FORT KENT, Maine — It used to be known as “prairie coal,” and now the heating fuel used in the late 19th century in the nation’s grasslands could be making a comeback.

The Center for Rural Sustainable Development at the University of Maine at Fort Kent last week announced it has received a $62,334 grant to study farmer interest in large-scale grass biomass production and the economic feasibility of grass biomass in the St. John Valley.

The study, “ Sustainable Heating in Fort Kent: A Biomass Initiative Case Study,” is federally funded through the Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research and the Sustainability Solutions Partners project.

The total project budget is $74,801, including a local share of $12,467, according to information released by UMFK last week.

“Late last year we decided to take a look at grass as possible biofuel because we have so much fallow land here in Aroostook County,” John Martin, director of the Center for Rural Sustainable Development, said on Friday. “This could be a way for farmers to use the right type of grass as an alternate crop or for using land that is not currently in production.”

Martin, currently serving out his term as a Democratic member of the Maine House of Representatives for District 1, lost his re-election bid for that seat in November.

UMFK will work with student interns, the Cooperative Extension Service and local farmers in gauging the interest and feasibility of using grass to produce biomass heating fuel.

“There is a lot of underutilized agricultural land in northern Maine,” Andrew Plant, assistant professor with the UM cooperative extension, said on Saturday. “This could be a good way not let it go into secession or back into shrubs.”

Fifty percent of Aroostook County’s available cropland is currently out of production, Plant said. Using it to grow biofuel-producing grass would help keep it cleared when and if the demand for crops like potatoes increase to supply the region’s needs.

“Food demands are predicted to double or triple by 2050,” he said. “Growing grass for biomass could help us bridge the time to get there by keeping that land open.”

Some preliminary studies have already begun on different types of grasses and which would produce the better biomass heating source.

“It’s really like hay production,” Plant said. “We are actually trying to grow mulch or poor quality hay and that tends to do quite well.”

Over the past 15 years growing herbaceous and woody crops specifically for energy has gained widespread appeal around the country, according to the Biomass Energy Resource Center in Vermont.

“There is certainly enough land in the St. John Valley that if the farmers want to do something with this we will work with them,” Martin said, adding there are plans to contact area growers and landowners to gauge interest in the project.

“This winter we will work on a plan and see if we can encourage a couple of farmers to work with us,” he said.

That plan would include the construction of a prototype unit to transform the grass biomass into burnable pellets for home and commercial heating.

Pellets are not the only option, Plant said. Technology exists to use the grass in bales that have been processed through a specialized shredder.

“It would eliminate the need to make pellets and in the end would be less energy intensive,” he said. “That may be a model we could look at.”

On the economic front, according to the UMFK release, 10 percent of local household income is used for home heating, leaving residents vulnerable to fluctuating fossil fuel prices.

“These conditions raise a question about whether grass biomass, an annually renewable resource, could benefit the local economy for households and small business owners,” according to that release.

The grant represents the third year of biomass studies in northern Maine with UMFK and the University of Maine at Presque Isle, Plant said.

Previous work on the project, under the direction of project director Soraya Cardenas, UMFK associate professor of sociology and environmental studies currently on sabbatical, resulted in two educational documentaries about grass biomass that will be used during consumer and producer outreach.

This coming year student interns will conduct land use, economic and marketing studies on using locally produced grass as biofuel while university staff and area farmers will explore possible funding sources for long-term capital investment in grass biofuel processing and heat-producing facilities.

“Further exploration is needed and we are starting out small scale,” Plant said. “We are going to start small and figure out how this is all going to work while we get into the game.”

Julia Bayly is a Homestead columnist and a reporter at the Bangor Daily News.

Join the Conversation

43 Comments

  1. The U of M has no shame, accepting a $62,334 dollar grant to study “prairie coal”, good grief UMFK, they burned hay twist in their dugouts on the prairie, but it was never any serious fuel, this is really a funny one, LOL, I think they need a grant to study Moose droppings too, as a bio-fuel, LOL.

    1. Fuel from grass?
      Great concept.
      Fallow farm fields may be utilized for energy production.

      Now , if only the experts can figure out a way to turn
      all the extra trees into fuel they might be onto something.
      I look forward to new research in that regard.

    1. First thing I thought of when I first read this article. What I want to know is, is how much energy does this stuff make vs. how much does it take to produce?

  2. Its already being done in NY.
    http://www.enviroenergyny.com/
    I visited him last year for a tour of his facility, and brought a ton of grass pellets home to burn in my furnace. Worked fine, quite a bit more ash.
    He has a deal to harvest the median strips on the NY interstates, pellet the hay, and sell it back to the DOT to heat their garages. A smart man.

        1. Good info. Indeed there is a difference.
          I believe Brazil grows enough switch grass to fuel most of their transportation needs.

    1. Unless it’s converted to motor fuel, that’s not the concept here. It will burn dirtier (smoke and ash), with less heating energy than petroleum fuels, and will still emit CO2 (which admitedly would eventually be emitted by decomposition).

      1. It’s just another possible addition to our future energy needs. Shouldn’t neglect the future because of past thinking.

  3. Oh, Yeah, I can see a lot coming out of this, LOL, it could never be cost effective, good Gawd, how gullible can people be.

    1. Why could it not be cost effective? Fuel oil is almost 4 bucks a gallon. Grass grows real cheap and if it is not for feed then it is even easier to grow. Google grass/straw boilers and there are already plenty of solutions.

      1. Okay, think about it for a minute, I have filled many a barn full of hay, now, at $4.00 a bale, howmany would it take to keep a house warm for 24 hours? You have to plow, till, fertilize, cut, bale haul, store, this grass, and then, if it is processed, that is more money, now really, think about it.

        1. Like other biomass fuels I believe the switchgrass would be made into pellets, and handled, stored and burned much like wood pellets.
          I doubt we need a taxpayer funded study, that switchgrass used to grow quite easily as I recall from my potato picking days, the farmers spent a lot of money trying to get rid of it.

  4. Hahahaha hahahaha……what a bunch of moonbats! Grass for fuel when we have a huge supply of oil!….you loons will never cease to amaze! This is just a deception so the college leech professors can squeeze more money from you! Wake up!

    1. You are probably right but…heating oil right now is almost $4.00 a gallon, or about $400.00 per 100 gallons. Wood pellets on the other hand are running about $200.00 per ton. I was told that a ton of pellets yields btu’s equal to roughly 150 gallons of oil. If true, then pellets are real bargain, costing about half of the price of oil but yeilding more heat over time. If grass pellets can do the same thing, then these pellets would be an even better value on the economy and environment. Grass crops could be grown every year on the same peice of land, while it takes years for trees to grow. And turning the grass over after cutting would help fertilize the ground. Making the fields more fertile for other types of crop production.

  5. It is good, we get a comic relief article once in a while, we do get too serious, but, it is good to test your inner self, our ability to quickly sort out b—s–t, and keep our resistance to all the stupidity that gets written up, as something actually intelligent, I feel I passed this one, I must be, I am still laughing.

    1. I can see it now ! The chimney sweeps advertising, ” We will clean your chimney even while you burn “. LOL

  6. John and a $62,334.00 grant. Let me explain how this will work to the people from Northern Maine that can’t figure well. First we will need to prepare the field,$22,334.00 to Johns partner for equipment rental. Second $20,000.00 for supplies from Johns store (yes that store). And last $20,000.00 lease for Johns land. If he plays his cards right he maybe able to get a grant from Soil Conservation for the bridge they will need to put in and the cabin they will need for shelter while working in the field. There is life after public service, good for you.

  7. It’s not much different than wood pellets being burned in a stove and a very quick fuel to ‘grow’.

  8. We used to feed it to cows, but didn’t collect the dried pasture pies (chips) like the Western settlers did for their fuel.

  9. If Mr. Martin is involved I think I would pass. He has to clean up his act a little to be a reputable business man in my opinion. We have a enough bio stuff going on around here and don’t need any more. And if there was a market for this why aren’t we seeing it in the stores.

  10. Sounds like it could be cost effective but they should show the figures. Switch grass and other grasses have been proposed for fast growing sources of ethanol and other fuels. However, I don’t think much of ethanol as a gasoline additive, however.

  11. Industrial Hemp would be a good alternative biomass crop for a project like this, I bet it would produce higher yeilds, and would be a more valuable, versatile crop.

    1. Industrial Hemp is the only answer to save the County, but just try and get the politicians to listen to a really good idea, you will not see a Grant for that study.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *