PORTLAND, Maine — Maine’s shrimp boats traditionally take to the waters of the Gulf of Maine the first week of December. But not this year. And not last year.
In fact, the Northern Shrimp Technical Committee of the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission recommends that there not be a shrimp season at all this year.
Concern about depleted stocks and previous years of overfishing pushed the start of the 2011-12 shrimping season back from December to January 3, 2012, for trawlers, who were limited to fishing on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, and back to Feb. 1, 2012, for trappers, limited to landings of 1,000 pounds a day.
Regulatory officials also pulled the plug early on the New England shrimp fishery last season, ending it on Feb. 17, 2012, claiming that shrimpers had already exceeded the catch limit of 4.9 million pounds by as many as 1 million pounds. That closure left trawlers with a 21-day season and trappers with a 17-day season.
In a recent 81-page analysis released Nov. 21, the Northern Shrimp Technical Committee recommends a moratorium on shrimp fishing for 2013.
“Given the current condition of the resource (overfished and overfishing occurring) and poor prospects for the near future, the NSTC recommends that the Section implement a moratorium on fishing in 2013,” the report says. “If a fishery is allowed in 2013, the NSTC recommends a highly conservative approach … [including] starting the season after at least 50 percent of shrimp have hatched their brood. In recent years the midpoint of the hatch has been around Feb. 15.
“The NSTC bases its recommendations to the Section on its assessment of current stock status, the biology of the species, and the stated management goal of protecting and maintaining the stock at levels that will support a viable fishery on a sustainable resource. … Short-term commercial prospects for the 2013 fishing season are very poor given the low abundance of all stages of shrimp in the 2012 survey and the relatively small size of females in the 2011 and 2012 surveys.”
Those recommendations will be discussed during a daylong, two-session meeting in Portland on Monday, Dec. 3, at the downtown Holiday Inn by the Bay convention center. The 9 a.m. session involves the Northern Shrimp Advisory Panel and will include a review of the 2011-12 season status report by the Northern Shrimp Technical Committee and its moratorium recommendation. The 1 p.m. afternoon session will involve the Northern Shrimp Section, which includes one representative each from Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
That three-member group will decide at that meeting what the 2012-13 shrimp season will look like — if there is one — after analyzing the technical committee’s report and recommendations from an industry advisory panel.
The Maine shrimping community considers these to be important sessions, as the shrimp fishery is a $70 million industry that employs 1,500 people, from fishermen to those involved in trucking and processing the catch. Of the 256 shrimp boats operating in Gulf of Maine shrimp habitat last year, 225 of those boats were out of Maine, the other 31 out of Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Maine boats accounted for 90 percent of the catch, which had a landed value of about 95 cents a pound.
“It’s going to be interesting, as I expect there will be a contentious audience,” said Jim Markos, the general manager of the Ellsworth-based Maine Shellfish Co., which has a wholesale inventory that includes Maine shrimp. “I’ll be there, and I expect to leave with my ears ringing, and I expect to leave disappointed in the length of the season.”
Margaret “Maggie” Hunter is a shrimp specialist with Maine Department of Marine Resources and a member of the NSTC. She said Friday that, no matter what happens at Monday’s meetings, it’s going to be a “hard year” for both shrimpers and shrimp.
Hunter said shrimp thrive in cold waters and that their habitat off the Maine coastline has been heating up in recent years.
“The problem for shrimp is that the water is too warm for them in that section of the Gulf of Maine,” she said. “They are a sub-Arctic species, and this is the southernmost part of their habitat. And for the shrimp here it’s a closed system. The only way out of it is through the southern and eastern parts of the Gulf, and those parts are the warmest parts.”
Hunter said there was a similar Gulf of Maine warming trend in the 1950s, during which Maine shrimp all but disappeared. When that trend reversed after a few years and Gulf of Maine waters became colder, shrimp populations increased dramatically.
“I’m not thinking that shrimp are going extinct here if the warming trend continues,” she said. “If it continues, we won’t have commercial quantities, but I’m not ready to pull the shade on them yet.”



Hey, there is no global warming, haven’t you heard. Never used my snow shovel one time last Winter. First time ever for me.
Global warming is a fact. The denialists claim that fossil fuel burning and the subsequent 35% increase in CO2 has nothing to do with the warming, that it’s natural.
It is natural. It has been known for 150 years that CO2 is the reason we have a warm planet. It doesn’t make it right that we’re changing what has been a pretty stable climate for 10k years though.
Man, I’ll miss the shrimp and I bet the trawlers/trappers will too.
Any remaining skeptics out there might want to check out: http://www.skepticalscience.com/
Global warming is a fact.
Explain the warming trend in the 50s?
The human-induced rise in global sea surface and air temperatures began in the early 20th Century.
It is not a straight line…. and there was a warm spike in the late 40’s and early 50’s.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/images/content/208488main_global_temp_change.jpg
Gulf of Maine temperatures are also influenced by the intensity of upwelling and tidal mixing, Gulf Stream eddies, and water entering the GOM originating from the Labrador Current.
The latter is determined by the phase of the North Atlantic Oscillation Index.
http://oceandata.gmri.org/environmentalprediction/step1.html
Please try to keep up.
Yessah
Not going to happen. they only believe what they are told.
Hooray!! So the cavemen they had fires right? Why didn’t that like make global warming? I mean don’t be pullin nay science out on me…I get ALL of my information from the land of fair and balanced faux news and Rush. Rush and Sean Hannity.
Why didn’t archaic humans cause global warming?
Because of low global population densities – and because they used carbon-neutral plant biomass for fuel.
Once we began digging, pumping and burning fossil fuels, oxidizing soil organic matter, burning grasslands and forests to promote grazing animals and agriculture, and began large-scale rice production, we altered the global carbon cycle.
I’m glad I learned me some smarts at Orono.
Yessah
P.S. oops – you were being sarcastic – duh – lol
Please explain the on coming ice age in the 1970’s.
Easy, there was a small minority of climate scientist who believed we were headed for a cool down (basing most of their science on prior warming spells lasting about 10,000 years between recent ice ages) but they did not take into account that the same chemicals SO4 that contributed to the depletion of the ozone also have a cooling effect counteracting the warming influence of CO2.
Once the amount of ozone depleting chemicals was reduced the warming effects of CO2 started to override the observed cooling, thus Global Warming.
The deniers base this nonsense on a 1975 article in Newsweek magazine that had no scientific basis.
There was also a recent review of all the peer reviewed climate papers published in the 1970’s.
There was no evidence that supported the deniers ridiculous claims on the subject.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/ice-age-predictions-in-1970s.htm
So as we limit the abilities of companies to do business in the US by enacting enviormantal laws which destroy the companies people ask why do all these jobs go over seas?
Feel free to leave out the fact that the sun is burning hotter now than at any time ever recorded!
What companies are that – the wind industry Ronald Reagan gave away to Europe, or the photovolatic module industry Reagan and the Bushes gave away to Europe and Asia?
Go to Beijing and breathe air – then tell us all about how much better that is.
Environmental regulations have not harmed US competitiveness, saved lives and a boatload of $$$$$ in avoided healthcare costs.
Please try to keep up.
Yessah
the gulf warmed in the 50’s and then cooled back down hum could this whole global warming hoax actually be cyclical warming and cooling trends that have been going on for thousands if not millions of years?No its got to be co2 levels because thats what BIG AL says and if AL says it I believe it[100,000,000+]Thats the amount he has made off the planet having a fever.Brilliant absolutely brilliant BIG AL.
Authentic Frontier Gibberish and psuedoscience nonsense.
ugh
umm are you refering to my comment or maggie Hunters observations in the second to last paragraph of this article.
uga buga
Your comment – the evidence is clear, humans are warming and acidifying the ocean…
http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/
http://cmore.soest.hawaii.edu/oceanacidification/
I’ve think I have the solution lets just do away with all humans ecspeicaly those full of hot air.
Jesus said that science is for dummies.
Man no Maine shrimp? 10lbs at a time peeling away and tossing on the freezer. Tell me NONONONO!
Fish populations are collapsing all over the world, thanks to denial, greed and anti-environmental propaganda. It we don’t all wake up soon and start realizing what we are doing, we’re going to be like a swelling population of mice that guzzles and guzzles until there are lots of mice and no food left.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-05-18/news/27064725_1_fish-stocks-report-united-nations-environment-programme
No Maine shrimps because of global warming??
Bad stuff, for sure.
These shrimps need cold waters , right?
Arent there some shrimps that like warmer waters?
Maybe they will fill the niche left by our shrimps.
And they are worth more on the market , I believe.
I believe it was Galileo who said ” Nature abhors a vacuum”.
Best wishes to another species in peril : Maine Commercial Fisherman.
Yeah – there are thriving lobster, cod, haddock, steamer clam and scallop fisheries on the South Carolina and Georgia coasts where those “other shrimps (sic)” are found.
not
Wake up.
Yessah
a
That’s what happens when you target a species while it’s spawning…can’t do it for too long or the resource goes bye-bye.
Yep, this is what the democrats do – target the capable to pay for the special. Can’t do it for too long or the resource goes bye-bye.
Fish ’em til they are extinct…the fishermen own the seas and the resources. As long as they can make their boat and house payments nothing else matters.
Let em fish til nothings left then they will work at McDonalds and serve fillet ‘o fish
eventually that fishery will be gone too
happy holidays
Not too long ago, scientists say, Maine was completely covered by a sheet of ice. This was about 10,000-20,000 years ago. Apparently, Maine would get completely covered by ice for thousands of years, and then the ice would go away, and then come back.
How did the people do this?
They didn’t – but human activity is clearly responsible for current warming – and it is accelerating.
Good. If it gets any colder I will be heading to my winter home in AZ early this year. Al Gore says its true so it’s gots to be. He is also the same guy that INVENTED the Internet.
You should really look into the fact of that claim. http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp Let’s face it, if you were concerned with truth and fact, you probably wouldn’t be a Bushfan.
Fill up yer water bottle before you leave….
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/drought/science.shtml
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/apr2007/2007-04-05-01.asp
Yessah
I would rather have a little warming than another ice age.
You’re not going to get “a little warming”.
You are going to get a climate catastrophe that is already impacting our food and water supplies, destroying our physical assets and poisoning the ocean with carbonic acid.
Yessah
Wow, talk about simplistic.
Got to be Lepage’s fault.
More propeller-headed bureaucratic ‘scientists’ deciding when ‘enough’ is ‘enough.’ They do love playing ‘God’ and ‘Lord,’ don’t they?
Why do people despise science so much?
ugh
There are people who will never open their eyes, because they simply don’t want to. This reminds me of a cartoon, where a logger walks in to a CEO’s office and says “OK boss, I cut down the last tree, what do you want me to do now” CEO replies, “You’re fired”. Arguing on this forum, on most social forums rarely changes minds. For me it’s about measuring responses to issues, and a wee bit of entertainment.
The first time I realized that the season coincided with spawning and mentioned it to a fisheries biologist…he said “No this isn’t good, but who listens to science when the economy is the decision driver.”
I happen to like science very much . i am not that educated or as”indoctrinated”. Nothing in science is 100% . It may very well be 99.9% chance we are causing global warming. . Might also be a major or mini ice coming . Like the 1400s At that time almost no sunspots were reported .So by Making Global warming we are preventing a very serious natural disaster. Saving 100s of millions of lives . Scientist do not have all the answers . They make educated guesses . They are biases by thier own beliefs just like most people. Even politics come into play. We cannot predict the sun output levels of the future . To me the sun is like a candle . it flickers . Only about a billion times slower . Hard to predict . It is not a bell curve . it is more like a butterfly chart. If it got colder of the next 20 years would scientist still be screaming global warming by fossil fuels?
Sorry – natural forcings cannot account for the increasing amount of solar energy trapped in the Earth’s climate system.
I’ts not volcanoes or sun spots or Al Gore.
This has be examined time and again – it’s due to human activity and the consequences are not good.
Nossuh
Federal regulations are killing our fisherman.
Overfishing is killing our fisheries – not “over regulation”.
How can you sustain a fishery when the bulk of the harvest is of eggbearing females?