BELFAST, Maine — The mother of the Frankfort baby mauled to death by the family Rottweiler in April 2011 pleaded no contest Tuesday morning to a misdemeanor charge of endangering the welfare of a child.

Katrina Mitchell, 31, of Frankfort spoke quietly in Belfast District Court as Justice Robert Murray made sure she understood her rights. Until Friday, she had pleaded not guilty to the charge and was scheduled to have a jury trial in early January.

The plea means that Mitchell is no longer contesting her guilt and “will result in the guilty finding when she’s eventually sentenced,” Waldo County Deputy District Attorney Eric Walker said after the hearing.

When asked why she decided to change her plea, her reply was nearly inaudible. “I just don’t want to put my family through any more scrutiny,” she told the judge.

According to Waldo County Deputy District Attorney Eric Walker, the plea deal struck between the parties calls for a sentence of one year in jail with all but up to three months suspended as well as a year of probation.

The agreement allows the defense to argue for less or no jail time, which defense attorney Aaron Fethke said Tuesday he intends to do during the February sentencing hearing.

Walker also recommended psychological counseling, no use or possession of alcohol or illegal drugs, and submission to random searching and testing of her residence, vehicles and person. Mitchell also will have to submit to substance abuse counseling to the satisfaction of her probation officer, Walker said.

Mitchell had been home alone with her 7-month-old infant, Annabelle, and her nearly 3-year-old son, Jett, on April 12, 2011, when she passed out drunk on the couch, according to a police affidavit filed three months later in support of her arrest for child endangerment.

Tests done after the baby was killed showed that Mitchell’s blood alcohol level was about .30 percent, almost four times the legal driving limit in Maine. She also tested positive for THC, the active ingredient in marijuana. At the time of the mauling, she had an agreement with her husband not to drink alcohol unless he was present.

She told police that she had only consumed a 40-ounce beer that day and did not pass out, but was exhausted and had taken a nap with her baby on the other end of the couch.

A couple hours later, she woke up and found Annabelle lying dead on the floor with claw marks on her body, according to the police affidavit. She called 911 and her husband, Johnny Mitchell, who was at work.

Mitchell’s defense attorney, Aaron Fethke of Searsport, had written in documents submitted to the court that his client had started drinking more heavily after waking up to find her child dead.

“The state feels that Ms. Mitchell was drinking before this incident,” Walker said Tuesday.

When the police arrived, they found that the baby was stiff and purple, with scratch marks on her body. According to the autopsy report, Annabelle suffered from extensive clawing injuries and associated blood loss. However, Walker told the judge during the brief hearing Tuesday morning that the baby did not die from this.

“The ultimate cause of death was suffocation,” the deputy district attorney said.

According to the police affidavit, the dog’s mauling of the baby while in the same room as Katrina Mitchell likely lasted a while.

“The number of claw marks on Annabelle Mitchell’s body were extensive, and could not be the result of one or two brief contacts between the dog and Annabelle,” Maine State Police Detective Adam Kelley wrote after speaking with the deputy chief medical examiner. “Many of the claw marks were associated with hemorrhage, which is indicative of Annabelle being alive for at least part of the mauling, and she would have been capable of crying and-or screaming due to pain.”

The Rottweiler, Hannibal, was less than a year old and Johnny Mitchell told police the night of Annabelle’s death that the dog was friendly by nature and not vicious, according to the police affidavit filed by Detective Adam Kelley of the Maine State Police.

“There had not been a problem with the dog around their two children before,” the father told the detective.

Johnny Mitchell requested that police kill the dog, which they did that night.

Efforts made last week and Tuesday to contact the Maine attorney general’s office to learn why the state charged Katrina Mitchell with child endangerment were unsuccessful.

Waldo County District Attorney Geoffrey Rushlau said in 2011 that endangering a child is defined as a reckless act which violates a duty of care or protection.

“There’s lots of things parents can do to end up in bad situations without the slightest guilt attached to it. I think that when the evidence comes out, it’ll be clear … that this was criminal conduct,” he said then.

Since her arrest, she has been free on $1,000 cash bail, with conditions that include not being allowed to use any alcoholic beverages or drugs, submitting to random searches and the creation of a safety plan with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services.

“Ms. Mitchell by all accounts has done really well since the death occurred,” Walker said.

He said that the sentencing agreement worked out by both parties would allow her to serve a “significant” time in jail but give her a chance to continue to do well.

Mitchell’s sentencing hearing is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. Feb. 7 at Waldo County Superior Court in Belfast.

Join the Conversation

73 Comments

  1. No doubt sad all the way around. I would simply say to protect yourself, get sterilize. Seriously. And not trying to be mean. The realty is you should not even be allowed to own a pet much less be having children, unless you are milking the system.

    1. Sad, and unfortunately, here in Maine, That’s the way it is.
      She might just as well killed the poor child herself.

    2. I’m surprised that the defense didn’t find her the victim because of alcohol dependence………………. Just another day in the neighborhood…………….

  2. Addiction/alcoholism is a terrible thing. No good ever comes of it. A little one’s life was lost and a mother will now live with a guilty conscience knowing that her intoxication was a major contributing factor to her child’s death. For the rest of her life. I wish peace and recovery for this family.

    1. ilikecoffee, you echo my thoughts. Too often when people make horrible mistakes others simply condemn. The bottom line is no amount of time served nor any amount of fine could ever purchase relief for the poor woman. Her sentence is having to deal with what has happened every day of her life. Yes, she made a terrible mistake, but my heart still goes out to her. I also with the family somehow finds peace and the strength to get beyond it.

      1. Yeah, normally my response to a story like this would play to a different tune….but for whatever reason, I have some compassion here. I feel like no amount of jail time would amount to the punishment of “waking up everyday knowing that I played a role in my child’s death.” I just hope that other parents out there who do not choose to seek help for drug/alcohol addiction read this sory and realize the possible tragic outcomes of not doing so.

        1. I’m sorry (not) but this “thing” will not worry one minute about what she allowed to happen. Three months in prison and you forget about the real world and couldn’t care less cuz all you care about is what is in the present……..

      2. When you have children, most women do not act as this one did—She knew as she was consuming, exactly what she was doing!–People that condone this kind of behavior are as guilty as the ones that do it! How can you call it a horrible “mistake when this had evidently been an on-going thing?”–Would this be your behavior with your children??

        1. Sorry but you’re wrong, people with addictions will and do, neglect their kids all the time. You obviously know very little about addiction.

      3. Yes, when you are responsible for the well-being of another, your actions have to be a little less selfish. I have no sympathy for a druggy whose negligence clearly was involved in her child’s death. Her “having to live with this” for the rest of her life is NOT enough punishment.

        People drive drunk every day and kill people. Should they just be let go as their feeling of guilt is all the punishment they need? I don’t think so.

      1. obv price isn’t stopping ppl from drinking less. charge more tax on alcohol and cigs, use that money to pay for security guards n metal detectors at all schools. close the methadone clinics, give out medical marijuana instead of oxy’s n other addictive pain meds. no dangerous breeds around kids. if your homeowners don’t cover them then you shouldn’t have around your kids. it’s just not worth the risk. IMO

    1. Nah, booze is just some liquid in a bottle — not good, bad or indifferent — also not a friend or confidante or trusted pal. A jug of Liquid Drano is far more horrible, but only if ya drink it. Alcohol is used as a solvent, and when taken in excess by humans it’s still a solvent — it dissolves families, marriages, jobs, homes and health.

      Tax booze, hmm. I recall from History class that during Prohibition booze was made flat-out illegal for about four years and that didn’t stop folks from drinking. Money and more taxes ain’t the cause or cure.

  3. I had a friend who’s wife traded him all parental rights to their child for a car durning a divorce.. Sad thing it was a GM product..

    1. This really has nothing to do with it. You can test positive for THC days, even weeks, after it has been consumed. She passed out drunk, leave the MJ out of this.

      1. Marijuana could have had made her really sleepy and the combination, assuming that is the case, would have let her sleep through a child’s screams. IF she was dependent on alcohol and had been for some time, a .3 might not have been really high FOR HER. Remember all addicts develop a tolerance over time.

        1. How dumb. Marijuana didn’t make her really sleepy. A bac of .30 she was drunk, beyond drunk and PASSED out.

          1. Just as a point of interest, how do you know the marijuana didn’t make her sleepy. Used to make me sleep 12 hours or more.

          2. I took someone to a detox once. His BAC was .756 and he was walking and talking. They repeated the test to confirm the results. This was a long time alcoholic with an incredible tolerance after years of drinking.

          3. first of all, I can’t believe i’m going to respond to this ignorance. I feel sorry for Ray at this point. There’s no way in HELL you brought someone to detox with that bac, they would be dead! O, n weed might make you sleepy but not put you in a coma so that you don’t hear your dog ripping your baby apart.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_alcohol_content

        2. Yeah, yeah, but could’ve & would’ve & should’ve are pretty well played-out now. Understand what you mean, knew guys at work that showed up everyday with a BAC that’d put most folks in a coma — half-pint of JD and a baloney sangy for lunch. But not much sense adding the soap opera twist and what-if it to pieces.

      2. Don’t bother. He points this stuff out all the time. Its his soapbox, just walk on by dont throw money in the guitar case.

    2. So would half the elected officials and cops, lets don’t even go there. LOL The days of Reefer Madness propaganda are long gone.

  4. I don’t think she got off easy, she lost her child, her dog and ultimately yet to be determined ,maybe even her husband. she will forever have the scorn of her peers and family knowing what she did. Most of us reading this are products of the “free love” generation or older and we survived. Its unfortunate that this had such a tragic ending for the child.

      1. I got 2 that I would miss, seriously . They love unconditionally and don’t talk back. Glad I made your day!

  5. It just makes you sick to think of something this horrible happening. And where was the 3 year old little boy? It says she was home with the both of them.—For the love of God, how ignorant can people get??

    1. I lived with two Rottweilers from the time I was born till I was 14. They were gentle family pets, and FIERCELY protective. When someone they didn’t know approached any of the children in our family, the dogs would stand between us and them until my mother or father told them to “lick a hand” which they then did, and went to settle down someplace very close.

      I have no idea what these dogs would have done if someone attacked us, but we were never in any danger from the dogs.

      1. “Hannibal, was less than a year old and Johnny Mitchell told police the
        night of Annabelle’s death that the dog was friendly by nature and not
        vicious”.

        Nobody is ever in danger until they are.

        1. this was not the dogs fault..this was the mothers fault..she probably threw some cheerios at the kid to keep her on the couch..baby was scratched at multiple times..not eaten..sorry for being crass..but put the blame where it lies..if the mother had been responsible and kept her promise about not getting effed up when he(husband) was gone..wouldnt have happened.

        2. Well that fits… dogs are no different than people. All these mass murderers have neighbors who say “Yeah it was a shock” “… was a nice guy” “…never bothered anyone.”

  6. I am disappointed in her sentence. Manslaughter would be more appropiate. In some instances, I don’t agree with plea bargaining. It seems like society places more value on dogs and weapons then human life.

  7. Future Mother of the Year. Remove the other child while he/she still has a fighting chance. In this case, one strike and you’re out. And I don’t mean passed out.

  8. Really sad deal all around. Pretty good lawyer from the sounds of it, but all he’s doing is offering up possible alternatives as reasons to maybe give her a break. No need to condemn her to Hell — she’s already there.

  9. Plead deal……ridiculous, if that was the babysitter and not the mother she would have gotten a lot more time.

  10. After reading the article I wonder if maybe she passed out on top of the baby, thus the suffocation, and the baby was crying so the dog was trying to get the baby out. That might explain why the mother had scratches on her as well. Not defending her or the dog just a thought. Now let the bashing commence.

  11. Ok heres my thoughts, she needs to get some serious help and if she has another a child with another dog around please keep the boozes away from her and finally she needs a huge sentence because she needs to learn how to grow up. Like back in 2004 dover foxcroft arson was a big case and said those two teens needed help well she does to.

  12. All we need is a pitbull and a food stamps card and we have our failing society all wrapped in a tight little package. Drunk, Stoned, Innocent child murdered, …….good grief how she does not spend years in jail is beyond me!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *