Sandy was called the “Frankenstorm,” the “storm of a generation” and “unprecedented.” We all mourn the loss of life and chaos it has caused people to our south and west. Unfortunately, it is more likely that superstorms will become the new normal.
Global warming is changing our weather. Stronger hurricanes are one result. Right now, the ocean temperatures are 5 degrees above normal in the Northeast region. Warmer water pumps energy and moisture into storms. Sandy got even bigger because a cold jet stream dipped southward from Canada. The likely cause of this was the rapid melting of the Arctic ice caps caused, yes, by global warming. Finally, sea levels in the Northeast have risen four times faster than the global average, also due to global warming. Higher sea levels fuel bigger storm surges and flooding like what was seen in New York City and New Jersey.
Climate experts now agree that global warming is virtually the only explanation for recent extreme weather events, such as recent heat waves, droughts and stronger hurricanes. The insurance giant Munich Re has taken global warming seriously for years, as it watched claims from these unprecedented weather events rise sharply, particularly in North America.
While some may like the warmer winters and longer growing seasons that global warming has brought already, there will be many more changes that will be life threatening and expensive: destructive floods, droughts, ice storms, ticks, Lyme disease, an acidic ocean less hospitable to marine life and a disappearing northern forest. The majority of the world’s scientists have warned us of this for years, but the coal, oil and gas industries have funded just enough climate deniers to cast just enough doubt to confuse the public and prevent meaningful action to stem the warming.
Maine faces many important decisions in the coming weeks and months that will have an important impact on our state’s contribution and vulnerability to global warming. Efficiency Maine Trust and the Maine Public Utilities Commission will soon be deciding whether to invest more in cleaner and cheaper energy efficiency resources that reduce purchases of more expensive energy from polluting power plants. Energy savings from more efficient lighting, appliances and motors will not only reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but will save residential electric ratepayers at least $60 per year. Keeping this money in the local economy creates more than 16,600 additional jobs and increases the gross state product by $1.4 billion by 2025, according to an analysis recently done by Environment Northeast.
Before the end of the year, Maine and other Northeast states will decide how to strengthen the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, the successful, first-in-the-nation program to reduce global warming carbon pollution from power plants. RGGI is a “two-fer” in Maine: The market-based emission reduction program itself reduces global warming pollution, and the revenues collected from the polluters are then used to save energy, which also reduces emissions. Maine should build on this effective design and support efforts to increase RGGI’s pollution reduction targets.
Lastly, Maine may soon be facing a decision about whether to allow oil derived from Canada’s tar sands to flow through pipelines to Portland. Oil derived from tar sands can produce up to 35-percent more global warming pollution than conventional oil. The corrosiveness of tar sands oil also increases the likelihood of pipeline ruptures, posing serious risks to ground and surface waters. Investing in energy efficiency and renewable energy to power electric vehicles and efficient electric heat pumps is better for the planet and better for our economy over the long term.
In all of these cases, and more, Environment Northeast will be urging state decision-makers to vote for the clean energy alternative. Climate change is real, and its consequences are becoming more apparent by the day. Fortunately, we have tools that can reduce emissions in pocketbook-friendly ways. We should use them.
Beth A. Nagusky is the Maine director of Environment Northeast.



As the risk of super storms rises, Maine’s ability to forecast and prepare decreases. Why? The GOP controlled congress voted down $700 million in funding for weather satellites, which are fast reaching the end of their use. Once again, we can thank the GOP for thwarting President Obama and this time, at the risk of human lives.http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/03/24/207753/noaa-satellite-funding-forecasts/?mobile=nc
The article you reference is about “possible” cuts to the satellite program…..update yourself and you will see this particular program was indeed funded appropriately……http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/noaa-satellite-system-funded-but-at-what-cost-other-important-programs-may-suffer/2011/12/08/gIQAnhpZfO_blog.html
Thank you for the link. I don’t mind being wrong, Pab, at all. In fact, I like to know lives are protected. I read the article, however, and noted this:Possibly the biggest casualty of NOAA’s hard fought, top priority battle to fund JPSS is Congressional denial to provide its FY12 request to fund the replacement of COSMIC, the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere & Climate.
I’d appreciate your explaining it to this old grandma,who, more than anything, wants to know people are safe. Thank you.
If I could explain the processes and rationale for Gov’t fundings then, well, I guess I might be able to make sense of what seems to be non-sense most of the time….I do know that of the 6 COSMIC satellites that have been deployed 2 are currently malfunctioning and not working as fully intended…..3 others of the things have battery aging problems and may become dysfunctional in the near future….there have been intermittent power issues with the things and loss of control with a couple of the things, and when these problems occur then the transmitting of info is disrupted for months at a time…..it takes millions of $$ to make and launch one satellite and can take up to a year to get the orbiting position correct to optimize coverage and transmit good information…..I too want to know that people are safe, but I also don’t want to see wasting of monies either….to my understanding, of the 6 initial satellites, only one remains fully functional…..the best preparation for personal safety from weather events is to be prepared yourself and not have to totally rely on the Gov’t for answers….just ask the folks in NYC & coastal NJ…..
Thank you. Your final comment is 100% true, and something we Mainers have always known and practiced.
One less nuclear submarine this year would pay for this program with $500 million left over. Why do we need to keep building nuclear attack submarines when al-queda doesn’t even have a navy?
Sorry, this was meant for entitled
I did not realize that we had an extra $700 million to spend mainegal. I heard somewhere that Barrack Obama was spending one trillion dollars a year more than what was being collected, $4 trillion over his first four years in office. I guess, according to you that he has a surplus and so we can afford to spend another $700 million. Thanks for setting the record straight.
One less nuclear submarine this year would pay for this program with $500 million left over. Why do we need to keep building nuclear attack submarines when al-queda doesn’t even have a navy?
So just put another $700 million on the credit card?
What drives me nuts is that we have always had hurricanes. Many many of them more powerful than Sandy that formed in similar manner. Why suddenly are they superstorms?
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/outreach/history/#great
Because it was a superstorm. Look at the figures and the damage. Historical record high storm surge on Manhattan and the Jersey shore. A hurricane of near record low pressure that hooks up, via a near unprecedented left turn onto the coast, with a mid-continent low to produce a massive storm more than a thousand miles wide producing high waves as far away as Lake Michigan. Hope you sanity improves, and bone up on the rationale behind the forecasts. Better not pooh-pooh this one to anyone from CT to NJ.