this crook is being held accountable. White collar criminals are just as bad as any other criminal. He is not better because he was a stockbroker and wore a suit to work. What he did was absolutely awful and for once someone like him is not getting away with it.

    1.  The trouble is he will never live long enough to pay restitution.The couple will never see the money they are owed. Very sad case.

      1. I bet they recover and get more for punitive damages. This slime ball has no remorse because he continues to lie in court that he doesn’t know anything about family finances. He should also be charged with perjury and we all know his wife’s name is the only one on the house because he is a crook and thought that would save him. Guess what when you are married marital property is both of yours and she and he will have to sell their house worth $300,000. I hope the victims now sue him in civil court and not only re-coop their money but get an award for punitive damages. I hope this crook and his family go down broke and if it is  a judgement against them they will never get a line of credit anywhere so no more houses, cars and credit cards for them.  His son should also for over some money because it is his turn to help out… LOSERS … 

      2. He is a slime ball and yes they will because anything in his wife’s name is marital property and the house must be sold to pay the debt. He is still lying by telling the court he doesn’t know anything about the family finances. They should charge him with perjury to boot…. Best of luck to the crime victims and I hope they get all of that and more for punitive damages.

  2. “He also testified that he did not know the amount of his mortgage payments, details about various insurance policies or how much money his wife earns in salary.”
    And he was a so called money-man?? I wouldn’t trust this guy with my lunch money!

  3. Just a classic case of “Oh give me money, and I’ll double it.” They knew this guy for over 10  years and he screwed them over. . that just shows you cant trust ANYBODY with your own money. The economy is so bad now that we just might have to resort to burying cash in the back yard just like they did in the revolutionary war. Better than getting robbed blind by investors or banks.

  4. Just a classic case of “Oh give me money, and I’ll double it.” They knew this guy for over 10  years and he screwed them over. . that just shows you cant trust ANYBODY with your own money. The economy is so bad now that we just might have to resort to burying cash in the back yard just like they did in the revolutionary war. Better than getting robbed blind by investors or banks.

  5. Just a classic case of “Oh give me money, and I’ll double it.” They knew this guy for over 10  years and he screwed them over. . that just shows you cant trust ANYBODY with your own money. The economy is so bad now that we just might have to resort to burying cash in the back yard just like they did in the revolutionary war. Better than getting robbed blind by investors or banks.

  6. This is a bummer, but what would you do if somebody offered you an opportunity to invest in a “project” with Carmen Electra?  Nobody watches your money like you!

  7. This is a bummer, but what would you do if somebody offered you an opportunity to invest in a “project” with Carmen Electra?  Nobody watches your money like you!

  8. Philbrook apologized to the couple before he was sentenced, but he insisted that he thought they understood that the investment carried a risk…..This pathetic loser, crook, thief still hasn’t learned a thing.  You can add LIAR to this long list too.  How can you live with yourself Philbrook? 

  9. Since when is having cable & internet “a luxury”?  And owning a vehicle is a necessity, not a luxury.  And here’s something the judge obviously doesn’t know – when a person receives social security and they go to prison and/or jail,  their social security gets shut off by the SSA.  So now these people will have to wait 3 years before they can start getting any money instead of the 9 months that the attorney was pushing for.  And as a footnote, it’s going to cost the taxpayers from the State o’ME a boatload of money to keep him incarcerated. His medical issues are quite staggering. He’s had a stroke, multiple heart attacks and has type 1 diabetes….

    1.  Not the only guy who had a stoke.  Know plenty of people who had strokes and continue their normal way of living.  He’s using that as an excuse to have it easy while in jail..  As for repayment let them get it from his wife  holdings

  10. And yet a big campaign bundler, like Jon Corzine, steals $1.6-BILLION and he’s still walking around free.  The perks of being a party official.

  11. ” The only two things in life that you can truly depend on are gravity and greed”. Jack Palance, actor.

  12. 3 years? That’s all? If he was a 25 or 30 year old he would get triple that time if not more for the same exact crime. The system here in Maine is a total joke. And before any of you get mad and comment that he is an old man…so what. He was old enough to do the crime then he is old enough to do the time. (Just my opinion)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *