BANGOR, Maine — Republicans in Maine were looking for Mitt Romney to make history Tuesday night by winning the state’s Second Congressional district and for the first time ever splitting Maine’s four electoral votes.
Whether that happens won’t likely be clear until early Wednesday, and the odds that a single electoral vote from Maine will change the outcome of the presidential race are long and depend on a series of other factors falling into place across the United States.
But Maine GOP Chairman Charlie Webster said northern Maine has leaned right of center for years, a fact he said he expects to become crystal clear Tuesday night.
“I don’t believe Maine is a blue state,” he said. “I expect that the Democrats after this election will have to reassess whether they’re still pertinent in Maine anymore. The Second District is more rural and more conservative. They have a different approach to the level of government they want.”
Webster said that as of two weeks ago, polling from the Romney campaign showed that he led in the Second District, which Webster said led to a focus on the Pine Tree State by the campaign and the national Republican Party.
But Webster’s counterpart in the Maine Democratic Party, Ben Grant, said the prospect of Romney winning the Second District amounts to wishful thinking by Republicans.
“I’m pretty confident that all of Maine’s electoral votes will go to the president,” said Grant. “The Republicans try to sow the seeds of this story every election year. There are still parts of the Second District that are very strong for Democrats. On our side, we always campaign like we’re one vote behind. On the other side, we’re seeing what I call the kitchen-sink strategy. They have started throwing money around the country looking for a place where they can win.”
Douglas Hodgkin, a retired political science professor from Bates College, said even if Romney does win the Second District, he doubts it will have much of an impact on the overall race. That’s because if Romney wins the Second District, it probably means he has done exceptionally well across the country.
“There are some polls that suggest the Second District will be competitive, but the polls have been all over the place,” said Hodgkin. “Romney might not end up needing that one electoral vote.”
Maine has one of the more storied electoral college histories in the nation. When it became a state in 1820, Maine had nine electoral votes — and 10 in 1832, 1836 and 1840, But that number began to dwindle during the 19th century and by 1964, according to a history of the state at www.270towin.com, Maine had its current apportionment of four electoral votes. Because of the Census electoral vote reapportionment in 2010, Maine will remain at four electoral votes at least through the 2020 presidential election.
Maine and Nebraska are the only states in the country that do not automatically award all their electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most votes in the state. In Maine, the statewide winner receives two electoral votes and the winners in the First and Second Congressional District receive one additional vote each. Since the process was established in 1972, Maine has never split its electoral vote, although there is often speculation that this will happen.
Maine voted primarily Republican from the Civil War through the 1980s, voting for Democrats in the presidential election only in 1912, 1964 and 1968. However, Maine has voted for the Democratic candidate in the five presidential elections since 1992, including in 2000 and 2004 when Republican George W. Bush won the national election.
In the four electionsbefore Tuesday, Republicans have had a difficult time with Maine’s popular vote. The GOP garnered 31 percent of the Maine vote in 1996; 44 percent in 2000; 45 percent in 2004; and 40 percent in 2008. Democrats earned at least 49 percent of the vote in those elections, though other party candidates received 7 percent in 2000 and 17 percent in 1996.
Though Maine’s First Congressional District has been a virtual lock for President Barack Obama, according to polling this year, the Second District has been much closer. Republican nominee Mitt Romney has polled within in a few percentage points of Obama in the northern part of the state, with a split of 50 percent for Obama and 47 percent for Romney in a November 2 poll by Gravis Marketing, which based its results on a survey of 509 likely voters. That was within the poll’s margin of error. A Nov. 4 Critical Insights poll, which surveyed 613 likely voters statewide, found that 49 percent of Mainers said they would vote for Obama, with 42 percent saying they supported Romney. Nine percent said they were undecided or favored other candidates.
In a Nov. 2 poll of a much larger sample — 1,633 likely voters — Public Policy Polling found that statewide, 55 percent of respondents supported Obama compared to 42 percent for Romney.
Last year, lawmakers approved a redistricting plan that made the 2nd District slightly more Republican, moving about 2,500 GOP voters into the northern district. The slight shift in district boundaries, passed by lawmakers in September 2011, was much less drastic than the original redistricting plan pushed by Republican lawmakers. The two districts needed to be reconfigured based on 2010 U.S. Census population numbers.



“But Maine GOP Chairman Charlie Webster”
Then I stopped reading, after I saw that crazy name….
Charlie Webster sabotaged a real chance at a D2 win when he and his pack of corrupt Romney suckups dissed the Ron Paul contingent.
All 17 people in the contingent should be offended.
Your ignorance is showing. 35% of the most dedicated Republicans in the state were for Paul. You must have not been at the caucus.
Well, the chickens sure came home to roost for the GOP last night. Pissing everyone but their own off will do that.
I think Racism plays a bigger role than the press will admit to, and the same sentiment extends to the GOP as well.
It gets tiring hearing that we are racists. Did it ever occur to you that it’s about a persons character and what he’s done or not done?
Our President has done more for ALL Americans than W did.
Give an example.
Stop watching FOX and listening to Limbaugh. If you’d educate yourself, you’d know what the reelected president has accomplished.
What has your President for all Americans other than bury this country in debt ?
He only knows liberal talking points. He can’t really have a conversation with you.
I’m from the County and I can tell you that racism is alive and well. Certainly not all people it’s complete ignorance to deny it completely.
Absolutely, 80% of African Americans vote for Obama despite regressing in economic status during the past 4 years. Who can forget Obama’s typical white women comment. Then there is the KKK equivalent Black Panther’s trying to intimidate voters in Philadelphia in 2008 and again today getting a pass from Eric Holder. Obama will go down in history as one of the most racist and divisive Presidents to occupy the White House.
80%??? 80%????? Try 92%. But any white voting against Obama, can ONLY be because he is Black. Not because they have voted R every time, or that they judged the candidates and found the other candidate to be stronger. Has to be because they are racist.
The 2nd district was leaning heavily toward Ron Paul until Webster rigged the caucus. He should be in jail. You will see a lot of votes for Gary Johnson and Ron Paul in the 2nd.
Wasn’t Webster the one who referred to Ron Paul supporters as, “wingnuts”?
Would have been more had Paul had the guts to run 3rd party. Now that, that would have made it interesting. :)
Johnson lacks the name recognition, but is a more palatable candidate overall in truth. I hope he cracks 5%.
I agree,
and have spoken with lots of people about a “wasted” vote for Johnson. If we started voting for what we believe in rather than who we think will win, we can do away with this foolish 2-party debacle.
Unfortunately most aren’t willing to put their money where their mouth is. The value of a viable third party isn’t even in the ideology of whatever party it may be – it’s in the leverage.
We the people don’t have leverage. We’ve ceded it completely to the two parties.
I don’t know that a 3 or 4 party system would be any less of a debacle. You still have to sort out coalitions and caucuses. Then there is the problem of uninformed, uneducated and lazy citizens who drift with the wind.
We have a good system, but it depends on citizens understanding how it works and staying active. I still think Romney would have gained a few percentage points if he would have been willing to don a cowboy hat and get his photo taken riding a horse. I’m still trying to figure out how Obama lost his 16 point lead among women after the first debate. Was there some subliminal message that only women picked up on?
The only thing wrong with our system is it relies on voters and they are so easily manipulated by nonsense.
Yes all 500 of them. You ran one heck of a campaign ! Congrats!
ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
I think this is great.
I thinks is bad, very bad in fact it’s horrible!
If I recall correctly, the second district did give Perot their 2 electorial votes too so I don’t think this is the first time.
Actually, while he came in second in the state, he didn’t win any electoral votes in ME (or any other state). Also, each district has one electoral vote.
Rural voters always say they want smaller government… but every Halloween they drag their kids out to the SUV and drive 10 miles down to the suburbs, and places where they have street lights, and sidewalks, and send them to trick or treat in the closely settled neighborhoods where the pickins are good.
Then they take their bags of loot back to their dark farms, and eat it all by themselves.
Don’t think we’re not on to you, either.
UH OH they are on to us…
LOL!
HAHA!A friend of mine lives in a fairly well to do cul de sac.She gets 150 kids every year and most of the people on her street are older.TOO TRUE!
Ah- yup, and being from the big city of Bangor, I do understand that not voting GOP is like not supporting the local kids in the basketball tourney for folks from The County.
But seriously, on the National level, Ms, Sen. Olympia Snowe,herself, stopped supporting the The GOTea Party of No because she was disrespected for being a no good “‘RINO” ……………
or a proudly Maine independent , and rightly the pride of all Yankee old time Republican great woman of high integrity just like Ms.Sen. M.C. Smith.
If they disrespecrtect our heroines, and the traditional moderate pride of Maine … like them and Cohen and Mitchell. too,
Did they all lead ?
You have just shown us how ignorant you and people like you are, not to mention hateful. And that is exactly how most democrats feel which makes yesterday that much more of a surprise. We elected people that think and act like chopchop.
Where did BDN get this magic crystal ball? Can I get one, too?
Obama wins Calais by a handful of votes…does not bode well for Romney in the 2nd district.
Nope — seems like Florida is leaning Obama and if he gets Florida, it’s ovah!
He’s got Florida. The only remaining counties in Florida are Broward (Miami) which a traditionally democrat.
Can’t believe Allen West is even close there.
Well, looks like that’s not going to happen.
How embarrassing for Maine if Romney even had a shot at winning an electoral vote here.
Sorry, Repubes, it’s official. Your oligarch lost.
GOBAMA!!!
You’re right. Romney did not need the 1 vote from the Second District.
“I expect that the Democrats after this election will have to reassess whether they’re still pertinent in Maine anymore.”
Dems have retaken Augusta, he couldn’t be more wrong. After showing how he has his finger on the pulse of the state, I would think Webster would not be pertinent in Maine anymore.
“I expect that the Republicans after this election will have to reassess whether Charlie Webster is still pertinent in Maine anymore.”
“I expect that the Republicans after this election will have to reassess whether they’re still pertinent in Maine anymore.”
It is evident to me after this election that I am a member of the wrong party. BUT I have no other place to go. I can’t be a Democrat because their policies on fiscal issues (the only political issues I care about) are indistinguishable from my hijacked Republican party. I also am too much of a libertarian to be able to accept voting for a nanny.
I can’t be an Independent anymore, because Angles King is an Independent, and he can blow through taxpayer funds almost as well as a Democrat, and somewhat better than a Republican.He is also a self centered twip who is emotionally unable to play on a team.